References
- Attwood, F. (2005). What do people do with porn? Qualitative research into the comsumption, use, and experience of pornography and other sexually explicit media. Sexuality and Culture, 9(2), 65–86.
- Attwood, F., Hakim, J., & Winch, A. (2017). Mediated intimacies: Bodies technologies and relationships. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 249–253.
- Attwood, F., & Smith, C. (2014). Porn studies: An introduction. Porn Studies, 1(1–2), 1–6.
- Attwood, F., Smith, C., & Berker, M. (2018). ‘I’m just curious and still exploring myself’: Young people and pornography. New Media and Society, 20(10), 3738–3759.
- Bachmann, G. A., & Leiblum, S. R. (1991). Sexuality in sexagenarian women. Maturitas, 13(1), 43–50.
- Barbagli, M., Dalla Zuanna, G., & Garelli, F. (2010). La sessualità degli italiani [Italian’s Sexuality]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
- Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242–273.
- Benjamin, O., & Tlusten, D. (2010). Intimacy and/or degradation: Heterosexual images of togetherness and women’s embracement of pornography. Sexualities, 13(5), 599–623.
- Bertone, C., & Ferrero Camoletto, R. (2009). Beyond the sex machine? Sexual practices and masculinity in adult men’s heterosexual accounts. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(4), 369–386.
- Böhm, M., Franz, P., Dekker, A., & Matthiesen, S. (2015). Desire and dilemma– Gender differences in German students’ consumption of pornography. Porn Studies, 2(1), 76–92.
- Bordini, G. S, & Sperb, T. M. (2013). Sexual double standard: a review of the literature between 2001 and 2010. Sexuality & Culture, 17(4), 686–704.
- Duits, L., & van Zoonen, L. (2006). Headscarves and Porno-Chic. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(2), 103–117.
- Foster, G. (1994). Fishing with the net for research data. British Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 91–97.
- Gagnon, J. H. (1998). Sexual conduct revisited. Eitschrift Für Sexualforschung, 11(4), 353–366.
- Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct. The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.
- Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
- Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4(3), 301–331.
- Gray, J. (1992). Men are from mars, women are from venus. Glasgow: Harper Collins Publisher.
- Hare, K., Gahagan, J., Jackson, L., & Steenbeek, A. (2014). Perspectives on “Pornography”: Exploring sexually explicit Internet movies’ influences on Canadian young adults’ holistic sexual health. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(3), 148–158.
- Hockey, J., Meah, A., & Robinson, V. (2007). Mondane heterosexuality. From theory to practices. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hollway, W. (1984). Women’s power in heterosexual sex. Women’s Studies International Forum, 7(1), 63–68.
- Hollway, W. (2001). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice (pp. 272–283). London: SAGE.
- Jackson, S. (2006). Interchanges: Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory, 7(1), 105–121.
- James, N. (2007). The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational reseach. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 963–976.
- James, N., & Busher, H. (2016). Online interviewing. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 245–259, 6 ed.). London: Sage.
- James, N., & Busher, H. (2009). Online interviewing. London: Sage.
- Juffer, J. (1998). At home with pornography: Women, sex, and everyday life. New York: NYU Press.
- Kalish, R., & Kimmel, M. (2011). Hooking up. Australian Feminist Studies, 26(67), 137–151.
- Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender. An ethnomethodological approach. New York, NY: Wiley.
- Kimmel, M. (2004). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 119–141). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
- Kimmel, M., & Plante, R. F. (2004). Sexualities: Identities, behaviour, and society. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Lai, Y, & Hynie, M. (2011). A tale of two standards: an examination of young adults’ endorsement of gendered and ageist sexual double standards. Sex Roles, 64(5–6), 360–371.
- Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Stuart, M. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Leiblum, S. R. (2002). Reconsidering gender differences in sexual desire: An update. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 17(1), 57–68.
- Malamuth, N. (1996). Sexually explicit media, gender differences and evolutionary theory. Journl of Communication, 46(3), 8–31.
- McNair, B. (2002). Striptease culture: Sex, media and the democratisation of desire. London: Routledge.
- Mercer, J. (2017). Gay pornography. Representation of sexuality and masculinity. London: I.B.Tauris.
- Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(4), 477–507.
- Mulholland, M. (2013). Young people and pornography. Negotiating pornification. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Neville, L. (2015). Male gays in the female gaze: women who watch m/m pornography. Porn Studies, 2(2–3), 192–207.
- Paechter, C. (2003). Masculinities and femininities as communities of practice. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(1), 69–77.
- Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(2), 37–41.
- Plummer, K. (2002). Sexualities: Critical assessments. London: SAGE.
- Plummer, K. (2005). Critical humanism and queer theory: Living with the tensions. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). (pp. 75–100). London: SAGE.
- Sakaluk, J. K., Todd, L. M., Milhausen, R., & Lachowsky, N. J. (2014). Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 516–531.
- Scarcelli, C. M. (2015a). ‘It is disgusting, but … ’: adolescent girls’ relationship to internet pornography as gender performance. Porn Studies, 2(2–3), 237–249.
- Scarcelli, C. M. (2015b). Intimità digitali [digital intimacies]. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
- Sprecher, S., & Toro-Morn, M. (2002). A study of men and women from different sides of earth to determine if men are from Mars. Sex Roles, 46(March), 75–89. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/V21747KL33470784.pdf
- Stein, A. (1989). Three models of sexuality: drives, identities and practices. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 1-13.
- Stella, R. (2018). Porn culture, embodied experiences and knowledge of sexual practices. Sexualities. doi: 10.1177/1363460718791964
- Warner, M. (1999). The trouble with normal. Sex, politics, asn the ethics of wueer life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
- Wright, P. J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2018). Women’s perceptions of their male partners’ pornography consumption and relational, sexual, self, and body satisfaction: Toward a theoretical model. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42(1), 55–73.