‘It started with this one post’: #MeToo, India and higher education

References

• Agger, I., & Jensen, S. B. (1990). Testimony as ritual and evidence in psychotherapy for political refugees. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 3(1), 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• Alcoff, L., & Gray, L. (1993). Survivor discourse: Transgression or recuperation?. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,18(2), 260–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcoff, L. M. (2018). Rape and resistance. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Arruzza, C., Bhattacharya, T., & Fraser, N. (2019). Feminism for the 99 Percent. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ayyar, V. (2017). Caste-gender matrix and the promise and practice of academia. Economic and Political Weekly, 53(50). https://www.epw.in/engage/article/caste-gender-matrix-and-promise-and-practice-academia
   Google Scholar
• Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: Digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilge, S. (2010). Recent feminist outlooks on intersectionality. Diogenes, 57(1), 58–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose, C. E. (2012). Intersectionality and global gender inequality. Gender & Society, 26(1), 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Chadha, G. (2017). Towards complex feminist solidarities after the list-statement. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(50). Retrieved from https://www.epw.in/engage/article/towards-complex-feminist-solidarities-list-statement
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chakraborty, A. (2019) ‘Politics of #LoSha: Using naming and shaming as a feminist tool on facebook’ In D. Ging & E. Siapera. (Eds.), Gendered hate online: Understanding the new anti-feminism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (195–212).
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M. L., Gross, G., & Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2012). Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, A. (2020a). Sites of exception: Gender violence, digital activism, and Nirbhaya’s zone of anomie in India. Violence against Women, 26(11),1423–1444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, A. (2020b). ‘Me Too’and the ‘List’–power dynamics, shame, and accountability in Indian academia. IDS Bulletin, 51(2),63–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos Bruss, S. M. (2019) ‘Naming and shaming or ‘speaking truth to power’? On the ambivalences of the Indian ‘list of sexual harassers in academia’ (LoSHA)’, Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organisation, 19(4): 723–745.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, L. (1989). Theories of Rape: Inquiries into the Causes of Sexual Aggression. London: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Fileborn, B., & Loney-Howes, R. (2019). #MeToo and the politics of social change. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., Cullen F. T., & Turner M. G. (2000). The Sexual Victimization of College Women. Washington: US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, R. J., Stowell, E., Parker, A. G., & Welles, B. F. (2019). Reclaiming stigmatized Narratives: The networked disclosure landscape of# MeToo.
   Google Scholar
• Haire, B., Newman, C. E., & Fileborn, B. (2019). Shitty media men. In # MeToo and the politics of social change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1989). Is there a feminist method. In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism and science (pp. 18–32). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Wong, A. (2018) ‘When academics defend colleagues accused of harassment’, The Atlantic, August 15. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/08/why-do-academics-defend-colleagues-accused-of-harassment/567553/
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, T. (2017). Social media and everyday politics. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, P. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hosterman, A. R., Johnson, N. R., Stouffer, R., & Herring, S. (2018). Twitter, social support messages, and the# MeToo movement. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(2), 69–91.
   Google Scholar
• John, M. E. (2019). Sexual Violence 2012-2018 and #MeToo. Retrieved March 22, 2020, from https://www.theindiaforum.in/article/sexual-violence-2012-2018-and-metoo
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, C. P., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. D., Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2007). The Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study.
   Google Scholar
• Loney-Howes, R. (2018). Shifting the rape script:“Coming Out” online as a rape victim. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 39(2), 26–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loney-Howes, R., Mendes, K., Fernández Romero, D., Fileborn, B., & Núñez Puente, S. (2021) ‘Digital footprints of #MeToo’, Feminist Media Studies. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1886142 1–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukose, R. (2018). Decolonizing feminism in the# MeToo Era. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 36(2), 34–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaskill, C. (2014). Sexual Violence on Campus, United States Senate. https://cdn.atixa.org/website-media/atixa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/12194119/Sexual-Violence-on-Campus-McCaskill-Survey-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn, C. (2011). Feminism, Rape and the Search for Justice, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,31(4), 825–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019) Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, M., Dey, A., Gatto, M. A., & Rowden, H. (2020). Feminist activism 25 years after Beijing. Gender and Development, 28(2),315–336.
   Google Scholar
• Page, T., Bull, A., & Chapman, E. (2019). Making Power Visible: “Slow Activism” to Address Staff Sexual Misconduct in Higher Education. Violence against Women,25(11), 1309–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, S. (2009). Redefining Justice: Addressing the Individual Needs of Victims and Witnesses. UK: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• PEW Research Centre.(2018). How social media users have discussed sexual harassment since #MeToo went viral. 11 October. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/11/how-social-media-users-have-discussed-sexual-harassment-since-metoo-went-viral/
   Google Scholar
• Philipose, P., & Kesavan, M. (2019). The #MeToo movement. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 26(1&2), 207–214. Retrieved from
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps, A. (2019). “Every woman knows a Weinstein”: Political whiteness and white woundedness in# MeToo and public feminisms around sexual violence. Feminist Formations,31(2), 1-25. ISSN 2151-7363.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A. (2015). Seeking rape justice: Formal and informal responses to sexual violence through technosocial counter-publics. Theoretical Criminology,19(4), 571–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revolt Sexual Assault. (2018). Revolt sexual assault survey. Retrieved March 27, 2020, from https://revoltsexualassault.com/research
   Google Scholar
• Roiphe, K. (2018). The Other Whisper Network: How Twitter feminism is bad for women. Harper's Magazine. March.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S. (2019). # MeToo is A crucial moment to revisit the history of Indian feminism–CETRI, centre tricontinental. Economic and Political Weekly, 53(42).
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saar, M.M. (2018). Visualizing the #MeToo movement using Google Trends. 18 April. https://blog.google/products/search/visualizing-metoo-movement-using-google-trends/
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, K. T., & Carpenter, N. J. (2019). Sharing# MeToo on Twitter: Incidents, coping responses, and social reactions. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal. 39 1 87–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, R. (2017). Sexual harassment and the limits of speech. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(50)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serisier, T. (2018). Speaking out: Feminism, rape and narrative politics. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, C., Mallory, A., Toews, M., Stith, S., & Wood, L. (2017). Why sexual assault survivors do not report to universities: A feminist analysis. Family Relations, 66(1), 166–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starzynski, L. L., Ullman, S. E., Filipas, H. H., & Townsend, S. M. (2005). Correlates of women’s sexual assault disclosure to informal and formal support sources. Violence and Victims, 20(4), 417.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stern, V. (2010). The Stern Review: An Independent Review into how Rape Complaints are Handled by Public Authorities in England and Wales. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Vera-Gray, F. (2018). The right amount of panic: How women trade freedom for safety. Bristol: Bristol University
   Google Scholar
• Wolburt Burgess A., Lewis-O’Connor A., Nugent-Borakove, ME., & Fanflik, P. (2009). Victim Services and SANE/SART Programs. In R. Hazlewood & A. W. Burgess (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Rape Investigations, 4th ed (pp. 39-51). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. O., Crawford, E., & Sebastian, K. (2007). Positive resolution of childhood sexual abuse experiences: The role of coping, benefit-finding and meaning-making. Journal of Family Violence, 22(7), 597–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar