Whether your name is Manuel or María matters: gender biases in recommendations to study engineering

References

• Arbuckle, J. L. (2017). IBM SPSS Amos 25 user’s guide. Chicago: SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Auspurg, K., & Hinz, T. (2015). Factorial survey experiments. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing source. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces, 83(2), 759–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudarbat, B., & Montmarquette, C. (2009). Choice of fields of study of university Canadian graduates: The role of gender and their parents’ education. Education Economics, 17(2), 185–213.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9(1), 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-A-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), 924–976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S. (2012). Understanding the paradox in math-related fields: Why do some gender gaps remain while others do not? Sex Roles, 66, 184–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2003). Expectation states theory. In John Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 29–51). New York: Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 701–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 294–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J., Harold, R., Yoon, K. S., Arbreton, A., & Freedman-Doan, C. (1993). Parents and gender role socialization during the middle childhood and adolescent year. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 59–83). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (2014). Gendered socialization of STEM interests in the family. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 116–132.
   Google Scholar
• Foschi, M. (2001). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuegen, K., Biernat, M., & Haines, E. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 701–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, E., Ramírez, G., Levine, S., & Beilock, S. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-Related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66, 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase, S., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S., Kolmos, A., & Mejlgaard, N. (2013). What does it take to become a good engineer? Identifying cross-National Engineering student profiles according to perceived importance of skills. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(3), 698–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington DC: American Association of University Women.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, A. E., Hack, T., García, A. L., Goodfriend, W., & Habashi, M. M. (2018). Powerless men and agentic women: Gender bias in hiring decisions. Sex Roles, 80, 667–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jodl, K. M., Michael, A., Malanchuk, O., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. (2001). Parents’ roles in shaping early adolescents’ occupational aspirations. Child Development, 72(4), 1247–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, A. J., D’Mello, S. D., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 128–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCIU. (2017). Científicas en cifras 2017. Madrid: Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades.
   Google Scholar
• MECD. (2018). Estadística de Estudiantes Universitarios. Curso 2016/2017. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. Retrieved from http://www.mecd.gob.es/portada-mecd/
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2019). Comparing students’ engineering and science aspirations from age 10 to 16: Investigating the role of gender, ethnicity, cultural capital, and attitudinal factors. Journal of Engineering Education, 2019, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescollc, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Where are tomorrow’s female scientists? Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gender/data/wherearetomorrowsfemalescientists.htm
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 322–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 486–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M., & Müller, J. (2018). Gender and family influences on Spanish students’ aspirations and values in stem fields. International Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 188–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M., Palmén, R., & García-Cuesta, S. (2012). Parental and secondary school teachers’ perceptions of ICT professionals, gender differences and their role in the choice of studies. Sex Roles, 66, 235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66, 175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeding, A. (2012). Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): An investigation of their implicit gender stereotypes and stereotypes’ connectedness to math performance. Sex Roles, 67(11–12), 617–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth Frederick, L., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). On the gender–science stereotypes held by scientists: Explicit accord with gender-ratios, implicit accord with scientific identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vandello, J. A., Hettinger, V. E., Bosson, J. K., & Siddiqi, J. (2013). When equal isn’t really equal: The masculine dilemma of seeking work flexibility. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 303–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. J., & White, G. B. (2006). Implicit and explicit occupational gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 55(3), 259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar