Leakage: being a risk object or an object at risk? Investigating potential synergies between gender studies and discard studies through the concept of risk

References

• Agarwal, B. (1992). The gender and environment debate: Lessons from India. Feminist Studies, 18(1), 119–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å., & Corvellec, H. (2011). A relational theory of risk. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1986). Risk acceptability according to the Social Sciences. Routledge & Kegan Paul. London.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1982). Risk and Culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fingerson, L. (2006). Girls in power: Gender, body, and menstruation in adolescence. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredericks, R. (2018). Garbage Citizenship: Vital Infrastructures of Labor in Dakar, Senegal. London and Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J. (2009). Sink: The dirt of systems. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(4), 666–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregson, N., Watkins, H., & Calestani, M. (2010). Inextinguishable fibres: Demolition and the vital materialisms of asbestos. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1065–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies. Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1998). The body as an accumulation strategy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16(4), 401–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekman, S. (2008). Constructing the ballast: An ontology for feminism. In S. Aliamo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 85–119). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S. (1992). The social construction of risk objects: Or, how to pry open networks of risk. In J. F. Short & L. Clarke (Eds.), Organizations, uncertainties, and risk (pp. 39–53). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hird, M. (2012). Knowing waste: Towards an inhuman epistemology. Social Epistemology, 26(3–4), 453–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hird, M. (2013). Waste, landfills, and an environmental ethic of vulnerability. Ethics & the Environment, 18(1), 105–124. 1 0.2 979/e thicsenv iro.1 8.1.1 05
   Google Scholar
• Hutson, S., & Liddiard, M. (2000). Exclusionary environments. The media career of youth homelessness. In: Allan, Stuart, Adam, Barbara and Carter, Cynthia. (2000). In Environmental risks and the media, 160-170. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1999). The songlines of risk. Environmental Values, 8(2), 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. (2018). The what and the why of discard studies. Retrieved from https://discardstudies.com/2018/09/01/the-what-and-the-why-of-discard-studies/ (access date: 2021-07-11)
   Google Scholar
• Litvintseva, S. (2019). Asbestos. Inside and outside, toxic and haptic. Environmental Humanities, 11(1), 152–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1993). Risk as Moral Danger: The Social and Political Functions of Risk Discourse in Public Health. International Journal of Health Services, 23(3), 425–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meegoda, J. N., Ezeldin, A. S., Fang, H.-Y., & Inyang, H. I. (2003). Waste immobilization technologies. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 7, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, M. (1997a). Feminism and ecology. Cambridge and Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, M. (1997b). Gender and the environment. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 195–203). Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature. Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. London: Zed Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, K. (2018). Reclaiming the discarded. Life and labor on Rio’s garbage dump. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montelius, E., & Giritli Nygren, K. (2014). ‘Doing’ risk, ‘doing’ difference: Towards an understanding of the intersections of risk, morality and taste. Health, Risk & Society, 16(5), 431–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, S. A. (2012). Garbage matters: Concepts in new geographies of waste. Progress in Human Geography, 36(6), 780–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren, G. K., & Olofsson, A. (2014). Intersectional Approaches in Health-risk Research: A Critical Review. Sociology Compass, 8(9), 1112–1126.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, M.-B. (2016). LAST MANUSCRIPT, “Embodied Vulnerability in Large Scale Technical Systems – Vulnerable Dam Bodies, Water Bodies and Human Bodies”. In L. F. Käll (Ed.), Bodies, Boundaries and Vulnerabilities - Interrogating Social, Cultural and Political Aspects of Embodiment. Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Paster, G. K. (1993). Drama and the disciplines of shame in early modern England. Ithaca and New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, L. (2011). Getting intimate. A feminist analysis of old age, masculinity & sexuality. Doctoral dissertation. Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. (1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of Risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. W. (2011). The body embarrassed? Rethinking the leaky male body in Eighteenth-Century England and France. Gender & History, 23(1), 26–46.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction. An ethnography of global connection. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world. On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuana, N. (2008). Viscous porosity: Witnessing Katrina. In S. Aliamo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 188–213). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wyck, P. C. (2005). Signs of danger. Waste, trauma, and nuclear threat. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar