Evaluation of the start-up of hydraulic conditions of a fluidised bed system

References

• Bello MM, Raman AAA, Purushothaman M. Applications of fluidized bed reactors in wastewater treatment – a review of the major design and operational parameters. J Clean Prod. 2017;141:1492–1514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson MJ, Nakhla G, Zhu J. Fluidized-bed bioreactor applications for biological wastewater treatment: a review of research and developments. Engineering. 2017;3(3):330–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harb M, Lou E, Smith AL, et al. Perspectives on the fate of micropollutants in mainstream anaerobic wastewater treatment. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;57:94–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metolina P, Lopes GC. Numerical analysis of liquid-solid flow in tapered and cylindrical fluidized beds for wastewater treatment and biogas production. Energy Convers Manage. 2019;187:447–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell WJ, Switzenbaum MS, Morris JW. Municipal wastewater treatment with the anaerobic attached microbial film expanded bed process. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1981;53(4):482–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeshanew MM, Frunzo L, Luongo V, et al. Start-up of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor treating synthetic carbohydrate rich wastewater. J Environ Manage. 2016;184:456–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Zhang C, Lu B. Treatment of high-strength purified terephthalic acid (PTA) wastewater using a magnetic porous ceramic support in laboratory-scale anaerobic-aerobic fluidized bed reactors. Biocatal Biotransform. 2018;36(6):436–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyedsalehi M, Jaafari J, Hélix-Nielsen C, et al. Evaluation of moving-bed biofilm sequencing batch reactor (MBSBR) in operating A 2 O process with emphasis on biological removal of nutrients existing in wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2018;15(1):199–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Lam TY, Tan GYA, et al. Use of polymeric scouring agent as fluidized media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: system performance and microbial community. J Memb Sci. 2020;606:118121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghipour D, Rouhbakhsh E, Jaafari J. Application of the biological reactor with fixed media (IFAS) for removal of organic matter and nutrients in small communities. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2020:1–11. DOI:10.1080/03067319.2020.1803851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari J, Mesdaghinia A, Nabizadeh R, et al. Investigation of anaerobic fluidized bed reactor/aerobic moving bed bio reactor (AFBR/MMBR) system for treatment of currant wastewater. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(8):860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga JK, Motteran F, Macedo TZ, et al. Biodegradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in commercial laundry wastewater by an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor. J Environ Sci Health Part A. 2015;50(9):946–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B, Li Y, Lim W, et al. Single-stage versus two-stage anaerobic fluidized bed bioreactors in treating municipal wastewater: performance, foulant characteristics, and microbial community. Chemosphere. 2017;171:158–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Kim J. Investigating membrane fouling associated with GAC fluidization on membrane with effluent from anaerobic fluidized bed bioreactor in domestic wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26(2):1170–1180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WH, Tsai CY, Chen SY, et al. Treatment of campus domestic wastewater using ambient-temperature anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactors with zeolites as carriers. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2019;136:49–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boening PH, Larsen VF. Anaerobic fluidized bed whey treatment. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1982;24(11):2539–2556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Liu M, Li X. Flow regimes in gas-liquid-solid mini-fluidized beds with single gas orifice. Powder Technol. 2018;333:293–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Graaf AA, de Bruijn P, Robertson LA, et al. Autotrophic growth of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing micro-organisms in a fluidized bed reactor. Microbiology. 1996;142(8):2187–2196.
   Google Scholar
• Kurup R. Performance of a residential scale plug flow anaerobic reactor for domestic organic waste treatment and biogas generation. In: ORBIT 2003: Organic Recovery and Biological Treatment Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of ORBIT Association on Biological Processing of Organics: Advances for a Sustainable Society, 30 April–2 May 2003, Perth, Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Paranhos AGO, Silva EL. Statistical optimization of H2, 1, 3-propanediol and propionic acid production from crude glycerol using an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor: interaction effects of substrate concentration and hydraulic retention time. Biomass Bioenergy. 2020;138:105575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delforno TP, Lacerda GV Jr, Sierra-Garcia IN, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the microbiome in three different bioreactor configurations applied to commercial laundry wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ. 2017;587:389–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua R, Regueira A, Mauricio-Iglesias M, et al. Protein composition determines the preferential consumption of amino acids during anaerobic mixed-culture fermentation. Water Res. 2020;183:115958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresson R, Escudié R, Carrère H, et al. Influence of hydrodynamic conditions on the start-up of methanogenic inverse turbulent bed reactors. Water Res. 2007;41(3):603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialek K, Kumar A, Mahony T, et al. Microbial community structure and dynamics in anaerobic fluidized bed and granular sludge bed reactors: influence of operational temperature and reactor configuration. Microb Biotechnol. 2012;5(6):738–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andalib M, Elbeshbishy E, Mustafa N, et al. Performance of an anaerobic fluidized bed bioreactor (AnFBR) for digestion of primary municipal wastewater treatment biosolids and bioethanol thin stillage. Renewable Energy. 2014;71:276–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar-Corona A, Masbernat O, Figueroa B, et al. The effect of column tilt on flow homogeneity and particle agitation in a liquid fluidized bed. Int J Multiphase Flow. 2017;92:50–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez NP, Pedroso DT, Machin EB, et al. Prediction of the minimum fluidization velocity of particles of sugarcane bagasse. Biomass Bioenergy. 2018;109:249–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asif M, Kalogerakis N, Behie LA. Hydrodynamics of liquid fluidized beds including the distributor region. Chem Eng Sci. 1992;47(15-16):4155–4166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzak SA, Al-Hammadi SA, Rahman SM, et al. Scale-up effect analysis and modeling of liquid–solid circulating fluidized bed risers using multigene genetic programming. Particuology. 2020;52:57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga MCB. Estudo da eficiência dos processos bioquímicos em um reator anaeróbio de leito fluidizado automatizado (Study of the eficiency of biochemical processes in an automated anerobic fluidised bed reactor – in Portuguese). Master Dissertation. Departament of Biochemistry. Parana Federal University; 1989, pp. 83.
   Google Scholar
• Marin P, Alkalay D, Guerrero L, et al. Design and startup of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor. Water Sci Technol. 1999;40(8):63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Lu B, Jiang Y, et al. Performance evaluation of anaerobic fluidized bed reactors using brick beads and porous ceramics as support materials for treating terephthalic acid wastewater. Desalin Water Treat. 2015;53:1814–1821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Liu X. Treatment of the real boiler cleaning wastewater in an anaerobic fluidized bed microbial fuel cell: organic matter degradation, bioelectrochemistry, and kinetics. Can J Chem Eng. 2019;97(12):2994–3001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iza J. Fluidized bed reactors for anaerobic wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol. 1991;24(8):109–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais RG. Estudo da adaptação do inóculo ao lixiviado de aterro sanitário visando ao tratamento anaeróbio em reator de leito fluidizado. (Study of the adaptation of the inoculum to the landfill leachate in an anaerobic fluidised bed reactor – in Portuguese). Master Dissertation. Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation. Parana Federal University; 2016, pp. 109.
   Google Scholar
• He X, Li H, Zhu J. A value-added insight of reusing microplastic waste: carrier particle in fluidized bed bioreactor for simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal from septic wastewater. Biochem Eng J. 2019;151:107300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilal N, Ghannam MT, Anabtawi MZ. Effect of bed diameter, distributor and inserts on minimum fluidization velocity. Chem Eng Technol. 2001;24(2):161–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes M. What is turbulent fluidization? Powder Technol. 1996;88(1):3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limtrakul S, Chen J, Ramachandran PA, et al. Solids motion and holdup profiles in liquid fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci. 2005;60(7):1889–1900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabanian J, Chaouki J. Effects of temperature, pressure, and interparticle forces on the hydrodynamics of a gas-solid fluidized bed. Chem Eng J. 2017;313:580–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu K, Ge L, Wang C. Effect of upflow velocity on the performance of a fluidized bed reactor to remove phosphate from simulated swine wastewater. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2019;140:78–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shieh WK, Sutton PM, Kos P. Predicting reactor biomass concentration in a fluidized-bed system. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1981;53(11):1574–1584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye X, Ye ZL, Lou Y, et al. A comprehensive understanding of saturation index and upflow velocity in a pilot-scale fluidized bed reactor for struvite recovery from swine wastewater. Powder Technol. 2016;295:16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Feng Y, Chen Y, et al. High-efficiency treatment of PTA wastewater using a biogas jet assisted anaerobic fluidized bed reactor. Environ Technol. 2019;40(12):1534–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Shi Q, Huang Z, et al. Effects of liquid action mechanisms on hydrodynamics in liquid-containing gas–solid fluidized bed reactor. Chem Eng J. 2016;285:121–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi-Asl M, Azhgan S, Movahedirad S. Some general aspects of a gas-solid fluidized bed using digital image analysis. Korean J Chem Eng. 2018;35(2):613–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari J, Mesdaghinia A, Nabizadeh R, et al. Influence of upflow velocity on performance and biofilm characteristics of Anaerobic Fluidized Bed Reactor (AFBR) in treating high-strength wastewater. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014;12(1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang H, He X, Nakhla G, et al. Performance and bacterial community structure of a novel inverse fluidized bed bioreactor (IFBBR) treating synthetic municipal wastewater. Sci Total Environ. 2020;718:137288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denac MA, Dunn IJ. Packed- and fluidized-bed biofilm reactor performance for anaerobic wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988;32(2):159–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin C, Lee E, McCarty PL, et al. Effects of influent DO/COD ratio on the performance of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor fed low-strength synthetic wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(21):9860–9865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Düppenbecker B, Cornel P. Anaerobic treatment of sulfate-containing municipal wastewater with a fluidized bed reactor at 20° C. Water Sci Technol. 2016;73(10):2446–2452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais RG, Braga SM, Braga MCB. Estudo para a determinação das condições hidráulicas de partida de um reator anaeróbio de leitofluidizado (Determination of the start-up conditions of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor – in Portuguese). In: ABES/FENASAN 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira LL, Costa RB, Okada DY, et al. Anaerobic degradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in fluidized bed reactor by microbial consortia in different support materials. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:5112–5122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunii D, Levenspiel O. Chapter 1, Introduction chapter. In: Brenner H, editor. Fluidization engineering. Stoneham (MA): Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991. p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• El-Gohary F, Tawfik A, Badawy M, et al. Potentials of anaerobic treatment for catalytically oxidized olive mill wastewater (OMW). Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(7):2147–2154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, McCarty PL, Shin C, et al. Low energy single-staged anaerobic fluidized bed ceramic membrane bioreactor (AFCMBR) for wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2017;240:33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes-Alvarado LC, Okpalanze NN, Kankanala D, et al. Forecasting the effect of feast and famine conditions on biological sulphate reduction in an anaerobic inverse fluidized bed reactor using artificial neural networks. Process Biochem. 2017;55:146–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moharram MA, Abdelhalim HS, Rozaik EH. Anaerobic up flow fluidized bed reactor performance as a primary treatment unit in domestic wastewater treatment. HBRC J. 2016;12(1):99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Barros VGD, Duda RM, Oliveira RAD. Biomethane production from vinasse in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors inoculated with granular sludge. Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47(3):628–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escudero D, Heindel TJ. Bed height and material density effects on fluidized bed hydrodynamics. Chem Eng Sci. 2011;66(16):3648–3655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan WA, Asghar U, Shamshad I. Effect of initial static bed height and liquid superficial velocity on the minimum fluidization velocity (Umf) and pressure drop for the bed of semolina particles in liquid-solid fluidization. J Chem Eng Process Technol. 2016;7(05):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Delebarre A, Morales JM, Ramos L. Influence of the bed mass on its fluidization characteristics. Chem Eng J. 2004;98(1-2):81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijnen JJ, Mulder A, Enger W, et al. Review on the application of anaerobic fluidized bed reactors in waste-water treatment. Chem Eng J. 1989;41(3):B37–B50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunii D, Levenspiel O. Chapter 3, Fluidization and mapping of regimes. In: Brenner H, editor. Fluidization engineering. Stoneham (MA): Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991. p. 61–94.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarado-Lassman A, Rustrián E, García-Alvarado MA, et al. Brewery wastewater treatment using anaerobic inverse fluidized bed reactors. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(8):3009–3015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulsen H, Turan M. Anaerobic treatability of sanitary landfill leachate in a fluidized bed reactor. Turk J Eng Environ Sci. 2004;28(5):297–306.
   Google Scholar