A modelling study and optimization of catalytic reduction of NO over CeO₂–MnO_x (0.25)–Ba mixed oxide catalyst using design of experiments

References

• Roy S, Hegde MS, Madras G. Catalysis for NOx abatement. Appl Energ. 2009;86:2283–2297. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basfar AA, Fageeha OI, Kunnummal N, Al-Ghamdi S, Chmielewski AG, Licki J, Pawelec A, Tymin`ski B, Zimek Z. Electron beam flue gas treatment (EBFGT) technology for simultaneous removal of SO2 and NOx from combustion of liquid fuels. Fuel. 2008;87:1446–1452. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forzatti P. Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis. Appl Catal A. 2001;222:221–236. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00832-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Z, Lu P, Li C, Zeng G, Jiang X, Zhai Y, Fan X. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by urea loaded on activated carbon fibre (ACF) and CeO2/ACF: The SCR mechanism. Environ Technol. 2012;33(11):1331–1337. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2011.626799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang M, Park ED, Kim JM, Yie JE. Manganese oxide catalysts for NOx reduction with NH3 at low temperatures. Appl Catal A. 2007;327:261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondragon Rodriguez GC, Kelm K, Saruhan B. H2-selective catalytic reduction of NOx activity and microstructural analysis of new BaTi0.95Pd0.05O3 catalyst. Appl Catal A. 2010;387:173–184. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.08.012
   Google Scholar
• Holma T, Palmqvist A, Skoglundh M, Jobson E. Continuous lean NOx reduction with hydrocarbons over dual pore system catalysts. Appl Catal B. 2004;48:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centi G. NO reduction by C3H6 and O2 over supported noble metals part I. Role of the support on the nature of NO_x adspecies and their relationship with the catalytic behavior. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2003;204–205:663–671.
   Google Scholar
• Labhsetwar N, Minamino H, Mukherjee M, Mitsuhashi T, Rayalu S, Dhakad M, Haneda H, Subrt J, Devotta S. Catalytic properties of Ru-mordenite for NO reduction. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2007;261:213–217. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2006.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakhostin Panahi P, Salari D, Niaei A, Mousavi SM. NO reduction over nanostructure M-Cu/ZSM-5 (M: Cr, Mn, Co and Fe) bimetallic catalysts and optimization of catalyst preparation by RSM. J Ind Eng Chem. 2013;19(6):1793–1799. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin F, Wu X, Weng D. Effect of barium loading on CuOx–CeO2 catalysts: NOx storage capacity, NO oxidation ability and soot oxidation activity. Catal Today. 2011;175:124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Furfori S, Russo N, Fino D, Saracco G, Specchia V. NO SCR reduction by hydrogen generated in line on perovskite-type catalysts for automotive diesel exhaust gas treatment. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.01.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amanpour J, Salari D, Niaei A, Mousavi SM, Panahi PN. Optimization of Cu/activated carbon catalyst in low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO process using response surface methodology. J Environ Sci Health A. 2013;48:879–885. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2013.761490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi SM, Niaei A, Salari D, Panahi PN, Samandari M. Modeling and optimization of Mn/activate carbon nanocatalysts for NO reduction: comparison of RSM and ANN techniques. Environ Technol. 2013;34:1377–1384. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2012.750381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Zhang Q, Qiu C, Lin T, Gong M, Chen Y. Tungsten modified MnOx–CeO2/ZrO2 monolith catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia. Chem Eng Sci. 2012;76:120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.04.012
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Shen M, Wang J, Cui M, Gao J, Ma J, Liu S. Preparation of FexCe1−xOy solid solution and its application in Pd-only three-way catalysts. J Environ Sci. 2012;24: 757–764. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60816-4
   Google Scholar
• Hong WJ, Iwamoto S, Inoue M. Direct NO decomposition over a Ce–Mn mixed oxide modified with alkali and alkaline earth species and CO2-TPD behavior of the catalysts. Catal Today. 2011;164:489–494. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.10.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi G, Yang RT, Chang R. MnOx–CeO2 mixed oxides prepared by co-precipitation for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperatures. Appl Catal B. 2004;51:93–106. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi G. Performance and kinetics study for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3 over MnOx–CeO2 catalyst. J Catal. 2003;217:434–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigenmann F, Maciejewski M, Baiker A. Selective reduction of NO by NH3 over manganese–cerium mixed oxides: relation between adsorption, redox and catalytic behavior. Appl Catal B. 2006;62:311–318. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang D, Zhang M, Li G, Jiang H. Preparation and evaluation of MnOx–CeO2 nanospheres via a green route. Catal Commun. 2012;17:59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2011.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour V, Kazemeini M, Mohammadrezaee A. A study of the water–gas shift reaction in Ru-promoted Ir-catalysed methanol carbonylation utilising experimental design methodology. Chem Eng Sci. 2011;66: 4798–4806. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.06.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. New Jersey: John Wiley; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour V, Kazemeini M, Mohammadrezaee A. Optimisation of Ru-promoted Ir-catalysed methanol carbonylation utilising response surface methodology. Appl Catal A. 2011;394:166–175. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.12.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuri AI, Cornell JA. Response surfaces: designs and analyses. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini SA, Niaei A, Salari D, Vieira RK, Sadigov S, Nabavi SR. Optimization and statistical modeling of catalytic oxidation of 2-propanol over CuMnmCo2−mO4 nano spinels by unreplicated split design methodology. J Ind Eng Chem. 2013;19:166–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khataee AR, Kasiri MB, Alidokht L. Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of photocatalytic removal of environmental pollutants using nanocatalysts. Environ Technol. 2011;32(15):1669–1684. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2011.597432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasiri MB, Khataee AR. Removal of organic dyes by UV/H2O2 process: modelling and optimization. Environ Technol. 2012;33(12):1417–1425. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2011.630425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Yu Y, Zhang C, He H. Selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 over a Ce/TiO2 catalyst. Catal Commun. 2008;9:1453–1457. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2007.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeng KD, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S. Process optimization studies of structured Cu–ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst for the removal of NO using design of experiments (DOE). Chem Eng J. 2004;103:147–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2004.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathinia M, Khataee AR, Zarei M, Aber S. Comparative photocatalytic degradation of two dyes on immobilized TiO2 nanoparticles: Effect of dye molecular structure and response surface approach. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2010;333:73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2010.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metkar PS, Salazar N, Muncrief R, Balakotaiah V, Harold MP. Selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 on iron zeolite monolithic catalysts: Steady-state and transient kinetics. Appl Catal B. 2011;104:110–126. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala S, Lassi U, Perämäki P, Keiski RL. Effect of process parameters on catalytic incineration of solvent emissions. J Autom Methods Manage Chem. 2008;1–7. doi: 10.1155/2008/759141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar