Enhancing faecal sludge dewaterability and end-use by conditioning with sawdust and charcoal dust

References

• Nakagiri A, Niwagaba CB, Nyenje PM, et al. Are pit latrines in urban areas of sub-Saharan Africa performing? A review of usage, filling, insects and odour nuisances. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strande L. The global situation. In: Strande L, Ronteltap M, Brdjanovic D, editors. Faecal sludge management – system approach implementation and operation. London: IWA; 2014. p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Tsinda A, Abbott P, Pedley S, et al. Challenges to achieving sustainable sanitation in informal settlements of Kigali, Rwanda. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:6939–6954. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10126939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumwebaze IK, Orach CG, Niwagaba C, et al. Sanitation facilities in Kampala slums, Uganda: users’ satisfaction and determinant factors. Int J Environ Health Res. 2013;23:191–204. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2012.713095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strande L, Ronteltap M, Brdjanovic D. Faecal sludge management – systems approach implementation and operation. London: IWA; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Semiyaga S, Okure MAE, Niwagaba CB, et al. Decentralized options for faecal sludge management in urban slum areas of sub-Saharan Africa: A review of technologies, practices and end-uses. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2015;104:109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray Muspratt A, Nakato T, Niwagaba C, et al. Fuel potential of faecal sludge: calorific value results from Uganda, Ghana and Senegal. J Water, Sanit Hyg Dev. 2014;4:223–230. doi: 10.2166/washdev.2013.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Thapa KB, Hoadley AFA. Application of filtration aids for improving sludge dewatering properties – a review. Chem Eng J. 2011;171:373–384. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semiyaga S, Okure MAE, Niwagaba CB, et al. Dewaterability of faecal sludge and its implications on faecal sludge management in urban slums. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2017;14:151–164. doi: 10.1007/s13762-016-1134-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold M, Dayer P, Faye MCAS, et al. Locally produced natural conditioners for dewatering of faecal sludge. Environ Technol. 2016;37:1–13. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1165293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Ning X, Liang X, et al. Effects of sawdust-CPAM on textile dyeing sludge dewaterability and filter cake properties. Bioresour Technol. 2013;139:330–336. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener S, Semiyaga S, Niwagaba CB, et al. A value proposition: resource recovery from faecal sludge – can it be the driver for improved sanitation? Resour Conserv Recycl. 2014;88:32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne A, Gold M, Turyasiima D, et al. Suitable biowastes for energy recovery. Dübendorf, Switzerland: Eawag/Sandec; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Seck A, Gold M, Niang S, et al. Faecal sludge drying beds : increasing drying rates for fuel resource recovery in Sub-Saharan Africa. Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2015;5:72–80. doi: 10.2166/washdev.2014.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson H. Briquette businesses in Uganda. The potential for briquette enterprises to address the sustainability of the Ugandan biomass fuel market. London: GVEP International; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Basu A, Blodgett C, Müller N, et al. Nationally appropriate mitigation action study on sustainable charcoal in Uganda. New York (NY): United Nations Development Programme (UNDP); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Eichner Y, Hollander A, Kirabo-Steffens S, et al. Global action programme on education for all youth project - charcoal dust. Germany: UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Zziwa A, Kizito S, Banana AY, et al. Production of composite bricks from sawdust using Portland cement as a binder. Uganda J Agric Sci. 2006;12:38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Komakech AJ, Banadda NE, Kinobe JR, et al. Characterization of municipal waste in Kampala, Uganda. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2014;64:340–348. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.861373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla A, Zhang Y, Dubey P, et al. The role of sawdust in the removal of unwanted materials from water. J Hazard Mater. 2002;95:137–152. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00089-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton CH. The potential contribution of separation technologies to the management of livestock manure. Livest Sci. 2007;112:208–216. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA/AWWA/WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington (DC): American Water Works Association (AWWA); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Han YW, Anderson AW. Semisolid fermentation of ryegrass straw. Appl Microbiol. 1975;30:930–934.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin Y-F, Jing S-R, Lee D-Y. Recycling of wood chips and wheat dregs for sludge processing. Bioresour Technol. 2001;76:161–163. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00098-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin B, Wilén B-M, Lant P. Impacts of morphological, physical and chemical properties of sludge flocs on dewaterability of activated sludge. Chem Eng J. 2004;98:115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2003.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas A. Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2004;30:219–230. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2003.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor-Villegas J, Pastor-Valle JF, Meneses Rodrı´guez JM, et al. Study of commercial wood charcoals for the preparation of carbon adsorbents. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2006;76:103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen LH, Keiding K. Physico-chemical characteristics of full scale sewage sludges with implications to dewatering. Water Res. 2002;36:2451–2462. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00477-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding A, Qu F, Liang H, et al. Effect of adding wood chips on sewage sludge dewatering in pilot-scale plate-and frame filter press process. R Soc Chem Adv. 2014;4:24762–24768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Zhang P, Zeng G, et al. Sewage sludge conditioning with coal fly ash modified by sulfuric acid. Chem Eng J. 2010;158:616–622. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing S-R, Lin Y-F, Lin YM, et al. Evaluation of effective conditioners for enhancing sludge dewatering and subsequent detachment from filter cloth. J Environ Sci Heal. 1999;34:1517–1531. doi: 10.1080/10934529909376909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulido-Novicio L, Hata T, Kurimoto Y, et al. Adsorption capacities and related characteristics of wood charcoals carbonized using a one-step or two-step process. J Wood Sci. 2001;47:48–57. doi: 10.1007/BF00776645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niwagaba CB, Nalubega M, Vinnerås B, et al. Incineration of faecal matter for treatment and sanitation. London (UK): IWA Publ; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bassan M, Tchonda T, Yiougo L, et al. Characterization of faecal sludge during dry and rainy seasons in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso; 2013;1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Appiah-Effah E, Nyarko KB, Antwi EO, et al. Heavy metals and microbial loads in raw fecal sludge from low income areas of Ashanti Region of Ghana. Water Pract Technol. 2015;10:124–132. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2015.014
   Google Scholar
• Nyenje PM, Foppen JW, Kulabako R, et al. Nutrient pollution in shallow aquifers underlying pit latrines and domestic solid waste dumps in urban slums. J Environ Manage. 2013;122:15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu P, Casaca C, Costa M. Ash deposition during the co-firing of bituminous coal with pine sawdust and olive stones in a laboratory furnace. Fuel. 2010;89:4040–4048. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur JR, Bangham DH, Bowring JR. Kinetic aspects of the combustion of solid fuels. Symp Combust Flame, Explos Phenom. 1948;3:466–474. doi: 10.1016/S1062-2896(49)80060-2
   Google Scholar