Improving CH₄/O₂ energy ratio of meat processing wastewater treatment systems through micro-sieving

References

• Burian SJ, Nix SJ, Pitt RE, et al. Urban wastewater management in the United States: past, present, and future. J Urban Technol. 2000;7:33–62. DOI:10.1080/713684134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Mehrvar M. Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by combined anaerobic baffled reactor and UV/H2O2 processes. Chem Eng Res Des. 2011;89:1136–1143. DOI:10.1016/j.cherd.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khamtib S, Reungsang A. Co-digestion of oil palm trunk hydrolysate with slaughterhouse wastewater for thermophilic bio-hydrogen production by thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticm KKU19. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2014;39:6872–6880. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salsnes. Eco-efficient solids separation benchmarking water solutions. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Franchi A, Santoro D. Current status of the rotating belt filtration (RBF) technology for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Pract Technol. 2015;10:319–327. DOI:10.2166/wpt.2015.038
   Google Scholar
• Tien C, Ramarao BV. Revisiting the laws of filtration: An assessment of their use in identifying particle retention mechanisms in filtration. J Membrane Sci. 2011;383:17–25. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bixio D, Van Hauwermeiren P, Thoeye C. Impact of primary treatment technologies on BNR: the case study of the STP of Ghent. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rusten B, Ødegaard H. Evaluation and testing of fine mesh sieve technologies for primary treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol. 2006;54:31–38. DOI:10.2166/wst.2006.710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusten B, Lundar A. How a simple bench-scale test greatly improved the primary treatment performance of fine mesh sieves. Proc Water Environ Feder. 2006;2006:1919–1935. DOI:10.2175/193864706783750114
   Google Scholar
• Tang WZ, Sillanpää M. Sustainable environmental engineering. Wiley; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. Process design manual for suspended solids removal. US Environmental Protection Agency; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Ljunggren M. Micro screening in wastewater treatment-an overview. Vatten. 2006;62:171.
   Google Scholar
• Sarathy S, Ho D, Murray A, et al. Engineered fractionation of primary solids – a comparison of primary treatments using rotating belt filters and primary clarifiers. Proc Water Environ Feder. 2015;2015:4950–4959.
   Google Scholar
• Bi Z, Qiao S, Zhou J, et al. Fast start-up of Anammox process with appropriate ferrous iron concentration. Bioresource Technol. 2014;170:506–512. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensson M, Ekström S, Chan AA, et al. Experience from start-ups of the first ANITA Mox plants. Water Sci Technol. 2013;67:2677–2684. DOI:10.2166/wst.2013.156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins D, Wanner J. Activated sludge – 100 years and counting. London: IWA Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• van Haandel AC, van der Lubbe JGM. Handbook of biological wastewater treatment. London: IWA Publishing; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cokgor EU, Sozen S, Orhon D. Biological treatability for meat processing effluent. Fresen Environ Bull. 2004;13:1020–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görgün E, Çokgör EU, Orhon D, et al. Modelling biological treatability for meat processing effluent. Water Sci Technol. 1995;32:43–52. DOI:10.1016/0273-1223(96)00137-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipp M, Masmoudi Jabri K, Wellmann J, et al. Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment: a review on recycling and reuse possibilities. Water (Basel). 2021;13:3175. DOI:10.3390/w13223175
   Google Scholar
• Bustillo-Lecompte CF, Mehrvar M. Slaughterhouse wastewater characteristics, treatment, and management in the meat processing industry: a review on trends and advances. J Environ Manage. 2015;161:287–302. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton M, Willis S, Rezaie B, et al. Food processing industry energy and water consumption in the Pacific northwest. Innov Food Sci Emerg. 2018;47:371–383. DOI:10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad Latiff NA, Radin Mohamed RMS, Shanmugan VA, et al. Characteristics of water quality from meat processing wastewater. J Adv Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2020;17:78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf E. Wastewater engineering: treatment and resource recovery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Qasim SR, Zhu G. Wastewater treatment and reuse: theory and design examples. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt Jr HE, Dhulashia S. Carbon diversion and its role in energy efficiency. Florida Water Resour J. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Behera CR, Daynouri-Pancino F, Santoro D, et al. An empirical model for carbon recovery in a rotating belt filter and Its application in the frame of plantwide evaluation. Front Int Conf Wastewater Treatment Model. 2017;4:30–36. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-58421-8_5
   Google Scholar
• Gupta M, Giaccherini F, Sridhar GRD, et al. Application of respirometric techniques to determine COD fractionation and biokinetic parameters of sieved wastewater. Proc Water Environ Feder. 2018;2018:106–121. DOI:10.2175/193864718825138079
   Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Wang X, Yang J. Experimental study on recycled steel fiber concrete. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pabi S, Amarnath A, Goldstein R, et al. Electricity use and management in the municipal water supply and wastewater industries. Electric Power Research Institute. Palo Alto. 2013;194.
   Google Scholar
• Tarallo S. Utilities of the future energy findings. London: IWA Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari M, Foladori P, Nembrini S, et al. Benchmarking of energy consumption in municipal wastewater treatment plants – a survey of over 200 plants in Italy. Water Sci Technol. 2018;77:2242–2252. DOI:10.2166/wst.2018.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons L, Clifford E, McNamara G, et al. Increasing resource efficiency in wastewater treatment plants: environmental protection agency. Ireland: Johnstown Castle; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pakenas LJ. Energy efficiency in municipal wastewater treatment plants: technology assessment. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Lackner S, Gilbert EM, Vlaeminck SE, et al. Full-scale partial nitritation/Anammox experiences – an application survey. Water Res. 2014;55:292–303. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekker I, Bhowmick GD, Priks H, et al. ANAMMOX-denitrification biomass in microbial fuel cell to enhance the electricity generation and nitrogen removal efficiency. Biodegradation. 2020;31:249–264. DOI:10.1007/s10532-020-09907-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikmann E, Zekker I, Tenno T, et al. Inoculum-free start-up of biofilm- and sludge-based deammonification systems in pilot scale. Int J Environ Sci Te. 2018;15:133–148. DOI:10.1007/s13762-017-1374-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekker I, Kivirüüt A, Rikmann E, et al. Enhanced efficiency of nitritating-Anammox sequencing batch reactor achieved at Low decrease rates of oxidation–reduction potential. Environ Eng Sci. 2019;36:350–360. DOI:10.1089/ees.2018.0225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caixeta CET, Cammarota MC, Xavier AMF. Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment: evaluation of a new three-phase separation system in a UASB reactor. Bioresource Technol. 2002;81:61–69. DOI:10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00070-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R. Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost–benefit analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408:4396–4402. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Wang XC. Cost–benefit evaluation of a decentralized water system for wastewater reuse and environmental protection. Water Sci Technol. 2009;59:1515–1522. DOI:10.2166/wst.2009.156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar