Investigation of a biosurfactant-enhanced electrokinetic method and its effect on the potentially toxic trace elements in waterways sediments

References

• Dubois V, Abriak NE, Zentar R, et al. The use of marine sediments as a pavement base material. Waste Manag. 2009;29(2):774–782. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Shafi M, Penttinen P, et al. Bioavailability of heavy metals in contaminated soil as affected by different mass ratios of biochars. Environ Technol. 2020;41(25):3329–3337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Xie F, Chen S, et al. The removal of Pb (II) and Cd (II) with hydrous manganese dioxide: mechanism on zeta potential and adsorption behavior. Environ Technol. 2020;41(24):3219–3232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amrate S. Etude du transport d’ions dans des milieux poreux sous l’action d’un champ électrique. Application à la décontamination de sols pollués. Université des Siences et de la Technologie Houari Boumediene. Thèse de doctorat. Bab Ezzouar; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kribi S. Décomposition des matières organiques et stabilisation des métaux lourds dans les sédiments de dragage. Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon. Thèse de doctorat. Lyon; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Mamindy Pajany Y, Hurel C, Marmier N, et al. Tests de lixiviation et de stabilisation d’un sédiment portuaire contaminé à l’arsenic. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. 2010;14(2):233–251. doi:10.1080/19648189.2010.9693215.
   Google Scholar
• Mamindy-Pajany Y, Hurel C, Geret F, et al. Comparison of mineral-based amendments for ex-situ stabilization of trace elements (As, Cd, Cu, Mo, Ni, Zn) in marine dredged sediments: A pilot-scale experiment. J Hazard Mater. 2013;252–253:213–219. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi RD, Blais JF, Meunier N, et al. Biolixiviation des metaux lourds et stabilisation des boues d’epuration: essai en bioreacteur opere en mode cuvee. Can J Civ Eng. 1993;20:57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SY, Lin JG. Bioleaching of heavy metals from sediment: significance of pH. Chemosphere. 2001;44(5):1093–1102. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00334-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan M, Jie S, Li M, et al. Bioleaching of multiple metals from contaminated sediment by moderate thermophiles. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;97: 47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licinio A. Phyto-extraction du zinc et de l’arsenic par différentes espèces de plantes. Université de Montréal. Montréal; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Benamar A, Baraud F, Alem A. Traitement des sédiments de dragage : un enjeu du développement durable. 25e rencontres de l’AUGC; 2007, p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Ammami MT. Contribution à l’étude des processus électrocinétiques appliqués aux sédiments de dragage. Université du Havre. Thèse de doctorat. Le Havre; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Benamar A, Mezazigh S, et al. Extraction de métaux lourds des sédiments par méthode électrocinétique. IIIèmes Journées Nationales Génie Côtier – Génie Civil. Dunkerque. 2014: 1055–1062.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud A, Olivier J, Vaxelaire J, et al. Electrical field: A historical review of its application and contributions in wastewater sludge dewatering. Water Res. 2010;44(8):2381–2407. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.01.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y. Traitement électrocinétique des sédiments de dragage et valorisation par solidification/stabilisation. Université du Havre. Thèse de doctorat. Le Havre; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Yuan S, Wan J, et al. Pilot-scale electrokinetic movement of HCB and Zn in real contaminated sediments enhanced with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin. Chemosphere. 2009;76(9):1226–1232. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.05.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JS, Kwon MJ, Choi J, et al. The transport behavior of As, Cu, Pb, and Zn during electrokinetic remediation of a contaminated soil using electrolyte conditioning. Chemosphere. 2014;117:79–86. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Ma Q, Su W, et al. On the dewatering of electroosmotic soil using intermittent current incorporated with calcium chloride. Environ Technol. 2021;42(3):468–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ Sci Technol. 1993;27(13):2638–2647. doi:10.1021/es00049a002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN, Gale RJ. Fundamentals of extracting species from soils by electrokinetics. Waste Manag. 1993;13(2):141–151. doi:10.1016/0956-053X(93)90006-I.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro AP, Probstein RF. Removal of contaminants from saturated clay by electroosmosis. Environ Sci Technol. 1993;27(2):283–291. doi:10.1021/es00039a007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamukcu S, Wittle JK. Electrokinetic treatment of contaminated soils, sludges, and lagoons. Final report; 1993. doi: 10.2172/10185835.
   Google Scholar
• Acar YB, Gale RJ, Alshawabkeh AN, et al. Electrokinetic remediation: basics and technology status. J Hazard Mater. 1995;40(2):117–137. doi:10.1016/0304-3894(94)00066-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameselle C. Enhancement of electro-osmotic flow during the electrokinetic treatment of A contaminated soil. Electrochim Acta. 2015;181:31–38. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavat N, Oh E, Chai G. A review of electrokinetic treatment technique for improving the engineering characteristics of low permeable problematic soils. Int J Geomate. 2012;2(2):266–272.
   Google Scholar
• Tang J, He J, Xin X, et al. Biosurfactants enhanced heavy metals removal from sludge in the electrokinetic treatment. Chem Eng J. 2018;334:2579–2592. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung AT, Hsu C. Electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated clay. J Environ Eng. 2005;131(2):298–304. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2005)131:2(298).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masi M, Ceccarini A, Iannelli R. Model-based optimization of field-scale electrokinetic treatment of dredged sediments. Chem Eng J. 2017;328:87–97. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S. Sequentially enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in Low buffering clayey soils. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng. 2003;129(3):263–277. doi:10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2003)129:3(263).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottosen LM, Pedersen AJ, Ribeiro AB, et al. Case study on the strategy and application of enhancement solutions to improve remediation of soils contaminated with Cu, Pb and Zn by means of electrodialysis. Eng Geol. 2005;77:317–329. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidarakos E, Giannis A. Chelate agents enhanced electrokinetic remediation for removal cadmium and zinc by conditioning catholyte pH. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2006;172:295–312. doi:10.1007/s11270-006-9080-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennou B, El Meray M, Romane A, et al. Assessment of heavy metal availability (Pb, Cu, Cr, Cd, Zn) and speciation in contaminated soils and sediment of discharge by sequential extraction. Environ Earth Sci. 2015;74(7):5849–5858. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4609-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzini O, Plaza A, Di Palma L, et al. Electrokinetic remediation of gasoil contaminated soil enhanced by rhamnolipid. J Appl Electrochem. 2010;40(6):1239–1248. doi:10.1007/s10800-010-0095-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JSH, Hicks RE, Probstein RF. EDTA-enhanced electroremediation metal-contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater. 1997;55:61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evangelou MWH, Bauer U, Ebel M, et al. The influence of EDDS and EDTA on the uptake of heavy metals of Cd and Cu from soil with tobacco Nicotiana tabacum. Chemosphere. 2007;68(2):345–353. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Ammami MT, Benamar A, et al. Effect of EDTA, EDDS, NTA and citric acid on electrokinetic remediation of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn contaminated dredged marine sediment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(11):10577–10586. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-5966-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WC, Juang RS, Wei YH. Applications of a lipopeptide biosurfactant, surfactin, produced by microorganisms. Biochem Eng J. 2015;103:158–169. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2015.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, He J, Liu T, et al. Removal of heavy metal from sludge by the combined application of a biodegradable biosurfactant and complexing agent in enhanced electrokinetic treatment. Chemosphere. 2017;189:599–608. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Qiu Z, Tang H, et al. Coupled with EDDS and approaching anode technique enhanced electrokinetic remediation removal heavy metal from sludge. Environ Pollut. 2021;272(115975):10.
   Google Scholar
• Tang J, He J, Tang H, et al. Heavy metal removal effectiveness, flow direction and speciation variations in the sludge during the biosurfactant-enhanced electrokinetic remediation. Sep Purif Technol. 2020;246(116918):11.
   Google Scholar
• Tang J, He J, Qiu Z, et al. Metal removal effectiveness, fractions, and binding intensity in the sludge during the multiple washing steps using the combined rhamnolipid and saponin. J Soils Sediments. 2019;19(3): 1286–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aşçi Y, Nurbaş M, Saǧ Açikel Y. Investigation of sorption/desorption equilibria of heavy metal ions on/from quartz using rhamnolipid biosurfactant. J Environ Manage. 2010;91(3):724–731. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannis A, Gidarakos E, Skouta A. Application of sodium dodecyl sulfate and humic acid as surfactants on electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil. Desalination. 2007;211:249–260. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahamat Ahmat A, Mamindy-Pajany Y, Nadah J. Lowering sulfates release from SO42- rich geomaterials: few tests regarding the hydraulic binders’ pathway. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2021; doi:10.1007/s13762-020-03027-x.
   Google Scholar
• Tribout C. Valorisation de sédiments traités en techniques routières : contribution à la mise en place d’un protocole d’acceptabilité. Université de Toulouse. Thèse de doctorat. Toulouse; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Priadi CR. Caractérisation des phases porteuses: Métaux particulaires en Seine. Université Paris Sud 11. Thèse de doctorat. Paris; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Poitevin A. Caractérisation multi-échelles des phases porteuses des polluants métalliques Zn et Pb dans un sédiment mis en dépôt. De l’analyse de terrain au rayonnement synchrotron. Université d’Orléans. Thèse de doctorat. Orléans; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gao J, Luo Q, Zhang C, et al. Enhanced electrokinetic removal of cadmium from sludge using a coupled catholyte circulation system with multilayer of anion exchange resin. Chem Eng J. 2013;234:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maturi K, Reddy KR. Simultaneous removal of organic compounds and heavy metals from soils by electrokinetic remediation with a modified cyclodextrin. Chemosphere. 2006;63(6):1022–1031. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colacicco A, De Gioannis G, Muntoni A, et al. Enhanced electrokinetic treatment of marine sediments contaminated by heavy metals and PAHs. Chemosphere. 2010;81(1):46–56. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammami MT, Benamar A, Wang H, et al. Simultaneous electrokinetic removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and metals from a sediment using mixed enhancing agents. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2014;11(7):1801–1816. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0395-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahemmat M, Farahbakhsh M. Catholyte conditioning enhanced electrokinetic remediation of Co and Pb polluted soil. Environ Eng Manag J. 2015;14(1):89–96. doi:10.30638/eemj.2015.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saichek RE, Reddy KR. Effect of pH control at the anode for the electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene from kaolin soil. Chemosphere. 2003;51(4):273–287. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00849-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundl T, Michalski P. Electroosmotically driven water flow in sediments. Water Res. 1996;30(4):811–818. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(95)00224-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ait Ahmed O. Dépollution des sols par la méthode électrocinétique. Université des Sciences et de la Technologie d’Oran Mohamed Boudiaf. Thèse de doctorat. Oran; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rozas F, Castellote M. Electrokinetic remediation of dredged sediments polluted with heavy metals with different enhancing electrolytes. Electrochim Acta. 2012;86:102–109. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon CS, Yang JS, Kim KJ, et al. Electrokinetic removal of petroleum hydrocarbon from residual clayey soil following a washing process. Clean Soil Air Water. 2010;38(2):189–193. doi:10.1002/clen.200900190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Amosa MK, Iwata M, et al. Electrokinetic sedimentation: a review. Int J Environ Technol Manag. 2016;19(5/6):374. doi:10.1504/ijetm.2016.10004548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Ren W, Zhang J, et al. Electrokinetic remediation of Pb near the e-waste dismantle site with Fe(NO3)3 as cathode electrolyte. Environ Technol. 2021;42(6):884–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornilovich B, Mishchuk N, Abbruzzese K, et al. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of metals-contaminated clay. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2005;265:114–123. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.02.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JH, Qiang Z, Huang CP. Remediation and stimulation of selected chlorinated organic solvents in unsaturated soil by a specific enhanced electrokinetics. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2006;287:86–93. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.03.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghadam MJ, Moayedi H, Sadeghi MM, et al. A review of combinations of electrokinetic applications. Environ Geochem Health. 2016;38(6):1217–1227. doi:10.1007/s10653-016-9795-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Zhu S, Wei X. Effects of electrolyte on the removal of fluorine from red mud by electrokinetic remediation. Environ Technol (United Kingdom). 2019: 1–12. doi:10.1080/09593330.2019.1701563.
   Google Scholar
• Virkutyte J, Sillanpää M, Latostenmaa P. Electrokinetic soil remediation – critical overview. Sci Total Environ. 2002;289:97–121. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01027-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SP, Tack FM, Verloo MG. Heavy metal fractionation and extractability in dredged sediment derived surface soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1998;102:313–328. doi:10.1023/A:1004916632457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyanar A, Thatikonda S. Enhanced electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from a contaminated lake sediment for ecological risk reduction. Soil Sediment Contam. 2020;30: 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlavackova P. Evaluation du comportement du cuivre et du zinc dans une matrice de type sol à l’aide de différentes méthodologies. Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon. Thèse de doctorat. Lyon; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Nystroem GM, Ottosen LM, Villumsen A. Electrodialytic removal of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd from harbor sediment: influence of changing experimental conditions. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(8):2906–2911. doi:10.1021/es048930w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tack FM, Lapauw F, Verloo MG. Determination and fractionation of sulphur in a contaminated dredged sediment. Talanta. 1997;44(12):2185–2192. doi:10.1016/S0039-9140(97)00035-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lions J, van der Lee J, Guéren V, et al. Zinc and cadmium mobility in a 5-year-old dredged sediment deposit: experiments and modelling. J Soils Sediments. 2007;7(4):207–215. doi:10.1065/jss2007.05.226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gäbler HE. Mobility of heavy metals as a function of pH of samples from an overbank sediment profile contaminated by mining activities. J Geochemical Explor. 1997;58:185–194. doi:10.1016/S0375-6742(96)00061-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lions J, Guérin V, Bataillard P, et al. Metal availability in a highly contaminated, dredged-sediment disposal site: field measurements and geochemical modeling. Environ Pollut. 2010;158(9):2857–2864. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaure M. Spéciation et transfert du zinc dans un dépôt de sédiment de curage contaminé : évolution le long du profil pédologique. Université Joseph-Fourier. Thèse de doctorat. Grenoble; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Meima JA, Comans RNJ. Application of surface complexation/precipitation modeling to contaminant leaching from weathered municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash. Environ Sci Technol. 1998;32(5):688–693. doi:10.1021/es9701624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra JJ, Meeussen JCL, Comans RNJ. Leaching of heavy metals from contaminated soils: An experimental and modeling study. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38(16):4390–4395. doi:10.1021/es049885v.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calmano W, Hong J, Forstner U. Binding and mobilization of heavy metals in contaminated sediments affected by pH and redox potential. Wal Sci Tech. 1993;28(8):223–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JW, Luther GW. Chemical influences on trace metal-sulfide interactions in anoxic sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1999;63(19–20):3373–3378. doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00258-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achard R. Dynamique des contaminants inorganiques dans les sédiments de dragage : rôle spécifique de la matière organique naturelle. Université de Toulon. Thèse de doctorat. Toulon; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cappuyns V. Barium (Ba) leaching from soils and certified reference materials. Appl Geochemistry. 2018;88:68–84. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammami MT, Portet-Koltalo F, Benamar A, et al. Application of biosurfactants and periodic voltage gradient for enhanced electrokinetic remediation of metals and PAHs in dredged marine sediments. Chemosphere. 2015;125:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao X, Jiang R, Xiao W, et al. Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: A review. J Hazard Mater. 2015;285:419–435. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuan MC, Shu GY, Liu JC. Solubility of heavy metals in a contaminated soil: Effects of redox potential and pH. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1996;90:543–556. doi:10.1007/BF00282668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idivan A, Nunes V. Transport d’ions sous l’effet d’un champ électrique en milieu poreux : application à la séparation de terres rares par électrophorèse à focalisation. Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine. Thèse de doctorat. Nacy; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Cappuyns V, Swennen R. Kinetics of element release during combined oxidation and pHstat leaching of anoxic river sediments. Appl Geochemistry. 2005;20(6):1169–1179. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satawathananont S, Patrick WH, Moore PA. Effect of controlled redox conditions on metal solubility in acid sulfate soils. Plant Soil. 1991;133(2):281–290. doi:10.1007/BF00009200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan CN. Recent advances in the environmental applications of biosurfactants. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;14(5):372–378. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2009.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar