Estimation of long-term methane emissions from Mechanical-Biological Treatment waste through biomethane potential test

References

• Vaverková MD, Elbl J, Voběrková S, et al. Composting versus mechanical–biological treatment: does it really make a difference in the final product parameters and maturity. Waste Manag. 2020;106:173–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei X, Zekkos D, Raskin L. Quantification of parameters influencing methane generation due to biodegradation of municipal solid waste in landfills and laboratory experiments. Waste Manag. 2016;55:276–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzesik K, Malinowski M. Life cycle assessment of mechanical-biological treatment of mixed municipal waste. Environ Eng Sci 2017;34:207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adani F, Tambone F, Genevini PL, et al. Stabilization of municipal solid waste fraction: a laboratory approach. Technol. Environ. 1998;4:2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jędrczak A. A Comparison of waste stability indices for mechanical–biological waste treatment and composting plants. Int J Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15(11):2585. doi:10.3390/ijerph15112585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adani F, Tambone F, Gotti A. Biostabilization of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag. 2004;24:775–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossu R, Raga R. Test methods for assessing the biological stability of biodegradable waste. Waste Manag. 2008;28:381–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaglia B, Confalonieri R, D’Imporzano G, et al. Estimating biogas production of biologically treated municipal solid waste. Bioresour Technol 2010;101:945–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lornage R, Redon E, Lagier T, et al. Performance of a low cost MBT prior to landfilling: study of the biological treatment of size reduced MSW without mechanical sorting. Waste Manag. 2007;27:1755–1764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsá S, Gea T, Alerm L, et al. Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic stability indices through a MSW biological treatment process. Waste Manag. 2008;28:2735–2742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrena R, D’Imporzano G, Ponsá S, et al. In search of a reliable technique for the determination of the biological stability of the organic matter in the mechanical–biological treated waste. J Hazard Mater 2009;162:1065–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gioannis G, Muntoni A, Cappai G, et al. Landfill gas generation after mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste. estimation of gas generation rate constants. Waste Manag. 2009;29:1026–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller W, Fricke K, Vogtmann H. Biodegradation of organic matter during mechanical biological treatment of MSW. Compost Sci Util 1998;6:42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germany Institut for Normative (Deutsches Institut für Normung). DIN 38414-8. German Standardised Procedures for Testing of Water, Wastewater and Sludge; Sludge and Sediments (Group S); Determination of Fermentation Behaviour (S 8). 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Schievano A, Pognani M, D’Imporzano G, et al. Predicting anaerobic biogasification potential of ingestates and digestates of a full-scale biogas plant using chemical and biological parameters. Bioresour Technol 2008;99:8112–8117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, et al. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol 2009;59:927–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliger C, Alves M, Andrade D, et al. Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests. Water Sci Technol 2016;74:2515–2522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantini S, Verginelli I, Lombardi F, et al. Assessment of biogas production from MBT waste under different operating conditions. Waste Manag. 2015;43:37–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA. Landfill Gas emissions model (LandGEM) version 3.02 user’s guide. Alexander, A., C. Burklin, and A. Singleton. EPA; 600, R-05/047 (NTIS PB2006-102386). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. and Tanabe K. (eds). Published: IGES, Japan. ISBN 4-88788-032-4. Vol. 5. Chapter 3.
   Google Scholar
• Majdinasab A, Zhang Z, Yuan Q. Modelling of landfill gas generation: a review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017;16:361–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson S, Sawyer J, Bonam R, et al. Building a better methane generation model: validating models with methane recovery rates from 35 Canadian landfills. Waste Manag. 2009;29:2085–2091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini HR, Reinhart DR, Niskanen A. Comparison of first-order-decay modeled and actual field measured municipal solid waste landfill methane data. Waste Manag. 2013;33:2720–2728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer K U, Hupe K, Stegmann R. Methane emissions from MBT landfills. Waste Manag. 2013;33:1853–1860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee U, Han J, Wang M. Evaluation of landfill gas emissions from municipal solid waste landfills for the life-cycle analysis of waste-to-energy pathways. J Clean Prod 2017;166:335–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollapalli M, Kota SH. Methane emissions from a landfill in north-east India: performance of various landfill gas emission models. Environ Pollut 2018;234:174–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho HS, Moon HS, Kim JY. Effect of quantity and composition of waste on the prediction of annual methane potential from landfills. Bioresour Technol 2012;109:86–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldas Á, Machado S, Karimpour-Fard M, et al. MSW characteristics and landfill gas generation performance in tropical regions. Electron J Geotech Eng 2014;19:8545–8560.
   Google Scholar
• Krause MJ, Chickering G, Townsend TG, et al. Critical review of the methane generation potential of municipal solid waste. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2016;46:1172–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chynoweth DP, Turick CE, Owens JM, et al. Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy. 1993;5:95–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho J K, Park S C, Chang HN. Biochemical methane potential and solid state anaerobic digestion of Korean food wastes. Bioresour Technol 1995;52:245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eleazer WE, Odle WS, Wang YS, et al. Biodegradability of municipal solid waste components in laboratory-scale landfills. Environ Sci Technol 1997;31:911–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Padgett JM, De La Cruz FB, et al. Wood biodegradation in laboratory-scale landfills. Environ Sci Technol 2011;45:6864–6871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, De la Cruz FB, Ximenes F, et al. Decomposition and carbon storage of selected paper products in laboratory-scale landfills. Sci Total Environ 2015b;532:70–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong S. (2016). Verification of methodologies and estimation of IPCC model parameters for solid waste landfills; PhD thesis; Seoul National University. https://hdl.handle.net/10371/118739.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Barlaz MA. Decomposition and carbon storage of hardwood and softwood branches in laboratory-scale landfills. Sci Total Environ 2016;557–558:355–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayard R, Araújo Morais J, Ducom G, et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of an industrial unit of mechanical–biological treatment of municipal solid waste. J. Hazard. Mater. J. 2010;175:23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen TL, Schmidt JE, Angelidaki I, et al. Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. Waste Manag. 2004;24:393–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2001. Methods 1684. Total, Fixed, and Volatile Solids in Water, Solids, and Biosolids 2001.
   Google Scholar
• APHA. APHA: standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1995. Test methods for the evaluation of solid waste, SW-846, Method 9040C, Soil and residues pH.
   Google Scholar
• Aquino S, Chernicharo C, Foresti E, et al. Metodologias para determinação da atividade metanogênica específica (ame) em lodos anaeróbios. Eng. Sanit. e Ambient. 2007;12:192–201.
   Google Scholar
• Córdoba V, Fernández M, Santalla E. The effect of different inoculums on anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016;4:115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JK, Chong YG, Tameda K, et al. Methods for determining the methane generation potential and methane generation rate constant for the FOD model: a review. Waste Manag Res 2018;36:200–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson J, Hettiaratchi P, Hunte C, et al. Methane balance of a bioreactor landfill in latin america. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2008;58:620–628.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machado SL, Carvalho MF, Gourc JP, et al. Methane generation in tropical landfills: simplified methods and field results. Waste Manag. 2009;29:153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon EJ, Bae SJ, Lee DH, et al. Methane generation potential and biodegradability of MSW components. Proceedings Sardinia 2007, Eleventh International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Amini HR, Reinhart DR, Mackie KR. Determination of first-order landfill gas modeling parameters and uncertainties. Waste Manag. 2012;32:305–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg A, Achari G, Joshi RC. A model to estimate the methane generation rate constant in sanitary landfills using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Waste Manag Res 2006;24:363–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Cruz F, Barlaz MA. Estimation of waste component-specific landfill decay rates using laboratory-scale decomposition data. Environ Sci Technol 2010;44:4722–4728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2004. Quantification for Exposure: Development of the Emissions Inventory for the Inhalation Risk Assessment (Chapter 7) 2004; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Elwell DL, Keener HM, Hoitink HAJ, et al. Pilot and full scale evaluations of leaves as an amendment in sewage sludge composting. Compost Sci Util 1994;2:55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Lee YW, Jahng D. Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and piggery wastewater: focusing on the role of trace elements. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:5048–5059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt GM, Liu HW, Kennedy KJ, et al. Super blue box recycling (SUBBOR) enhanced two-stage anaerobic digestion process for recycling municipal solid waste: laboratory pilot studies. Bioresour Technol 2002;85:291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielfa A, Cano R, Fdz-Polanco M. Theoretical methane production generated by the co-digestion of organic fraction municipal solid waste and biological sludge. Biotechnol. Reports. 2015a;5:14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito G, Frunzo L, Panico A, et al. Enhanced bio-methane production from co-digestion of different organic wastes. Environ Technol 2012;33:2733–2740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:4044–4064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielfa A, Cano R, Vinot M, et al. Anaerobic digestion modeling of the main components of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Process Saf Environ Prot 2015b;94:180–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellera FM, Gidarakos E. Effect of substrate to inoculum ratio and inoculum type on the biochemical methane potential of solid agroindustrial waste. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016;4:3217–3229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Brummeler E, Koster IW. Enhancement of dry anaerobic batch digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste by an aerobic pretreatment step. Biol. Wastes. 1990;31:199–210.
   Google Scholar
• Adani F, Scatigna L, Genevini P. Biostabilization of mechanically separated municipal solid waste fraction. Waste Manag Res 2000;18:471–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerassimidou S, Evangelou A, Komilis D. Aerobic biological pretreatment of municipal solid waste with a high content of putrescibles: effect on landfill emissions. Waste Manag Res 2013;31:783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke K, Santen H, Wallmann R. Comparison of selected aerobic and anaerobic procedures for MSW treatment. Waste Manag. 2005;25:799–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayard R, Benbelkacem H, Gourdon R, et al. Characterization of selected municipal solid waste components to estimate their biodegradability. J Environ Manage 2018;216:4–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Ai P, Yu L, et al. Comparing the hydrolysis and biogas production performance of alkali and acid pretreatments of rice straw using two-stage anaerobic fermentation. Biosyst Eng 2015a;132:47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner J, Spokas K. Landfill CH4: rates, fates, and role in global carbon cycle. Chemosphere 1993;26:369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcolini I. Análisis del efecto del tratamiento mecánico biológico en las emisiones de gases de efecto Invernadero en la etapa de disposición final de los residuos sólidos urbanos Estudio de caso planta TMB-Norte III Tesis Gestión Ambiental (maestría). Buenos Aires: Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires; 2018; http://ri.itba.edu.ar/handle/123456789/1174.
   Google Scholar