Employing e-tandem language learning method to enhance speaking skills and willingness to communicate: the case of EFL learners

References

• Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brammerts, H. (2003). Autonomous language learning in tandem: The development of a concept. In T. Lewis. & L. Walker (Eds.), Autonomous language learning in tandem (pp. 27–36) Academy Electronic Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, L., & Alpaslan, R. S. (2017). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice. System, 65, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, M. (1999). Tandem: A vehicle for language and intercultural learning. Language Learning Journal, 19(1), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739985200111
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi trait-multi method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canals, L. (2020). The effects of virtual exchanges on oral skills and motivation. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 103–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cando-Guanoluisa, F., Tovar-Taipicana, J., & Vargas-Guevara, W. (2020 The use of learning strategies in an e-tandem English program [Paper presentation]. 2nd International Academic Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y. K., & Wei, W. (2019). Willingness to communicate from an English as an international language (EIL) perspective: The case Macau. System, 87, 102–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.) Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative approaches to research (3rd ed.). Merrill/Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209–240). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dakowska, M. (2007). Teaching English as a foreign language: A guide for professionals. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Develotte, C. (2009). From face to face to distance learning: the online learner’s emerging identity. In R. Goodfellow & M. N. Lamy (Eds). Learning cultures in online education (pp. 71–92). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2013). Filling in the gaps: linking theory and practice through telecollaboration in teacher education. ReCALL, 25, 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: a mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5–6), 617–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 527–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hariri, Y. (2016). Learner perspectives on task design for oral-visual eTandem language learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2016.1138578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, J., & Pörn, M. (2021). Challenges of implementing authenticity of tandem learning in formal language education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(6), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1516188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2020). Examining the impact of flipped classroom on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A case of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1825097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. A companion to qualitative research, 3, 178–183.
   Google Scholar
• Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The culture project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55–102.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language acquisition. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Guth, S., & Marini-Maio, N. (2010). Close encounters of a new kind: The use of Skype and Wiki in telecollaboration. Telecollaboration, 2, 413–426.
   Google Scholar
• Hauck, M., & Youngs, B. L. (2008). Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: The impact on task design and learner interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 87–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220801943510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., & Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mixed methods. In J. Heigham, & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction (pp. 135–161) Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaime, A., Domínguez, C., Sánchez, A., & Blanco, J. M. (2013). Interuniversity telecollaboration to improve academic results and identify preferred communication tools. Computers & Education, 64, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauregi, K., De Graaff, R., Van den Bergh, H., & Kriz, M. (2012). Native/non-native speaker interactions through video-web communication: A clue for enhancing motivation? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.582587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, K. (2005). Conversations and negotiated interaction in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabata, K., & Edasawa, Y. (2011). Tandem language learning through a cross-cultural keypal project. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 104–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Ke, I. C., & Cahyani, H. (2014). Learning to become users of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF): how ELF online communication affects Taiwanese learners’ beliefs of English. System, 46, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitade, K. (2012). An exchange structure analysis of the development of online intercultural activity. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.584512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruk, M. (2019). Dynamicity of perceived willingness to communicate, motivation, boredom and anxiety in second life: The case of two advanced learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning,35(1–2), 190–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.16777222
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S. (2020). The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1746319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). Willingness to communicate in digital and non-digital EFL contexts: Scale development and psychometric testing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 692–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1535509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Dressman, M. (2018). When IDLE hands make an English workshop: Informal digital learning of English and language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. (2018). Implementing computer‐mediated intercultural communication in English education: A critical reflection on its pedagogical challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 673–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in second language acquisition, 23(3), 369–388.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099409359951
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Clement, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985 Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement [Paper presentation]. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association Convention, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the other side: Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 118–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R. (2013). Telecollaborative networks in university higher education: Overcoming barriers to integration. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning; collaborative learning; and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2005). Task design for audiographic conferencing: Promoting beginner oral interaction in distance language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500442772
   Google Scholar
• Sabbah-Taylor, A. (2021). Intercultural competence in a face-to-face tandem language learning: A micro-analytic perspective. Language and Intercultural Communication, 21(2), 304–3017. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1837149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevilla‐Pavón, A. (2019). L1 versus L2 online intercultural exchanges for the development of 21st century competences: the students’ perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 779–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickler, U., & Lewis, T. (2003). Tandem learning and intercultural competence. In T. Lewis & L. Walker (Eds.), Autonomous language learning in tandem (pp. 93–104) Academy Electronic Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Szewkis, E., Nussbaum, M., Rosen, T., Abalos, J., Denardin, F., Caballero, D., et al. (2011). Collaboration within large groups in the classroom. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9123-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutty, J. I., & Klein, J. D. (2008). Computer-mediated instruction: a comparison of online and face-to-face collaboration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassallo, M. L., & Telles, J. A. (2006). Foreign language learning in-tandem: Theoretical principles and research perspectives. The Especialist, 27(1), 83–118.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, P., & Kessler, G. (2016). Telecollaboration in the secondary language classroom: Case study of adolescent interaction and pedagogical integration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.961481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Woodin, J. (2003). Encouraging intercultural competence in tandem learning. In T. Lewis & L. Walker (Eds.), Autonomous language learning in tandem (pp. 71–78) Academy Electronic Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W.-C V., Chen Hsieh, J. S., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 142–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar