Reducing THMFP by H₂O₂/UV oxidation for humic acid of small molecular weight

References

• Jacangelo JDJ, Owen D, Randtke S. Selected processes for removing NOM: An overview. J AWWA. 1995;87:64–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanly M, Lim KC, Amal R, Fabris R, Chow C, Drikas M. A study on the removal of humic acid using advanced oxidation processes. Sep Sci Technol. 2007;42:1391–1404. doi: 10.1080/01496390701289799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matilainen A, Sillanpaa M. Removal of natural organic matter from drinking water by advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere. 2010;80:351–365. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.04.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang DS, Zhao YM, Yan MQ, Chow CWK. Removal of DBP precursors in micro-polluted source waters: A comparative study on the enhanced coagulation behavior. Sep Purif Technol. 2013;118:271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HC, Wang GS. Effects of UV/H2O2 on NOM fractionation and corresponding DBPs formation. Desalination. 2011;270:221–226. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CA, Parsons SA. Removal of NOM from drinking water: Fenton's and photo-Fenton's processes. Chemosphere. 2004;24:1017–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.08.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei MC, Wang KS, Hsiao TE, Lin IC, Wu HJ, Wu YL, Liu PH, Chang SH. Effects of UV irradiation on humic acid removal by ozonation, Fenton and Fe0/air treatment: THMFP and biotoxicity evaluation. J Hazard Mater. 2011;195:324–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang Q, Gao BY, Yue Q, Zhao Y. The disinfection by-products precursors removal efficiency and the subsequent effects on chlorine decay for humic acid synthetic water treated by coagulation process and coagulation–ultrafiltration process. Chem Eng J. 2012;193–194:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reguero V, López-Fernández R, Fermoso J, Prieto O, Pocostales P, González R, Irusta R, Villaverde S. Comparison of conventional technologies and a submerged membrane photocatalytic reactor (SMPR) for removing trihalomethanes (THM) precursors in drinking water treatment plants. Desalination. 2013;330:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribera G, Llenas L, Rovira M, de Pablo J, Martinez-Llado X. Pilot plant comparison study of two commercial nanofiltration membranes in a drinking water treatment plant. Desalin Water Treat. 2013;51(1–3):448–457. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2012.714528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakruam P, Wattanachira S. Reduction of DOM fractions and their trihalomethane formation potential in surface river water by in-line coagulation with ceramic membrane filtration. J Environ Sci. 2014;26(3):529–536. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60471-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarathy SR, Stefan M, Royce A, Mohseni M. Pilot-scale UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process for surface water treatment and downstream biological treatment: Effects on natural organic matter characteristics and DBP formation potential. Environ Technol. 2011;32:1709–1718. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2011.553843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Hu C, Hu X, Wei D, Chen Y, Qu J. Photodegradation and toxicity changes of antibiotics in UV and UV/H2O2 process. J Hazard Mater. 2011;185(2–3):1256–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Pelaez M, Westrick JA, O'Shea KE, Hiskia A, Triantis T, Kaloudis T, Stefan MI, de la Cruz AA, Dionysiou DD. Efficient removal of microcystin-LR by UV-C/H2O2 in synthetic and natural water samples. Water Res. 2012;46(5):1501–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu Z, Bolton JR, Belosevic M, El Din MG. Photodegradation of emerging micropollutants using the medium-pressure UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process. Water Res. 2013;47(8):2881–2889. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrovic JZ, Radovic MD, Andelkovic TD, Bojic DV, Bojic A. Identification of intermediates and ecotoxicity assessment during the UV/ H2O2 oxidation of azo dye reactive orange 16. J Environ Sci Heal A. 2014;49:491–502. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2014.859022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumczyk J, Bogacki J, Marcinowski P, Kowalik P. Cosmetic wastewater treatment by coagulation and advanced oxidation processes. Environ Technol. 2014;35:1–8. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2013.808245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penru Y, Raaijmakers MJT, Guastalli AR, Esplugas S, Baig S. Influence of high salinity on the degradation of humic acid by UV254 and H2O2/UV254. Ozone Sci Eng. 2012;34:101–108. doi: 10.1080/01919512.2012.649998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilhunen S, Puton J, Virkutyte J, Sillanpää M. Efficiency of hydroxyl radical formation and phenol decomposition using UV light emitting diodes and H2O2. Environ Technol. 2011;32:865–872. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2010.516770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Lu S, Qiu Z, Lin K. UV and VUV photolysis vs. UV/H2O2 and VUV/H2O2 treatment for removal of clofibric acid from aqueous solution. Environ Technol. 2011;32:1063–1071. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2010.525750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester Y, Avisar D, Mamane H. Photodegradation of the antibiotic sulphamethoxazole in water with UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process. Environ Technol. 2010;31:175–183. doi: 10.1080/09593330903414238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grčić I, Papić S, Mesec D, Koprivanac N, Vujević D. The kinetics and efficiency of UV assisted advanced oxidation of various types of commercial organic dyes in water. J Photoch Photobio A. 2014;273:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmez-Hanci T, Dalmaz B, Arslan-Alaton I, Kabdasli I, Tunay O. Kinetic modeling and toxicity assessment of diethyl phthalate treated by H2O2/UV-C process. Ozone Sci Eng. 2010;32:238–243. doi: 10.1080/01919512.2010.493395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang GS, Liao CH, Chen HW, Yang HC. Characteristics of natural organic matter degradation in water by UV/H2O2 treatment. Environ Technol. 2006;27(3):277–287. doi: 10.1080/09593332708618638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieliechi JM, Lartiges BS, Kayem GJ, Hupont S, Frochot C, Thieme J, Ghanbaja J, d'Espinose de la Caillerie JB, Barres O, Kamga R, Levitz P, Michot LJ. Changes in humic acid conformation during coagulation with ferric chloride: Implications for drinking water treatment. Water Res. 2008;2(8–9):2111–2123. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, Liu C, Yang K, Lin D. Coagulation removal of humic acid-stabilized carbon nanotubes from water by PACl: Influences of hydraulic condition and water chemistry. Sci Total Environ. 2012;439:123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu WZ, Gregory J, Li GB, Qu JH. Effect of humic acid on coagulation performance during aggregation at low temperature. Chem Eng J. 2013;223:412–417. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Administration, Taiwan. Taiwan's Drinking Water Source Standard; 2014. Available from: http://www.epa.gov.tw.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton JR, Bircher KG, Tumas W, Tolman CA. Figures-of-merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation technologies for both electric- and solar-driven systems. Pure Appl Chem. 2001;73:627–637. doi: 10.1351/pac200173040627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleboyeh A, Olya M, Aleboyeh H. Electrical energy determination for an azo dye decolorization and mineralization by UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process. Chem Eng J. 2008;137:518–524. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoreishi SM, Haghighi MR. Chromophores removal in pulp and paper mill effluent via hydrogenation-biological batch reactors. Chem Eng J. 2007;127:59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2006.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matilainen A, Gjessing ET, Lahtinen T, Hed L, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpaa M. An overview of the methods used in the characterisation of natural organic matter (NOM) in relation to drinking water treatment. Chemosphere. 2011;83:1431–1442. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salari D, Daneshar N, Aghazadeh F, Khataee AR. Application of artificial neural networks for modeling of the treatment of wastewater contaminated with methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) by UV/H2O2 process. J Hazard Mater. 2005;125:205–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.05.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muruganandham M, Selvam K, Swaminathan M. A comparative study of quantum yield and electrical energy per order (EEO) for advanced oxidative decolourisation of reactive azo dyes by UV light. J Hazard Mater. 2007;144:316–322. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarathy SR, Mohseni M. The impact of UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation on molecular size distribution of chromophoric natural organic matter. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:8315–8320. doi: 10.1021/es071602m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarathy SR, Mohseni M. Effects of UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation on chemical characteristics and chlorine reactivity of surface water natural organic matter. Water Res. 2010;44:4087–4096. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar