Discretion and military frontline workers: investigating civil-military relations policies in Afghanistan

Bibliography

• Baumann, Andrea Barbara. “Clash of Organisational Cultures? A Comparative Analysis of American and British Approaches to the Coordination of Defence, Diplomacy and Development in Stability Operations, 2001-2010.” PhD diss., Oxford University, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bolle, Tor Aksel. “Forsvaret i parløp med USAID” [The Armed Forces in Pair with USAID]. Bistandsaktuelt 22, no. October (2010): 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dafinova, Maya. “Keeping the Inter-Agency Peace? A Comparative Study of Swedish, German, and British Whole-of-Government Approaches in Afghanistan.” Phd diss., Carleton University, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Diesen, Sverre, interviewed by Hans-Wilhelm Steinfeld, Dagsnytt 18, NRK P2, September 25, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, Catherine. “Revisiting Lipsky: Front-Line Work in UK Local Governance.” Political Studies 59, no. 4 (2011): 978–995. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00886.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekhaugen, Lene. “Whole-of-government Coordination for Complex Operations: Symbolic Politics or Coordination Failure?” Journal of Strategic Studies 1–25 (2020).DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2020.1730819.
   Google Scholar
• Ekhaugen, Lene, and Ida Maria Oma. “Norwegians in Maymanah: Between on-the-Ground Developments and Domestic Politics.” In From Venus to Mars. Provincial Reconstruction Teams and the European Military Experience in Afghanistan, edited by Bernhard Chiari, Thijs Brocades Zaalberg, Nicola Labanca, and Ben Schoenmaker, 221–231. Freiburg: Rombach, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Flatemo, Trond Martin. “Norsk konseptutvikling i Provincial Reconstruction Team Meymahne” [Norwegian Concept Development in Provincial Reconstruction Team Meymahne]. Master’s thesis, Norwegian Defence University College, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Friesendorf, Cornelius. How Western Soldiers Fight: Organizational Routines in Multinational Missions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gjørv, Gunhild Hoogensen. Understanding Civil-Military Interaction: Lessons Learned from the Norwegian Model. London: Ashgate Publishers, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gofen, Anat. “Mind the Gap: Dimensions and Influence of Street-Level Divergence.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24, no. 2 (2014): 473–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompelman, Geert. Winning Hearts and Minds?: Examining the Relationship between Aid and Security in Afghanistan’s Faryab Province. Medford (MA): Tufts University, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Greentree, Todd. “Bureaucracy Does Its Thing: US Performance and the Institutional Dimension of Strategy in Afghanistan.” Journal of Strategic Studies 36, no. 3 (2013): 325–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2013.764518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpviken, Kristian B. “A Peace Nation Takes up Arms. The Norwegian Engagement in Afghanistan.” PRIO paper, Oslo, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hellum, Nina. “Menn i dumme kjoler: en antropologisk studie av menneskelige faktorer i fredsstøttende operasjoner” [Men in Stupid Dresses: An Antpropological Study of Human Factors in Peace Support Operations]. FFI-rapport 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, Peter, Michael Hill, and Aurélien Buffat, eds. Understanding Street-level Bureaucracy. Bristol and Chicago: Policy Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, Peter, Michael Hill, and Aurélien Buffat. “Introduction: Defining and Understanding Street-level Bureaucracy.” In Understanding Street-level Bureaucracy, edited by Peter Hupe, Michael Hill, and Aurélien Buffat, 3–24. Bristol and Chicago: Polic. Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson, Magnus. “Strategic Colonels: The Discretion of Swedish Force Commanders in Afghanistan 2006–2013.” PhD diss., Uppsala University, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kalkman, Jori Pascal, and Peter Groenewegen. “On Frontline Workers as Bureau-Political Actors: The Case of Civil–Military Crisis Management.” Administration & Society 51, no. 7 (2018): 1148–1170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718780581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, Conor, and Glenn Diesen. “Divided We Stand: The US Foreign Policy Bureaucracy and Nation-Building in Afghanistan.” International Peacekeeping 22, no. 3 (2015): 205–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2015.1039456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, Conor, and Steve Wood. “Bureaucratic Politics, Role Conflict, and the Internal Dynamics of US Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan.” Armed Forces & Society 42, no. 1 (2016): 99–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X15572113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leader Group, PRT Meymaneh, ISAF, Afghanistan. Provincial Reconstruction Team Meymaneh, Guidelines. 1st ed. May 1, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, Magdalena Tham, and Cecilia Hull Wiklund. “Jakten på synergin: Erfarenheter av civil-militär samverkan i PRT Mazar-e-Sharif” [Chasing Synergies: Civil-Military Relations in PRT Mazar-E Sharif]. FOI, Stockholm (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, Michael. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th ann. ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defence, and Ministry of Justice and the Police. A Strategy for Comprehensive Norwegian Civilian and Military Efforts in Faryab Province, Afghanistan. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Justice and the Police, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. “AJP-9 NATO Civil-Military Co-Operation (CIMIC) Doctrine.” NATO, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. ISAF Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) Handbook. 4th ed. Brussels: NATO, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2016: 8. A Good Ally: Norway in Afghanistan 2001–2014. Oslo: Departementenes servicesenter, Informasjonsforvaltning, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Ombudsman for the Armed Forces. “Rapport fra befaring i Afghanistan” [Inspection Report from Afghanistan]. undated.
   Google Scholar
• Piiparinen, Touko. “A Clash of Mindsets? An Insider’s Account of Provincial Reconstruction Teams.” International Peacekeeping 14, no. 1 (2007): 143–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310601114350.
   Google Scholar
• Rietjens, Sebastiaan. “Between Expectations and Reality: The Dutch Engagement in Uruzgan.” In Statebuilding in Afghanistan, edited by Nik Hynek and Peter Marton, 73–95. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rietjens, Sebastiaan, Joseph Soeters, and Paul C. van Fenema. “Learning from Afghanistan: Towards a Compass for Civil–military Coordination.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 24, no. 2 (2013): 257–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2013.778027.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffa, Chiara. Military Cultures in Peace and Stability Operations: Afghanistan and Lebanon. Philadeplhia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffa, Chiara, Christopher Dandeker, and Pascal Vennesson. “Soldiers Drawn into Politics? The Influence of Tactics in Civil–military Relations.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 24, no. 2 (2013): 322–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2013.778035.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 2017:16. Sverige I Afghanistan 2002–2014. Stockholm: Regeringskansliets förvaltningsavdelning, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm-Erichsen, Anne-Grethe. 2005. “Norges innsats i Afghanistan” [Norway’s Efforts in Afghanistan]. Dagbladet, December 26.
   Google Scholar
• van der Lijn, Jaïr. “Comprehensive Approaches, Diverse Coherences: The Different Levels of Policy Coherence in the Dutch 3D Approach in Afghanistan.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 26, no. 1 (2015): 72–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2014.959773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Michael J. “Empire Lite Revisited: NATO, the Comprehensive Approach and State-building in Afghanistan.” International Peacekeeping 18, no. 1 (2011): 64–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2011.527513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar