Environmental advantages of coproducing beef meat in dairy systems

References

• Abín R, Laca A, Laca A, et al. Environmental assessment of intensive egg production: A Spanish case study. J Clean Prod. 2018;179:160–168. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angerer V, Sabia E, Köning von Borstel U, et al. Environmental and biodiversity effects of different beef production systems. J Environ Manage. 2021;289:112523. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Hess PS, Little SM, Moate PJ, et al. A partial life cycle assessment of the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of feeding 3-nitrooxypropanol and nitrate to cattle. Agric Syst. 2019;169:14–23. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andretta I, Remus A, Franceschi CH, et al. Environmental impacts of feeding crops to poultry and pigs in environmental impact of agro-food industry and food consumption. In: CM Galanakis, editor. Environmental impact of agro-food industry and food consumption. London: Academic Press; 2021. p. 59–80.
   Google Scholar
• Baldini C, Gardoni D, Guarino M. A critical review of the recent evolution of life cycle assessment applied to milk production. J Clean Prod. 2017;140:421–435. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA, Janzen HH, Little SM, et al. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study. Agric Syst. 2010;103:371–379. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA, Janzen HH, Little SM, et al. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada - evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2011;166–167:663–677. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilotto F, Recavarren P, Vibart R, et al. Backgrounding strategy effects on farm productivity, profitability and greenhouse gas emissions of cow-calf systems in the flooding Pampas of Argentina. Agric Syst. 2019;176:102688. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonesmo H, Beauchemin KA, Harstad OM, et al. Greenhouse gas emission intensities of grass silage based dairy and beef production: A systems analysis of Norwegian farms. Livest Sci. 2013;152:239–252. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2012.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragaglio A, Napolitano F, Pacelli C, et al. Environmental impacts of Italian beef production: A comparison between different systems. J Clean Prod. 2018;172:4033–4043. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breton C, Blancher P, Amor B, et al. Assessing the climate change impacts of biogenic carbon in buildings: a critical review of two main dynamic approaches. Sustainability. 2018;10:1–30. doi:10.3390/su10062020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckwell A, Nadeu E. (2018). What is the safe operating space for EU livestock? RISE Foundation, Brussels. https://risefoundation.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2018_RISE_Livestock_Full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Buratti C, Fantozzi F, Barbanera M, et al. Carbon footprint of conventional and organic beef production systems: An Italian case study. Sci Total Environ. 2017;576:129–137. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureš D, Bartoň L. Performance, carcass traits and meat quality of Aberdeen Angus, gascon, Holstein and Fleckvieh finishing bulls. Livest Sci. 2018;214:231–237. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2018.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canellada F, Laca A, Laca A, et al. Environmental impact of cheese production: A case study of a small-scale factory in Southern Europe and global overview of carbon footprint. Sci Total Environ. 2018;635:167–177. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso AS, Berndet A, Leytem A, et al. Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use. Agric Syst. 2016;143:86–96. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey JW, Holden NM. Quantification of GHG emissions from sucker-beef production in Ireland. Agric Syst. 2006;90:79–98. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2005.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederberg C, Stadig M. System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. Int J LCA. 2003;8:350–356. doi:10.1007/BF02978508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerri CC, Moreira CS, Alves PA, et al. Assessing the carbon footprint of beef cattle in Brazil: a case study with 22 farms in the State of mato grosso. J Clean Prod. 2016;112:2593–2600. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole NA, Parker DB, Brown MS, et al. Effects of steam flaking on the carbon footprint of finishing beef cattle. Transl Anim Sci 2020;4:S84–S89. doi:10.1093/tas/txaa110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, An C, Fang H, et al. Assessment of regional greenhouse gas emission from beef cattle production: A case study of Saskatchewan. Canada J Environ Manage. 2020;264, Article 110443. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110443.
   Google Scholar
• Clune S, Crossin E, Verghese K. Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. J Clean Prod. 2017;140:766–783. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper J, Diesburg S, Babej A, et al. Life cycle assessment of products from alaskan salmon processing wastes: implications of coproduction, intermittent landings, and storage time. Fish Res. 2014;151:26–38. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2013.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosson P, Shalloo L, O’Brien D, et al. A review of whole farm systems models of greenhouse gas emissions from beef and dairy cattle production systems. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2011;166–167:29–45. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucurachi S, Scherer L, Guinée J, et al. Life cycle assessment of food systems. One Earth. 2019;1:292–297. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.014.
   Google Scholar
• De Figueiredo EB, Javasundara S, Bordonal RO, et al. Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of beef cattle in three contrasting pasture-management systems in Brazil. J Clean Prod. 2017;142:420–431. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira G, Bourscheidt DS. Multi-sectorial convergence in greenhouse gas emissions. J Environ Manage. 2017;196:402–410. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza NRD, Fracarolli JA, Junqueira TL, et al. Sugarcane ethanol and beef cattle integration in Brazil. Biomass Bioenerg. 2019;120:448–457. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries M, de Boer IJM. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livest Sci. 2010;128:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries M, van Middelaar CE, de Boer IJM. Comparing environmental impacts of beef production systems: A review of life cycle assessments. Livest Sci. 2015;178:279–288. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2015.06.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Prado A, Mas K, Pardo G, et al. Modelling the interactions between C and N farm balances and GHG emissions from confinement dairy farms in northern Spain. Sci Total Environ. 2013;465:156–165. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick M, da Silva MA, Dewes H. Life cycle assessment of beef cattle production in two typical grassland systems of southern Brazil. J Clean Prod. 2015;961:426–434. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.080.
   Google Scholar
• Dopelt K, Radon P, Davidovitch N. Environmental effects of the livestock industry: the relationship between knowledge, attitudes, and behavior among students in Israel. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:1–16. doi:10.3390/ijerph16081359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley QM, Liska AJ, Watson AK, et al. Uncertainties in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. beef cattle. J Clean Prod. 2014;75:31–39. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. (2021). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019-2028: http://www.fao.org/ (accessed 3 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Fathollahi H, Mousavi-Avval SH, Akram A, et al. Comparative energy, economic and environmental analyses of forage production systems for dairy farming. J Clean Prod. 2018;182:852–862. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florindo TJ, Florindo GIB, Talamini E, et al. Application of the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach in the identification of carbon footprint reduction actions in the Brazilian beef production chain. J Clean Prod. 2018;196:1379–1389. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flysjö A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M, et al. The interaction between milk and beef production and emissions from land use change – critical considerations in life cycle assessment and carbon footprint studies of milk. J Clean Prod. 2012;28:134–142. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FoodPrint. (2021). https://foodprint.org/ (accessed 3 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Gollnow S, Lundie S, Moore AD, et al. Carbon footprint of milk production from dairy cows in Australia. Int Dairy J. 2014;37:31–38. doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Quintero R, Bolívar-Vergara DM, Chirinda N, et al. Environmental impact of primary beef production chain in Colombia: carbon footprint, non-renewable energy and land use using life cycle assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2021;773:145573. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison MT, McSweeney C, Tomkins NW, et al. Improving greenhouse gas emissions intensities of subtropical and tropical beef farming systems using leucaena leucocephala. Agric Syst. 2015;136:138–146. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2015.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy D, Delaby L, Van den Pol-van Dasselaar A, et al. Increasing grazing in dairy cow milk production systems in Europe. Sustainability. 2020;12:1–15. doi:10.3390/su12062443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero M, Laca A, Laca A, et al. Application of life cycle assessment to food industry wastes. In: MR Kosseva, C Webb, editor. Food industry wastes (second edition). London: Academic Press; 2020. p. 331–353. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-817121-9.00015-2
   Google Scholar
• Horrillo A, Gaspar P, Escribano M. Organic farming as a strategy to reduce carbon footprint in dehesa agroecosystems: a case study comparing different livestock products. Animals (Basel). 2020;162:1–22. doi:10.3390/ani1001016.
   Google Scholar
• Huerta AR, Güereca LP, Lozano MSR. Environmental impact of beef production in Mexico through life cycle assessment. Resour Conserv Recy. 2016;109:44–53. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hünerberg M, Little SM, Beauchemin KA, et al. Feeding high concentrations of corn dried distillers’ grains decreases methane, but increases nitrous oxide emissions from beef cattle production. Agric Sys. 2014;127:19–27. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDF. (2015) Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 479/2015.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. (2006). https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/ (accessed 11 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• ITER: Technological Institute of Renewable Energies (Spain). (2008). http://www.iter.es/ (accessed 15 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Jeswani HK, Espinoza-Orias N, Croker T, et al. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from integrated organic farming: A systems approach considering rotation cycles. Sustain Prod Consum. 2018;13:60–79. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2017.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiggundu N, Ddungu SP, Wanyama J, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from Uganda's cattle corridor farming systems. Agric Syst. 2019;176:102649. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinley RD, Martínez-Fernández G, Matthews MK, et al. Mitigating the carbon footprint and improving productivity of ruminant livestock agriculture using a red seaweed. J Clean Prod 2020;259:120836. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs B, Miller L, Heller MC, et al. The carbon footprint of dietary guidelines around the world: a seven country modeling study. Nutr J. 2021;20(1):15, doi:10.1186/s12937-021-00669-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen T, Mogensen L, Knudsen MT, et al. Effect of production system and farming strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from commercial dairy farms in a life cycle approach. Livest Sci. 2011;140:136–148. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laca A, Gómez N, Laca A, et al. Overview on GHG emissions of raw milk production and a comparison of milk and cheese carbon footprints of two different systems from northern Spain. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020a;27:1650–1666. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-06857-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laca A, Gómez N, Rodríguez A, et al. Environmental performance of semi-confinement and pasture based systems for dairy cows from a life cycle assessment perspective. Environ Eng Manag J. 2020b;19:1199–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laca A, Laca A, Diaz M. Environmental impact of poultry farming and egg production. In: CM Galanakis, editor. Environmental impact of agro-food industry and food consumption. London: Academic Press; 2021. p. 81–100. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.067.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann N, Briner S, Finger R. The impact of climate and price risks on agricultural land use and crop management decisions. Land Use Pol. 2013;35:119–130. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Qin Y, Subbiah J, et al. Life cycle assessment of the U.S. beef processing through integrated hybrid approach. J Clean Prod. 2020;265:121813. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch J. Availability of disaggregated greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production: A systematic review. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2019;76:69–78. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAPA: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Spain). (2020). https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ (accessed 28 April 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Marton SMRR, Zimmermann A, Kreuzer M, et al. Comparing the environmental performance of mixed and specialised dairy farms: the role of the system level analysed. J Clean Prod. 2016;124:73–83. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe GA, Takahashi T, Orr RJ, et al. Distributions of emissions intensity for individual beef cattle reared on pasture-based production systems. J Clean Prod. 2018;171:1672–1680. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.01.075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeough EJ, Little SM, Janzen HH, et al. Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production in eastern Canada: A case study. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:5164–5175. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-5229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misselbrook TH, Van Der Weerden TJ, Pain BF, et al. Ammonia emission factors for UK agriculture. Atmos Environ. 2000;34:871–880. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00350-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberg E, Säll S, Hansson PA, et al. Taxing food consumption to reduce environmental impacts - Identification of synergies and goal conflicts. Food Policy. 2021;101:102090. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modernel P, Dogliotti S, Alvarez S, et al. Identification of beef production farms in the Pampas and campos area that stand out in economic and environmental performance. Ecol Indic. 2018;89:755–770. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogensen L, Kristensen T, Nielsen NI, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from beef production systems in Denmark and Sweden. Livest Sci. 2015;174:126–143. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2015.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molossi L, Hoshide AK, Pedrosa LM, et al. Improve pasture or feed grain? greenhouse gas emissions, profitability, and resource use for nelore beef cattle in Brazil’s cerrado and Amazon biomes. Animals (Basel). 2020;1386:1–21. doi:10.3390/ani10081386.
   Google Scholar
• Morel K, Farrié JP, Renon J, et al. Environmental impacts of cow-calf beef systems with contrasted grassland management and animal production strategies in the Massif Central, France. Agric Syst. 2016;144:133–143. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2016.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moset V, Wahid R, Ward A, et al. Modelling methane emission mitigation by anaerobic digestion: effect of storage conditions and co-digestion. Environ Technol. 2019;40(20):2633–2642. doi:10.1080/09593330.2018.1447999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy B, Crosson P, Kelly AK, et al. An economic and greenhouse gas emissions evaluation of pasture-based dairy calf-to-beef production systems. Agric Syst. 2017;154:124–132. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete-Molina C, Meza-Herrera CA, Herrera-Manduza MA, et al. To beef or not to beef: unveiling the economic environmental impact generated by the intensive beef cattle industry in an arid region. J Clean Prod. 2019;231:1027–1035. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto MI, Barrantes O, Privitello L, et al. Greenhouse Gas emissions from beef grazing systems in semi-arid rangelands of central Argentina. Sustainability. 2018;10:4228. doi:10.3390/su10114228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noya I, González-García S, Berzosa J, et al. Environmental and water sustainability of milk production in Northeast Spain. Sci Total Environ. 2018;616–617:1317–1329. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TLT, Hermansen JE, Mogensen L. Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU. J Clean Prod. 2010;18:756–766. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogino A, Orito H, Shimada K, et al. Evaluating environmental impacts of the Japanese beef cow–calf system by the life cycle assessment method. Anim Sci J. 2007;78:424–432. doi:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2007.00457.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parera i Pous J, Mallol Nabot C, Domingo Olivé F, et al. (2010). In situ rapid determination of the nutrients in dairy cattle slurry based on the electrical conductivity (EC) for correct fertilization. II Spanish Congress of Integral Management of Livestock Manure (Congress Proceedings) (in Spanish).
   Google Scholar
• Payen S, Falconer S, Carlson B, et al. Eutrophication and climate change impacts of a case study of New Zealand beef to the European market. Sci Total Environ. 2020;710:136120. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier N, Piroq R, Rasmunssen R. Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the upper midwestern United States. Agric Syst. 2010;103:380–389. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira CH, Patino HO, Hoshide AK, et al. Grazing supplementation and crop diversification benefits for southern Brazil beef: A case study. Agric Syst. 2018;162:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechey R, Hollands GJ, Marteau TM. Are meat options preferred to comparable vegetarian options? An experimental study. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(37):1–5. doi:10.1186/s13104-021-05451-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrovic Z, Djordjevic V, Milicevic D, et al. Meat production and consumption: environmental consequences. Procedia Food Sci. 2015;5:235–238. doi:10.1016/j.profoo.2015.09.041.
   Google Scholar
• Picasso VD, Modernel PD, Becoña G, et al. Sustainability of meat production beyond carbon footprint: a synthesis of case studies from grazing systems in Uruguay. Meat Sci. 2014;98:346–354. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reşitoğlu İA, Altinişik K, Keskin A. The pollutant emissions from diesel-engine vehicles and exhaust after treatment systems. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 2015;17:15–27. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0793-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roer AG, Johansen A, Bakken AK, et al. Environmental impacts of combined milk and meat production in Norway according to a life cycle assessment with expanded system boundaries. Livest Sci. 2013;155:384–396. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2013.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy P, Orikasa T, Thammawong M, et al. Life cycle of meats: An opportunity to abate the greenhouse gas emission from meat industry in Japan. J Environ Manage. 2012;93:218–224. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruviaro CF, de Leis CM, Lampert VDN, et al. Carbon footprint in different beef production systems on a southern Brazilian farm: a case study. J Clean Prod. 2015;96:435–443. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salami SA, Luciano G, O’Grady MN, et al. Sustainability of feeding plant by-products: A review of the implications for ruminant meat production. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2019;251:37–55. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsonstuen S, Åby BA, Crosson P, et al. Farm scale modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from semi-intensive suckler cow beef production. Agric Syst. 2019;176:102670. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saetrens W, Smetana S, Van Campenhout L, et al. Life cycle assessment of burger patties produced with extruded meat substitutes. J Clean Prod. 2021;306:127177. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov VK, VanderZaag A, Habtewold J, et al. Dairy manure acidification reduces CH4 emissions over short and long-term. Environ Technol. 2021;42(18):2797–2804. doi:10.1080/09593330.2020.1714744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stackhouse-Lawson K, Rotz C, Oltjen J, et al. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:4641–4655. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STATISTA. (2020). https://www.statista.com/ (accessed 14 April 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Tichenor NE, Peters CJ, Norris GA, et al. Life cycle environmental consequences of grass-fed and dairy beef production systems in the northeastern United States. J Clean Prod. 2017;142:1619–1628. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos K, Farinha M, Bernardo L, et al. Livestock-derived greenhouse gas emissions in a diversified grazing system in the endangered Pampa biome, southern Brazil. Land Use Pol. 2018;75:442–448. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellinga TV, de Vries M. Effectiveness of climate change mitigation options considering the amount of meat produced in dairy systems. Agric Syst. 2018;162:136–144. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergé XPC, Dyer JA, Desjardins RL, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian beef industry. Agric Syst. 2008;98:126–134. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2008.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedermann S, McGahan EJ, Murphy CM, et al. Environmental impacts and resource use of Australian beef and lamb exported to the USA determined using life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod. 2015a;94:67–75. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedermann S, Henry B, McGahan EJ, et al. Resource use and greenhouse gas intensity of Australian beef production: 1981-2010. Agric Syst. 2015b;133:109–118. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Velden R, da Fonseca-Zang W, Zang J, et al. Closed-loop organic waste management systems for family farmers in Brazil. Environ Technol. 2021. doi:10.1080/09593330.2021.1871660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Meng G. The evolution and research framework of carbon footprint: based on the perspective of knowledge mapping. Ecol Indic. 2020;112:106125. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehetmeier M, Hoffmann H, Sauer J, et al. A dominance analysis of greenhouse gas emissions, beef output and land use of German dairy farms. Agric Syst. 2014;129:55–67. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucali M, Tamburini A, Sandrucci A, et al. Global warming and mitigation potential of milk and meat production in Lombardy (Italy). J Clean Prod. 2017;153:474–482. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucali M, Bacenetti J, Tamburini A, et al. Environmental impact assessment of different cropping systems of home-grown feed for milk production. J Clean Prod. 2018;172:3734–3746. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westhoek Henk, Peter Lesschen Jan, Rood Trudy, etal Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake. Global Environ Change. 2014;26:196–205. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar