Systematic evaluation of PDA/PAM/MAH-modified basalt fibre as biofilm carrier for wastewater treatment

References

• Hamza RA, Iorhemen OT, Tay JH. Advances in biological systems for the treatment of high-strength wastewater. J Water Process Eng. 2016;10:128–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Biase A, Kowalski MS, Devlin TR, et al. Moving bed biofilm reactor technology in municipal wastewater treatment: a review. J Environ Manage. 2019;247:849–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekker I, Raudkivi M, Artemchuk O, et al. Mainstream-sidestream wastewater switching promotes anammox nitrogen removal rate in organic-rich, low-temperature streams. Environ Technol. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1721566.
   Google Scholar
• Rikmann E, Zekker I, Tomingas M, et al. Comparison of sulfate-reducing and conventional Anammox upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. J Biosci Bioeng. 2014;118(4):426–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring GE. The disposal of sewage. Public Health Pap Rep. 1884;10:174–179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mann A, Mendoza-Espinosa L, Stephenson T. A comparison of floating and sunken media biological aerated filters for nitrification. J Chem Technol Biotech. 1998;72(3):273–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol R, Canler JP, Vachon A, et al. Biological aerated filters - an adapted biological process for waste-water from coastal areas. Water Sci Technol. 1992;25(12):175–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero S, Storck T, Heimovaara TJ, et al. Biofilm development and the dynamics of preferential flow paths in porous media. Biofouling. 2013;29(9):1069–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felfoeldi T, Jurecska L, Vajna B, et al. Texture and type of polymer fiber carrier determine bacterial colonization and biofilm properties in wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J. 2015;264:824–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafari J, Seyedsalehi M, Safari GH, et al. Simultaneous biological organic matter and nutrient removal in an anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A(2)O) moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) integrated system. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2017;14(2):291–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafari J, Mesdaghinia A, Nabizadeh R, et al. Influence of upflow velocity on performance and biofilm characteristics of Anaerobic Fluidized Bed reactor (AFBR) in treating high-strength wastewater. J Environ Health Sci. 2014;12:139.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari J, Mesdaghinia A, Nabizadeh R, et al. Investigation of Anaerobic Fluidized Bed reactor/aerobic Moving Bed Bio reactor (AFBR/MMBR) system for treatment of Currant wastewater. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(8):860–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakansson K, Mattiasson B. Microbial degradation of acetonitrile using a suspended-carrier biofilm process. Biotechnol Lett. 2002;24(4):287–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushwaha PK, Kumar R. Influence of chemical treatments on the mechanical and water absorption properties of bamboo fiber composites. J Reinf Plast Comp. 2011;30(1):73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Yu Z, Jin S, et al. Lignocellulosic residue as bio-carrier for algal biofilm growth: effects of carrier physicochemical proprieties and toxicity on algal biomass production and composition. Bioresource Technol. 2019;293:122091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Zhang C, Bao Y, et al. Carbon fibers with a nano-hydroxyapatite coating as an excellent biofilm support for bioreactors. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;443:255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler E, Gadow R, Straub J. Basalt, glass and carbon fibers and their fiber reinforced polymer composites under thermal and mechanical load. Aims Mater Sci. 2016;3(4):1561–1576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasini F, Tirillo J, Seghini MC. Influence of thermal conditioning on tensile behaviour of single basalt fibres. Compos Part B-Eng. 2018;132:77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat T, Fortomaris D, Kandare E, et al. Properties of thermally recycled basalt fibres and basalt fibre composites. J Mater Sci. 2018;53(3):1933–1944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore V, Scalici T, Di Bella G, et al. A review on basalt fibre and its composites. Compos Part B-Eng. 2015;74:74–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamshaid H, Mishra R. A green material from rock: basalt fiber - a review. J Text I. 2016;107(7):923–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhand V, Mittal G, Rhee KY, et al. A short review on basalt fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part B-Eng. 2015;73:166–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhou X, Xie Y, et al. A sustainable bio-carrier medium for wastewater treatment: modified basalt fiber. J Clean Prod. 2019;225:472–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Moigne N, Sonnier R, El Hage R, et al. Radiation-induced modifications in natural fibres and their biocomposites: Opportunities for controlled physico-chemical modification pathways? Ind Crop Prod. 2017;109:199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackerle J. Coatings and surface modification technologies: a finite element bibliography (1995-2005). Model Simul Mater Sc. 2005;13(6):935–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball V. Physicochemical perspective on “polydopamine” and “poly(catecholamine)” films for their applications in biomaterial coatings. Biointerphases. 2014;9:0308013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay TG, Hegab HM, Clarke SR, et al. Versatile surface modification using Polydopamine and related Polycatecholamines: chemistry, structure, and applications. Adv Mater Interfaces. 2017;4:160119219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynge ME, van der Westen R, Postma A, et al. Polydopamine-a nature-inspired polymer coating for biomedical science. Nanoscale. 2011;3(12):4916–4928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie J, Michael PL, Zhong S, et al. Mussel inspired protein-mediated surface modification to electrospun fibers and their potential biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res a. 2012;100A(4):929–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy D, Semsarilar M, Guthrie JT, et al. Cellulose modification by polymer grafting: a review. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38(7):2046–2064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong KH, Liu N, Sun G. UV-induced graft polymerization of acrylamide on cellulose by using immobilized benzophenone as a photo-initiator. Eur Polym J. 2009;45(8):2443–2449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek H, Chaberska H. The influence of UV irradiation and support type on surface properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) thin films. Appl Surf Sci. 2006;252(23):8185–8192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu J, Zhang Y, Shen Y, et al. Hydrophilic modification of microporous polysulfone membrane via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization of acrylamide. Appl Surf Sci. 2010;256(10):3274–3280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diop MF, Torkelson JM. Maleic anhydride functionalization of polypropylene with suppressed molecular weight reduction via solid-state shear pulverization (vol 54, pg 4143, 2013). Polymer (Guildf). 2013;54(24):6663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais DDS, Siqueira DD, Luna CBB, et al. Grafting maleic anhydride onto polycaprolactone: influence of processing. Mater Res Express. 2019;6:0553155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Yan C, Wei X, et al. Study on Chlorination of maleic anhydride grafted Polypropylene. Polym Polym Compos. 2013;21(2):123–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhou X, Ni H, et al. Surface modification of basalt fiber with organic/inorganic Composites for biofilm carrier used in wastewater treatment. Acs Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6(2):2596–2602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA. Standard methods for the Examination of water and wastewater. 21th ed Washington (DC): American Public Health Association (APHA); 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wei B, Song S, Cao H. Strengthening of basalt fibers with nano-SiO2-epoxy composite coating. Mater Design. 2011;32(8-9):4180–4186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew RK, Nam WL, Chong MY, et al. Oil palm waste: An abundant and promising feedstock for microwave pyrolysis conversion into good quality biochar with potential multi-applications. Process Saf Environ. 2018;115(SI):57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Xue A, Zhao Y, et al. Grafting polyacrylic acid brushes onto zirconia membranes: Fouling reduction and easy-cleaning properties. Sep Purif Technol. 2013;114:53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado LM, Ando RA, Siqueira Petri DF. Polydopamine-coated cellulose acetate butyrate microbeads for caffeine removal. J Mater Sci. 2020;55(8):3243–3258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao N, Fan W, Xu Z. Ceramic membrane with protein-resistant surface via dopamine/diglycolamine co-deposition. Sep Purif Technol. 2020;234:116135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drews J, Launay H, Hansen CM, et al. Hydrolysis and stability of thin pulsed plasma polymerised maleic anhydride coatings. Appl Surf Sci. 2008;254(15):4720–4725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murillo EA, Lopez BL. Effect of the maleic anhydride content on the structural, thermal, rheological and film properties of the n-butyl methacrylate-maleic anhydride copolymers. Prog Org Coat. 2015;78:96–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry TH. Mechanism and Theory in organic chemistry. Harper & Row; New York, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Aksu Z. Application of biosorption for the removal of organic pollutants: a review. Process Biochem. 2005;40(3-4):997–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Trujillo MA, Garcia-Rivero M. Review article: environmental applications of immobilized microorganisms. Rev Mex Ing Quim. 2012;11(1):55–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan NJ, Huo CX. Production and characterization of immobilized-biomass carriers, using polyacrylamide. Environ Technol. 2004;25(6):667–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junter GA, Coquet L, Vilain S, et al. Immobilized-cell physiology: current data and the potentialities of proteomics. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2002;31(3):201–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyedsalehi M, Jaafari J, Helix-Nielsen C, et al. Evaluation of moving-bed biofilm sequencing batch reactor (MBSBR) in operating A(2)O process with emphasis on biological removal of nutrients existing in wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Te. 2018;15(1):199–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekker I, Rikmann E, Tenno T, et al. Anammox bacteria enrichment and phylogenic analysis in moving bed biofilm reactors. Environ Eng Sci. 2012;29(10):946–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekker I, Kiviruut A, Rikmann E, et al. Enhanced efficiency of Nitritating-Anammox sequencing batch reactor achieved at low decrease rates of oxidation-reduction potential. Environ Eng Sci. 2019;36(3):350–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikmann E, Zekker I, Tenno T, et al. Inoculum-free start-up of biofilm- and sludge-based deammonification systems in pilot scale. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2018;15(1):133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griessmeier V, Leberecht K, Gescher J. NO3- removal efficiency in field denitrification beds: key controlling factors and main implications. Env Microbiol Rep. 2019;11(3):316–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaali M, Naghdi M, Brar SK, et al. A review on the advances in nitrifying biofilm reactors and their removal rates in wastewater treatment. J Chem Technol Biotech. 2018;93(11):3113–3124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia J, Rousseau DPL, Morato J, et al. Contaminant removal processes in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands: a review. Crit Rev Env Sci Technol. 2010;40(PII 9239327027):561–661.
   Google Scholar
• Muisa N, Nhapi I, Ruziwa W, et al. Utilization of alum sludge as adsorbent for phosphorus removal in municipal wastewater: a review. J Water Process Eng. 2020;35:101187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafari J, Javid AB, Barzanouni H, et al. Performance of modified one-stage Phoredox reactor with hydraulic up-flow in biological removal of phosphorus from municipal wastewater (vol 171, pg 216, 2019). Desalin Water Treat. 2020;175:422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capodici M, Corsino SF, Di Trapani D, et al. Effect of biomass features on oxygen transfer in conventional activated sludge and membrane bioreactor systems. J Clean Prod. 2019;240:118071.
   Google Scholar
• Pan M, Yan J, Ding C, et al. Study on the mass transfer enhancement in Biofilms applied in Papermaking wastewater treatment. Bioresources. 2018;13(1):299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daija L, Selberg A, Rikmann E, et al. The influence of lower temperature, influent fluctuations and long retention time on the performance of an upflow mode laboratory-scale septic tank. Desalin Water Treat. 2016;57(40):18679–18687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barwal A, Chaudhary R. To study the performance of biocarriers in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) technology and kinetics of biofilm for retrofitting the existing aerobic treatment systems: a review. Rev Environ Sci Bio. 2014;13(3):285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenno T, Rikmann E, Uiga K, et al. A novel proton transfer model of the closed equilibrium system H2O-CO2-CaCO3-NHx. P Est Acad Sci. 2018;67(3):260–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar