The gender order in action: consistent evidence from two distinct workplace settings

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes:Gender,class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., Giuliano, P., & Nunn, N. (2013). On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2), 469–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avril, C. (2008). Les aides à domicile pour personnes âgées face à la norme de sollicitude. Retraite et société, 53(1), 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benelli, N. (2011). Nettoyeuse. Comment tenir le coup dans un sale boulot. Zurich: Seismo.
   Google Scholar
• BFS, Bundesamt für Statistik. (2011). Erwerbstätige nach Geschlecht sowie beruflicher Tätigkeit und höchster abgeschlossener Ausbildung (aggregiert) sowie Fünfjahresaltersklassen, 1970-2000. Neuchâtel.
   Google Scholar
• BFS, Bundesamt für Statistik. (2019). Aufteilung der Hausarbeit in Paarhaushalten, 2018, Neuchâtel. Retrieved May 12, 2022, from https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/wirtschaftliche-soziale-situation-bevoelkerung/gleichstellung-frau-mann/vereinbarkeit-beruf-familie/aufteilung-hausarbeit.html
   Google Scholar
• Blair-Loy, M. (2005). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blithe, S. J., & Elliott, M. (2020). Gender inequality in the academy: Microaggressions, work-life conflict, and academic rank. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(7), 751–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumley, K. (2014). The gendered ideal worker narrative: Professional women’s and men’s work experiences in the new economy at a Mexican company. Gender and Society, 28(6), 799–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcuff, P. (2008). Aaron V. Cicourel: De l’ethnométhodologie au problème micro/macro en sciences sociales. SociologieS, online Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/2382.
   Google Scholar
• Criado Perez, C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. New York: Abrams Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crofts, J., & Coffey, J. (2017). Young women’s negotiations of gender, the body and the labour market in a post-feminist context. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(5), 502–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Simone, S., & Scano, C. (2018). Discourses of sameness, unbalance and influence: Dominant gender order in medicine. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(8), 914–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinh, H., Strazdins, L., & Welsh, J. (2017). Hour-Glass ceilings: Work-Hour thresholds, gendered health inequities. Social Science & Medicine, 176, 42–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The incomplete revolution: Adapting to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (2015). Welfare regimes and social stratification. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(1), 124–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). She Figures 2018. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(3), 267–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frances, R. (1993). The Politics of Work: Gender and labour in Victoria, 1880-1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs Epstein, C. (1988). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galerand, E., & Kergoat, D. (2014). Les apports de la sociologie du genre à la critique du travail. La nouvelle revue du travail, 4. Retrieved January 26, 2018, from http://journals.openedition.org/nrt/1533
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working out durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2001). Creating and recreating gender order in organizations. Journal of World Business, 36(3), 245–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman, C. P. (2012). Our androcentric culture: Or, the man-made world. New York: Simon & Schuster, Start Publishing LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). A Reply to denzin and Keller. Review of frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Contemporary Sociology, 10(1), 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1983). The Interaction Order: American sociological association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 36(3), 217–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golde, P. (1970). Women in the field. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gonos, G. (1977). “Situation” versus “frame”: The “Interactionist” and the “structuralist” analyses of everyday life. American Sociological Review, 42(6), 854–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42–55.
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2000). Analyzing interpretive practice. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 487–508). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, C. (2020, July). What is “toxic masculinity” and why does it matter? Men and Masculinities, 23. doi:10.1177/1097184x20943254
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeister, H. (2015). ‘Und Mails ganz spät Abends!‘ Führungsfrauen berichten wie ihre männlichen Kollegen mit Zeit und Technik umgehen: Ausdruck der hegemonialen Männlichkeit? In U. Wischermann & A. Kirschenbauer (Eds.), Geschlechterarrangements in Bewegung: Veränderte Arbeits- und Lebensweisen durch Informatisierung? (pp. 231–252). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, J., Einarsdóttir, Þ., & Sigurðardóttir, S. A. (2016). Queering the Trans: Gender and sexuality binaries in Icelandic Trans, Queer, and Feminist communities. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(1), 70–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, S. J., & Wendy, M. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Feuvre, N. (2003). Le 'genre' comme outil d'analyse sociologique. In D. Fougeyrollas-Schwebel, C. Planté, M. Riot-Sarcey, C. Zaidman (Eds.), Le genre comme catégorie d'analyse : Sociologie, histoire, littérature (pp. 39–52). Paris: L‘Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maharaj, Z. (1995). A Social Theory of Gender: Connell’s “gender and power”. Feminist Review, 49, 50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y. (2001). “Mobilizing masculinities”: Women’s experiences of men at work. Organization, 8(4), 587–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y. (2003). “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society, 17(3), 342–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y. (2004). Gender as Social Institution. Social Forces, 82(4), 1249–1273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y. (2006). Practising gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender, Work & Organization, 13(3), 254–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. J. (1984). Good and mad women: The historical construction of femininity in twentieth century Australia. Sydney and London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. A., & Sabo, D. F. (eds.). (1990). Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). Gender order In J. Pilcher, I. Whelehan (Eds.), Fifty key concepts in gender studies (pp. 62–64). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ponterotto, D. (2016). Resisting the male gaze: Feminist responses to the “normatization” of the female body in western culture. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 17(1), 133–151.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender & Society, 23(2), 145–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18(4), 429–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. (1970). On Phenomenology and social relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A., & Luckmann, P. (1973). The structures of the Life-World. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Schweizer Fleisch-Fachverband SFF.(2020). Jahresbericht 2020. Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Sumerau, J. E., Padavic, I., & Schrock, D. P. (2015). Little girls unwilling to do what’s best for them: Resurrecting patriarchy in an LGBT Christian church. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 44(3), 306–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valarino, I. (2020). Politique de la famille. In J.-M. Bonvin, V. Hugentobler, C. Knöpfel, P. Maeder, & U. Tecklenburg (Eds.), Dictionnaire de politique sociale suisse (pp. 379–381). Zurich: Seismo.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing Difference. Gender and Society, 9(1), 8–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. C. (2000). Unbending gender. Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T. (2016). Women’s experience of workplace interactions in male-dominated work: The intersections of gender, sexuality and occupational group. Gender, Work and Organization, 23(3), 348–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, E. (1981). Hidden rhythms: Schedules and calendars in social life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, I. (2017). Les métiers de la viande et des fleurs. Ethnographier le genre au travail. Université de Lausanne & EHESS, Paris, Unpublished doctoral thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, I. (2019). Les épreuves corporelles des bouchères et des bouchers. Nouvelles Questions féministes, 38(2), 51–67.
   Google Scholar