Visualising the ‘real’ and the ‘fake’: emotion work and the representation of orgasm in pornography and everyday sexual interactions

References

• Allen, L. (2006). ‘Looking at the real thing’: Young men, pornography and sexuality education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27, 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Attwood, F. (2005). What do people do with porn? Qualitative research into the consumption, use, and experience of pornography and other sexually explicit media. Sexuality and Culture, 9, 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, E. (2007). Sex work for the middle classes. Sexualities, 10, 473–488.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, K. (2011). Producing abuse: Selling the harms of pornography. Women's Studies International Forum, 34, 593–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Gavey, N., & McPhillips, K. (2003). The ‘fair deal’? Unpacking accounts of reciprocity in heterosex. Sexualities, 6, 237–261.
   Google Scholar
• Brewis, J., & Linstead, S. (2000). Sex, work and sex work: Eroticizing organizations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cacchioni, T. (2007). Heterosexuality and ‘the labour of love’: A contribution to recent debates on female sexual dysfunction. Sexualities, 10, 299–320.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, E. B., Fenigstein, A., & Fauber, R. L. (2014). The faking orgasm scale for women: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 423–435. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0212-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, C. A., & Davidson, J. K. (1986). Enhancing relationships: Understanding the feminine mystique of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 12, 182–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncombe, J., & Marsden, D. (1993). Love and intimacy: The gender division of emotion and ‘emotion work’: A neglected aspect of sociological discussion of heterosexual relationships. Sociology, 27, 221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, J., & Marsden, D. (1996). Whose orgasm is this anyway? Sex work in long-term couple relationships. In J. Weeks & J. Holland (Eds.), Sexual cultures (pp. 220–238). Basingstoke: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S., & Umberson, D. (2008). The performance of desire: Gender and sexual negotiation in long term marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70, 391–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, R. J. (2005). Why emotion work matters: Sex, gender and the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67, 337–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffier, J. (2007). Scripting the sex: Fantasy, narrative and sexual scripts in pornographic films. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts (pp. 61–79). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fahs, B. (2011). Performing sex: The making and unmaking of women's erotic lives. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2010). Young men using pornography. In K. Boyle (Ed.), Everyday pornography (pp. 164–178). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Vol. 1: An introduction. (R. Hurley, Trans.) New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hite, S. (1976). The Hite report. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. London: Tufnell.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2007). Faking it like a woman? Towards an interpretive theorization of sexual pleasure. Body & Society, 13, 95–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., Janssen, M., & Pasquinelli, M. (Eds.). (2007). C'Lick me: A Netporn studies reader (pp. 1–3). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Jagose, A. (2010). Counterfeit pleasures: Fake orgasm and queer agency. Textual Practice, 24, 517–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerner, I. (2013). Faking orgasms: The signs. Askmen.com. Retrieved March 21, from http://www.askmen.com/dating/love_tip/584_faking-orgasms-the-signs.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, S. (2010). Widening the glory hole: The discourse of online porn fandom. In F. Attwood (Ed.), Porn.com: Making sense of online pornography (pp. 171–186). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren-Mårtenson, L., & Månsson, S. A. (2010). Lust, love, and life: A qualitative study of Swedish adolescents' perceptions and experiences with pornography. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 568–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, A. (2006). The aesthetics of pornography: The insights of consumers. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 20, 523–539.
   Google Scholar
• Messina, S. (n.d.). Realcore: the digital porno revolution, Retrieved November 18, 2013, from http://www.realcore.radiogladio.it/.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Shippee, S. K. (2010). Men's and women's reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 552–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS Choices. (2013). Sexual arousal in women. UK: National Health Service. Retrieved March 21, from http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Goodsex/Pages/Sexualarousalinwomen.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Paasonen, S. (2006). Email from Nancy Nutsucker: Representation and gendered address in online pornography. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9, 403–420.
   Google Scholar
• Paasonen, S. (2010). Labors of love: Netporn, Web 2.0 and the meanings of amateurism. New Media & Society, 12, 1297–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvez, Z. F. (2006). The labor of pleasure: How perceptions of emotional labor impact women's enjoyment of pornography. Gender & Society, 20, 605–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, C. (1989). Hegemony and orgasm – Or the instability of heterosexual pornography. Screen, 20, 100–113.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, A. (2002). The science/fiction of sex: Feminist deconstruction and the vocabularies of heterosex. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C., Kippax, S., Waldby, C., & Crawford, J. (1995). Faking it: The story of ‘Ohh!’. Women's Studies International Forum, 18, 523–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, J. L. (2007). ‘The real thing’: Reframing queer pornography for virtual spaces. In K. Jacobs, M. Janssen, & M. Pasquinelli (Eds.), C'Lick me: A Netporn studies reader (pp. 239–251). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. (2005). ‘It's just acting’: Sex workers' strategies for capitalizing on sexuality. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 319–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L. C. (1973). Women and sex: Sexual experiences and reactions of a group of thirty women as told to a female psychotherapist. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, N. (2007). PlayBlog: Pornography, performance and cyberspace. In K. Jacobs, M. Janssen, & M. Pasquinelli (Eds.), C'Lick me: A Netporn studies reader (pp. 31–44). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, N. (2010). Keeping it real: User-generated pornography, gender reification, and visual pleasure. Convergence, 16, 411–430.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, A. E. (2010). Pantomimes of ecstasy: BeautifulAgony.com and the representation of pleasure. Camera Obscura, 25, 161–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whisnant, R. S. (2010). From Jekyll to Hyde: The grooming of male pornography consumers. In Karen Boyle (Ed.), Everyday Pornography (pp. 114–133). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Pretending orgasm during sexual intercourse: Correlates in a sample of young adult women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 23, 131–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. (1989). Hard core: Power, pleasure and the ‘Frenzy of the Visible’. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar