A comparison of aerobic granular sludge with conventional and compact biological treatment technologies

References

• Morgenroth E, Sherden T, Van Loosdrecht MCM, et al. Aerobic granular sludge in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Res. 1997;31:3191–3194. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00216-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Tay JH. State of the art of biogranulation technology for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv. 2004;22:533–563. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beun JJ, Hendriks A, van Loosdrecht MCM, et al. Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Res. 1999;33:2283–2290. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00463-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni BJ, Xie WM, Liu SG, et al. Granulation of activated sludge in a pilot-scale sequencing batch reactor for the treatment of low-strength municipal wastewater. Water Res. 2009;43:751–761. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kreuk MK, van Loosdrecht MCM. Selection of slow growing organisms as a means for improving aerobic granular sludge stability. Water Sci Technol. 2004;49:9–17. doi: 10.2166/wst.2004.0792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Yang SF, Tay JH. Improved stability of aerobic granules by selecting slow-growing nitrifying bacteria. J Biotechnol. 2004;108:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kreuk MK, Heijnen JJ, Van Loosdrecht MCM. Simultaneous COD, nitrogen, and phosphate removal by aerobic granular sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;90:761–769. doi: 10.1002/bit.20470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beun JJ, Heijnen JJ, van Loosdrecht MCM. N-Removal in a granular sludge sequencing batch airlift reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001;75:82–92. doi: 10.1002/bit.1167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochmatter S, Gonzalez-Gil G, Holliger C. Optimized aeration strategies for nitrogen and phosphorus removal with aerobic granular sludge. Water Res. 2013;47:6187–6197. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronk M, de Kreuk MK, de Bruin B, et al. Full scale performance of the aerobic granular sludge process for sewage treatment. Water Res. 2015;84:207–217. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie JP, Boltz JP. Moving bed biofilm reactor technology: process applications, design, and performance. Water Environ. Res. 2011;83:560–575. doi: 10.2175/106143010X12851009156286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzeminski P, Leverette L, Malamis S, et al. Membrane bioreactors – a review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects. J Memb Sci. 2017;527:207–227. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson S, de Blois M, Wilén BM, et al. Treatment of municipal wastewater with aerobic granular sludge. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2018; in press. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2018.1439653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenskt Vatten. Svenskt Vattens undersökning VASS reningsverk 2015 – nyckeltal från första året. 2016 . Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Tchobanoglous G, Stensel HD, Tsuchihashi R, et al. Metcalf & Eddy wastewater engineering: treatment and resource recovery. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• ATV. ATV-DVWK-A 131E Dimensioning of single stage activated sludge plants; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard H. Norwegian experiences with chemical treatment of raw wastewater. Water Sci Technol. 1992;25:255–264. doi: 10.2166/wst.1992.0357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Roest HF, de Bruin LMM, Gademan G, et al. Towards sustainable waste water treatment with Dutch Nereda® technology. Water Pract Technol. 2011;6:3. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2011.059
   Google Scholar
• de Kreuk MK, Pronk M, Van Loosdrecht MCM. Formation of aerobic granules and conversion processes in an aerobic granular sludge reactor at moderate and low temperatures. Water Res. 2005;39:4476–4484. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.08.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hem L, Rusten B, Ødegaard H. Nitrification in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Water Res. 1994;28:1425–1433. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)90310-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensson M, Welander T. Treatment of municipal wastewater in a hybrid process using a new suspended carrier with large surface area. Water Sci Technol. 2004;49:207–214. doi: 10.2166/wst.2004.0843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer JT, Menniti AL, Erdal ZK, et al. A practitioner’s perspective on the application and research needs of membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2012;122:2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kängsepp P, Väänänen J, Örning K, et al. Performance and operating experiences of the first Scandinavian full-scale discfilter installation for tertiary phosphorus polishing with preceding coagulation and flocculation. Water Pract Technol. 2016;11:459–468. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2016.040
   Google Scholar
• Langer M, Väänänen J, Boulestreau M, et al. Advanced phosphorus removal via coagulation, flocculation and microsieve filtration in tertiary treatment. Water Sci Technol. 2017;75:2875–2882. doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolzonella D, Pavan P, Battistoni P, et al. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: influence of the solid retention time in the wastewater treatment process. Process Biochem. 2005;40:1453–1460. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.06.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavala HN, Yenal U, Skiadas I V, et al. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of primary and secondary sludge. Effect of pre-treatment at elevated temperature. Water Res. 2003;37:4561–4572. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00401-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abma WR, Driessen W, Haarhuis R, et al. Upgrading of sewage treatment plant by sustainable and cost-effective separate treatment of industrial wastewater. Water Sci Technol. 2010;61:1715–1722. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmidt E, Ghyselbrecht K, Zhang Y, et al. Global phosphorus scarcity and full-scale P-recovery techniques: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2015;45:336–384. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2013.866531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner S, Gilbert EM, Vlaeminck SE, et al. Full-scale partial nitritation/anammox experiences - An application survey. Water Res. 2014;55:292–303. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolders GJF, van der Meij J, van Loosdrecht MCM, et al. Stoichiometric model of the aerobic metabolism of the biological phosphorus removal process. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994;44:837–848. doi: 10.1002/bit.260440709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosso D, Lothman SE, Jeung MK, et al. Oxygen transfer and uptake, nutrient removal, and energy footprint of parallel full-scale IFAS and activated sludge processes. Water Res. 2011;45:5987–5996. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander S, Behnisch J, Wagner M. Energy, cost and design aspects of coarse- and fine-bubble aeration systems in the MBBR IFAS process. Water Sci Technol. 2017;75:890–897. doi: 10.2166/wst.2016.571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEF. Membrane bioreactors: WEF manual of practice No. 36. Alexandria (VA): McGraw-Hilll Education; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rusten B, Siljudalen JG, Nordeidet B. Upgrading to nitrogen removal with the KMT moving bed biofilm process. Water Sci Technol. 1994;29:185–195. doi: 10.2166/wst.1994.0608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qasim SR. Wastewater treatment plants: planning, design, and operation. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tao G, Kekre K, Oo MH, et al. Energy reduction and optimisation in membrane bioreactor systems. Water Pract Technol. 2010;5. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2010.088
   Google Scholar
• Xiao K, Xu Y, Liang S, et al. Engineering application of membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment in China: current state and future prospect. Front Environ Sci Eng. 2014;8:805–819. doi: 10.1007/s11783-014-0756-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itokawa H, Tsuji K, Yamashita K, et al. Design and operating experiences of full-scale municipal membrane bioreactors in Japan. Water Sci Technol. 2014;69:1088–1093. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzeminski P, van der Graaf JHJM, van Lier JB. Specific energy consumption of membrane bioreactor (MBR) for sewage treatment. Water Sci Technol. 2012;65:380–392. doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ødegaard H. Innovations in wastewater treatment: the moving bed biofilm process. Water Sci Technol. 2006;53:17–33. doi: 10.2166/wst.2006.284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusten B, Hen LJ, Ødegaard H. Nitrogen removal from dilute wastewater in cold climate using moving-bed biofilm reactors. Water Environ Res. 1995;67:65–74. doi: 10.2175/106143095X131204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusten B, Hellstrom BG, Hellstrom F, et al. Pilot testing and preliminary design of moving bed biofilm reactors for nitrogen removal at the FREVAR wastewater treatment plant. Water Sci Technol. 2000;41:13–20. doi: 10.2166/wst.2000.0419
   Google Scholar
• Lustig G. Moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR) i Sverige – Dimensionering och funktion [master’s thesis]. Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University; 2012. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon R, Chavan R, Kreidler D, et al. Can innovative technologies provide benefits to municipal water resource recovery facilities. Proc Water Environ Fed WEFTEC. 2016: 4354–4373. doi: 10.2175/193864716819712872
   Google Scholar
• Versprille AI, Zuurveen B, Stein T. The A-B process – a novel 2 stage waste-water treatment system. Water Sci. Technol. 1985;17:235–246. doi: 10.2166/wst.1985.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin LMM, de Kreuk MK, van der Roest HFR, et al. Aerobic granular sludge technology: an alternative to activated sludge? Water Sci Technol. 2004;49:1–7. doi: 10.2166/wst.2004.0790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmeiro-Sanchez T, del Rio A, Mosquera-Corral A, et al. Comparison of the anaerobic digestion of activated and aerobic granular sludges under brackish conditions. Chem Eng J. 2013;231:449–454. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Rio A V, Morales N, Isanta E, et al. Thermal pre-treatment of aerobic granular sludge: impact on anaerobic biodegradability. Water Res. 2011;45:6011–6020. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilén B-M, Cimbritz M, Pettersson Jr. T, et al. Large scale tertiary filtration - results and experiences from the discfilter plant at the Rya WWTP in Sweden. Water Pract Technol. 2016;11:547–555. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2016.063
   Google Scholar
• Judd S, Judd C. The MBR book – principles and applications of membrane bioreactors for water and wastewater treatment. Oxford: Elsevier; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Baresel C, Westling K, Samuelsson O, et al. Membrane bioreactor processes to meet todays and future municipal sewage treatment requirements? Int J Water Wastewater Treat. 2017;3.
   Google Scholar