Effects of ciprofloxacin on biogas production and microbial community composition in anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater in ASBR type reactor

References

• ABPA. Relatório Anual, Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal, 2020: 160. <http://abpa-br.org/relatorios/>.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng DL, Ngo HH, Guo WS, et al. Problematic effects of antibiotics on anaerobic treatment of swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol 2018;263:642–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Liu J, Li Q, et al. A review of the effects of antibiotics on the anaerobic digestion of swine waste. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 2022;25:100312.
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Wang J, Li Z, et al. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural soils: a systematic analysis. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2022: 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiseo K, Huber L, Gilbert M, et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals from 2017 to 2030. Antibiotics. 2020;9(12):918.
   Google Scholar
• Dutra MC, Moreno LZ, Dias RA, et al. Antimicrobial Use in Brazilian swine herds: assessment of Use and reduction examples. Microorganisms. 2021;9(4):881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TK, Kim T, Park H, et al. Degradation of ciprofloxacin and inactivation of ciprofloxacin resistant E. faecium during UV-LED (275 nm)/chlorine process. Chem Eng J. 2020;394:124803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang H, Oberoi AS, He Z, et al. Ciprofloxacin-degrading Paraclostridium sp. isolated from sulfate-reducing bacteria-enriched sludge. Optimization and mechanism. Water Res. 2021;191:116808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Buriahi AK, Al-shaibani MM, Mohamed RMSR, et al. Ciprofloxacin removal from non-clinical environment: a critical review of current methods and future trend prospects. J Water Process Eng. 2022;47:102725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei R, Ge F, Chen M, et al. Occurrence of ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, and florfenicol in animal wastewater and water resources. J Environ Qual 2012;41(5):1481–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer T. Medicamentos e medicações no controle de doenças entéricas pós-desmame. Suínos & Cia – Revista Técnica da Suinocultura. 2012;42:28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng D, Liu Y, Shehata E, et al. In-feed antibiotic use changed the behaviors of oxytetracycline, sulfamerazine, and ciprofloxacin and related antibiotic resistance genes during swine manure composting. J Hazard Mater 2021;402:123710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou LJ, Ying GG, Liu S, et al. Excretion masses and environmental occurrence of antibiotics in typical swine and dairy cattle farms in China. Sci Total Environ. 2013;444:183–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalakova P, Cizmas L, McDonald TJ, et al. Occurrence and toxicity of antibiotics in the aquatic environment: a review. Chemosphere. 2020;251:126351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourinho G, Rodrigues LFTG, Brito PSD. Recent advances on anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2020;17(12):4917–4938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollas CE, Bolsan AC, Chini A, et al. Effects of swine manure storage time on solid-liquid separation and biogas production: a life-cycle assessment approach. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2021;150:111472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Chen Y, Wu J. Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: a review. Appl Energy. 2019;240:120–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadaroo SN, Poh PE, Gouwanda D, et al. Applicability of various pretreatment techniques to enhance the anaerobic digestion of Palm oil Mill effluent (POME): a review. J Environ Chem Eng. 2019;7(5):103310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelon LK, Ramos JGVS, Carvalho KQ, et al. Effects of temperature and HRT on biogas production in moving and fixed bed of a novel upflow anaerobic hybrid (UAHB) reactor. Environ Technol. 2022: 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mari A, Secco D, Kunz A, et al. Performance of up-flow anaerobic digester in solids removal and biogas production. Int J Food Agric Environ. 2014;12:1135–1139.
   Google Scholar
• Franzoni RM, Bernardelli JKB, Silveira DD, et al. Performance of an anaerobic–oxic–anoxic (AOA) system in the simultaneous removal of nutrients and triclosan and bacterial community. Environ Technol. 2022: 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva AR, Gomes JC, Salvador AF, et al. Ciprofloxacin, diclofenac, ibuprofen and 17α-ethinylestradiol differentially affect the activity of acetogens and methanogens in anaerobic communities. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29(7):866–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Li X, Wu S, et al. Enhanced strategies for antibiotic removal from swine wastewater in anaerobic digestion. Trends Biotechnol 2021;39(1):8–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do TM, Stuckey DC, Oh S. Effect of ciprofloxacin on methane production and anaerobic microbial community. Bioresour Technol 2018;261:240–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Ji Y, Sun P, et al. Effects of individual and complex ciprofloxacin, fullerene C60, and ZnO nanoparticles on sludge digestion: methane production, metabolism, and microbial community. Bioresour Technol 2018;267:46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Deng L, Wang L, et al. Comparison of three biomass-retaining reactors of the ASBR, the UBF and the USR treating swine wastewater for biogas production. Renewable Energy. 2019;138:521–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher TM, Mott HV, Lupo CD, et al. Effects of chlortetracycline amended feed on anaerobic sequencing batch reactor performance of swine manure digestion. Bioresour Technol 2012;125:65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndegwa PM, Hamilton DW, Lalman JA, et al. Effects of cycle-frequency and temperature on the performance of anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBRs) treating swine waste. Bioresour Technol 2008;99(6):1972–1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Water Environmental Federation; American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 23rd ed. Publisher: American Public Health Association; 2017; Washington, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley LE, Boyle WC, Converse JC. Improved alkalimetric monitoring for anaerobic digestion of high-strength wastes. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1986: 406–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiLallo R, Albertson OE. Volatile acids by direct titration. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1961: 356–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malavolta, E., Vitti, G. C., & Oliveira, S. A. de. (1997). Avaliação do estado nutricional das plantas: princípios e aplicações. Piracicaba: POTAFOS.
   Google Scholar
• Deaver JA, Soni MN, Diviesti KI, et al. Taxonomic and functional variations induced by an overloading event in anaerobic codigestion of municipal wastewater sludge with fats, oils, and grease. ACS ES&T Engineering. 2021;1(8):1205–1216.
   Google Scholar
• Do TM, Choi D, Oh S, et al. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor performance with varying feed concentrations of ciprofloxacin. Sci Total Environ. 2022;803:150108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, McAdam E, Zhang Y, et al. Ammonia inhibition and toxicity in anaerobic digestion: a critical review. J Water Process Eng. 2019;32:100899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, L., Eddy, H. (2013). Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. (Vol. 5). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal R, Massé DI, Singh G. A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. Bioresour Technol 2013;143:632–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz A, Steinmetz RLR, do Amaral AC. Fundamentos da digestão anaeróbia, purificação do biogás, uso e tratamento do digestato. Concórdia: Sbera: Embrapa Suínos e Aves; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton DW, Steele MT. Operation and performance of a farm-scale anaerobic sequencing batch reactor treating dilute swine manure. Trans ASABE. 2014;57(5):1473–1482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton DW, Lopez HFB, Alonso EPC. Improved mixing system for anaerobic sequencing batch reactors. Trans ASABE. 2020;63(4):933–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez L, Garzón-Zúñiga MA, Buelna G, et al. Tylosin effect on methanogenesis in an anaerobic biomass from swine wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol. 2016;73(2):445–452. doi:10.2166/wst.2015.507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang T, Liu M, Du Y, et al. Deciphering the internal mechanisms of ciprofloxacin affected anaerobic digestion, its degradation and detoxification mechanism. Sci Total Environ. 2022;842:156718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao X, Li B, Zou R, et al. Biodegradation of antibiotic ciprofloxacin: pathways, influential factors, and bacterial community structure. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(8):7911–7918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonugli-Santos RC, Marteres TJ, Luiz FN, et al. Prolonged acetogenic phase and biological succession during anaerobic digestion using swine manure. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 2022: 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari V, Gupta RS. Molecular signatures for the phylum Synergistetes and some of its subclades. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;102(4):517–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng NX, Yu J, Xiang L, et al. Co-metabolic degradation of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin by the enriched bacterial consortium XG and its bacterial community composition. Sci Total Environ. 2019;665:41–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro RB, Mukaeda CM, Sabatini CA, et al. Influence of organic loading rate on ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole biodegradation in anaerobic fixed bed biofilm reactors. J Environ Manage 2020;273:111170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung CH, Chang YT, Chang YJ. Roles of microorganisms other than Clostridium and Enterobacter in anaerobic fermentative biohydrogen production systems – A review. Bioresour Technol 2011;102(18):8437–8444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campoli-Richards DM, Monk JP, Price A, et al. Ciprofloxacin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use. Drugs. 1988;35:373–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso MC, Braghieri A, Capece A, et al. Recent updates on the use of agro-food waste for biogas production. Appl Sci. 2019;9(6):1217.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Shah, F., Mahmood, Q., Maroof Shah, M., Pervez, A., & Ahmad Asad, S. (2014). Microbial ecology of anaerobic digesters: the key players of anaerobiosis. Scientific World J, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chen S, Cheng H, Liu J, et al. Unexpected competitiveness of Methanosaeta populations at elevated acetate concentrations in methanogenic treatment of animal wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;101(4):1729–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamorano-López N, Borrás L, Seco A, et al. Unveiling microbial structures during raw microalgae digestion and co-digestion with primary sludge to produce biogas using semi-continuous AnMBR systems. Sci Total Environ. 2020;699:134365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar