2,881
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

On being the ‘gender person’ in an academic department: constructions, configurations and implications

ORCID Icon
Pages 730-742 | Received 23 Apr 2018, Accepted 15 May 2019, Published online: 22 May 2019

References

  • Aaron, J., & Walby, S. (1991). Introduction: Towards a feminist intellectual space. In J. Aaron & S. Walby (Eds.), Out of the margins: Women’s studies in the nineties (pp. 1–6). London: Falmer Press.
  • Abbott, P. (1991). Feminist perspectives in sociology: The challenge to ‘Mainstream’ Orthodoxy. In J. Aaron & S. Walby (Eds.), Out of the margins: Women’s studies in the nineties (pp. 181–190). London: Falmer Press.
  • Acker, S. (2010). Gendered games in academic leadership. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 20(2), 129–152.
  • Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
  • Association nationale des études féministes (ANEF). (2014). Le genre dans l’enseignement supérieur et la recherche: Livre blanc. Paris: la Dispute.
  • Boyle, C. (2012). Post-Queer (Un)made in France? Paragraph, 35(2), 265–280.
  • Burford, J. (2017). Not writing, and giving ‘zero-f**ks’ about it: Queer(y)ing doctoral ‘failure’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(4), 473–484.
  • Chanana, K. (2003). Visibility, gender and the careers of women faculty in an Indian university. McGill Journal of Education/Revue Des Sciences De L’éducation De McGill, 38(3), 381–389.
  • Coate, K. (2006). Imagining women in the curriculum: The transgressive impossibility of women’s studies. Studies in Higher Education, 31(4), 407.
  • Courtois, A. D. M., & O’Keefe, T. (2015). Precarity in the ivory cage: Neoliberalism and casualisation of work in the Irish higher education sector. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 13(1), 43–66.
  • David, M. (2011). Overview of researching global higher education: Challenge, change or crisis? Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 6(2), 147–163.
  • David, M. E. (2014). Feminism, gender and universities: Politics, passion and pedagogies. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.
  • Fassin, É. (2009). Le sexe politique genre et sexualité au miroir transatlantique. Paris: Éd. de l’EHESS.
  • Ferguson, L. (2015). This is our gender person. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17(3), 380–397.
  • Gill, R. (2010). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of the neoliberal university. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 228–244). London: Routledge.
  • Ginsberg, A. E. (2008). Triumphs, controversies, and change: Women’s studies 1970s to the twenty-first century. In A. E. Ginsberg (Ed.), The evolution of American women’s studies: Reflections on triumphs, controversies, and change (1st ed., pp. 9–37). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Grant, B. M. (2008). Agonistic struggle: Master–Slave dialogues in humanities supervision. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(1), 9–27.
  • Hancock, S., Clegg, S., Crossouard, B., Kahn, P., & Weller, S. (2016). Who is the newer researcher into higher education? Locating ourselves in shifting terrains. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 282–295.
  • Hemmings, C. (2005). The life and times of academic feminism. In R. Braidotti & A. V. Baren (Eds.), The making of European women’s studies: A work in progress report on curriculum development and related issues in gender education and research (pp. 99–123). Utrecht: ATHENA Advanced Thematic Network in Activities in Women’s Studies in Europe.
  • Hemmings, C. (2011). Why stories matter: The political grammar of feminist theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Henderson, E. F. (2015). Gender pedagogy: Teaching, learning and tracing gender in higher education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Henderson, E. F. (2016). Eventful gender: An ethnographic exploration of gender knowledge production at International Academic Conferences. PhD thesis awarded by UCL Institute of Education
  • Henderson, E. F. (2018). Feminist conference time: Aiming (not) to have been there. In Y. Taylor & K. Lahad (Eds.), Feeling academic in the neoliberal university: Feminist flights, fights and failures (pp. 33–60). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Henderson, E. F. (2019a). Gender, definitional politics and ‘live’ knowledge production: contesting concepts at conferences. New York, NY; London: Routledge.
  • Henderson, E. F. (2019b). The (un)invited guest? Feminist pedagogy and guest lecturing. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 115–120. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1527766
  • Herschberg, C., Benschop, Y., & van Den Brink, M. (2018). Selecting early-career researchers: The influence of discourses of internationalisation and excellence on formal and applied selection criteria in academia. Higher Education, 76(5), 807–825.
  • Hirshfield, L. E., & Joseph, T. D. (2012). ‘We need a woman, we need a black woman’: Gender, race, and identity taxation in the academy. Gender and Education, 24(2), 213–227.
  • Howe, F. (1991). Women’s studies in the United States: Growth and institutionalization. In A. Rao (Ed.), Women’s studies international: Nairobi and beyond (pp. 103–121). New York: Feminist Press.
  • John, M. (2008). Introduction. In M. John (Ed.), Women’s studies in India: A reader (pp. 1–22). Gurgaon: Penguin.
  • Kanagasabai, N. (2018). Possibilities of transformation: Women’s studies in Tier II cities in Tamil Nadu, India. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–14. doi:10.1080/01596306.2018.1448702
  • Kirkup, G., & Whitelegg, E. (2012). The legacy and impact of Open University women’s/gender studies: 30 years on. Gender and Education, 25(1), 6–22.
  • Krishna, S. (2007). Feminist perspectives and the struggle to transform the disciplines: Report of the IAWS Southern regional workshop. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 14(3), 499–515.
  • Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2009). Gender and the changing face of higher education: A feminized future. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Lee, A., & Williams, C. (1999). “Forged in fire: Narratives of trauma in PhD supervision pedagogy. Southern Review, 32(1), 6–26.
  • Lopes, A., & Dewan, I. A. (2018). Precarious pedagogies? Impact of casual and zero-hour contracts in higher education. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 7(Fall), 28–42.
  • Lowe, M., & Lowe Benston, M. (1984). The uneasy alliance of feminism and academia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 7(3), 177–183.
  • Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. London: Routledge.
  • Montgomery, F., & Collette, C. (1997). Introduction. In F. Montgomery & C. Collette (Eds.), Into the melting pot: Teaching women’s studies in the new millennium (pp. 1–12). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Morley, L. (1999). Organising feminisms: The micropolitics of the academy. Basingstoke: Macmillan P.
  • Morley, L. (2007). Sister-matic: Gender mainstreaming in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5), 607.
  • Morley, L. (2012). The rules of the game: Women and the leaderist turn in higher education. Gender and Education, 25(1), 116–131.
  • Mukhopadhyay, M. (2007). Mainstreaming gender or ‘streaming’ gender away: Feminists marooned in the development business. In A. Cornwall, E. Harrison, & A. Whitehead (Eds.), Feminisms in development: Contradictions, contestations, and challenges (pp. 135–149). London; New York: Zed Books.
  • Nadolny, A., & Ryan, S. (2013). McUniversities revisited: A comparison of university and McDonald’s casual employee experiences in Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 142–157.
  • Nielsen, M. W. (2017). Reasons for leaving the academy: A case study on the ‘Opt Out’ phenomenon among younger female researchers. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(2), 134–155.
  • Padilla, A. M. (1994). Ethnic minority scholars, research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27.
  • Pappu, R. (2002). Constituting a field: Women’s studies in higher education. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 9(2), 221–234.
  • Pereira, M. D. M. (2014). The importance of being “Modern” and foreign: Feminist scholarship and the epistemic status of nations. Signs, 39(3), 627–657.
  • Pereira, M. D. M. (2017). Power, knowledge and feminist scholarship: An ethnography of academia. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Rosenfelt, D. (1984). What women’s studies programs do that mainstreaming can’t. Women’s Studies International Forum, 7(3), 167–175.
  • Smith, B. G. (2013). Women’s studies: The basics. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Smyth, I. (2007). Talking of gender: Words and meanings in development organisations. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 582–588.
  • Sreenivas, D. (2015). Between politics and discipline: Gender studies in an institutional setting. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 22(2), 265–281.
  • Stromquist, N. P. (2001). Gender studies: A global perspective of their evolution contribution, and challenges to comparative higher education. Higher Education, 41(4), 373–387.
  • Unterhalter, E., & North, A. (2010). Assessing gender mainstreaming in the education sector: Depoliticised technique or a step towards women’s rights and gender equality? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(4), 389–404.
  • Walker, M. (1998). Academic identities: Women on a South African landscape. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 335–354.
  • Wöhrer, V. (2016). Gender studies as a multi-centred field? Centres and peripheries in academic gender research. Feminist Theory, 17(3), 323–343.
  • Zmoroczek, C., & Duchen, C. (1991). What are those women up to? Women’s studies and feminist research in the European community. In J. Aaron & S. Walby (Eds.), Out of the margins: Women’s studies in the nineties (pp. 11–29). London: Falmer Press.