Performance evaluation and substrate removal kinetics in an up-flow anaerobic hybrid membrane bioreactor treating simulated high-strength wastewater

References

• *The Refs. [42] to [47] are cited in Table 5 (S1).
   Google Scholar
• Oktem YA, Ince O, Sallis P, et al. Anaerobic treatment of a chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater in a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:1089–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamza RA, Iorhemen OT, Tay JH. Advances in biological systems for the treatment of high-strength wastewater. J Water Process Eng. 2016;10:128–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutamim NSA, Noor ZZ, Hassan MAA, et al. Application of membrane bioreactor technology in treating high strength industrial wastewater: A performance review. Desalination. 2012;305:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyva-díaz JC, González-martínez A, González-lópez J, et al. Kinetic modeling and microbiological study of two-step nitrification in a membrane bioreactor and hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor – membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J. 2015;259:692–702. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin M, Fazeli S, Hassani A, et al. Evaluation of flat sheet membrane bioreactor efficiency for municipal wastewater treatment. Int J Environ Health Eng. 2012;1:19, Available from: http://www.ijehe.org/text.asp?2012/1/1/19/96008. doi: 10.4103/2277-9183.96008
   Google Scholar
• Yujiao S, Yong W, Xia H. Relationship between sludge settleability and membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor. Front Environ Sci Eng China. 2007;1(2):221–225. doi: 10.1007/s11783-007-0038-9
   Google Scholar
• He P, Li M, Xu S, et al. Anaerobic treatment of fresh leachate from a municipal solid waste incinerator by upflow blanket filter reactor. Front Environ Sci Eng China. 2009;3:404–411. doi: 10.1007/s11783-009-0149-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visvanathan C, Abeynayaka A. Developments and future potentials of anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs). Membr Water Treat. 2012;3:1–23. Available from: http://koreascience.or.kr/journal/view.jsp?kj=TPTPIQ&py=2012&vnc=v3n1&sp=1. doi: 10.12989/mwt.2012.3.1.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo W, Ngo HH, Palmer CG, et al. Roles of sponge sizes and membrane types in a single stage sponge-submerged membrane bioreactor for improving nutrient removal from wastewater for reuse. Desalination. 2009;249:672–676. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2009.01.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H, Peng W, Zhang M, et al. A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications, membrane fouling and future perspectives. Desalination. 2013;314:169–188. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011916413000386. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saddoud A, Abdelkafi S, Sayadi S. Effects of domestic wastewater toxicity on anaerobic membrane-bioreactor (MBR) performances. Environ Technol. 2009;30:1361–1369. doi: 10.1080/09593330903100027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monclus H, Buttiglieri G, Ferrero G, et al. Knowledge-based control module for start-up of flat sheet MBRs. Bioresour Technol. 2012;106:50–54. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YK, Pan XR, Sheng GP, et al. Development of an energy-saving anaerobic hybrid membrane bioreactors for 2-chlorophenol-contained wastewater treatment. Chemosphere. 2015;140:79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skouteris G, Hermosilla D, López P, et al. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: A review. Chem Eng J. 2012;198-199:138–148. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian M, Ngo H, Pazhaniappan S. Substrate removal kinetics of an anaerobic hybrid reactor treating pharmaceutical wastewater. J Water Sustain. 2011;1(3):301–312.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Jin X, Ma Z, et al. Methane production in simulated hybrid bioreactor landfill. Bioresour Technol. 2014;168:92–96. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navaratna D, Shu L, Jegatheesan V. Evaluation of herbicide (persistent pollutant) removal mechanisms through hybrid membrane bioreactors. Bioresour Technol. 2016;200:795–803. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik A, Badr N, Taleb E, et al. Sewage treatment in an up-flow anaerobic sponge reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor based on polyurethane carrier material. Desalin Water Treat. 2012;37:350–358. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2012.661291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Kamah H, Tawfik A, Mahmoud M, et al. Treatment of high strength wastewater from fruit juice industry using integrated anaerobic/aerobic system. Desalination. 2010;253:158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik A, El-Gohary F, Temmink H. Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2010;33:267–276. doi: 10.1007/s00449-009-0321-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandclement C, Seyssiecq I, Piram A, et al. From the conventional biological wastewater treatment to hybrid processes, the evaluation of organic micropollutant removal : a review To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-01456484. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tawfik A. Polyurethane trickling filter in combination with anaerobic hybrid reactor for treatment of tomato industry wastewater. In: Dr. Fahmina Zafar, editor. Polyurethnae. India: InTech; 2012. p. 355–377, DOI:10.5772/47982.
   Google Scholar
• Jamal Khan S, Ilyas S, Javid S, et al. Performance of suspended and attached growth MBR systems in treating high strength synthetic wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:5331–5336. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal Khan S, Zohaib-Ur-Rehman, Visvanathan C, et al. Influence of biofilm carriers on membrane fouling propensity in moving biofilm membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol. 2012;113:161–164. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyükkamaci N, Filibeli A. Determination of kinetic constants of an anaerobic hybrid reactor. Process Biochem. 2002;38:73–79. doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00047-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Rao NC, Qiu R, et al. Performance and kinetic evaluation of anaerobic moving bed biofilm reactor for treating milk permeate from dairy industry. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:5641–5647. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debik E, Coskun T. Use of the static granular Bed reactor (SGBR) with anaerobic sludge to treat poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and kinetic modeling. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:2777–2782. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuşçu ÖS, Sponza DT. Treatment efficiencies of a sequential anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR)/completely stirred tank reactor (CSTR) system at increasing p-nitrophenol and COD loading rates. Process Biochem. 2006;41:1484–1492. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şentürk E, Ince M, Onkal Engin G. Kinetic evaluation and performance of a mesophilic anaerobic contact reactor treating medium-strength food-processing wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:3970–3977. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo W, Ngo HH, Dharmawan F, et al. Roles of polyurethane foam in aerobic moving and fixed bed bioreactors. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:1435–1439. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan YJ, Chong MF, Law CL. An integrated anaerobic-aerobic bioreactor (IAAB) for the treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME): start-up and steady state performance. Process Biochem. 2012;47:485–495. DOI:10.1016/j.procbio.2011.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Singare PU, Talpade MS, Dagli DV, et al. Heavy metals in sediment ecosystem of Bhavan’s College Lake of Andheri, Mumbai. Int Lett Chem Phys Astron. 2013;13:105–112. Available from: http://www.scipress.com/ILCPA.13.105. doi: 10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILCPA.13.105
   Google Scholar
• Solids S, Sieve IS, Cooling F, et al. General Standards for discharge of environment Pollutants Part-A: Effluents. 1993;2:2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Khan SJ, Visvanathan C. Influence of mechanical mixing intensity on a biofilm structure and permeability in a membrane bioreactor. Desalination. 2008;231:253–267. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narra M, Balasubramanian V, Mehta H, et al. Performance evaluation of anaerobic hybrid reactors with different packing media for treating wastewater of mild alkali treated rice straw in ethanol fermentation process. Bioresour Technol. 2014;152:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponza DT, Uluköy A. Kinetic of carbonaceous substrate in an upflow anaerobic sludge sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating 2,4 dichlorophenol (2,4 DCP). J Environ Manage. 2008;86:121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponza DT, Işik M. Substrate removal kinetics in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor decolorising simulated textile wastewater. Process Biochem. 2005;40:1189–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abtahi SM, Amin MM, Nateghi R, et al. Prediction of effluent COD concentration of UASB reactor using kinetic models of Monod, Contois, second order Grau and modified Stover-Kincannon. Int J Environ Health Eng. 2013;2(1):12. doi: 10.4103/2277-9183.110149
   Google Scholar
• Jijai S, Siripatana C, Sompong O, et al. Kinetic models for prediction of COD effluent from upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor for cannery seafood wastewater treatment. Jurnal Teknologi. 2016;78(5-6):93–99. doi: 10.11113/jt.v78.8644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsirai T, Buzatu P, Aerts P, et al. Efficacy of relaxation, backflushing, chemical cleaning and clogging removal for an immersed hollow fibre membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2012;46:4499–4507. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Priya KR, Sandhya S, Swaminathan K. Kinetic analysis of treatment of formaldehyde containing wastewater in UAFB reactor. Chem Eng J. 2009;148(2-3):212–216. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kusçu ÖS, Sponza DT. Kinetics of para-nitrophenol and chemical oxygen demand removal from synthetic wastewater in an anaerobic migrating blanket reactor. J Hazard Mater. 2009;161(2-3):787–799. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Turkdogan-Aydinol FI, Yetilmezsoy K, Comez S, et al. Performance evaluation and kinetic modeling of the start-up of a UASB reactor treating municipal wastewater at low temperature. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2011;34(2):153–162. doi: 10.1007/s00449-010-0456-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Yilmaz T, Yuceer A, Basibuyuk M. A comparison of the performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic filters treating papermill wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(1):156–163. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Coskun T, Kabuk HA, Varinca KB, et al. Antibiotic fermentation broth treatment by a pilot upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor and kinetic modeling. Bioresour Technol. 2012;121:31–35. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Li L, Suwanate S, Visvanathan C. Performance evaluation of attached growth membrane bioreactor for treating polluted surface water. Bioresour Technol. 2017;240:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar