E-learning: development of a model to assess the acceptance and readiness of technology among language learners

Reference

• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J., (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Gahtani, S. (2016). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27–50. doi: 10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Bilgiç, H. G., Doğan, D., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). Current situation of online learning in Turkish higher education institutions: Needs, problems, and possible solutions [in Turkish]. Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 80–87.
   Google Scholar
• Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50(2), 475–490. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar, S., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2016). Evaluating the motivational impact of CALL systems: Current practices and future directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 186–212. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2014.927365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borotis, S., & Poulymenakou, A. (2004). E-learning readiness components: Key issues to consider before adopting e-learning interventions. In J. Nall & R. Robson, Proceedings of E-Learn 2004–World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1622–1629). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Carrión, G. C., Nitzl, C., & Roldán, J. L. (2017). Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: Guidelines and empirical examples. In Partial least squares path modeling (pp. 173–195). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. M., Lin, H. Y., Sun, S. Y., & Hsu, M. H. (2009). Understanding customers’ loyalty intentions towards online shopping: An integration of technology acceptance model and fairness theory. Behavioural Information Technology, 28(4), 347–360. doi: 10.1080/01449290801892492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. (1986). Technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user iinformation systems: Theory and results (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. doi: 10.1006/imms.1993.1022
   Google Scholar
• Demir, O. (2015). The investigation of e-learning readiness of students and faculty members: Hacettepe university, Faculty of education example (Unpublished Master Thesis). Ankara: Hacettepe University.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guglielmino, L. M., & Guglielmino, P. J. (2003). Identifying learners who are ready for e-learning and supporting their success. In G. M. Piskurich (Ed.), Preparing learners for e-learning (pp. 19–33). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications. Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00118.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, Y. (2016). Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández García, Á. (2008). Desarrollo de un modelo unificado de adopción del comercio electrónico entre empresas y consumidores finales. aplicación al Mercado español. Madrid: E.T.S.I. Telecomunicación (UPM).
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Lin, P. H. (2017). Intrinsic motivation of Chinese learning in predicting online learning self-efficacy and flow experience relevant to students’ learning progress. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 552–574. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1329215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, J. S. C., Huang, Y. M., & Wu, W. C. V. (2017). Technological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 178–190. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, L. (2016). An empirical examination of EFL learners' perceptual learning styles and acceptance of ASR-based computer-assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 881–900. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1069747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, M. C., & Jen, W. Y. (2012). The adoption of mobile health management services: An empirical study. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(3), 1381–1388. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9600-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauregi, K., De Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2012). Learning by doing: Promoting language teacher competencies for networked teaching and learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 34, 116–121. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.024
   Google Scholar
• Kakar, A. K. (2017). How do perceived enjoyment and perceived usefulness of a software product interact over time to impact technology acceptance?. Interacting with Computers, 29(4), 467–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, K., & Abas, Z. W. (2004). An assessment of e-learning readiness at the Open University Malaysia. Paper presented at the International conference on computers in education (ICCE2004) (pp. 129–137). Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, Z. (2002). Distance education. Ankara: Pegem A Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, I. M. (2009). An analysis of the motivational factors in online learning (Doctoral dissertation). University of Phoenix.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. Y., Lee, J. Y., Mun, J. M., & Johnson, K. P. (2017). Consumer adoption of smart in-store technology: Assessing the predictive value of attitude versus beliefs in the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 10(1), 26–36. doi: 10.1080/17543266.2016.1177737
   Google Scholar
• King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Associated Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. C., & Chang, H. C. (2011). The role of technology readiness in self service technology acceptance. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21(4), 424–444. doi: 10.1108/09604521111146289
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Lin, C. H., & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: A survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 745–765. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, W. K., Andersson, R., & Streith, K. O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moftakhari, M. M. (2013). Evaluating e-learning readiness of faculty of letters of Hacettepe (Master Thesis). Ankara: Hacettepe University
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. (2012). Towards an integrated model of IT acceptance in healthcare. Decision Support Systems, 53, 507–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Park, N., Lee, K. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2007). University instructors' acceptance of electronic courseware: An application of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 163–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persico, D., Manca, S., & Pozzi, F. (2014). Adapting the technology acceptance model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 614–622. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piskurich, G. M. (2003). Preparing learners for e-learning. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rafiee, M., & Abbasian-Naghneh, S. (2018). Prioritization of critical individual factors influencing willingness to communicate: AHP method. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(6), 461–474, doi: 10.1080/01434632.2018.1521814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saade, R., & Kira, D. (2007). Mediating the impact of technology usage on perceived ease of use by anxiety. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1189–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Prieto, J., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2015). Informal tools in formal contexts: Development of a model to assess the acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 519–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers and Education, 49(2), 396–413. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J. B. (2018). Teacher development in technology-enhanced language teaching. Springer Science and Business Media. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell, G. (2013). Technology and motivation in English-language teaching and learning. In International perspectives on motivation (pp. 156–175). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Urdan, T. A. (2000). Corporate e-learning: Exploring a new frontier. New York: WR Hambrecht + Co.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aacken, S. (1999). What motivates L2 learners in acquisition of Kanji using CALL: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(2), 113–136. doi: 10.1076/call.12.2.113.5723
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239–260. doi: 10.2307/249753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 265–342. doi: 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41, 75–86.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, I. L., & Wu, K. L. (2005). A hybrid technology acceptance approach for exploring e-CRM adoption in organizations. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(4), 303–316. doi: 10.1080/0144929042000320027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, I., & Chen, J. (2005). An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 62(6), 784–808. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251–260. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, H. K., & Ma, W. K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229–243. doi: 10.1080/13598660802232779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurdugül, H., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2013). The scale of online learning readiness: A study of validity and reliability. Education and Science, 38, 391–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandi, P., Thang, S. M., & Krish, P. (2014). Teacher professional development through blogging: Some preliminary findings. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 530–536. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.072
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Zhao, J., & Tan, W. (2008). Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective. Tsinghua Science & Technology, 13(3), 312–317.
   Google Scholar