When “Silence is Complicity”: voicing Muslim women’s resistance through reiteration of the veil

References

• Abu-Lughod, L. (2013). Do Muslim women need saving (1st ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, L. (1992). Women and gender in Islam (1st ed.). New Heaven; London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mahadin, S. (2015). Do Muslim women need saving? Making (Non)sense of FEMEN’s ethico-aesthetics in the Arab world. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38, 388–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Najjar, A., & Abusalim, A. (2015). Framing the female body: Beyond morality and pathology? In M. El-Said, L. Meari, & N. Pratt (Eds.), Rethinking gender in revolutions and resistance: Lessons from the Arab World (pp. 135–154). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2012). Land of strangers (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Betlemidze, M. (2015). Mediatized controversies of feminist protest: Femen and bodies as affective events. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38(4), 374–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. (1994). Location of culture (1st ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, G. (2008). Dangerous brown Men: Exploiting sex, violence, and feminism in the war on terror (1st ed.). London & New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, J. (2001). Inscribing identity: Skin as country in the Central Desert. In S. Ahmed & J. Stacey (Eds.), Thinking through the skin (pp. 177–193). London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, J. (2007). Why The French don’t like headscarves: Islam, the state and public space (1st ed.). Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brayson, K. (2019). Of bodies and burkinis: Institutional islamophonia, islamic dress, and the colonial condition. Journal of Law and Society, 46(1), 55–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, S. (1996). Reconstructing self and society: Javanese Muslim women and the veil. American Ethnologist, 23(4), 673–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004c). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence (2nd ed.). s.l.: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2006b). Gender trouble (1st ed.). New York: Routledge Classic.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2011a). Bodies that matter (1st ed.). London & New York: Routledge Classic.
   Google Scholar
• Callero, P. (2003). The sociology of the self. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clothier, I. M. (2005). Created identities: Hybrid cultures and the internet. Convergence, 11(4), 44–59.
   Google Scholar
• Colpean, M. (2019). Muslim women against FEMEN: Asserting agency in online spaces. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 13(3), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Delphy, C. (2015). Separate and dominate: Feminism and racism after the war on terror (1st ed.). London & New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, F. (1965). A dying colonialism. New York, NY: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, N., Shifman, L., & Kampf, Z. (2015). “It Gets Better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media and Society, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism (1st ed.). Bloomington; Indiana Polis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1992). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography (1st ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2009). Projects? How can qualitative internet researchers define the boundaries of their. In A. N. Markham & N. K. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversation about method (pp. 1–20). Los Angeles; London; New Delhi; Singapore: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschmann, N. J. (2003). The subject of liberty: Toward a feminist theory of freedom (1st ed.). Princeton & oxford: Princeton Univesity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalu, O. U. (2003). Safiyya and adamah: Punishing adultery with sharia stones in twenty-frist-century Nigeria. Oxford Journal, 102(408), 389–408.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, R. (2018). Gender, aterity and human rights: Freedom in a fishbowl. Cheltenham; Northampton; Massachisetts: Edwar Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., Turki, N., Izaguirre, R. C., DeMahy, C., Thibodeaux, B.L., Gage, T. (2020). Twitter as a tool for social movement: An analysis of feminist activism on social media communities. Journal of Community Psychology, Special Issue, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton Unicersity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, S. (2012). Patriarchy as the exclusive domain of the other: The veil controversy, false projection and cultural racism. I.CON, 10(2), 411–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, C. (1999). Cyberspace and disadvantaged communities the internet as a tool for collective action. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 290–310). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D. (2018). What does it mean to decolonize?. In W.Mignolo & C.Walsh (Eds.), On decoloniality: Concepts; Analytics; Praxis (pp. 105–134). Durham & London: Duke Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, S. (2005). Michel foucault. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, A. (2004). Voices of the marginalized on the internet: Examples from a website for woman of South Asia. Journal of Communication, 54(3), 492–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, A., & Watts, E. (2002). Theorizing cyberspace: The idea of voice applied to the internet discourse. New Media Society, 4(4), 479–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moi, T. (1999). What is a Woman? (1st ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. C. (2013a). Hufftpost [Online] Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/04/08/inna-shevchenko-muslim-women-femens-open-letter-amina-tyler-topless-jihad_n_3035439.html
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. C. (2013b). Hufftpost [Online] Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/04/05/muslim-women-against-femen-facebook-topless-jihad-pictures-amina-tyler_n_3021495.html?guccounter=1
   Google Scholar
• Newsom, V. A., & Lengel, L. (2012). Arab women, social media, and the Arab spring: Applying the framework of digital reflexivity to analyze gender and online activism. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 13, 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Orgad, S. (2009). How can researchers make sense of the issues involved in collecting and interpreting online and offline data. In A. N. Markham & N. K. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 33–53). Los Angeles; London; New Delhi; Singapore: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Posocco, S. (2016). (Decolonising) the ear of the other: Subjectivity, ethics and politics in question. In S. Bakshi, S. Jivraj, & S. Posocco (Eds.), Decolonising sexualities: Transnational perspectives, critical interventions (pp. 249–263). Oxford: Counterpress.
   Google Scholar
• Posser, J. (2001). Skin memories. In S. Ahmed & J. Stacey (Eds.), Thinking through the skin (pp. 52–68). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pozorov, S. (2007). Foucault, freedom and sovereignty (1st ed.). Hampshire & Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Reestorff, C. M. (2014). Mediatised affective activism: The activist imaginary and the topless body in the femen movement. convergence. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 20(4), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, T. (2006). Listening to the voices of Hijab. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29(1), 54–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. (2007a). The politics of the veil. Chicago: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. (2011b). The fantasy of feminist history. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Hefner, N. (2007). Javanese women and the veil in Post Soeharto. The Journal of Asian Studies, 66(2), 389–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak?. In C. Nelson & L. Grossber (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–311). Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, A. (2005). Towards a genealogical feminism: A reading of Judith Butler’s political thought. Contemporary Political Theory, 4(1), 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, J., & Pollock, S. (2000). Online activism for women’s rights. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(5), 699–706.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, S. (2001). ‘That is my star of david’ skin, abjection and hybridity. In S. Ahmed & J. Stacey (Eds.), Thinking through the skin (pp. 209–222). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. (2012). Silence as resistance before the subject, or could the subaltern remain silent?. Theory Culture Society, 29(6), 99–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. E. (2018). The Decolonial for: Resurgences, shifts, and movements. In W.Mignolo &  C.Walsh (Eds.), On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis (pp. 15–33). Durham & London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, A. (2013). Identities and freedom: Feminist theory between power and connection (1st ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar