Pesticides removal from water using activated carbons and carbon nanotubes

References

• Di Bernardo Dantas A, Paschoalato CFR, Martinez MS, et al. Removal of diuron and hexazinone from guarany aquifer groundwater. Brazilian J Chem Eng. 2011;28:415–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fava L, Orrù MA, Scardala S, et al. Pesticides and their metabolites in selected Italian groundwater and surface water used for drinking. Ann Ist Super Sanita [Internet]. 2010;46:309–316. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20847467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagner CC, Vidal C, Acayaba RD, et al. Trace analysis of pesticides and an assessment of their occurrence in surface and drinking waters from the State of São Paulo (Brazil). Anal Methods [Internet]. 2014;6:6668–6677. http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C4AY00782D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chagas Pd, Souza MdF, Dombroski JLD, et al. Occurrence of the potent mutagens 2- nitrobenzanthrone and 3-nitrobenzanthrone in fine airborne particles. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia NM, Carbonari CA, Velini ED. Detection of herbicides in water bodies of the Samambaia River sub-basin in the Federal District and eastern Goiás. J Environ Sci Heal – Part B Pestic Food Contam Agric Wastes [Internet]. 2020;55:574–582. doi:10.1080/03601234.2020.1742000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortoluzzi EC, Rheinheimer DS, Gonçalves CS, et al. Investigation of the occurrence of pesticide residues in rural wells and surface water following application to tobacco. Quim Nova. 2007;30:1872–1876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dores EFGC, Carbo L, Ribeiro ML, et al. Pesticide levels in ground and surface waters of primavera do Leste Region, Mato Grosso, Brazil. J Chromatogr Sci. 2008;46:585–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohaupt V, Völker J, Altenburger R, et al. Pesticides in European rivers, lakes and groundwaters – Data assessment. ETC/ICM Technical Report 1/2020: European Topic Centre on Inland, Coastal and Marine waters. ETC/ICM Tech. Rep. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira EN, Dores EFGC, Pinto AA, et al. Currently used pesticides in water matrices in central-western Brazil. J Braz Chem Soc. 2012;23:1476–1487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleder AA, Vargas LMP, Hansel FA, et al. Evaluation of occurrence of NO3–, Coliform and atrazine in a karst aquifer, Colombo. PR. Rev Bras Recur Hidricos. 2017;22:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Almberg KS, Turyk ME, Jones RM, et al. Atrazine contamination of drinking water and adverse birth outcomes in community water systems with elevated atrazine in Ohio, 2006–2008. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:1889–1815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campinas M, Silva C, Viegas RMC, et al. To what extent may pharmaceuticals and pesticides be removed by PAC conventional addition to low-turbidity surface waters and what are the potential bottlenecks? J Water Process Eng. 2021;40:101833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoya AA, Adegbaju OS, Akinola OE, et al. Comparative assessment of the efficiency of rice husk biochar and conventional water treatment method to remove chlorpyrifos from pesticide polluted water. Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2020;39:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza RM, Seibert D, Quesada HB, et al. Occurrence, impacts and general aspects of pesticides in surface water: a review. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2020;135:22–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfikrie N, Bin HY, Zaidon SZ, et al. Occurrence of pesticides in surface water, pesticides removal efficiency in drinking water treatment plant and potential health risk to consumers in Tengi River Basin, Malaysia. Sci Total Environ. 2020;712(712):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Syafrudin M, Kristanti RA, Yuniarto A, et al. Pesticides in drinking water — a review. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Hylling O, Nikbakht Fini M, Ellegaard-Jensen L, et al. A novel hybrid concept for implementation in drinking water treatment targets micropollutant removal by combining membrane filtration with biodegradation. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2019;694:133710. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urtiaga A. Electrochemical technologies combined with membrane filtration. Curr Opin Electrochem [Internet]. 2021;27:100691. doi:10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saylor GL, Kupferle MJ. The impact of chloride or bromide ions on the advanced oxidation of atrazine by combined electrolysis and ozonation. J Environ Chem Eng [Internet]. 2019;7:103105. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2019.103105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komtchou S, Delegan N, Dirany A, et al. Photo-electrocatalytic oxidation of atrazine using sputtured deposited TiO2: WN photoanodes under UV/visible light. Catal Today [Internet]. 2020;340:323–333. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2019.04.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan K, Branchu P, Boudahmane L, et al. Field performance of two biofiltration systems treating micropollutants from road runoff. Water Res [Internet]. 2018;145:562–578. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzaquén TB, Cuello NI, Alfano OM, et al. Degradation of Atrazine over a heterogeneous photo-fenton process with iron modified MCM-41 materials. Catal Today [Internet]. 2017;296:51–58. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2017.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklos DB, Remy C, Jekel M, et al. Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment – A critical review. Water Res. 2018;139:118–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai L, Dykstra JE, Adishakti MG, et al. Diffusion of hydrophilic organic micropollutants in granular activated carbon with different pore sizes. Water Res [Internet]. 2019;162:518–527. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam SW, Choi DJ, Kim SK, et al. Adsorption characteristics of selected hydrophilic and hydrophobic micropollutants in water using activated carbon. J Hazard Mater [Internet]. 2014;270:144–152. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves Pimenta JA, Francisco Fukumoto AA, Madeira TB, et al. Adsorbent selection for pesticides removal from drinking water. Environ Technol (United Kingdom). 2020;Advance online publication.:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Liu H, Wang S, et al. Simultaneous removal and oxidation of arsenic from water by δ-MnO2 modified activated carbon. J Environ Sci (China) [Internet]. 2020;94:147–160. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2020.03.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee CS, Shuit SH, Lim CC, et al. Synthesis of magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes via facile and solvent-free direct doping method for water remediation. J Water Process Eng [Internet]. 2022;45:102487. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Xiong M, Shi B, et al. Treatment of shale gas flowback water by adsorption on carbon- nanotube-nested diatomite adsorbent. J Water Process Eng [Internet]. 2021;42:102074. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong L, Pan S, Liu J, et al. Performance and mechanism of Pb(II) removal from water by the spent biological activated carbon (SBAC) with different using-time. J Water Process Eng [Internet]. 2020;36:101255. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaarela O, Koppanen M, Kesti T, et al. Natural organic matter removal in a full-scale drinking water treatment plant using ClO2 oxidation: performance of two virgin granular activated carbons. J Water Process Eng [Internet]. 2021;41:102001. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaman S, Rodriguez R, Mazyck DW. Evaluation of common granular activated carbon parameters for trace contaminant removal. J Environ Eng. 2019;145:04019035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piplai T, Kumar A, Alappat BJ. Removal of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles from water using an activated carbon column. J Environ Eng. 2018;144:04017113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt JB, Burns N, Mobley D, et al. Modeling PFAS removal using granular activated carbon for full-scale system design. J Environ Eng. 2022;148:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Fox JT. Adsorption of humic acid by acid-modified granular activated carbon and powder activated carbon. J Environ Eng. 2018;144:04018104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Yu L, Iranmanesh S, et al. Laboratory and field investigation of sulfolane removal from water using activated carbon. J Environ Eng. 2020;146:04020022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng WJ, Li C, Feng Y, et al. Carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs-COOH)-intercalated graphene oxide membranes for highly efficient treatment of organic wastewater. J Water Process Eng [Internet]. 2021;40:101901. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marszałek A, Kamińska G, Abdel Salam NF. Simultaneous adsorption of organic and inorganic micropollutants from rainwater by bentonite and bentonite-carbon nanotubes composites. J Water Process Eng [Internet]. 2022;46:102550. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214714421006371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong Q, Wang J, Zhang Z, et al. Preparation of polyurethane and carbon nanotube foam and its adsorption properties for sulfonamides in water. J Environ Eng. 2020;146:04020116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Program NWA. Pesticides in the Nation’s streams and ground water, 1992–2001; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil. BRAZIL. Ministry of Health. Ordinance GM/MS No. 888, of May 4, 2021. Amends Annex XX of the Consolidation Ordinance GM/MS No. 5, of September 28, 2017, to provide for water quality control and surveillance procedures for human consumption and its potabil; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Walter WG. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (11th ed.). Am J Public Heal Nations Heal [Internet]. 1961;51:940–940. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105AJPH.51.6.940-a.
   Google Scholar
• ABNT AB de NT. NBR 6508 standard: soil: real specific mass. Rio de Janeiro: Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas – ABNT; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rouquerol J, Avnir D, Fairbridge CW, et al. Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem [Internet]. 1994;66:1739–1758. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1351pac199466081739/html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Castilla C. Adsorption of organic molecules from aqueous solutions on carbon materials. Carbon N Y. 2004;42:83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lladó J, Lao-Luque C, Ruiz B, et al. Role of activated carbon properties in atrazine and paracetamol adsorption equilibrium and kinetics. Process Saf Environ Prot [Internet]. 2015;95:51–59. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2015.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambabu N, Guzman CA, Soltan J, et al. Adsorption characteristics of atrazine on granulated activated carbon and carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng Technol. 2012;35:272–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren X, Chen C, Nagatsu M, et al. Carbon nanotubes as adsorbents in environmental pollution management: a review. Chem Eng J [Internet]. 2011;170:395–410. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Gao B, Morales VL, et al. Methods of using carbon nanotubes as filter media to remove aqueous heavy metals. Chem Eng J [Internet]. 2012;210:557–563. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebello S, Asok AK, Mundayoor S, et al. Surfactants: toxicity, remediation and green surfactants. Environ Chem Lett. 2014;12:275–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes RF, Teixeira ACSC. An overview on surfactants as pollutants of concern: occurrence, impacts and persulfate-based remediation technologies. Chemosphere [Internet]. 2022;300:134507. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur K, Kaur J, Kumar R, et al. Formulation and physiochemical study of α-tocopherol based oil in water nanoemulsion stabilized with non toxic, biodegradable surfactant: sodium stearoyl lactate. Ultrason Sonochem [Internet]. 2017;38:570–578. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.08.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Wang X, Zhou X, et al. Quantitative structure-activity relationship between the toxicity of amine surfactant and its molecular structure. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2020;702:134593. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikehata K, El-Din MG. Degradation of recalcitrant surfactants in wastewater by ozonation and advanced oxidation processes: a review. Ozone Sci Eng. 2004;26:327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu T, Zhou Z, Qu F, et al. Separation performance of ultrafiltration during the treatment of algae-laden water in the presence of an anionic surfactant. Sep Purif Technol. 2022;281:119894. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsehly EM, Chechenin NG, Makunin AV, et al. Ozone functionalized CNT-based filters for high removal efficiency of benzene from aqueous solutions. J Water Process Eng [Internet]. 2018;25:81–87. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luan H, Teychene B, Huang H. Efficient removal of As(III) by Cu nanoparticles intercalated in carbon nanotube membranes for drinking water treatment. Chem Eng J [Internet]. 2019;355:341–350. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulton R, Haase JP, Kaalberg S, et al. Hydroxyl radical formation during ozonation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes: performance optimization and demonstration of a reactive CNT filter. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49:3687–3697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park WK, Yoon Y, Kim S, et al. Feasible water flow filter with facilely functionalized Fe3O4-non-oxidative graphene/CNT composites for arsenic removal. J Environ Chem Eng [Internet]. 2016;4:3246–3252. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2016.06.028.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Jeong S, Liu Z. Progress and challenges of carbon nanotube membrane in water treatment. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2016;46:999–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali S, Rehman SAU, Luan HY, et al. Challenges and opportunities in functional carbon nanotubes for membrane-based water treatment and desalination. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2019;646:1126–1139. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee B, Baek Y, Lee M, et al. A carbon nanotube wall membrane for water treatment. Nat Commun. 2015;6:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jame SA, Zhou Z. Electrochemical carbon nanotube filters for water and wastewater treatment. Nanotechnol Rev. 2016;5:41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihsanullah. Carbon nanotube membranes for water purification: developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. Sep Purif Technol. 2019;209:307–337. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaten TP. Aluminium as a risk factor in Alzheimer’s disease, with emph] asis on drinking water. Brain Res Bull. 2001;55:187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongpun J, Chanmanee T, Tocharus C, et al. The effects of festidinol treatment on the D-galactose and aluminum chloride–induced Alzheimer-like pathology in mouse brain. Phytomedicine [Internet]. 2022;98:153925. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2022.153925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke N, Yenugadhati N, Birkett NJ, et al. Association between aluminum in drinking water and incident Alzheimer’s disease in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging cohort. Neurotoxicology. 2021;83:157–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva Neto GC, Morais SN, Costa FdA, et al. O nível de concentração de alumínio na água como fator de risco para o desenvolvimento da doença de alvzheimer / The aluminum concentration level in water as a risk factor for the development of alzheimer’s disease. Brazilian J Heal Rev. 2020;3:15324–15339.
   Google Scholar
• Ogunlade B, Adelakun SA, Agie JA. Nutritional supplementation of gallic acid ameliorates Alzheimer-type hippocampal neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment induced by aluminum chloride exposure in adult Wistar rats. Drug Chem Toxicol [Internet]. 2022;45:651–662. doi:10.1080/01480545.2020.1754849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalifa M, Safar MM, Abdelsalam RM, et al. Telmisartan protects against aluminum-induced Alzheimer-like pathological changes in rats. Neurotox Res. 2020;37:275–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima DRS, Tonucci MC, Libânio M, et al. Fármacos e desreguladores endócrinos em águas brasileiras: ocorrência e técnicas de remoção. Eng Sanit e Ambient. 2017;22:1043–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhangar K, Kumar M. Tricks and tracks in removal of emerging contaminants from the wastewater through hybrid treatment systems: a review. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2020;738:140320. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang L, Ma XY, Wang Y, et al. Removal of trace organic pollutants (pharmaceuticals and pesticides) and reduction of biological effects from secondary effluent by typical granular activated carbon. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2020;749:141611. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes TdA, Heßler R, Bohner C, et al. Pesticides removal from industrial wastewater by a membrane bioreactor and post-treatment with either activated carbon, reverse osmosis or ozonation. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8(282):1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dong H, Xu L, Mao Y, et al. Effective abatement of 29 pesticides in full-scale advanced treatment processes of drinking water: from concentration to human exposure risk. J Hazard Mater [Internet]. 2021;403:123986. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves AdA, Ruiz GdO, Nonato TCM, et al. Performance of the fixed-bed of granular activated carbon for the removal of pesticides from water supply. Environ Technol (United Kingdom). 2019;40:1977–1987.
   Google Scholar
• Debnath D, Gupta AK, Ghosal PS. Recent advances in the development of tailored functional materials for the treatment of pesticides in aqueous media: a review. J Ind Eng Chem [Internet]. 2019;70:51–69. doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2018.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove S, Jefferson B, Jarvis P. Pesticide removal from drinking water sources by adsorption: a review. Environ Technol Rev. 2019;8:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jatoi AS, Hashmi Z, Adriyani R, et al. Recent trends and future challenges of pesticide removal techniques - A comprehensive review. J Environ Chem Eng [Internet]. 2021;9:105571. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh IA, Zouari N, Al-Ghouti MA. Removal of pesticides from water and wastewater: chemical, physical and biological treatment approaches. Environ Technol Innov [Internet]. 2020;19:101026. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2020.101026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puziy AM, Poddubnaya OI, Martínez-Alonso A, et al. Synthetic carbons activated with phosphoric acid. Carbon N Y. 2002;40:1493–1505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanning PE, Vannice MA. A DRIFTS study of the formation of surface groups on carbon by oxidation. Carbon N Y. 1993;31:721–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fengel D. Characterization of cellulose by deconvoluting the OH valency range in FTIR spectra. Holzforschung. 1992;46:283–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar