What does gender got to do with it? PMSCs and privatization of security revisited

Bibliography

• Abrahamsen, Rita, and Michael Williams. “Security beyond the State: Global Security Assemblages in International Politics1.” International Political Sociology 3 (2009): 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00060.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Academi. “Careers.” 2015. http://www.academi.com/pages/careers
   Google Scholar
• AECOM. “Government.” 2016. http://www.aecom.com/markets/government
   Google Scholar
• Åhäll, Linda, and Laura J. Shepherd. Gender, Agency and Political Violence. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• AKE. “About AKE.” 2015. http://www.akegroup.com/about-ake
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah D. The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Frank J. “The Organizational Construction of Masculinity: The Case of the US Navy.” In The Masculinities Reader, edited by Frank J. Barrett and Stephen M. Whitehead, 77–99. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin, Aaron. Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire 1898-2001. London: Hurst/Columbia, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Berndtsson, Joakim. “Security Professionals for Hire: Exploring the Many Faces of Private Security Expertise.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40, no. 2 (2011): 303–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811425635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethke Elsthain, Jean. Women and War: With a New Epilogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bethke Elsthain, Jean. “Women and War: Ten Years On.” Review of International Studies 24, no. 4 (1998): 447–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598004471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BH Defense. “Why Choose Us.” 2015. http://www.bhdefense.com/the-stakes/why-choose-us
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, Eric M. “Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28, no. 4 (2003): 1289–1312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/368328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiker, Roland. “Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43, no. 3 (2015): 872–890. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815583084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blue Hackle. “Our People.” 2013. http://www.bluehackle.com/our-people
   Google Scholar
• Blue Hackle. “Blue Hackle.” 2015a. www.bluehackle.com
   Google Scholar
• Blue Hackle. “Services.” 2015b. http://www.bluehackle.com/?page_id=88
   Google Scholar
• Blue Hackle. “U.S. Government.” 2015c. http://www.bluehackle.com/?page_id=161
   Google Scholar
• Britam Defence. “Company Overview.” 2017. http://www.britamdefence.com/company_overview.php
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Doug. “‘Stopping Traffick’: TCNs and the Challenges of Human Resources in Stability Operations.” International Journal of Peace Operations 7, no. 6 (2011): 39.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Doug. “Attention: Trafficking. Translating Policy Initiatives in to Successful Compliance.” International Journal of Peace Operations 7, no. 5 (2012): 20.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, Alexander, and Alan Levine. “Web 2.0 Storytelling: Emergence of a New Genre.” EDUCAUSE Review, no. November/December (2008): 40–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, Sarah, and Maya Eichler. “Unmaking Militarized Masculinity: Veterans and the Project of Military-to-Civilian Transition.” Critical Military Studies 3, no. 2 (2017): 161–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2017.1320055.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• CACI. “Great Pride.” 2014a. http://www.caci.com/job/military.shtml
   Google Scholar
• CACI. “Veterans.” August 28, 2014b. http://www.caci.com/job/vets.shtml
   Google Scholar
• CACI. “CACI’s Missions.” 2015. http://www.caci.com/about/mission_lv.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, David. “Geopolitics and Visuality: Sighting the Darfur Conflict.” Political Geography 26, no. 4 (2007): 357–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, David. “The Iconography of Famine.” In Picturing Atrocity: Reading Photographs in Crisis, edited by Geoffrey Batchen, Mick Gidley, Nancy K. Miller, and Jay Prosser, 168–176. London: Reaktion Books, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Centerra. “Governance.” 2015. http://www.centerragroup.com/governance.html
   Google Scholar
• Centurion. “Centurion.” 2016. http://www.centurionsafety.net
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, Partap. “Doing the Dirty Work.” Colorlines: The National Newsmagazine on Race and Politics, no. September (2006): 33.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, Partap. “Not Necessarily a Glamorous Existence: Tough Choice Faces Many Third Country Nationals.” Journal of Peace Operations, no. 4 (2009): 19–20.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, Amanda. “The Silenced and Indispensible.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 16, no. 1 (2014): 26–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2013.781441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, Amanda, and Maya Eichler. “Reproductions of Global Security: Accounting for the Private Security Household.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 20, no. 4 (2018): 563–582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1516512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, Amanda, and Joanna Tidy. “Beyond the Hegemonic in the Study of Militaries, Masculinities, and War.” Critical Military Studies 3, no. 2 (2017): 99–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2017.1328182.
   Google Scholar
• Citadel Maritime. “Social Responsibility.” 2016. http://www.citadel-maritime.com/general/social_responsibility
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W. The Men and the Boys. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. “Change among the Gatekeepers: Men, Masculinities, and Gender Equality in the Global Arena.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30, no. 3 (2005): 1801–1825. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/427525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, Andrea, and Nancy Lindisfarne. “Dislocating Masculinity. Gender, Power and Anthropology.” In Dislocating Masculinity. Comparative Ethnographies, edited by Andrea Cornwall and Nancy Lindisfarne, 11–47. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• CorpWatch. “Houston, We Still Have a Problem: An Alternative Report on Halliburton.” 2004.
   Google Scholar
• CorpWatch. “Houston, We Still Have a Problem: An Alternative Report on Halliburton.” 2005.
   Google Scholar
• CorpWatch. “Hurricane Halliburton: Conflict, Climate Change and Catastrophe. An Alternative Report on Haliburton.” 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cubic. “2011 Annual Report.” 2011. https://www.cubic.com/Portals/0/Cubic_Annual_Report_2011_%20Editorial1_11_12.pdf?ver=2012-01-10-142718-000
   Google Scholar
• Cubic. “About Cubic Global Defense.” 2015a. http://www.cubic.com/Global-Defense/About-CGD
   Google Scholar
• Cubic. “Global Defense.” 2015b. http://www.cubic.com/Global-Defense
   Google Scholar
• Cubic. “National Security Solutions.” 2015c. http://www.cubic.com/Global-Defense/National-Security
   Google Scholar
• Cusumano, Eugenio. “Private Military and Security Companies’ Logos: Between Camouflaging and Corporate Socialization.” Security Dialogue 52, no. 2 (2020): 135–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010620923586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandeker, Christopher, Simon Wessely, Amy Iversen, and John Ross. “What’s in a Name? Defining and Caring for ‘Veterans’: The United Kingdom in International Perspective.” Armed Forces & Society 32, no. 2 (2006): 161–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X05279177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank. “Kommunales Vermögen.” 2016. http://www.deutsche-bank.de/ioek
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson, Claire. “Forces for Good? Narratives of Military Masculinity in Peacekeeping Operations.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 11, no. 1 (2009): 63–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740802567808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynsafe. “Our Values.” 2016. http://www.minetech.co.uk/who-we-are/corporate-values
   Google Scholar
• Eichler, Maya. “Gender and the Privatization of Military Security: An Introduction.” In Gender and Private Security in Global Politics, edited by Maya Eichler, 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Engility. “Business Support Services.” 2015a. http://www.engilitycorp.com/service-offerings/program-business-support-services
   Google Scholar
• Engility. “History.” 2015b. http://www.engilitycorp.com/about/history
   Google Scholar
• Engility. “Specialized Technical Consulting.” 2015c. http://www.engilitycorp.com/service-offerings/specialized-technical-consulting
   Google Scholar
• Engility. “U.S. Army.” 2016. www.engilitycorp.com/who-we-serve/army/
   Google Scholar
• Esrock, Stuart L., and Greg B. Leichty. “Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-Presentation or Agenda-Setting?” Public Relations Review 24, no. 3 (1998): 305–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80142-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, Volker. Preparing for Peace: Military Identity, Value Orientations, and Professional Military Education. London: Praeger, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• FSI Worldwide. “Consultancy.” 2016. http://www.fsi-worldwide.com/index.php/services/consultancy#.Vmqfm7_2eJw
   Google Scholar
• FSI Worldwide. “History.” 2017. http://www.fsi-worldwide.com/index.php/about-us/history#.WL1EI_JMa0h
   Google Scholar
• G4S. “With Employees.” 2014. http://www.g4s.com/en/Social%20Responsibility/Securing%20our%20people/Diversity%20and%20inclusion
   Google Scholar
• G4S. “Our Priorities.” 2016a. http://www.g4s.com/en/SocialResponsibility/Ourcommitmentandapproach/OurPriorities
   Google Scholar
• G4S. “Services.” 2016b. http://www.g4s.com/en/Whatwedo/Services
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Joshua S. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Grespin, Whitney. “Anatomy of a Kidnapping: Helping Companies and Individuals Understand the Process and Aftermath of Incident.” Journal of International Peace Operations 7 (2012): 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Greystone. “Ground Support.” 2016. http://www.greystone-ltd.com/ground.html
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Lene. “Theorizing the Image for Security Studies: Visual Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis.” European Journal of International Relations 17, no. 1 (2011): 51–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110388593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Lene. “How Images Make World Politics: International Icons and the Case of Abu Ghraib.” Review of International Studies 41, no. 2 (2015): 263–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeg, Maruska J. “When Are States Hypermasculine.” In Gender and International Security. Feminist Perspectives, edited by Laura Sjoberg, 235–255. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Higate, Paul. “In the Business of (In)security? Mavericks, Mercenaries and Masculinites in the Private Security Company.” In Making Gender, Making War: Violence, Military and Peacekeeping Practices, edited by Paul Higate, 182–196. London and New York: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Higate, Paul, and Marsha Henry. “Engendering (In)security in Peace Support Operations.” Security Dialogue 35, no. 4 (2004): 481–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010604049529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, Ramon. “Doing Hegemony: Military, Men, and Constructing a Hegemonic Masculinity.” The Journal of Men’s Studies 18, no. 2 (2010): 179–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1802.179.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, Charlotte. “Masculinist Practices and Gender Politics: The Operation of Multiple Masculinities in International Relations.” In The ‘Man’ Question in International Relations, edited by Marysia Zalewski and Jane Parpart, 28–53. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, Charlotte. “Masculinities, IR and the ‘Gender Variable’: A Cost-Benefit Analysis for (Sympathetic) Gender Sceptics.” Review of International Studies 25, no. 3 (1999): 475–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599004751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, Charlotte. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hopton, John. “The State and Military Masculinity.” In Military Masculinities: Identity and the State, edited by Paul Higate, 111–123. Westport: Praeger, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, Emma. “A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami.” International Political Sociology 8, no. 1 (2014): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPOA. “State of the Peace & Stability Operations Industry.” 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, Sheila. “Double Jeopardy: Women, the US Military and the War in Iraq.” Women’s Studies International Forum 30, no. 1 (2007): 16–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2006.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jester, Natalie. “Army Recruitment Video Advertisements in the US and UK since 2002: Challenging Ideals of Hegemonic Military Masculinity?” Media, War & Conflict 14, no. 1 (2019): 57–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219859488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joachim, Jutta, and Andrea Schneiker. “Of ‘True Professionals’ and ‘Ethical Hero Warriors’: A Gender-Discourse Analysis of Private Military and Security Companies.” Security Dialogue 43, no. 6 (2012): 495–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612463488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joachim, Jutta, and Andrea Schneiker. “The License to Exploit: PMSCs, Masculinities, and Third-Country Nationals.” In Gender and Private Security in Global Politics, edited by Maya Eichler, 114–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, Jutta, and Andrea Schneiker. Private Security and Identity Politics Ethical Hero Warriors, Professional Managers and New Humanitarians. London and New York: Routledge, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Michael. “Men, Feminism, and Men’s Contradictory Experiences of Power.” In Theorizing Masculinities, edited by Harry Brod and Michael Kaufman, 142–163. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, Michael S. “Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame, and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity.” In Theorizing Masculinities, edited by Harry Brod and Michael Kaufman, 119–141. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Kompella, Kartikeya. “Branding with a Cause.” In The Definitive Book of Branding, edited by Kartikeya Kompella, 171–199. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Krahmann, Elke. “Germany. Civilian Power Revisited.” In Commercialising Security in Europe. Political Consequences for Peace Operations, edited by Anna Leander, 161–180. London and New York: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kronsell, Annica. “Gendered Practices in Institutions of Hegemonic Masculinity: Reflections from Feminist Standpoint Theory.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7, no. 2 (June 2005): 280–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740500065170.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, Anna. “The Power to Construct International Security: On the Significance of Private Military Companies.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33, no. 3 (2005): 803–825. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330030601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, Anna, and Rens van Munster. “Private Security Contractors in the Debate about Darfur: Reflecting and Reinforcing Neo-Liberal Governmentality.” International Relations 21, no. 2 (2007): 201–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117807077004.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Megan. Beyond the Band of Brothers: The US Military and the Myth that Women Can’t Fight. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, Katharine M., and Joanna Tidy. “Combat as a Moving Target: Masculinities, the Heroic Soldier Myth, and Normative Martial Violence.” Critical Military Studies 3, no. 2 (2017): 142–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2017.1302556.
   Google Scholar
• Niva, Steve. “Tough and Tender: New World Order Masculinity and the Gulf War.” In The “Man” Question in International Relations, edited by Marysia Zalewski and Jane Parpart, 109–128. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• PAE. “Doing Business with PAE.” 2016. http://www.pae.com/about-pae/doing-business-pae
   Google Scholar
• Pax Mondial. “Conflict Mitigation.” 2016. http://www.paxmondial.com/services/conflict-mitigation
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Alan. “Research on Men and Masculinities: Some Implications of Recent Theory for Future Work.” Men and Masculinities 6, no. 1 (2003): 54–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X02250843.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, V. Spike. “Security and Sovereign States: What Is at Stake in Taking Feminism Seriously.” In Gendered States: Feminist (Re-)visions of International Relations Theory, edited by V. Spike Peterson, 31–64. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, Michael G., and Anat Rafaeli. “Organizational Dress as a Symbol of Multilayered Social Identities.” The Academy of Management Journal 40, no. 4 (1997): 862–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, Nicola. “Reconceptualizing Gender, Reinscribing Racial–Sexual Boundaries in International Security: The Case of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on ‘Women, Peace and Security’1.” International Studies Quarterly 57, no. 4 (2013): 772–783. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers. “PWC.” 2016. www.pwc.com/#2
   Google Scholar
• Prividera, Laura C., and John W. Howard III. “Masculinity, Whiteness, and the Warrior Hero: Perpetuating the Strategic Rhetoric of U.S. Nationalism and the Marginalization of Women.” Women and Language 29, no. 2 (2006): 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Pudrovska, Tetyana, and Myra Marx Ferree. “Global Activism in ‘Virtual Space’: The European Women’s Lobby in the Network of Transnational Women’s NGOs on the Web.” International Studies in Gender, State & Society 11, no. 1 (2004): 117–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, J. 2013. “10 Ways Military Veterans are Ideal for Physical Security Sector.” Security Magazine. https://www.securitymagazine.com/articles/84184-ways-military-veterans-are-ideal-for-physical-security-sector
   Google Scholar
• Relyant Global. “Overview.” 2016. http://www.gorelyant.com/about-relyant
   Google Scholar
• Rhodius. “Intelligence and Investigations.” 2016. http://www.rhodius-srm.com/intelligence-and-investigations
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Catherine V. “Rescue in the Age of Empire: Children, Masculinity, and the War on Terror.” In (En)gendering the War on Terror: War Stories and Camouflaged Politics, edited by Kim Rygiel and Krista Hunt, 97–117. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Laura J. “Visualising Violence: Legitimacy and Authority in the ‘War on Terror’.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 1, no. 2 (2008): 213–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17539150802184611.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Laura J. “Introduction: Rethinking Gender, Agency and Political Violence.” In Gender, Agency and Political Violence, edited by Linda Åhäll and Laura J. Shepherd, 1–18. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, and Stengel. “Social Media, Gender and the Mediatization of War: Exploring the German Armed Forces’ Visual Representation of the Afghanistan Operation on Facebook.” Global Discourse 7, no. 2 (2017): 330–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1337982.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. W. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, Laura. Gendering Global Conflict: Toward a Feminist Theory of War. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, Laura, and Caron E. Gentry. Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women’s Violence in Global Politics. London: Zed Books, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• SOC. “Latest News.” 2017. http://www.soc-usa.com/news/?id=113
   Google Scholar
• Spartent. “About Us.” 2015. http://www.spartentgs.com/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Stachowitsch, Saskia. “The Reconstruction of Masculinities in Global Politics: Gendering Strategies in the Field of Private Security.” Men and Masculinities 18, no. 3 (2014): 363–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X14551205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling Global. “Supports.” 2014. http://www.sterlinggo.com/about/overview
   Google Scholar
• Sterling Global. “Our Ethics.” 2015. http://www.sterlinggo.com/about/ethics
   Google Scholar
• Strand, Sanna, and Joakim Berndtsson. “Recruiting the ‘Enterprising Soldier’: Military Recruitment Discourses in Sweden and the United Kingdom.” Critical Military Studies 1, no. 3 (2015): 233–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2015.1090676.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. Ann. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gilder, Bobbi J. “Femininity as Perceived Threat to Military Effectiveness: How Military Service Members Reinforce Hegemonic Masculinity in Talk.” Western Journal of Communication 83, no. 2 (2019): 151–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2018.1502892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadley, Jonathan D. “Gendering the State: Performativity and Protection in International Security.” In Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives, edited by Laura Sjoberg, 38–58. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Warkentin, Craig. Reshaping World Politics NGOs, the Internet, and Global Civil Society. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, Richard D., and Paul M. Jones. “Using Video to Build an Organization’s Identity and Brand: A Content Analysis of Nonprofit Organizations’ YouTube Videos.” Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 23, no. 3 (2011): 248–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2011.594779.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Cynthia. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. 2nd ed. Routledge: London and New York, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Werhane, Patricia H., Margaret Posig, Lisa Gundry, Elizabeth Powell, Jane Carlson, and Laurel Ofstein. “Management, Gender, and Ethnicity in the United States. Women Leaders in Corporate America: A Study of Leadership Values and Methods.” In Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in the Workplace: Issues and Challenges for Today’s Organizations, edited by Margaret Foegen Karsten, 1–29. Westport: Praeger, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Rachel. “Warrior Heroes and Little Green Men: Soldiers, Military Training, and the Construction of Rural Masculinities.” Rural Sociology 65, no. 4 (2009): 640–657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00048.x.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Rachel, and K. Neil Jenkings. “Military Identities in the Situated Accounts of British Military Personnel.” Sociology 45, no. 2 (2011): 252–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510394016.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Rachel, and Patricia Winter. “Discourses of Gender in the Contemporary British Army.” Armed Forces & Society 30, no. 2 (2004): 279–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X0403000207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurich Insurance. “Zurich.” 2016. http://www.zurich.com
   Google Scholar