Two-phase anaerobic digestion of partially acidified sewage sludge: a pilot plant study for safe sludge disposal in developing countries

References

• United Nations . 2010 . The Millennium Development Goals Report 2010 , New York : United Nations .
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez , B. , Barrios , J. A. , Mendez , J. M. and Diaz , J. 2004 . Sustainable sludge management in developing countries . Water Sci. Technol. , 49 : 251 – 258 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauerfeld , K. , Dockhorn , T. and Dichtl , N. 2008 . Sludge treatment and reuse considering different climates and varying other conditions—Export-oriented research for developing and threshold countries . J. Environ. Sci. Health. Part A , 43 : 1556 – 1561 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond , T. and Templeton , M. R. 2011 . History and future of domestic biogas plants in the developing world . Energy Sustainable Dev. , 15 : 347 – 354 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Sperling , M. 1996 . Comparison among the most frequently used systems for wastewater treatment in developing countries . Water Sci. Technol. , 33 : 59 – 72 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zao , Q. and Wang , B. Z. 1996 . Evaluation on a pilot-scale attached-growth pond system treating domestic wastewater . Water Res. , 30 : 242 – 245 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA . 1979 . “ Process design manual: sludge treatment and disposal ” . Cincinnati , OH : US Environmental Protection Agency . EPA 625/1-79-011
   Google Scholar
• USEPA . 1992 . “ Environmental regulations and technology: control of pathogens in municipal wastewater sludge ” . Cincinnati , OH : US Environmental Protection Agency . EPA/625-10-89-006
   Google Scholar
• Kim , M. , Ahn , Y. H. and Speece , R. E. 2003 . Hydrolysis and acidogenesis of particulate organic material in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion . Environ. Technol. , 24 : 1183 – 1190 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA . 1999 . Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater , 20 , Washington , DC : American Public Health Association .
   Google Scholar
• Tchobanoglous , G. , Burton , F. L. and Stensel , H. D. 2003 . “ Wastewater Engineering, Treatment and Reuse ” . In , 4 , New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Ponsà , S. , Ferrer , I. , Vazquez , F. and Font , X. 2008 . Optimization of the hydrolytic–acidogenic anaerobic digestion stage (55°C) of sewage sludge: Influence of pH and solid content . Water Res. , 42 : 3972 – 3980 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister , S. S. and Pretorius , W. A. 1998 . Optimization of primary sludge acidogenic fermentation for biological nutrient removal . Water SA , 24 : 35 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh , S. , Buoy , K. , Dressel , L. , Miller , T. , Wilcox , G. and Loos , D. 1995 . Pilot and full-scale two-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge . Water Environ. Res. , 67 : 206 – 214 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatziconstantinou , G. J. , Yannakopoulos , P. and Andreadakis , A. 1996 . Primary sludge hydrolysis for biological nutrient removal, . Water Sci. Technol. , 34 : 417 – 423 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rincòn , B. , Borja , R. , Gonzàlez , J. M. , Portillo , M. C. and Sàiz-Jiménez , C. 2008 . Influence of organic loading rate and hydraulic retention time on the performance, stability and microbial communities of one-stage anaerobic digestion of two-phase olive mill solid residue . Biochem. Eng. J. , 40 : 253 – 261 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Rubia , M. A. , Perez , M. , Romero , L. I. and Sales , D. 2006 . Effect of SRT on pilot scale anaerobic thermophilic sludge digestion . Process Biochem. , 41 : 79 – 86 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez , X. , Cuetos , M. J. , Cara , J. , Moram , A. and Garcia , A. I. 2006 . Anaerobic co-digestion of primary sludge and the fruit and vegetable fraction of the municipal solid wastes: Condition for mixing and evaluation of the organic loading rate . Renew. Energ. , 31 : 2017 – 2024 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchi , F. , Traverso , P. G. and Cescon , P. 1986 . Anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid wastes- performance digester . Sci. Total Environ. , 56 : 183 – 197 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe , H. , Kitamura , T. , Ochi , S. and Ozaki , M. 1997 . Inactivation of pathogenic bacteria under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions, . Water Sci. Technol. , 36 : 25 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith , S. R. , Lang , N. L. , Cheung , K. H.M. and Spanoudaki , K. 2005 . Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes, . Waste Manage. , 25 : 417 – 425 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazmi , A. A. , Tyagi , V. K. , Trivedi , R. C. and Kumar , A. 2008 . Coliforms removal in full-scale activated sludge plants in India, . J. Environ. Manage. , 87 : 415 – 419 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez , M. , Romero , L. I. and Sales , D. 2001 . Organic matter degradation kinetics in an anaerobic thermophilic fluidized bed bioreactor . Anaerobe , 7 : 25 – 35 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim , M. , Ahn , Y. H. and Speece , R. E. 2002 . Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic . Water Res. , 36 : 4369 – 4385 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirer , G. N. and Chen , S. 2005 . Two-phase anaerobic digestion of unscreened dairy manure . Process Biochem. , 40 : 3542 – 3549 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussati , M. C. , Aguirre , P. , Fuentes , M. and Scenna , N. 2006 . Aspects on methanogenic biofilm reactor modeling . Lat. Am. Appl. Res. , 36 : 173 – 180 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beux , S. , Nunes , E. and Barana , A. C. 2007 . Effects of temperature on two-phase anaerobic reactors treating slaughterhouse wastewater . Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. , 50 : 1061 – 1072 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mhnert , P. and Linke , B. 2009 . Kinetic study of biogas production from energy crops and animal waste slurry: Effect of organic loading rate and reactor size . Environ. Technol. , 30 : 93 – 99 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar