Dynamics of peace or legacy of rebel governance? Patterns of cooperation between FARC-ex-combatants and conflict-affected communities in Colombia

Bibliography

• Acosta-Navas, Diana, and Carlos Felipe Reyes. “From Combatants’ Boots Reincorporation and Reconciliation.” In Truth, Justice and Reconciliation in Colombia, edited by Fabio A. Díaz Pabón, 119–135. London: Routledge. 2018. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315148373-8/combatants-boots-diana-acosta-navas-carlos-felipe-reyes
   Google Scholar
• Agencia para la Reincorporación y la Normalización. Así avanca la reincorporación. 2020. Accessed October 29, 2021. http://www.reincorporacion.gov.co/es/reincorporacion/La%20Reincorporacion%20en%20cifras/Reincorporacio%CC%81n%20en%20cifras%20-%20corte%2030042020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Agencia para la Reincorporación y la Normalización. Nuestra Entidad. (2021). https://www.reincorporacion.gov.co/es/agencia/Documentos%20de%20ARN%20en%20Cifras/ARN_en_Cifras_corte_septiembre_2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ansorg, Nadine, and Sabine Kurtenbach, eds. Institutional Reforms and Peacebuilding: Change, Path-Dependency and Societal Divisions in Post-War Communities. London, GB, AU, NZ, ZA: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Arjona, Ana. Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge, New York, NY, Port Melbourne, VIC, Delhi, Singapore: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Arjona, Ana, Nelson Kasfir, and Zachariah C. Mampilly, eds. Rebel Governance in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, Séverine. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. 3rd printing ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Azar, Edward E. The Management of Protracted Social Conflict: Theory and Cases. Aldershot, Hampshire: Dartmouth, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Bakonyi, Jutta, Stephan Hensell, and Jens Siegelberg. Gewaltordnungen bewaffneter Gruppen: Ökonomie und Herrschaft nichtstaatlicher Akteure in den Kriegen der Gegenwart. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker. “Looking beyond Institutional Reform. Engaging with the Hybridization of Peace and Political Order. Two Cases from Oceania and West Africa.“ In Institutional Reforms and Peacebuilding: Change, path-dependency and Societal Divisions in post-war Communities”. In Studies in Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding, edited by Nadine Ansorg and Sabine Kurtenbach, 218–236. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker, Anne Brown, Kevin Clements, and Anna Nolan. “Building Peace and Political Community in Hybrid Political Orders.” International Peacekeeping 16, no. 5 (2009): 599–615. doi:10.1080/13533310903303248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brück, Tilman, Patricia Justino, Philip Verwimp, and Andrew Tedesco. Measuring Conflict Exposure in Micro-Level Surveys: The Conflict Survey Sourcebook. SIPRI Policy Brief. 2013. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/files/misc/SIPRIPB1310.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. Social Research Methods. 4. ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bultmann, Daniel. “The Social Structure of Armed Groups. Reproduction and Change during and after Conflict.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 29, no. 4 (2018): 607–628. doi:10.1080/09592318.2018.1488402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, David “Insurgency as a Struggle for Legitimation: The Case of Southern Africa.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 5, no. 1 (1994): 29–61. doi:10.1080/09592319408423068.
   Google Scholar
• Burnyeat, Gwen. The Face of Peace: Government Pedagogy Amidst Disinformation in Colombia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, Julia. Reintegration and Long-Term Development: Linkages and Challenges. Bradford, 2008. Accessed October 12, 2017. http://lekiworld.com/AU/docs/45.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carranza-Franco, Francy. Demobilisation and Reintegration in Colombia: Building State and Citizenship. Routledge Studies in Latin American Development. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Castrillón-Torres, Ghina A., and Helver J. Cadavid-Ramirez. “Proceso de paz entre gobierno colombiano y las FARC-EP: Camino hacia la reincorporación de combatientes.” Entramado 14, no. 2 (2018): 148–165. doi:10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.4755.
   Google Scholar
• Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. Guerrilla y población civil. Trayectoria de las FARC 1949-2013. 3rd ed. Bogotá: CNMH, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. Caquetá: Conflicto y memoria. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• CINEP. Caso tipo n.° 15 Caquetá. Rastreo de una barbarie silenciada. 2019. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.academia.edu/41328766/Caquet%C3%A1_Rastreo_de_una_barbarie_silenciada
   Google Scholar
• Comisión de Historia del Conflicto y sus Víctimas (CHCV). Contribución al entendimiento del conflicto armado en Colombia. Accessed July 13, 2022. https://indepaz.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Version-final-informes-CHCV.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Comisión para el Esclarecimiento de la Verdad, la convivencia y la no repetición (CEV). Informe final: Hallazgos y recomendaciones. Bogotá: CEV, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Fletcher D., Timothy D. Sisk, and Elizabeth Hester. “Introduction.” In Peacebuilding in Deeply Divided Societies: Toward Social Cohesion? Edited by Timothy D. Sisk and Fletcher D. Cox. 1–12. Springer eBook Collection Political Science and International Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dirkx, Toon. “The Institutional Legacies of Rebel Governance. Theorising the Political Stability of Post-Insurgent States.” Swiss Peace Working Papers, no. 1. (2020): 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez, Cancelado, and F. José. “Las FARC-EP: De la guerra de guerrillas al control territorial.” Universidad del Valle, 2011. Accessed October 29, 2021. http://repository.icesi.edu.co/biblioteca_digital/handle/10906/80466
   Google Scholar
• Duyvesteyn, Isabelle. “Rebels & Legitimacy; An Introduction.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 28, no. 4–5 (2017): 669–685. doi:10.1080/09592318.2017.1322337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck, Kristine. “Survey Research in Conflict and Post-conflict Societies.” In Understanding Peace Research: Methods and Challenges, edited by Kristine Höglund and Magnus Oberg, 177–194. London: Routledge, 2011. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203828557-19/survey-research-conflict-post-conflict-societies-kristine-eck
   Google Scholar
• Ernesto, Cardenas, Kristian S. Gleditsch, and Luis C. Guevara. “Network Structure of Insurgent Groups and the Success of DDR Processes in Colombia.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 29, no. 4 (2018): 754–775. doi:10.1080/09592318.2018.1488416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada Álvarez, Jairo, and Ana M. González Suárez, eds. El acuerdo de paz en Colombia: Entre la perfidia y la potencia transformadora. Primera edición ed. Bogotá: CEPDIPO, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Feldmann, Andreas E. Will Colombia’s peace accord boost its democracy. 2017 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Accessed October 29, 2021. http://carnegieendowment.org/2017/07/13/will-colombia-s-peace-accord-boost-its-democracy-pub-71524
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, Henrique, Mírian Oliveira, Milton Jenkins, and Oveta Popjoy. “The Focus Group, a Qualitative Research Method: ISRC Working Paper 010298.” Merrick School of Business, University of Baltimore (MD, EUA), 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Fundación Ideas para la Paz. Conflicto armado en Caquetá y Putumayo y su impacto humanitario. 2014. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.ideaspaz.org/publications/posts/1012
   Google Scholar
• Fundación Ideas para la Paz. Huila y Caquetá: Capacidades locales para la paz. 2015. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.ideaspaz.org/especiales/capacidades-locales-para-la-paz/descargas/FIP_CartillasRegiones_05HuilaCaqueta.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John, and Lee Cojocaru. “Selecting Cases for Intensive Analysis.” Sociological Methods & Research 45, no. 3 (2016): 392–423. doi:10.1177/0049124116631692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraldo Zuluaga, César. “La historia de violencia en Algeciras que parece repetirse.” El Espectador. June 5, 2021. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.elespectador.com/colombia-20/conflicto/la-historia-de-violencia-en-algeciras-que-parece-repetirse-article/
   Google Scholar
• Gobierno Nacional de Colombia. “FARC-EP, and países garantes.” Acuerdo Final para la Terminación del Conflicto y la Construcción de una Paz Estable y Duradera. 2016. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.jep.gov.co/Marco%20Normativo/Normativa_v2/01%20ACUERDOS/Texto-Nuevo-Acuerdo-Final.pdf?csf=1&e=0fpYA0
   Google Scholar
• González, Arias, and J. José. “El Huila: ¿por la tierra prometida?” Ciudad Paz-ando Bogotá 4, 2. 2012: 135–142. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/0e1881_1e5520077e384b6389fefe4827e7969e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• González Posso, Camilo. Los Focos del Conflicto en Colombia: Informe sobre presencia de grupos armados. indepaz. 2021. Accessed February 10, 2022. http://www.indepaz.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/INFORME-DE-GRUPOS-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Sanín, Francisco. “Organization and Governance: The Evolution of Urban Militias in Medellín, Colombia.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by Ana Arjona, Nelson Kasfir, and Zachariah C. Mampilly, 246–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hagman, Lotta, and Zoe Nielsen. A framework for lasting disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration of former combatants in crisis situations: IPA Workshop Report. Australian Outlook. 2002. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/framework_for_ddr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hensell, Stephan, and Felix Gerdes. “Exit from War: The Transformation of Rebels into post-war Power Elites.” Security Dialogue 48, no. 2 (2017): 168–184. doi:10.1177/0967010616677713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensell, Stephan, and Schlichte Klaus. “Gewalt und Legitimität: Die internationale Politik bewaffneter Gruppen.” In Krieg im 21. Jahrhundert: Konzepte, Akteure, Herausforderungen, edited by Ehrhart Hans-Georg. 28–213. Demokratie, Sicherheit, Frieden Band 220. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017. 1. Auflage.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, Castañeda, and B. Karen. “Estrategias de Resiliencia adoptadas ante los efectos del Conflicto Armado en la Dimensión Humana y Alimentaria de la SAN, por las personas del municipio de Algeciras – Huila que resistieron en el territorio.” Master Thesis. Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Nutrición Humana, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2019. Accessed February 10, 2022. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/handle/unal/77952/1032430535.2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas. Caquetá. Construcción de un territorio amazónico en el siglo XX. Bogotá: Editorial Tercer Mundo, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas. Balance anual sobre el estado de los ecosistemas y el ambiente de la Amazonia colombiana 2006. Bogotá: Instituto Sinchi, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. “In the Shadow of ‘No’: Peace after Colombia’s Plebiscite.” Latin America Report N°60. 2017. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.crisisgroup.org/latin-america-caribbean/andes/colombia/060-shadow-no-peace-after-colombia-s-plebiscite
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants - Guidelines. Geneva, 2009. Accessed October 29, 2021. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/documents/instructionalmaterial/wcms_141276.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jenss, Alke. “Criminal Heterarchy and Its Critics: Governance and the Making of Insecurity in Colombia.” Global Crime 19, no. 3–4 (2018): 250–270. doi:10.1080/17440572.2018.1471992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justino, Patricia. “Research and Policy Implications from A Micro-Level Perspective on the Dynamics of Conflict, Violence, and Development.” In A micro-level Perspective on the Dynamics of Conflict, Violence, and Development. Edited by Patricia Justino 1ed. 290–305. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, Stathis N. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Oliver, and Enzo Nussio. “Explaining Recidivism of Ex-combatants in Colombia”. Journal of Conflict Resolution 62, no. 1 (2018): 64–93. doi:10.1177/0022002716644326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasfir, Nelson. “Rebel Governance – Constructing a Field of Inquiry: Definitions, Scope, Patterns, Order, Causes.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by Ana Arjona, Nelson Kasfir, and Zachariah C. Mampilly, 21–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, Jenny. “Qualitative Research. Introducing Focus Groups.” BMJ 311, no. 7000 (1995): 299–302. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger, Heike. “International Law and Governance by Armed Groups: Caught in the Legitimacy Trap?” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12, no. 4 (2018): 563–583. doi:10.1080/17502977.2018.1504489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroc Institute. Three Years after the Signing of the Final Agreement in Colombia: Moving toward Territorial Transformation. 2020. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://peaceaccords.nd.edu/fourthreport
   Google Scholar
• Kroc Institute. “Fifth Kroc Institute Report on Colombian Peace Agreement Shows Continued Progress despite Adversity.” 2021. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://kroc.nd.edu/news-events/news/fifth-kroc-institute-report-on-colombian-peace-agreement-shows-continued-progress-despite-adversity/
   Google Scholar
• Kurtenbach, Sabine. “The Challenges of Institutional Reforms in the Midst of War. Lessons from Colombia.” In Institutional Reforms and Peacebuilding: Change, Path-Dependency and Societal Divisions in Post-War Communities, edited by Nadine Ansorg and Sabine Kurtenbach, 93–113. London, GB, AU, NZ, ZA: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, Margaret, Audrey Sacks, and Tom Tyler. “Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs.” American Behavioral Scientist 53, no. 3 (2009): 354–375. doi:10.1177/0002764209338797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londoño, Juan F. “El próximo plebiscito será la elección de 2018.” Semana, January 6, 2017. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.semana.com/opinion/articulo/elecciones-presidenciales-2018-en-colombia-el-momento-para-decidir-por-la-paz/527129/
   Google Scholar
• Macartan, Humphreys, and Jeremy M. Weinstein. “Demobilization and Reintegration.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51, no. 4 (2007): 531–567. doi:10.1177/0022002707302790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. “Everyday Peace: Bottom-up and Local Agency in conflict-affected Societies.” Security Dialogue 45, no. 6 (2014): 548–564. doi:10.1177/0967010614550899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malthaner, Stefan. “Violence, Legitimacy, and Control: The Microdynamics of Support Relationships between Militant Groups and Their Social Environment.” Civil Wars 17, no. 4 (2015): 425–445. doi:10.1080/13698249.2015.1115575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, Montoya, and M. Angie. “Limitaciones en la implementación de la ruta PDET: Algeciras, Huila: Programa Manos a la paz - IV generación.” Master Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolivár, 01/2018. Accessed February 10, 2022. http://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12585/836/0072980.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Matanock, Aila M., and Miguel García-Sánchez. “The Colombian Paradox: Peace Processes, Elite Divisions & Popular Plebiscites.” Daedalus 146, no. 4 (2017): 152–166. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew, Charles, Başar Baysal, and Juan D. Forero. “A Criminal Peace. Mapping the Murders of Ex-FARC Combatants: Documentos OCCO.” The Colombian Observatory of Organized Crime Working Paper Series. Bogotá: Universidad del Rosario, 2020 2.CIDOB. Conflicto en Colombia: antecedentes históricos y actores. Accessed October 29, 2021. http://www.cidob.org/publicaciones/documentacion/dossiers/dossier_proceso_de_paz_en_colombia/dossier_proceso_de_paz_en_colombia/conflicto_en_colombia_antecedentes_historicos_y_actores
   Google Scholar
• McFee, Erin, Kyle Johnson, and Mateo Adarve. “Aprender a ser en la Colombia del posacuerdo: Relaciones integrupales entre los exguerrilleros de las FARC-EP, la ONU y las comunidades.” In Excombatientes y acuerdo de paz con las FARC-EP en Colombia: Balance de la etapa temprana, edited by Angelika Rettberg Beil and Erin McFee, 189–224. 2019. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes-Universidad de los Andes.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, David L. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. California: SAGE Publications, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Museo de Memoria de Colombia. Algeciras. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://museodememoria.gov.co/algeciras/
   Google Scholar
• n.a. “Primer pueblo socialista del país fundado por exmiembros de las Farc.” El Tiempo, October 23, 2017. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.eltiempo.com/politica/proceso-de-paz/el-pueblo-fundado-por-exguerrilleros-de-las-farc-en-caqueta-143838
   Google Scholar
• n.a. “‘Participamos en elecciones a pesar de que no hubo garantías’: Partido FARC.” El Espectador. October 28, 2019. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.elespectador.com/colombia-20/paz-y-memoria/participamos-en-elecciones-a-pesar-de-que-no-hubo-garantias-partido-farc-article/
   Google Scholar
• Niño, Neira, and J. María Historias: La Unión Peneya, Montañita, Caquetá. Accessed October 29, 2021. http://rutasdelconflicto.com/pueblos-olvido/node/40
   Google Scholar
• Nullmeier, Frank, and Martin Nonhoff. “Der Wandel des Legitimitätsdenkens.” In Prekäre Legitimitäten: Rechtfertigung von Herrschaft in der postnationalen Konstellation, edited by Frank Nullmeier, et al., 16–44. Staatlichkeit im Wandel 14. Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verl, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, Hanna, and Regine Schwab. “Politicising the Rebel Governance Paradigm. Critical Appraisal and Expansion of a Research Agenda.” Small Wars and Insurgencies 0(0).
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, Alexandra. The FARC’s Transition to Colombian Democracy. Australian Outlook. 2017. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/farc-transition-colombian-democracy/
   Google Scholar
• Podder, Sukanya. “Mainstreaming the non-state in bottom-up state-building: Linkages between Rebel Governance and post-conflict Legitimacy.” Conflict, Security & Development 14, no. 2 (2014): 213–243. doi:10.1080/14678802.2014.889878.
   Google Scholar
• Podder, Sukanya. “Understanding the Legitimacy of Armed Groups: A Relational Perspective.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 28, no. 4–5 (2017): 686–708. doi:10.1080/09592318.2017.1322333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettberg Beil, Angelika. La construcción de la paz como una disputa a largo plazo por el contrato social en Colombia: desafíos y oportunidades del nuevo Acuerdo de paz. 2018. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/kolumbien/17360.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0hSVOqCywCPFqEH7ntGvcnQefhq9IbV06dsmC4XeWeKNxZyIvJFJMjekc
   Google Scholar
• Rettberg Beil, Angelika, and Erin McFee eds. Excombatientes y acuerdo de paz con las FARC-EP en Colombia: Balance de la etapa temprana. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes-Universidad de los Andes, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Solveig, and Siddharth Tripathi. “Blended Legitimacy in the Dynamics of State Formation: EU Peace Missions and Informal Power Networks.” Working Paper. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas. “Limited Statehood: A Critical Perspective.” In Transformations of the State, Edited by Stephan Leibfried, Zürn Michel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 152–169. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas, and Eric Stollenwerk. “Legitimacy in Areas of Limited Statehood”. Annual Review of Political Science 21, no. 1 (2018): 403–418. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-023610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, Haer, Johannes Vüllers, and Nils B. Weidmann. “Studying Micro Dynamics in Civil Wars: Introduction.” Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 8, no. 2 (2019): 151–159. doi:10.1007/s42597-019-00018-9.
   Google Scholar
• Sabogal, Barrios, and C. Laura. “Beyond Victimization: Agency of Former Female FARC-EP Combatants in Colombia.” Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 10, no. 1 (2021): 83–101. doi:10.1007/s42597-020-00054-w.
   Google Scholar
• Sabogal, Barrios, C. Laura, Johana Bottia Díaz, Andrés Restrepo Correa, and Solveig Richter. “¡El nivel local sí hace la diferencia! Patrones de cooperación entre reincorporados de las FARC-EP y comunidades afectadas por el conflicto.” Policy Brief. Bogotá, no. 1 (2020). 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sabogal, Barrios, C. Laura, and Solveig Richter. “Las Farianas: Reintegration of Former Female FARC Fighters as a Driver for Peace in Colombia.” Cuadernos de Economía 38, no. 78 (2019): 753–784. doi:10.15446/cuad.econ.v38n78.73540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar, Luis G. S., Jonas Wolff, and Fabián E. Camelo. “Towards Violent Peace? Territorial Dynamics of Violence in Tumaco (Colombia) before and after the Demobilisation of the FARC-EP.” Conflict, Security & Development 19, no. 5 (2019): 497–520. doi:10.1080/14678802.2019.1661594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambanis, Nicholas. “What Is Civil War?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48, no. 6 (2004): 814–858. doi:10.1177/0022002704269355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichte, Klaus. “In the Shadow of Violence: The Politics of Armed Groups.” In Mikropolitik der Gewalt. Vol. 1. Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verl, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichte, Klaus, and Ulrich Schneckener. “Armed Groups and the Politics of Legitimacy.” Civil Wars 17, no. 4 (2015): 409–424. doi:10.1080/13698249.2015.1115573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelzle, Cord, and Eric Stollenwerk. “Virtuous or Vicious Circle? Governance Effectiveness and Legitimacy in Areas of Limited Statehood.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12, no. 4 (2018): 449–467. doi:10.1080/17502977.2018.1531649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, Julius, and Jackie Waterfield. “Focus Group Methodology: Some Ethical Challenges.” Quality & Quantity 53, no. 6 (2019): 3003–3022. doi:10.1007/s11135-019-00914-5.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström, Johanna. „focus Groups: Safety in Numbers?“ in Understanding Peace Research: Methods and Challenges, Edited by Kristine Höglund and Magnus Oberg. 146–164. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, Paul. “States, Insurgents, and Wartime Political Orders”. Perspectives on Politics 10, no. 2 (2012): 243–264. doi:10.1017/s1537592712000655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, Paul. “Leftist Insurgency in Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 54, no. 3–4 (2021): 518–552. doi:10.1177/0010414020938096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supelano, Peñaranda, and R. Daniel. “El Movimiento Armado Quintín Lame (MAQL): Una Guerra Dentro de Otra. With the Assistance of Agencia Sueca de Cooperación Internacional Para El Desarrollo, Colombia).” In Organización Internacional para las Migraciones (OIM-Misión, and Corporación N. A. Iris. Bogotá: Corporación Nuevo Arco iris, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Steven J., Robert Bogdan, and Marjorie L. DeVault. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. Fourth ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, Tatjana, Vetters Larissa, and von Benda-Beckmann Keebet. “Stategraphy: Toward a Relational Anthropology of the State.” Social Analysis 58, no. 3 (2014): 1–19. doi:10.3167/sa.2014.580302.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Andrew. “The Credible Commitment Problem and Multiple Armed Groups: FARC Perceptions of Insecurity during Disarmament in the Colombian Peace Process.” Conflict, Security & Development 20, no. 4 (2020): 497–517. doi:10.1080/14678802.2020.1794139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, Charles. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crimes.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol, 169–191. (1985). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torjesen, Stina. “Towards a Theory of ex-combatant Reintegration.” Stability: International Journal of Security & Development 2, no. 3 (2013): 63. doi:10.5334/sta.cx.
   Google Scholar
• Tull, D. M. “The Hidden Costs of power-sharing: Reproducing Insurgent Violence in Africa.” African Affairs 104, no. 416 (2005): 375–398. doi:10.1093/afraf/adi034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. “The Role of United Nations Peacekeeping in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Report of the Secretary-General.” 2000. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/role-united-nations-peacekeeping-disarmament-demobilization-and-reintegration-report
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards (IDDRS). 2006. Accessed October 29, 2021. http://pdf2.hegoa.efaber.net/entry/content/1511/IDDRS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. United Nations Verification Mission in Colombia: Report of the Secretary General. 2019; S/2019/988. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://undocs.org/en/S/2019/988
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. “The Role of United Nations Peacekeeping in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Report of the Secretary-General.” 2021; S/2000/101. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/407791
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Program. Demobilization and Reintegration of Combatants. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Program. Huila: Análisis de de la conflictividad. 2010. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://info.undp.org/docs/pdc/Documents/COL/00058220_Analisis%20de%20conflictividad%20Huila%20PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Caracterización comunidad FARC-EP: Resultados generales. 2021. Accessed October 29, 2021. http://pensamiento.unal.edu.co/fileadmin/recursos/focos/piensa-paz/docs/presentacion_censo_farc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez Delgado, Teófilo. “Territorios, conflicto armado y política en el Caquetá: 1900-2010: Cambio ambiental y movilidad humana en Colombia.” Ediciones Uniandes-Universidad de los Andes (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Vélez, Juanita “La última trinchera.” La Silla Vacía, May 9, 2016. Accessed February 10, 2022. https://www.lasillavacia.com/historias/silla-nacional/la-ultima-trinchera/
   Google Scholar
• Verwimp, Philip, Patricia Justino, and Tilman Brück. “The Analysis of Conflict: A Micro-Level Perspective.” Journal of Peace Research 46, no. 3 (2009): 307–314. doi:10.1177/0022343309102654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienand, Sandra. “Legacies of Militias in Post-Demobilization Contexts: Tracing ‘Militia Stakeholders’ in Guatemala and Colombia.” Sicherheit & Frieden 33, no. 4 (2015): 28–33. doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2015-4-28.
   Google Scholar
• Wolter, Detlev. A United Nations for the 21st Century: From Reaction to Prevention: Towards an Effective and Efficient International Regime for Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding. 1. Aufl. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zambrano Quintero, Liliana. “CIDOB - La reincorporación colectiva de las FARC-EP: Una apuesta estratégica en un entorno adverso.” CIDOB. (2019). http://www.cidob.org/es/articulos/revista_cidob_d_afers_internacionals/121/la_reincorporacion_colectiva_de_las_farc_ep_una_apuesta_estrategica_en_un_entorno_adverso
   Google Scholar
• Zirion Landaluze, Iker. “Los procesos de desarme, desmovilización y reintegración de excombatientes desde la perspectiva de género. ” Cuadernos de Trabajo Hegoa no. 58 (2012). https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/hegoa/article/view/10321
   Google Scholar
• Zukerman Daly, Sarah. Organized Violence after Civil War: The Geography of Recruitment in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar