Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy analysis of landfill leachate DOM in coagulation–flocculation process

References

• Zhu G, Yin J, Zhang P, et al. DOM removal by flocculation process: fluorescence excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy (EEMs) characterization. Desalination. 2014;346:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.04.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu W, Li X, Bond T, et al. The formation of haloacetamides and other disinfection by-products from non-nitrogenous low-molecular weight organic acids during chloramination. Chem Eng J. 2016;285:164–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Li A, Lu Y, et al. Characterization and removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from landfill leachate rejected by nanofiltration. Waste Manag. 2009;29(3):1035–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu L, Wang K, Zhao QL, et al. Characterization of dissolved organic matter during landfill leachate treatment by sequencing batch reactor, aeration corrosive cell-Fenton, and granular activated carbon in series. J Hazard Mater. 2010;179(1–3):1096–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W-T, Chen S-Y, Xu Z-X, et al. Characterization of dissolved organic matter in municipal wastewater using fluorescence PARAFAC analysis and chromatography multi-excitation/emission scan: a comparative study. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(5):2603–2609. doi: 10.1021/es404624q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita Y, Jaffé R, Maie N, et al. Assessing the dynamics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in coastal environments by excitation emission matrix fluorescence and parallel factor analysis (EEM-PARAFAC). Limnol Oceanogr. 2008;53(5):1900–1908. doi: 10.4319/lo.2008.53.5.1900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker A. Fluorescence properties of some farm wastes: implications for water quality monitoring. Water Res. 2002;36(1):189–195. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00210-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Baker A, Murphy K, et al. Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: a review. Water Res. 2009;43(4):863–881. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markechová D, Tomková M, Sádecká J, et al. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy and parallel factor analysis in drinking water treatment: a review. Pol J Environ Stud. 2013;22(5):1289–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maranon E, Castrillon L, Fernandez-Nava Y, et al. Colour, turbidity and COD removal from old landfill leachate by coagulation-flocculation treatment. Waste Manag Res. 2010;28(8):731–737. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09352504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghafari S, Aziz HA, Isa MH, et al. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation-flocculation treatment of leachate using poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum. J Hazard Mater. 2009;163(2–3):650–656. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Wang Q, Zhai X, et al. Improved pretreatment (coagulation-floatation and ozonation) of younger landfill leachate by microbubbles. Water Environ Res. 2010;82(7):657–665. doi: 10.2175/106143010X12609736966522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poblete R, Prieto-Rodríguez L, Oller I, et al. Solar photocatalytic treatment of landfill leachate using a solid mineral by-product as a catalyst. Chemosphere. 2012;88(9):1090–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashir MJ, Isa MH, Kutty SRM, et al. Landfill leachate treatment by electrochemical oxidation. Waste Manage. 2009;29(9):2534–2541. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Englehardt JD. Treatment of landfill leachate by the Fenton process. Water Res. 2006;40(20):3683–3694. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohdziewicz J, Neczaj E, Kwarciak A. Landfill leachate treatment by means of anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Desalination. 2008;221(1–3):559–565. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Y, Wu Q, Yang M, et al. Three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy and fractions of dissolved organic matter change in landfill leachate by biological treatment. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2016;23(1):793–799. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5226-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C-x. 3D-EEM fluorescence characteristics of different fraction of dissolved organic matter in landfill leachate. Spectrosc Spectr Anal. 2012:1575–1579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shouliang H, Beidou X, Haichan Y, et al. Characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in leachate with different landfill ages. J Environ Sci. 2008;20(4):492–498. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62085-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz S, Böhm K, Ottner R, et al. Determination of leachate compounds relevant for landfill aftercare using FT-IR spectroscopy. Waste Manag. 2016;55:321–329. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu F, Chang C-H, Lee D-J, et al. Dissolved organic matter with multi-peak fluorophores in landfill leachate. Chemosphere. 2009;74(4):575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X-S, Xi B-D, Wei Z-M, et al. Physicochemical and spectroscopic characteristics of dissolved organic matter extracted from municipal solid waste (MSW) and their influence on the landfill biological stability. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(3):2322–2327. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Hur J. Heterogeneous adsorption behavior of landfill leachate on granular activated carbon revealed by fluorescence excitation emission matrix (EEM)-parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). Chemosphere. 2016;149:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellman JB, Miller MP, Cory RM, et al. Characterizing dissolved organic matter using PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence spectroscopy: a comparison of two models. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(16):6228–6234. doi: 10.1021/es900143g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy KR, Hambly A, Singh S, et al. Organic matter fluorescence in municipal water recycling schemes: toward a unified PARAFAC model. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(7):2909–2916. doi: 10.1021/es103015e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii SK, Boyer TH. Behavior of reoccurring PARAFAC components in fluorescent dissolved organic matter in natural and engineered systems: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(4):2006–2017. doi: 10.1021/es2043504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghoth S, Sharma S, Amy G. Tracking natural organic matter (NOM) in a drinking water treatment plant using fluorescence excitation–emission matrices and PARAFAC. Water Res. 2011;45(2):797–809. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu G, Zheng H, Chen W, et al. Preparation of a composite coagulant: polymeric aluminum ferric sulfate (PAFS) for wastewater treatment. Desalination. 2012;285:315–323. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Zhu G, Jiang S, et al. Investigations of coagulation–flocculation process by performance optimization, model prediction and fractal structure of flocs. Desalination. 2011;269(1–3):148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu G, Zheng H, Zhang Z, et al. Characterization and coagulation–flocculation behavior of polymeric aluminum ferric sulfate (PAFS). Chem Eng J. 2011;178:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddam SS, Moghaddam MA, Arami M. Response surface optimization of acid red 119 dye from simulated wastewater using Al based waterworks sludge and polyaluminium chloride as coagulant. J Environ Manag. 2011;92(4):1284–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolto B, Gregory J. Organic polyelectrolytes in water treatment. Water Res. 2007;41(11):2301–2324. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fangying J, Zhigang X, He H, et al. Three dimensional excitation-emission fluorescence spectra of dissolved organic matter in landfill leachates treatment process. Chin J Environ Eng. 2009:1783–1788.
   Google Scholar
• Battin TJ. Dissolved organic matter and its optical properties in a blackwater tributary of the upper Orinoco river, Venezuela. Org Geochem. 1998;28(9–10):561–569. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight DM, Boyer EW, Westerhoff PK, et al. Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity. Limnol Oceanogr. 2001;46(1):38–48. doi: 10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhoff P, Chen W, Esparza M. Fluorescence analysis of a standard fulvic acid and tertiary treated wastewater. J Environ Qual. 2001;30(6):2037–2046. doi: 10.2134/jeq2001.2037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• qing FP, qiang LC, ying YZ, et al. Characterization of humic acid by three-dimensional excitation emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. GEOCHIMICA. 2004:301–308.
   Google Scholar
• Xujing G, Beidou X, Sen X, et al. Study on fluorescence spectra and UV-vis spectra of dissolved organic matter collected from sediment pore water in Wuliangsuhai Lake. Chin J Environ Eng. 2012:440–444.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson N, Baker A, Reynolds D. Fluorescence analysis of dissolved organic matter in natural, waste and polluted waters – a review. River Res Appl. 2007;23(6):631–649. doi: 10.1002/rra.1005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstea EM, Bridgeman J, Baker A, et al. Fluorescence spectroscopy for wastewater monitoring: a review. Water Res. 2016;95:205–219. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstea EM, Baker A, Savastru R. Comparison of river and canal water dissolved organic matter fluorescence within an urbanised catchment. Water Environ J. 2014;28(1):11–22. doi: 10.1111/wej.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar