Effect of macro- and micro-nutrients addition during anaerobic mono-digestion of grass silage in leach-bed reactors

References

• EC 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:849–860. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saady NM, Massè DI. Impact of organic loading rate on the performance of psychrophilic dry anaerobic digestion of dairy manure and wheat straw: long term operation. Bioresour Technol. 2015;182:50–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamisiriroj T, Nizami AS, Murphy JD. Why does mono-digestion of grass silage fail in long-term operation? Appl Energ. 2012;95:64–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsamadony M, Tawfik A, Suzuki M. Surfactant – enhanced biohydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) via dry anaerobic digestion. Appl Energ. 2015;149:272–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.127
   Google Scholar
• Cysneiros D, Banks CJ, Heaven S, et al. The role of phase separation and feed cycle length in leach beds couple to methanogenic reactors for digestion of a solid substrate (Part I): optimisation of reactors performance. Bioresour Technol 2012;103:56–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.094
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nizami AS, Murphy JD. What type of digester configurations should be employed to produce biomethane from grass silage? Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2010; 14: 1558–1568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massè ID, Saady NMC, Gilbert Y. Psychrophilic dry anaerobic digestion of cow feces and wheat straw: feasibility studies. Biomass Bioenerg. 2015;77:1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.03.017
   Google Scholar
• Wall DM, O’Kiely P, Murphy JD. The potential for biomethane from grass and slurry to satisfy renewable energy targets. Bioresour Technol. 2013;149:425–431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder V, Schalau B, Molnarne M. Explosion protection in biogas and hybrid power plants. Procedia Eng. 2014;84:259–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.433
   Google Scholar
• Braun R, Weiland P, Wellinger A. Biogas from Energy crop digestion [Internet]. IEA Bioenergy, 2010. Task 37 [cited 2014 Jul 24]. Available from: http://www.en.esbjerg.aau.dk/digitalAssets/80/80448_energycrop_def_low_res.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nges IA, Björn A, Björnsson L. Stable operation during pilot scale anaerobic digestion of nutrient-supplemented maize/sugar beet silage. Bioresour Technol. 2012;118:445–454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirel B, Neumann L, Scherer P. Microbial community dynamics of a continuous mesophilic anaerobic biogas digester fed with sugar beet silage. Eng Life Sci. 2008;8:390–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200800010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattauer A, Abdoun E, Weiland P, et al. Abundance of micro elements in demonstration biogas plants. Biosyst Eng. 2011;108:57–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortner M, Rachbauer L, Somitsch W, et al. Can bioavailability of trace nutrients be measured in anaerobic digestion. Appl Energ. 2015;126:190–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.070
   Google Scholar
• Wall DM, Allen E, Straccialini B, et al. The effect of trace element addition to mono-digestion of grass silage at high organic loading rates. Bioresour Technol. 2014;172:349–355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.066
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zandavoort MH, Van Hullebusch ED, Fermoso FG, et al. Micro metals in anaerobic granular sludge reactors: bioavailability and dosing strategies. Eng Life Sci. 2006;6:293–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200620129
   Google Scholar
• Pobeheim H, Munk B, Johansson J, et al. Influence of micro elements on methane formation from a synthetic model substrate for maize silage. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:836–839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pobeheim H, Munk B, Lindorfer H, et al. Impact of nickel and cobalt on biogas production and process stability during semi-continuous anaerobic fermentation of model substrate for maize silage. Wat Res. 2011;45:781–787. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Banks CJ, Heaven S. Co-digestion of source segregated domestic food waste to improve process stability. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:168–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtomäki A, Huttunen S, Lehtinen TM, et al. Anaerobic digestion of grass silage in batch leach bed processes for methane production. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:3267–3278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis A, Nordberg A, Jarlsvik T, et al. Improvement of a grass-clover silage-fed biogas process by the addition of cobalt. Biomass Bioenerg. 1997;12:453–460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00015-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• SFS Standards. Determination of chemical oxygen demand (CODCr) in water with the closed tube method, oxidation with dichromate. SFS 5504. Helsinki: Finnish Standards Association; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Väisänen A, Laatikainen P, Ilander A, et al. Determination of mineral and micro element concentrations in pine needles by ICP-OES: evaluation of different sample pretreatment methods. Intern J Environ Anal Chem. 2008;88:1005–1016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03067310802308483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS Inc. SPSS version 7.0 for Windows®, 233 S. Wacker Drive, 11th floor, Chicago, IL 60606-6307, USA; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Nizami A-S, Korres NE, Murphy JD. Review of the integrated process for the production of grass biomethane. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:8496–8508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/es901533j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nges IA, Wang B, Cui Z, et al. Digestate liquor recycle in minimal nutrients-supplemented anaerobic digestion of wheat straw. Biochem Engg. 2015;94:106–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2014.11.023
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson J, Yekta SS, Sundberg C, et al. Bioavailability of cobalt and nickel during anaerobic digestion of sulfur rich stillage for biogas formation. Appl Energ. 2013;112:473–477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isa HM, Anderson GK. Molybdate inhibition of sulphate reduction in two-phase anaerobic digestion. Process Biochem. 2005;40:2079–2089. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.07.025
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Güiza MS, Vila J, Mata-Alvarez J, et al. The role of additives on anaerobic digestion: a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2016;58:1486–1499. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:4044–4064. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu SY, Lam HP, Parthiba Karthikeyan O, et al. Optimization of food waste hydrolysis in leach bed coupled with methanogenic reactor: effect of pH and bulking agent. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:3702–3708. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner AO, Hohlbrugger P, Linns P, et al. Effects of different nitrogen sources on biogas production. A lab-scale investigation. Microbiol Res. 2012;167:630–636. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2011.11.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demirel B, Scherer P. Production of methane from sugar beet silage without manure addition by a single stage anaerobic digestion process. Biomass Bioenerg. 2008;32:203–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirel B, Scherer P. Micro element requirements of agricultural biogas digesters during biological conversion of renewable biomass to methane. Biomass Bioenerg. 2011;35:992–998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo WC, Parking GF. Characterization of soluble microbial products from anaerobic treatment by molecular weight distribution and nickel chelating properties. Wat Res. 1996;30:915–922. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00201-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagadabhi PS, Kaparaju P, Rintala J. Effect of micro-aeration and leachate replacement on COD solubilization and VFA production on during mono-digestion of grass-silage in one-stage leach bed reactors. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:2818–2824. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selling R, Håkansson T, Björnsson L. Two stage anaerobic digestion enables heavy metal removal. Wat Sci Technol. 2008;57:553–558. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson J. Cobalt and nickel bioavailability for biogas formation. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, Linköping University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming H-C. Sorption sites in biofilms. Wat Sci Technol. 1995;32:27–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1995.0256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osuna MB, Zandavoort MH, Iza JM, et al. Effects of micro element addition on volatile fatty acid conversions in anaerobic granular sludge reactors. Environ Technol. 2003;24:573–587. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330309385592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar