Feminist men?: examining men’s feminist self-identification, activism and the impact of language

References

• Adichie, C. N. (2014). We should all be feminists. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, V. N. (2009). What’s in a label? Judgments of feminist men and feminist women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 206–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402,2009.01490.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashe, F. (2007). The new politics of masculinity: Men, power and resistance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, M. M., Friedman, C. K., & Leaper, C. (2009). Individual and situational factors related to young women’s likelihood of confronting sexism in their everyday lives. Sex Roles, 61, 449–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baily, J. (2015). Contemporary British feminism: Opening the door to men? Social Movement Studies, 14, 443–458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2014.947251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2011). Using Mechanical Turk as a subject recruitment tool for experimental research. Retrieved from https://web.mit.edu/berinsky/www/files/MT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bojin, K. (2012). “All our work is political”: Men’s experience in pro-feminist organizing ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, A. B., & Karpinski, A. (2008). What’s in a name? Two approaches to evaluating the label feminist. Sex Roles, 58, 299–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, E. (2010). Strategies for engaging men as anti-violence allies: Implications for ally movements. Advances in Social Work, 11, 267–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207311948
   Google Scholar
• Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156–2160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. (2014, May 23). Can men be feminists too? Half (48%) of men in 15 country survey seem to think so. Retrieved from http://www.ipsos-na.com/newspolls/pressrelease.aspx?id=6511
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2(4), 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlin, S. E. (2017). Feminist therapy: A brief integrative review of theory, empirical support, and call for new directions. Women’s Studies International Forum., 62, 78–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, G., Mestlin, M., & Masek, J. (1992). Predictors of feminist self-labeling. Sex Roles, 27, 321–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, L. E. (1999). Motivation for collective action: Group consciousness as mediator of personality, life experiences, and women’s rights activism. Political Psychology, 20, 611–635. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncanson, C. (2015). Hegemonic masculinity and the possibility of change in gender relations. Men and Masculinities, 18, 231–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X15584912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns, C. Z. (2012). Feminist approaches to counseling. In E. Altmaier & J. Hansen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 434–459). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2011). Involving men in efforts to end violence against women. Men and Masculinities, 14, 358–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X10363995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, M. D., & Matheson, K. (1995). Double relative deprivation: Combining the personal and political. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1167–1177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952111005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from https://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holland, K. J., Rabelo, V. C., Gustafson, A. M., Seabrook, R. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2016). Sexual harassment against men: Examining the roles of feminist activism, sexuality, and organizational context. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17, 17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren, L. E., & Hearn, J. (2009). Framing ‘men in feminism’: Theoretical locations, local contexts and practical passings in men’s gender-conscious positionings on gender equality and feminism. Journal of Gender Studies, 18, 403–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230903260076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houvouras, S., & Carter, Scott. J. (2008). The F word: College students’ definitions of a feminist. Sociological Forum, 23, 234–256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00072.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, C., & Tingley, D. (2015). “Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics, 2(3), 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardine, A. (1987). Men in feminism: Odor di oumo or compagnons de route. In A. Jardine, & P. Smith (Eds.), Men in feminism (pp. 54–61). London: Metheun.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361900
   Google Scholar
• Jardine, A., & Smith, P. (Eds.). (1987). Men in feminism. London: Metheun.
   Google Scholar
• Javaid, A. (2014). Feminism, masculinity and male rape: Bringing male rape ‘out of the closet’. Journal of Gender Studies, 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2014
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. S. (1998) Who’s afraid of men doing feminism? In T. Digby (Ed.), Men doing feminism (pp. 57–68). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. S. (2005). Why men should support gender equity. In S. Freedberg, E. Haghighat, & B. Ngo-Ngijol-Banoum (Eds.), Women’s studies review, special edition: The role of women in world peace & the role of men and boys in gender equity (pp. 102–114). Bronx, NY: The City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kliff, S. (2015, April 8). Only 18% of Americans consider themselves feminists. Retrieved from http://www.vox.com/2015/4/8/8372417/feminist-gender-equality-poll
   Google Scholar
• Lemaster, P., Strough, J., Stoiko, R., & DiDonato, L. (2015). To have and to do: Masculine facets of gender predict men’s and women’s attitudes about gender equality among college students. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16, 195–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, P. A. (2014). Gendered discontent: Participation in the feminist movement in Ottawa ( Doctoral dissertation). Carleton University, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Liss, M., Hoffner, C., & Crawford, M. (2000). What do feminists believe? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 279–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00210.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liss, M., O’Connor, C., Morosky, E., & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 124–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, J. (2005). What’s in a label? The relationship between feminist self-identification and “feminist” attitudes among US women and men. Gender & Society, 19, 480–505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204273498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, M. A. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, J. M. (2015). Men’s gender role conflict: Psychological costs, consequences, and an agenda for change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.https://doi.org/10.1037/14501-000
   Google Scholar
• Precopio, R. F., & Ramsey, L. R. (2017). Dude looks like a feminist!: Moral concerns and feminism among men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18, 78–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353501011004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, R. E., Weibust, K. S., & Miller, C. T. (2007). Effects of stereotypes about feminists on feminist self-identification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 146–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., Mescher, K., & Moss-Racusin, C. A. (2013). Reactions to gender egalitarian men: Perceived feminization due to stigma-by-association. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 572–599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212461160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, J. E. (2007). Predictors of change in feminist activism through women’s and gender studies. Sex Roles, 57, 43–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9227-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant, S. (2009). Men and Feminism: Seal Studies. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 101–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, A. M. (2006). Racial and gender attitudes as predictors of feminist activism among self-identified African American feminists. Journal of Black Psychology, 32, 455–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798406292469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, S. (2002). Men and masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, S., Srinivasan, R., Finke, E., Firnhaber, J., & Shilinsky, A. (2013). Positive portrayals of feminist men increase men’s solidarity with feminists and collective action intentions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 61–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but…”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37, 885–904. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, J. D., Tobias, A., & Snell, A. F. (2011). When declaring “I am a Feminist” matters: Labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64, 9–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9890-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, A. N. (2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, “I’m not a feminist, but…”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 423–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar