Preliminary study testing the effects of tea and coffee on sludge characteristics and N-butyryl-l-homoserine lactone in an MBR system

References

• Atkinson S. Research studies predict strong growth for MBR markets. Membr Technol. 2006;2006(2):8–10. doi: 10.1016/S0958-2118(06)70635-8
   Google Scholar
• Oh HS, Yeon KM, Yang CS, et al. Control of membrane biofouling in MBR for wastewater treatment by quorum quenching bacteria encapsulated in microporous membrane. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(9):4877–4884. doi: 10.1021/es204312u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Wu Z, Tang S. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2009;43(9):2504–2512. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhardt N, Firk W, Warnken W. Integration of membrane filtration into the activated sludge process in municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol. 1998;38(4–5):429–436. doi: 10.2166/wst.1998.0686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas H, Judd S, Murrer J. Fouling characteristics of membrane filtration in membrane bioreactors. Membr Technol. 2000;2000(122):10–13. doi: 10.1016/S0958-2118(00)88959-4
   Google Scholar
• Kimura K, Naruse T, Watanabe Y. Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: relation to membrane fouling. Water Res. 2009;43(4):1033–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahendran BL, Lin H, Liao BH, et al. Surface properties of biofouled membranes from a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor after cleaning. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(6):504–513. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao BQ, Bagley DM, Kraemer HE, et al. A review of biofouling and its control in membrane separation bioreactors. Water Environ Res. 2004;76(5):425–436. doi: 10.2175/106143004X151527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massé A, Spérandio M, Cabassud C. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Res. 2006;40(12):2405–2415. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamato N, Kimura K, Miyoshi T, et al. Difference in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) caused by membrane polymer materials. J Membr Sci. 2006;280(1–2):911–919. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng F, Zhang H, Yang F, et al. Identification of activated sludge properties affecting membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. Sep Purif Technol. 2006;51(1):95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2006.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvořák L, Gómez M, Dvořáková M, et al. The impact of different operating conditions on membrane fouling and EPS production. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(13):6870–6875. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H-D, Chang I-S, Lee K-J. Principles of membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. New York: CRC Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Judd S. Chapter 2 – fundamentals. In: Simon Judd, editor. The MBR book. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 2006. p. 21–121.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway WR, Hodgkinson TJ, Bowden S, et al. Applications of small molecule activators and inhibitors of quorum sensing in gram-negative bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20(9):449–458. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobretsov S, Teplitski M, Paul V. Mini-review: quorum sensing in the marine environment and its relationship to biofouling. Biofouling. 2009;25(5):413–427. doi: 10.1080/08927010902853516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeon KM, Lee CH, Kim J. Magnetic enzyme carrier for effective biofouling control in the membrane bioreactor based on enzymatic quorum quenching. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(19):7403–7409. doi: 10.1021/es901323k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Choi DC, Yeon KM, et al. Enzyme-immobilized nanofiltration membrane to mitigate biofouling based on quorum quenching. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(4):1601–1607. doi: 10.1021/es103483j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo SJ, Kwon H, Jeong SY, et al. Effects of quorum quenching on the microbial community of biofilm in an anoxic/oxic mbr for wastewater treatment. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;26(9):1593–1604. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1604.04070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Park S-K, Kwon H, et al. Crossing the border between laboratory and field: bacterial quorum quenching for anti-biofouling strategy in an MBR. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(4):1788–1795. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalia VC. Quorum sensing inhibitors: an overview. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(2):224–245. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norizan S, Yin W-F, Chan K-G. Caffeine as a potential quorum sensing inhibitor. Sensors. 2013;13(4):5117. doi: 10.3390/s130405117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonthakaew A, Matan N, Aewsiri T, et al. Caffeine in foods and its antimicrobial activity. Int Food Res J. 2015;22(1):9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancı M, Bakirci S, Bayram S. et al. Caffeine levels in Turkish coffee and some beverages sold in Turkey. Duzce Med J. 2013;15:34–38.
   Google Scholar
• American Public Health, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington (DC): APHA-AWWA-WEF; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Bai R, Liu J. Distribution and composition of extracellular polymeric substances in membrane-aerated biofilm. J Biotechnol. 2008;135(1):52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, et al. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193(1):265–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, et al. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956;28(3):350–356. doi: 10.1021/ac60111a017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Wang Z, Huang S, et al. Effects of various factors on critical flux in submerged membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol. 2008;62(1):56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakaraki NI, Chormey DS, Bakirdere S, et al. Development of a sensitive liquid-liquid extraction method for the determination of N-butyryl-l-homoserine lactone produced in a submerged membrane bioreactor by gas chromatography mass spectrometry and deuterated anthracene as the internal standard. Anal Methods. 2016;8(12):2660–2665. doi: 10.1039/C6AY00317F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geesey GG. Microbial exopolymers: ecological and economic considerations. ASM News. 1982;48:9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lin H, Zhang M, Wang F, et al. A critical review of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in membrane bioreactors: characteristics, roles in membrane fouling and control strategies. J Membr Sci. 2014;460:110–125. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le-Clech P, Chen V, Fane TA. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci. 2006;284(1–2):17–53. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin HS, Kang S-T, Nam S-Y. Effect of carbohydrates to protein in EPS on sludge settling characteristics. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2000;5(6):460–464. doi: 10.1007/BF02931948
   Google Scholar
• Hao L, Liss SN, Liao BQ. Influence of COD:N ratio on sludge properties and their role in membrane fouling of a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2016;89:132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng HY, Tan TW, Ong SL. Membrane fouling of submerged membrane bioreactors:  impact of mean cell residence time and the contributing factors. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(8):2706–2713. doi: 10.1021/es0516155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowen M, Piirtola L. Characterization of activated sludge flocs. In: Hultman B, Kuntbiel J, editors. Proceedings of the Polish-Swedish seminar on advanced wastewater treatment, Report. no. 3; 1998. p. 135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Durmaz B, Sanin F. Effect of carbon to nitrogen ratio on the physical and chemical properties of activated sludge. Environ Technol. 2003;24(11):1331–1340. doi: 10.1080/09593330309385677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkan HS, Engin GO, Kulil B, et al. Activated sludge properties in a submerged membrane bioreactor: effect of COD/TKN ratio of wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2017;14(5):933–942. doi: 10.1007/s13762-016-1201-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey TJ, Daly J. Dewatering of activated sludge. In: L'Hermite P, Ott H, editors. Characterization, treatment and use of sewage sludge. Vienna: Springer Netherlands; 1981. p. 72–83.
   Google Scholar
• van Loosdrecht MC, Lyklema J, Norde W, et al. The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53(8):1893–1897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Gao M, Xin Y, et al. Effect of C/N ratio on extracellular polymeric substances of activated sludge from an anoxic–aerobic sequencing batch reactor treating saline wastewater. Environ Technol. 2014;35(22):2821–2828. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2014.924563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornel P, Krause S. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. In: Li NN, Fane AG, Ho WSW, et al. (coord.) Advanced membrane technology and applications. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2008. p. 217–239.
   Google Scholar
• Liao BQ, Allen DG, Droppo IG, et al. Surface properties of sludge and their role in bioflocculation and settleability. Water Res. 2001;35(2):339–350. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00277-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Kang S, Shin H. Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci. 2003;216(1–2):217–227. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00073-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabi S, Nakhla G. Impact of protein/carbohydrate ratio in the feed wastewater on the membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci. 2008;324(1–2):142–150. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen T, Roddick F, Fan L. Biofouling of water treatment membranes: a review of the underlying causes, monitoring techniques and control measures. Membranes. 2012;2(4):804. doi: 10.3390/membranes2040804
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blenkinsopp SA, Costerton JW. Understanding bacterial biofilms. Trends Biotechnol. 1991;9(1):138–143. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(91)90045-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies DG, Parsek MR, Pearson JP, et al. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science. 1998;280(5361):295–298. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5361.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar