Determination of microbial numbers in anaerobically digested biofertilisers

References

• Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Ferrer-Costa A, et al. Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;40:181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao C, Feng Y, Wang X, et al. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015;45:540–555. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambone F, Scaglia B, Imporzano GD, et al. Chemosphere Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost. Chemosphere. 2010;81:577–583. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller K, Müller T. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng. Life Sci. 2012;12:242–257. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201100085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkoa R. Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2014;34:473–492. doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho JJ, Prieto ML, Dowling S, et al. Physical-chemical traits, phytotoxicity and pathogen detection in liquid anaerobic digestates. Waste Manag. 2018;78:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlström L. A review of survival of pathogenic bacteria in organic waste used in biogas plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2003;87:161–166. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00168-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massé D, Gilbert Y, Topp E. Pathogen removal in farm-scale psychrophilic anaerobic digesters processing swine manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102:641–646. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynaud G, Pourcher A-M, Ziebal C, et al. Persistence and potential viable but non-culturable state of pathogenic bacteria during storage of digestates from agricultural biogas plants. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1469. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conversano G, Pizzolante G, Alifano P, et al. Characterization and enhancement of microbial biodiversity in digestate in the agronomic field. J. Life Sci. 2015;9:139–151.
   Google Scholar
• Insam H, Gómez-Brandón M, Ascher J. Manure-based biogas fermentation residues–friend or foe of soil fertility? Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015;84:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel S, Joergensen RG. Quantitative microbial indices in biogas and raw cattle slurries. Eng. Life Sci. 2016;16:231–237. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201400229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voća N, Krička T, Ćosić T, et al. Digested residue as a fertilizer after the mesophilic process of anaerobic digestion. Plant Soil Env. 2005;51:262–266. doi: 10.17221/3584-PSE
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Lim J, Lee C. Quantitative real-time PCR approaches for microbial community studies in wastewater treatment systems: applications and considerations. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013;31:1358–1373. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes M, Borrás L, Seco A, et al. Identification and quantification of microbial populations in activated sludge and anaerobic digestion processes. Environ. Technol. 2015;36:45–53. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2014.934745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson MC, Morrison M, Yu Z. A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102:3730–3739. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regueiro L, Veiga P, Figueroa M, et al. Relationship between microbial activity and microbial community structure in six full-scale anaerobic digesters. Microbiol. Res. 2012;167:581–589. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2012.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanwonterghem I, Jensen PD, Ho DP, et al. Linking microbial community structure, interactions and function in anaerobic digesters using new molecular techniques. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014;27:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffs P, Norling B, Rådström P. Risk assessment of false-positive quantitative real-time PCR results in food, due to detection of DNA originating from dead cells. J Microbiol Methods. 2005;60:315–323. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cangelosi GA, Meschke JS. Dead or alive: molecular assessment of microbial viability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014;80:5884–5891. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01763-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner AO, Malin C, Knapp BA, et al. Removal of free extracellular DNA from environmental samples by ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:2537–2539. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02288-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertsen M, Karst SM, Ziegler AS, et al. Back to basics–the influence of DNA extraction and primer choice on phylogenetic analysis of activated sludge communities. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerardi MH. The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:4044–4064. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopal R, Massé DI, Singh G. A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;143:632–641. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintsche B, Glaser K, Sträuber H, et al. Trace elements induce predominance among methanogenic activity in anaerobic digestion. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:2034. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatti E, McKew BA, Whitby C, et al. Simultaneous DNA-RNA extraction from coastal sediments and quantification of 16S rRNA genes and transcripts by real-time PCR. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE. 2016;112:pe5406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierer N, Jackson RB. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103:626–631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507535103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amann RI, Krumholz L, Stahl DA. Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology. J. Bacteriol. 1990;172:762–770. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.2.762-770.1990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainio EJ, Hantula J. Direct analysis of wood-inhabiting fungi using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of amplified ribosomal DNA. Mycol. Res. 2000;104:927–936. doi: 10.1017/S0953756200002471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KR, Gorley RN. PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial (Plymouth routines in multivariate ecological research). Plymouth: Plymouth Prim. Ltd.; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Riviere D, Desvignes V, Pelletier E, et al. Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge. ISME J. 2009;3:700–714. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziganshin AM, Liebetrau J, Pröter J, et al. Microbial community structure and dynamics during anaerobic digestion of various agricultural waste materials. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;97:5161–5174. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-4867-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnürer A, Schnürer J. Fungal survival during anaerobic digestion of organic household waste. Waste Manag. 2006;26:1205–1211. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procházka J, Mrázek J, Štrosová L, et al. Enhanced biogas yield from energy crops with rumen anaerobic fungi. Eng. Life Sci. 2012;12:343–351. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201100076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım E, Ince O, Aydin S, et al. Improvement of biogas potential of anaerobic digesters using rumen fungi. Renew Energy. 2017;109:346–353. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazda M, Langer S, Bengelsdorf FR. Fungi open new possibilities for anaerobic fermentation of organic residues. Energy. Sustain. Soc. 2014;4:6. doi: 10.1186/2192-0567-4-6
   Google Scholar
• Astals S, Venegas C, Peces M, et al. Balancing hygienization and anaerobic digestion of raw sewage sludge. Water Res. 2012;46:6218–6227. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coultry J, Walsh E, McDonnell KP. Energy and economic implications of anaerobic digestion pasteurisation regulations in Ireland. Energy. 2013;60:125–128. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin SG, Lee S, Lee C, et al. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of microbial community in batch anaerobic digestion of secondary sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101:9461–9470. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi J, Dong B, Xue Y, et al. Microbial community dynamics in batch high-solid anaerobic digestion of food waste under mesophilic conditions. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;24:270–279. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1306.06067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang HM, Kim JH, Ha JH, et al. Bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities during the single-stage anaerobic digestion of high-strength food wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2014;165:174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BH. Fundamentals of food biotechnology. Plymouth: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bossuyt H, Denef K, Six J, et al. Influence of microbial populations and residue quality on aggregate stability. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2001;16:195–208. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00116-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Six J, Frey SD, Thiet RK, et al. Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2006;70:555–569. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandte M, Schleusner Y, Heiermann M, et al. Viability of plant–pathogenic fungi reduced by anaerobic digestion. BioEnergy Res. 2013;6:966–973. doi: 10.1007/s12155-013-9326-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young D, Dollhofer V, Callaghan TM, et al. Isolation, identification and characterization of lignocellulolytic aerobic and anaerobic fungi in one-and two-phase biogas plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2018;268:470–479. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollhofer V, Callaghan TM, Griffith GW, et al. Presence and transcriptional activity of anaerobic fungi in agricultural biogas plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2017;235:131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar