Characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticle (nZnO) alginate beads in reducing gaseous emission from swine manure

References

• Barrasa M, Lamosa S, Fernandez MD, Fernandez E. Occupational exposure to carbon dioxide, ammonia and hydrogen sulphide on livestock farms in north-west Spain. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012;19:17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno L, Predicala B, Nemati M. Laboratory, semi-pilot and room scale study of nitrite and molybdate mediated control of H2S emission from swine manure. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:2141–2151. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thu KM. Public health concerns for neighbors of large-scale swine production operations. J Agric Safety Health. 2002;8:175–184. doi: 10.13031/2013.8430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peck H, Van Beeumen J, LeGall J. Biochemistry of dissimilatory sulphate reduction philosophical. Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci. 1982;298:443–466. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff J, Fankhauser H. Assimilatory sulfate reduction. Biology of inorganic nitrogen and sulfur. Springer; 1981. p. 153–168.
   Google Scholar
• ASABE. Manure storage safety. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers standard EP470. Available 8/1/2015 from http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_019839.pdf, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelmseeh VA, Jofriet J, Hayward G. Sulphate and sulphide corrosion in livestock buildings, Part I: Concrete deterioration. Biosyst Eng. 2008;99:372–381. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likens GE, Bormann FH, Johnson NM. Acid rain. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev. 1972;14:33–40. doi: 10.1080/00139157.1972.9933001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirabelli MC, Wing S, Marshall SW, Wilcosky TC. Race, poverty, and potential exposure of middle-school students to air emissions from confined swine feeding operations. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(4):591–596. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boadi D, Benchaar C, Chiquette J, Massé D. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: update review. Can J Anim Sci. 2004;84:319–335. doi: 10.4141/A03-109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruokojärvi A, Ruuskanen J, Martikainen PJ, Olkkonen M. Oxidation of gas mixtures containing dimethyl sulfide, hydrogen sulfide, and methanethiol using a two-stage biotrickling filter. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2001;51:11–16. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndegwa PM, Hristov AN, Arogo J, Sheffield RE. A review of ammonia emission mitigation techniques for concentrated animal feeding operations. Biosyst Eng. 2008;100:453–469. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amon B, Amon T, Boxberger J, Alt C. Emissions of NH3, N2O and CH4 from dairy cows housed in a farmyard manure tying stall (housing, manure storage, manure spreading). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2001;60:103–113. doi: 10.1023/A:1012649028772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh BP, Hatton BJ, Singh B, Cowie AL, Kathuria A. Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils. J Environ Qual. 2010;39:1224–1235. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattey E, Trzcinski MK, Desjardins RL. Quantifying the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as a result of composting dairy and beef cattle manure. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2005;72:173–187. doi: 10.1007/s10705-005-1268-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Amon T, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2006;112:153–162. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kai P, Pedersen P, Jensen JE, Hansen MN, Sommer SG. A whole-farm assessment of the efficacy of slurry acidification in reducing ammonia emissions. Eur J Agron. 2008;28:148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luostarinen S, Luste S, Rintala J. Nitrogen removal from on-site treated anaerobic effluents using intermittently aerated moving bed biofilm reactors at low temperatures. Water Res. 2006;40:1607–1615. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.02.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Xu M, Wall JD, Hu Z. Nanosilver impact on methanogenesis and biogas production from municipal solid waste. Waste Manage. 2012;32:816–825. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller NC, Nowack B. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:4447–4453. doi: 10.1021/es7029637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam DP, Rahman S, Bezbaruah AN, Borhan MS. Evaluation of nano zinc oxide entrapped Ca-alginate beads to reduce gaseous emissions from liquid livestock manure. Appl Eng Agric. 2016;32(1):89–102. doi: 10.13031/aea.32.11445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-delRisco M, Orupõld K, Dubourguier H-C. Particle-size effect of CuO and ZnO on biogas and methane production during anaerobic digestion. J Hazard Mater. 2011;189:603–608. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Predicala B, Alvarado A, Asis D. Use of zinc oxide nanoparticles to control hydrogen sulphide, ammonia and odour emissions from pig barns. 2012: ASABE Papper No. ILES12–1507, ASABE, St. Joseph, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes CL, Klabunde KJ. Unique chemical reactivities of nanocrystalline metal oxides toward hydrogen sulfide. Chem Mater. 2002;14:1806–1811. doi: 10.1021/cm011588r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma R, Levard CM, Judy JD, Unrine JM, Durenkamp M, Martin B, Jefferson B, Lowry GV. Fate of zinc oxide and silver nanoparticles in a pilot wastewater treatment plant and in processed biosolids. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;48:104–112. doi: 10.1021/es403646x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayyadnejad M, Ghaffarian H, Saeidi M. Removal of hydrogen sulfide by zinc oxide nanoparticles in drilling fluid. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2008;5:565–569. doi: 10.1007/BF03326054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhavatjou M, Moradi R, Hosseini Alhashemi A, Taghinia Hejabi A. A new method for sulfur components removal from sour gas through application of zinc and iron oxides nanoparticles. Int J Environ Res. 2014;8:273–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song HS, Park MG, Kwon SJ, Yi KB, Croiset E, Chen Z, Nam SC. Hydrogen sulfide adsorption on nano-sized zinc oxide/reduced graphite oxide composite at ambient condition. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;276:646–652. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steudel R, Steudel Y. Interaction of zinc oxide clusters with molecules related to the sulfur vulcanization of polyolefins (‘Rubber’). Chem A Eur Jl. 2006;12:8589–8602. doi: 10.1002/chem.200600700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awume B. Control of hydrogen sulfide emission using zinc oxide nanoparticles [master thesis]. Saskatoon: Department of Environment and Sustaninalbility, University of Saskatchewan. Available 08/10/2015 from http://ecommons.usask.ca/bitstream/handle/10388/ETD-2014–07–1621/AWUME-THESIS.pdf?sequence=4; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim HA, Jamshidi E. Kinetic study of zinc oxide reduction by methane. Chem Eng Res Design. 2001;79:62–70. doi: 10.1205/026387601528534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Z, Qin S, Tang D, Yang H, Hu C. Theoretical study on the reaction of methane and zinc oxide in gas phase. J Mol Struct Theochem. 2006;778:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2006.08.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajpai SK, Chand N, Chaurasia V. Nano zinc oxide-loaded calcium alginate films with potential antibacterial properties. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012;5:1871–1881. doi: 10.1007/s11947-011-0587-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finotelli PV, Da Silva D, Sola-Penna M, Rossi AM, Farina M, Andrade LR, Takeuchi AY, Rocha-Leão MH. Microcapsules of alginate/chitosan containing magnetic nanoparticles for controlled release of insulin. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2010;81:206–211. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipochka M, Stambolova I, Blaskov V, Stefanov P. XPS investigation on the surface of ZnO photocatalytic films obtained by polymer modified spray pyrolysis. Bulg Chem Commun. 2013;45:105–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarvey JA, Miller WG, Sanchez S, Stanker L. Identification of bacterial populations in dairy wastewaters by use of 16S rRNA gene sequences and other genetic markers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:4267–4275. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4267-4275.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag TE, Prosser JI. Correlation of methane production and functional gene transcriptional activity in a peat soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:6679–6687. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01021-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma K, Conrad R, Lu Y. Responses of methanogen mcrA genes and their transcripts to an alternate dry/wet cycle of paddy field soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:445–454. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06934-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luton PE, Wayne JM, Sharp RJ, Riley PW. The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill. Microbiology. 2002;148:3521–3530. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-11-3521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narihiro T, Sekiguchi Y. Oligonucleotide primers, probes and molecular methods for the environmental monitoring of methanogenic archaea. Microbial Biotechnol. 2011;4:585–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00239.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stops F, Fell JT, Collett JH, Martini LG. Floating dosage forms to prolong gastro-retention – the characterisation of calcium alginate beads. Int J Pharma. 2008;350:301–311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deze EG, Papageorgiou SK, Favvas EP, Katsaros FK. Porous alginate aerogel beads for effective and rapid heavy metal sorption from aqueous solutions: Effect of porosity in Cu2+ and Cd2+ ion sorption. Chem Eng J. 2012;209:537–546. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarvey JA, Miller WG, Zhang R, Ma Y, Mitloehner F. Bacterial population dynamics in dairy waste during aerobic and anaerobic treatment and subsequent storage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:193–202. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01422-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengeløv G, Agersø Y, Halling-Sørensen B, Baloda SB, Andersen JS, Jensen LB. Bacterial antibiotic resistance levels in Danish farmland as a result of treatment with pig manure slurry. Environ Int. 2003;28:587–595. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00084-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotta MA, Whitehead TR, Zeltwanger RL. Isolation, characterization and comparison of bacteria from swine faeces and manure storage pits. Environ Microbiol. 2003;5:737–745. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2920.2003.00467.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre M, Maggi L, Vigo D, Galli A, Bornaghi V, Maffeo G, Conte U. Controlled release of swine semen encapsulated in calcium alginate beads. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1493–1498. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00035-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western-University. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Reference Pages. Surface Science Western, Western University, Canada. Available 08/05/2015 from http://www.xpsfitting.com/search/label/Chlorine; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Barreca D, Gasparotto A, Maragno C, Tondello E, Spalding TR. Analysis of nanocrystalline ZnS thin films by XPS. Surf Sci Spectra. 2002;9:54–61. doi: 10.1116/11.20030117
   Google Scholar
• ThermoScientific-XPS. XPS Reference. Available 8/10/2015 from http://xpssimplified.com/periodictable.php; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• NIST. National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce; NIST X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database. NIST Standard Reference Database 20, Version 4.1. Available 08/10/2015 from http://srdata.nist.gov/xps/ElmComposition.aspx; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Liao H-C, Kuo P-C, Lin C-C, Chen S-Y. Synthesis and optical properties of ZnO–ZnS core-shell nanotube arrays. J Vacuum Sci Technol B. 2006;24:2198–2201. doi: 10.1116/1.2232456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez JA, Jirsak T, Chaturvedi S, Kuhn M. Reaction of SO2 with ZnO(0001¯)–O and ZnO powders: photoemission and XANES studies on the formation of SO3 and SO4. Surf Sci. 1999;442:400–412. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(99)00952-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar LG, Timbrell PY, Lamb RN. An XPS study of zinc oxide thin film growth on copper using zinc acetate as a precursor. Thin Solid Films. 1993;223:341–347. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(93)90542-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laajalehto K, Kartio I, Nowak P. XPS study of clean metal sulfide surfaces. Appl Surf Sci. 1994;81:11–15. doi: 10.1016/0169-4332(94)90080-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar