References
- Chang Y-R, Lee Y-J, Lee D-J. Membrane fouling during water or wastewater treatments: current research updated. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2019;94:88–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2017.12.019
- Kalboussi N, Harmand J, Rapaport A, et al. Optimal control of physical backwash strategy-towards the enhancement of membrane filtration process performance. J Memb Sci. 2018;545:38–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.053
- Cheng ZL, Li X, Chung T-S. The forward osmosis-pressure retarded osmosis (FO-PRO) hybrid system: a new process to mitigate membrane fouling for sustainable osmotic power generation. J Memb Sci. 2018;559:63–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.036
- Zhang M, Leung K-T, Lin H, et al. Characterization of foaming and non-foaming sludge relating to aeration and the implications for membrane fouling control in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Water Process Eng. 2019;28:250–259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.02.011
- Huang S, Ras RH, Tian X. Antifouling membranes for oily wastewater treatment: Interplay between wetting and membrane fouling. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;36:90–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2018.02.002
- Seo DH, Pineda S, Woo YC, et al. Anti-fouling graphene-based membranes for effective water desalination. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w
- Goh P, Lau W, Othman M, et al. Membrane fouling in desalination and its mitigation strategies. Desalination. 2018;425:130–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.018
- Kang G-d, Cao Y-m. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: a review. Water Res. 2012;46:584–600. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.041
- Vrijenhoek EM, Hong S, Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Memb Sci. 2001;188:115–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00376-3
- Du JR, Peldszus S, Huck PM, et al. Modification of poly (vinylidene fluoride) ultrafiltration membranes with poly (vinyl alcohol) for fouling control in drinking water treatment. Water Res. 2009;43:4559–4568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.08.008
- Du JR, Peldszus S, Huck PM, et al. Modification of membrane surfaces via microswelling for fouling control in drinking water treatment. J Memb Sci. 2015;475:488–495. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.040
- Xu J, Wang Z, Wang J, et al. Positively charged aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membrane with high anti-fouling property prepared by polyethylenimine grafting. Desalination. 2015;365:398–406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.026
- Li Q, Xu Z, Pinnau I. Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes by biopolymers in wastewater secondary effluent: Role of membrane surface properties and initial permeate flux. J Memb Sci. 2007;290:173–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.027
- Hirose M, Ito H, Kamiyama Y. Effect of skin layer surface structures on the flux behaviour of RO membranes. J Memb Sci. 1996;121:209–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00181-0
- Riedl K, Girard B, Lencki RW. Influence of membrane structure on fouling layer morphology during apple juice clarification. J Memb Sci. 1998;139:155–166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00239-1
- Guo Z, Liu W, Su B-L. Superhydrophobic surfaces: from natural to biomimetic to functional. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;353:335–355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.047
- Bhushan B, Jung YC. Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction. Prog Mater Sci. 2011;56:1–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.003
- Singh RA, Yoon E-S, Kim HJ, et al. Replication of surfaces of natural leaves for enhanced micro-scale tribological property. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2007;27:875–879. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.10.007
- Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann Bot. 1997;79:667–677. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1997.0400
- Madaeni S, Ghaemi N. Characterization of self-cleaning RO membranes coated with TiO2 particles under UV irradiation. J Memb Sci. 2007;303:221–233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.07.017
- Kruger N. J. The Bradford method for protein quantitation. In: Walker J.M., editor. The protein protocols handbook. Totowa (NJ): Springer; 2009. p. 17–24.
- Bolag D, Edelstein S. Protein methods. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1991.
- Godovsky YK. Thermophysical properties of polymers. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
- Rahaman MS, Thérien-Aubin H, Ben-Sasson M, et al. Control of biofouling on reverse osmosis polyamide membranes modified with biocidal nanoparticles and antifouling polymer brushes. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2:1724–1732. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tb21681k
- Hurwitz G, Guillen GR, Hoek EM. Probing polyamide membrane surface charge, zeta potential, wettability, and hydrophilicity with contact angle measurements. J Memb Sci. 2010;349:349–357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.063
- Jee KY, Shin DH, Lee YT. Surface modification of polyamide RO membrane for improved fouling resistance. Desalination. 2016;394:131–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.05.013
- Razmjou A, Arifin E, Dong G, et al. Superhydrophobic modification of TiO2 nanocomposite PVDF membranes for applications in membrane distillation. J Memb Sci. 2012;415-416:850–863. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.004
- Wenzel RN. Surface roughness and contact angle. J Phys Colloid Chem. 1949;53:1466–1467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/j150474a015
- Jung YC, Bhushan B. Contact angle, adhesion and friction properties of micro-and nanopatterned polymers for superhydrophobicity. Nanotechnology. 2006;17:4970–4980. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/17/19/033
- Xu P, Drewes JE, Bellona C, et al. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration–reverse osmosis membrane applications. Water Environ Res. 2005;77:40–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.2175/106143005X41609
- Xu P, Drewes JE. Viability of nanofiltration and ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membranes for multi-beneficial use of methane produced water. Sep Purif Technol. 2006;52:67–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.03.019
- Madureira AR, Pereira CI, Gomes AM, et al. Bovine whey proteins–overview on their main biological properties. Food Res Int. 2007;40:1197–1211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2007.07.005
- Genzer J, Marmur A. Biological and synthetic self-cleaning surfaces. MRS Bull. 2008;33:742–746. doi: https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2008.159
- Nishimoto S, Bhushan B. Bioinspired self-cleaning surfaces with superhydrophobicity, superoleophobicity, and superhydrophilicity. RSC Adv. 2013;3:671–690. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RA21260A