Purity, presumed displeasure and piety in the ‘big three’: a critical analysis of magazine discourse on young women's sexuality

References

• Ali, L. et al., 2002. Choosing virginity. Newsweek, 9 December, 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Baldauf, S., 2007. A summer assignment. U.S. News & World Report, 11 June, 68–69.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, C., 2005. Gender & sexuality: critical theories, critical thinkers. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, H., 2007. Virgin: the untouched history. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, L.M., 1998. From girls into women: scripts for sexuality and romance in seventeen magazine, 1974–1994. The journal of sex research, 35, 158–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilton, P., 1988. Critical discourse moments and critical discourse analysis. San Diego: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, M.G., 1998. Dilemmas of desire: representations of adolescent sexuality in two teen magazines. Youth and society, 29, 369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R., 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In: T. van Dijk ed. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. Vol. 2. London: Sage, 258–284.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M., 2003. Sexuality schooling and adolescent females: the missing discourse of desire. In: M. Fine and L. Weis, eds. Silenced voices and extraordinary conversations. New York: Teachers College Press, 38–67.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, A., Stark, H.M. and Adams, S., 1998. Narrative analysis of sexual etiquette in teenage magazines. Journal of communication, 48, 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. et al., 2004. The male in the head: young people, heterosexuality and power. London: Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, B., 1992. Black looks: race and representation. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, M., 2007. The history of federal abstinence-only funding, [online]. Advocates for youth. Available from: https://http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/429 [Accessed 8 Aug 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Journalism.org, 2005. 2005 Annual report: introduction, [online]. Available from: http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2005/narrative_magazines_newsinvestment.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K., 2005. Just don't do it!. U.S. News & World Report, 17 October, 44–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krassas, N.R., Blauwkamp, J.M. and Wesselink, P., 2001. Boxing Helena and corseting Eunice: sexual rhetoric in Cosmopolitan and Playboy magazines. Sex roles, 44, 751–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krassas, N.R., Blauwkamp, J.M. and Wesselink, P., 2003. Master your johnson: sexual rhetoric in Maxim and Stuff magazines. Sexuality & culture, 7, 98–119.
   Google Scholar
• Lemonick, M.D., 2005. A teen twist on sex. Time, 26 September, 64.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, A., 2006. Female chauvinist pigs. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, S. and Carmichael, M., 2002. Meet the gamma girls. Newsweek, 3 June, 44–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morse, J., 2002. Women on a binge. Time, 1 April, 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Mulrine, A., 2002. Risky business. U.S. News & World Report, 27 May, 42–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pascoe, C.J., 2011. Resource and risk: youth sexuality and new media use. Sexuality research and social policy, 8 (1), 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., 2010. Sex, power and consent: youth culture and the unwritten rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, J., 2007. Injected into a growing controversy. Newsweek, 26 February, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Sayre, C., 2007. Yikes! An STD vaccine for sixth-graders. Time, 19 February, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Schor, J.B., 2004. Born to buy. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.W., 1999. Gender and the politics of history. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D., 2007. Sisterhood, interrupted: from radical women to girls gone wild. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, M., 2002. Hey, parents: this won't hurt a bit. U.S. News & World Report, 27 May, 46–47.
   Google Scholar
• Smalley, S. et al., 2003. This could be your kid. Newsweek, 18 August, 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Snitow, A., Stansell, C. and Thompson, S., eds.1983. Powers of desire. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J., 2004. The strip is back! Time, 26 July, 22–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stokoe, E., 2003. Mothers, single women and sluts: gender, morality and membership categorization in neighbor disputes. Feminism & psychology, 13 (3), 317–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A., 2005. The case for compromise on abortion. Time, 7 March, 90.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L.D., 2005. All for him: articles about sex in American lad magazines. Sex roles, 52, 153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumanov, V., 2011. Mary versus Eve: paternal uncertainty and the Christian view of women. Neophilologus, 95, 507–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau, 2011. Population estimates, [online]. Available from: http://www.census.gov/popest/data/ [Accessed 8 Aug 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Valenti, J., 2009. The purity myth. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T.A., 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse society, 4 (2), 249–283.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, C., 2005. A snapshot of teen sex. Time, 7 February, 58.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, C., 2007. Saying yes to the shot. Time, 19 March, 96.
   Google Scholar
• Yabroff, J., 2007. Girls going mild(er). Newsweek, 23 July, 50–51.
   Google Scholar