The tyranny of expectations of post-natal delight: gendered happiness

References

• Anon. (1864). Child murder and its punishment (no author given). Social Science Review, New Series 2, p. 454.
   Google Scholar
• Banyard, K. (2010). The equality illusion. The truth about women & men today. London: Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, L. (2014). Everyday sexism. London: Simon and Schuster UK Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• BBC Broadcast. (2015). Childbirth all or nothing. Director Rebecca Arnold (Landmark Films for BBC 1, first broadcast 24.02.2015).
   Google Scholar
• Blessingway website. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.blessingwaybook.com
   Google Scholar
• Burns, E. (2015). The blessingway ceremony: Ritual, nostalgic imagination and feminist spirituality. Journal of Religious Health, 54, 783–797. Retrieved July 22, 2016, from http://bornonline.com.au/6-ways-motherhood-makes-you-feel-more-beautiful-by-midwifezoe/10.1007/s10943-014-9991-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, N. (Ed.). (2015). Natal signs. Cultural representations of pregnancy, birth and parenting. Bradford, ON: Demeter Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cody, L. F. (2005). Birthing the nation. Sex, science and the conception of eighteenth-century Britons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cressy, D. (1997). Birth, marriage & death: Ritual, religion and the life-cycle in Tudor and Stuart England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (2012). Modern motherhood: Women and family in England 1945–2000. Manchester: Manchester University Press.10.7228/manchester/9780719084553.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyde, R. (2008). The technocratic model of birth. In C. G. Helman (Ed.), Medical anthropology (pp. 277–306). Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall, R., Refferty, A. M., & Webster, C. (1988). An introduction to the social history of nursing. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203403310
   Google Scholar
• Donnison, J. (1988). Midwives and medical men: A history of the struggle for the control of childbirth. New Barnett: Historical Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dundes, L. (2003). In the manner born. Birth rites in cross-cultural perspective. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einion, A. (2015). Resistance and submission: A critique of representations of birth. In N. Burton (Ed.), Natal signs. Cultural representations of pregnancy, birth and parenting (pp. 172–194). Bradford, ON: Demeter Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliston, S. (1997). Life after death: Legal and ethical implication of the maintenance of post-mortem pregnancies. In K. Petersen (Ed.), Intersections: Women on law, medicine and technology (pp. 145–165). Dartmouth: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Evenden, D. (2000). The midwives of the seventeenth-century London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Figes, K. (1998). Life after birth: What even your friends won’t tell you. Harmondsworth: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, S. (2004, March 13). ‘Caesarean refusal’ mother in jail. The Observer, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan. (2016). Midwives use art to explore midwifery. Unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, S. (2006). The tyranny of the maternal body: Madness and maternity. Women’s History Magazine, 54, 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, S. (2008, November). The beestings: Rethinking breast-feeding practices, maternity rituals, & maternal attachment in Britain & Ireland. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 10, 141–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, S. (2012). Postmodernist but not post-feminist! A feminist postmodernist approach to working with new mothers. In H. Burt (Ed.), Art therapy and postmodernism (pp. 70–83). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, S., Baker, C., Cornish, S., McCloskey, P., & Watts, L. (2015). Birth shock: Exploring pregnancy, birth and the transition to motherhood using participatory arts. In N. Burton (Ed.), Natal signs: Representations of pregnancy, childbirth and parenthood (pp. 272–296). Canada: Demeter Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: A history of mothers and natural selection. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists and the Population Investigation Committee. (1948). Maternity in great Britain. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, S. (2001). Birth your way: Choosing birth at home or in a birth centre. London: Dorling Kindersley.
   Google Scholar
• Lancy, D. F. (2014). The anthropology of childhood. Cherubs, chattel, changings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, J. (2010, December 3). NHS criticised for ‘production line’ approach to childbirth. The Independent. Health News. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/nhs-criticised-for-production-line-approach-to-childbirth-2149759.html
   Google Scholar
• Loudon, I. (Ed.). (1997a). An illustrated history of western medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loudon, I. (1997b). Midwives & the quality of maternal care. In H. Marland & A. M. Rafferty (Eds.), Midwives, society and childbirth. Debates and controversies in the modern period (pp. 180–201). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, T. (2016). Motherhood: Having a child makes women smarter, study says. Retrieved July 22, 2016, from http://www.hngn.com/articles/167887/20160108/motherhood-having-a-child-makes-women-smarter-study-says.htm
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E. (2001). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, C. (2002). Maternal impressions: Pregnancy & childbirth in literature and theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, C. (Ed.). (2009). Childbirth, midwifery and concepts of time. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Moi, T. (1999). What is a Women? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, E., Pope, C., & Rogers, J. (2015, January). A feminist narrative study of the maternity care experiences of women who were sexually abused in childhood. Midwifery, 31, 54–60.10.1016/j.midw.2014.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountcashell, M. J. (1835). A grandmother’s advice to young mothers on the physical education of children. London: Baldwin & Cradock.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, M. (1998). Being pregnant, giving birth. London: Thorsons.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, M. J., & Philipp, E. E. (1994). The history of obstetrics and gynaecology. New York, NY: Parthenon.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1984). The captured womb. A history of the medical care of pregnant women. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, M. (2013). Suicide: The leading cause of maternal death. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 279–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, S. (1997). Midwifery and medicine: Gendered knowledge in the practice of delivery. In H. Marland & A. M. Rafferty (Eds.), Midwives, society and childbirth. Debates and controversies in the modern period (pp. 218–232). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, D. (1983). War in the nursery. Theories of the child and mother. London: Virago.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. (1671/1999). The midwives book. Or the whole art of midwifery. In E. Hobby (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Showalter, E. (1985). The female malady. Women, madness and English culture 1830–1930. London: Virago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoppard, M. (1993). Conception, pregnancy and birth. London: Dorling Kindersley.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. (1996). Every woman’s birth rights. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (1997). The controlling power of childbirth. In H. Marland & A. M. Rafferty (Eds.), Midwives, society and childbirth. Debates and controversies in the modern period (pp. 232–248). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. (1995). The making of man-midwifery: Childbirth in England 1660–1770. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, C., & Duff, M. (2009). The progress of labour: Orderly chaos? In C. McCourt (Ed.), Childbirth, midwifery and concepts of time (pp. 84–104). London: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (2015). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015 (Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. Report) (pp. 1–56). Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar