How do college students talk about sexual assault?

References

• Abbey, A., 2011. Alcohol's role in sexual violence perpetration: theoretical explanations, existing evidence and future directions. Drug and alcohol review, 30 (5), 481–489.doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00296.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbey, A. and Harnish, R.J., 1995. Perception of sexual intent: the role of gender, alcohol consumption and rape supportive attitudes. Sex roles, 32 (5–6), 297–313. doi:10.1007/BF01544599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbey, A., et al., 1996. Alcohol and dating risk factors for sexual assault among college women. Psychology of women quarterly, 20 (1), 147–169. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00669.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbey, A., et al., 2001. Attitudinal, experimental, and situational predictors of sexual assault perpetration. Journal of interpersonal violence, 16 (8), 784–807. doi:10.1177/088626001016008004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, D., et al., 2003. Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84 (1), 111–125. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams-Curtis, L.E. and Forbes, G.B., 2004. College women's experiences of sexual coercion: a review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables. Trauma, violence & abuse, 5 (2), 91–122. doi:10.1177/1524838003262331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armstrong, E.A., Hamilton, L. and Sweeney, B., 2006. Sexual assault on campus: multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social problems, 53 (4), 483–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basow, S.A. and Minieri, A., 2011. ‘You owe me’: effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape. Journal of interpersonal violence, 26 (3), 479–497. doi:10.1037/0022-33421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., et al., 2009. Rape myth acceptance: affective, behavioural, and cognitive effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In: M. Horvath and J. Brown, eds. Rape: challenging contemporary thinking. Cullompton: Willan, 17–45.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analyses in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2006. Criminal victimization in the United States, 2005 (NCJ 214644). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, M., 1980. Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of personality and social psychology, 38 (2), 217–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, E.S., 1996. How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of psychology and human sexuality, 8 (1–2), 7–25. doi:10.1300/J056v08n01_02.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C.A. and Stritzke, W.G.K., 2003. Alcohol and acquaintance rape in Australia: testing the presupposition model of attributions about responsibility and blame. Journal of applied social psychology, 33 (5), 983–1008. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01935.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control, 2010. National intimate partner and sexual violence survey. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Check, J.V. and Malamuth, N.M., 1983. Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger vs. acquaintance rape. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45 (2), 344–356. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M.L., 2006. Does drinking promote risky sexual behavior?: a complex answer to a simply question. Current directions in psychological science, 15 (1), 19–23. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00385.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowell, N.A. and Burgess, A.W., 1996. Understanding violence against women. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyssel, F., Bohner, G. and Siebler, F., 2006. Perceived rape myth acceptance of other predicts rape proclivity: social norm or judgmental anchoring? Swiss journal of psychology, 65 (2), 93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farris, C., et al., 2008. Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent. Clinical psychology review, 28 (1), 48–66. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, E. and Munro, V.E., 2005. Juror stereotypes and blame attribution in rape cases involving intoxicants. The British journal of criminology, 45 (1), 25–38. doi:10.1093/bjc/azh055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., Cullen, F. and Turner, M., 2000. The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Frese, B., Moya, M. and Megías, J.L., 2004. Social perception of rape: how rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of interpersonal violence, 19 (2), 143–161. doi:10.1177/0886260503260245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, H., 2000. Focusing on sex: using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities, 3 (3), 275–297. doi:10.1177/136346000003003001.
   Google Scholar
• Gavey, N., 1991. Sexual victimization among Auckland University students: how much and who does it? New Zealand journal of psychology, 20 (2), 63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, W.H., et al., 1995. Self-reported alcohol expectancies and post-drinking sexual inferences about women. Journal of applied social psychology, 25 (2), 164–186. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01589.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, W.H., et al., 1997. Post-drinking sexual inferences: evidence for linear rather than curvilinear dosage effects. Journal of applied social psychology, 27 (7), 629–648. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00652.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerger, H., et al., 2007. The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression (AMMSA) scale: development and validation in German and English. Aggressive behavior, 33 (59), 422–440. doi:10.1002/ab.20195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard, A.L. and Senn, C.Y., 2008. The role of the new ‘date rape drugs’ in attributions about date rape. Journal of interpersonal violence, 23 (1), 3–20. doi:10.1177/0886260507307648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P. and Fiske, S.T., 2011. Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of women quarterly, 35 (3), 530–535. doi:10.1177/0361684311414832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, E.M., Berry, M.A. and Rodriguez, D.N., 2011. The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario. Legal and criminological psychology, 16 (2), 242–252. doi:10.1348/135532510X499887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, M.A.H. and Brown, J., 2006. The role of alcohol and drugs in rape. Medicine, science and the law, 46 (3), 219–228. doi:10.1258/rsmmsl.46.3.219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., Lovett, J. and Regan, L., 2005. A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases. Child and Women Abuse Studies Unit (Study 293) London: Home Office Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, C. and Kanin, E., 1957. Male sex aggression on a university campus. American sociological review, 22, 52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koss, M.P., Gidycz, C.A. and Wisniewski, N., 1987. The scope of rape: incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 55 (2), 162–170. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahé, B., Scheinberger-Olwig, R. and Kolpin, S., 2000. Ambiguous communication of sexual intentions as a risk marker of sexual aggression. Sex roles, 42 (5–6), 313–337. doi:10.1023/A:1007080303569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahé, B., et al., 2008. Prospective lawyers' rape stereotypes and schematic decision-making about rape cases. Psychology, crime & law, 14 (5), 461–479. doi:10.1080/10683160801932380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, C.P., et al., 2009. College women's experiences with physically forced, alcohol- or other drug-enabled, and drug-facilitated sexual assault before and since entering college. Journal of American college health, 57 (6), 639–647. doi:10.3200/JACH.57.6.639-649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R.A., 1988. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R.A. and Casey, M.A., 2000. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, H., et al., 2009. Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women's bad hook-up and rape script. Sex roles, 60 (11–12), 793–804. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9586-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, J.A. and Testa, M., 2000. Qualitative analysis of women's perceived vulnerability to sexual aggression in a hypothetical dating context. Journal of social and personal relationship, 17 (6), 729–741. doi:10.1177/0265407500176002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C., et al., 2005. A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. Journal of interpersonal violence, 20 (10), 1325–1348. doi:10.1177/0886260505278528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsway, K.A. and Fitzgerald, L.F., 1994. Rape myths In review. Psychology of women quarterly, 18 (2), 133–164. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lottes, I.L. and Weinberg, M.S., 1997. Sexual coercion among university students: a comparison of the United States and Sweden. Journal of sex research, 34 (1), 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, G.E., Riger, S. and Foley, L.A., 2004. The impact of past sexual experiences on attributions of responsibility for rape. Journal of interpersonal violence, 19 (10), 1157–1171. doi:10.1177/0886260504269094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, T.W. and Robinson, D.W., 2008. Effects of attire, alcohol, and gender on perceptions of date rape. Sex roles, 58 (5/6), 423–434. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9343-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metts, S. and Spitzberg, B.H., 1996. Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: a script based approach. In: B.R. Burleson and A.W. Kunkel, eds. Communication yearbook 19. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 49–91.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A.K. et al., 2011. Stigma-threat motivated non-disclosure of sexual assault and sexual revictimization. A prospective analysis. Psychology of women quarterly, 35 (1), 119–128. doi:10.1177/0361684310384104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohler-Kuo, M. et al., 2004. Correlates of rape while intoxicated in a national sample of college women. Journal of studies on alcohol, 65 (1), 37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D.L., 1997. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C.L., 1998. The importance and danger of studying sexually aggressive women. In: P.B. Anderson and C. Struckman-Johnson, eds. Sexually aggressive women: current perspectives and controversies. New York: Guilford, 19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C.L., 2011. Examining stereotypes about token resistance to sex. Psychology of women quarterly, 35 (4), 676–683. doi:10.1177/0361684311426689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C.L. and Hollabaugh, L.C., 1988. Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54 (5), 872–879. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C.L. and McCoy, M.L., 1991. Double standard/double bind: the sexual double standard and women's communication about sex. Psychology of women quarterly, 15 (3), 447–461. doi:10.1111/j.1471–6402.1991.tb00420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, P., et al., 2008. Attributions of responsibility for rape: differences across familiarity of situation, gender, and acceptance of rape myths. Journal of applied social psychology, 38 (7), 1736–1754. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00367.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, J., Nurius, P.S. and Dimeff, L.A., 1996. Through her eyes: factors affecting women's perception of and resistance to acquaintance sexual aggression threat. Psychology of women quarterly, 20 (1), 123–145. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00668.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, L.F. and Allgeier, E.R., 1998. Feigning sexual desire: consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationship. Journal of sex research, 35 (3), 234–243. doi:10.1080/00224499809551938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, S.L., 2003. Predicting men's perceptions based on the belief that ‘No’ really means ‘Yes’. Journal of applied social psychology, 33 (4), 683–692. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01919.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Sánchez, M. and Megías, J.L., 2010. Alcohol use as a strategy for obtaining non-consensual sexual relations: incidence in Spanish university students and telation to rape myths acceptance. The Spanish journal of psychology, 13 (2), 864–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M.D. and Pitts, V.L., 1995. Toward a feminist routine activities theory on campus sexual assault. Justice quarterly, 12 (1), 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M.B. and Lyman, S.L., 1968. Accounts. American sociological review, 33 (1), 46–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, H.A., et al., 2006. ‘If it hurts you, then it is not a joke’: adolescents' ideas about girls' and boys' use and experience of abusive behaviour in dating relationships. Journal of interpersonal violence, 21 (9), 1191–1207. doi:10.1177/0886260506290423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W. and Gagnon, J.H., 1986. Sexual scripts: permanence and change. Archives of sexual behavior, 15 (2), 97–120. doi:10.1007/BF01542219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkin, J. and Krahé, B., 2008. Sexual assault and the justice gap: a question of attitude. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Testa, M. and Livingston, J.A., 1999. Qualitative analysis of women's experiences of sexual aggression: focus on the role of alcohol. Psychology of women quarterly, 23 (3), 573–589. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00382.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, S.E., 2003. A critical review of field studies on the link of alcohol and adult sexual assault in women. Aggression and violent behavior, 8 (5), 471–486. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(03)00032-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, S.E., 2010. Talking about sexual assault: society's response to survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Fund for Women, 2007. Violence against women: facts and figures. Available from: http://www.unifem.org/attachments/gender_issues/violence_against_women/facts_figures_violence_against_women_2007.pdf [Accessed 10 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S.J., 1997. When ‘no’ become ‘yes’: why girls and women consent to sex. Applied and preventive psychology, 6 (3), 157–166. doi:10.1016/S0962-1849(97)80003-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, K.G., 2011. Neutralizing sexual victimization: a typology of victims' non-reporting accounts. Theoretical criminology, 15 (4), 445–467. doi:10.1177/1362480610391527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, 2013. Violence against women. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/en/index.html [Accessed 10 October, 2012].
   Google Scholar