Generalized regression neural network-based approach for modelling hourly dissolved oxygen concentration in the Upper Klamath River, Oregon, USA

References

• UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive. UK environmental standards and conditions (phase 1). Final report, London (UK); 2008. p.73. Available from: http://www.wfduk.org/
   Google Scholar
• Williams RJ, Boorman DB. Modelling in-stream temperature and dissolved oxygen at sub-daily time steps: an application to the River Kennet, UK. Sci Total Environ. 2012;423:104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DJ, Ross J. Spokane river and lake Spokane dissolved oxygen total maximum daily load: water quality improvement report. Publication No. 07-10-073.P399. 2010. Available from: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0710073.html
   Google Scholar
• Nakova E, Linnebank FE, Bredeweg B, Salles P, Uzunov Y. The river Mesta case study: a qualitative model of dissolved oxygen in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Inform. 2009;4:339–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2009.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox BA. A review of dissolved oxygen modelling techniques for lowland rivers. Sci Total Environ. 2003;314–316:303–334. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00062-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox BA. A review of currently available in-stream water-quality models and their applicability for simulating dissolved oxygen in lowland rivers. Sci Total Environ. 2003;314–316:335–377. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00063-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia A, Revilla JA, Medina R, Alvarez C, Juanes JA. A model for predicting the temporal evolution of dissolved oxygen concentration in shallow estuaries. Hydrobiologia. 2002;475–476:205–211. doi: 10.1023/A:1020365225564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin S, Effler S, DePinto J, Trama F, Rodgers P, Dobi J, Wodka M. Dissolved oxygen model for a dynamic reservoir. ASCE J Environ Eng. 1985;111(4):647–664. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1985)111:5(647)
   Google Scholar
• Zielinski P. Stochastic dissolved oxygen model. ASCE J Environ Eng. 1988;114(1):74–90. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1988)114:1(74)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul-Aziz O, Wilson B, Gulliver J. Calibration and validation of an empirical dissolved oxygen model. ASCE J Environ Eng. 2007;133(7):698–710. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2007)133:7(698)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner D, Pelletier G, Kasper B. Dissolved oxygen and pH modeling of a periphyton dominated, nutrient enriched river. ASCE J Environ Eng. 2009;135(8):645–652. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:8(645)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid B, Koskiaho J. Artificial neural network modeling of dissolved oxygen in a wetland pond: the case of Hovi Finland. ASCE J Hydrol Eng. 2006;11(2):188–192. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:2(188)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkoyunlu A, Altun H, Cigizoglu H. Depth-integrated estimation of dissolved oxygen in a lake. ASCE J Environ Eng. 2011;137(10):961–967. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ay M, Kisi O. Modeling of dissolved oxygen concentration using different neural network techniques in foundation creek, El Paso County, Colorado. ASCE J Environ Eng. 2012;138(6):654–662. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antanasijević D, Pocajt V, Povrenović D, Perić-Grujić A, Ristić M. Modelling of dissolved oxygen content using artificial neural networks: Danube River, North Serbia, case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013;20(12): 9006–9013. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-1876-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan AB, Snyder DM, Rounds SA. Controls on biochemical oxygen demand in the upper Klamath River, Oregon. Chem Geol. 2010;269:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrazik S. Oregon water quality index summary water years 1997–2006. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. DEQ07-LAB-007-TR. 2007; p. 13. Available from: http://www.deq.state.or.us
   Google Scholar
• Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Oregon's 2004/2006 Integrated Report. 2007 [cited 2008 Dec 17]. Available from: http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/assessment/rpt0406.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan AB, Deas ML, Asbill J, Kirshtein JD, Butler K, Stewart MA, Wellman RW, Vaughn J. Klamath River water quality and acoustic Doppler current profiler data from Link River Dam to Keno Dam, 2007. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2008–1185. 2008; p. 24. Available from: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1185/
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan AB, Deas ML, Asbill J, Kirshtein JD, Butler K, Vaughn J. Klamath River water quality data from Link River Dam to Keno Dam, Oregon, 2008. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2009–1105. 2009; p. 25. Available from: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1105/
   Google Scholar
• USGS Oregon Water Science Center. 2012. http://water.usgs.gov
   Google Scholar
• Heddam S, Bermad A, Dechemi N. ANFIS-based modelling for coagulant dosage in drinking water treatment plant: a case study. Environ Monit Assess. 2012;184:1953–1971. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2091-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specht DF. A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1991;2(6):568–76. doi: 10.1109/72.97934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson DW. Artificial neural networks theory and applications. Korea: Prentice Hall International Editions; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Heddam S, Bermad A, Dechemi N. Applications of radial-basis function and generalized regression neural networks for modeling of coagulant dosage in a drinking water-treatment plant: comparative study. ASCE J Environ Eng. 2011;137(12):1209–1214. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahmy M, Moselhi O. Forecasting the remaining useful life of cast iron water mains. ASCE J Perform Constr Facil. 2009;23(4):269–275. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2009)23:4(269)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigizoglu H. Application of generalized regression neural networks to intermittent flow forecasting and estimation. ASCE J Hydrol Eng. 2005;10(4):336–341. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:4(336)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal M, Deswal S. Modeling pile capacity using support vector machines and generalized regression neural network. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2008;134(6):1021–1024. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:7(1021)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günaydın K, Günaydın A. Tsunami run-up height forecasting by using artificial neural networks. Civil Eng Environ Syst. 2011;28(2):165–181. doi: 10.1080/10286608.2010.526703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott CJ. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance, Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 1982;63:1309–1313. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:SCOTEO>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar