386
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Critical evaluation of different mass transfer equations to model N2O emissions from water resource recovery facilities with diffuse aeration

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 3339-3353 | Received 23 Dec 2022, Accepted 04 May 2023, Published online: 31 May 2023

References

  • Alahmady K. Effect of airflow rate and submergence of diffusers on oxygen transfer capacity of diffused aeration systems. Al-Rafidain Eng J (AREJ). 2006;14:27–38.
  • Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, et al. editors. IPCC summary for policymakers climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group i to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York (NY, USA): Cambridge University Press; 2021. p. 3–32. DOI:10.1017/9781009157896.001.
  • Tumendelger A, Alshboul Z, Lorke A. Methane and nitrous oxide emission from different treatment units of municipal wastewater treatment plants in Southwest Germany. PLoS One. 2019;14:1–17.
  • Faragò M, Damgaard A, Madsen JA, et al. From wastewater treatment to water resource recovery: environmental and economic impacts of full-scale implementation. Water Res. 2021;204:117554.
  • Domingo-Félez C, Smets BF. Regulation of key N2O production mechanisms during biological water treatment. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;57:119–126.
  • Caranto JD, Lancaster KM. Nitric oxide is an obligate bacterial nitrification intermediate produced by hydroxylamine oxidoreductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:8217–8222.
  • Yu R, Perez-Garcia O, Lu H, et al. Nitrosomonas europaea adaptation to anoxic-oxic cycling: insights from transcription analysis, proteomics and metabolic network modeling. Sci Total Environ. 2018;615:1566–1573.
  • Su Q, Domingo-Félez C, Jensen MM, et al. Abiotic nitrous oxide (N2O) production is strongly pH dependent, but contributes little to overall N2O emissions in biological nitrogen removal systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53:3508–3516.
  • Massara TM, Malamis S, Guisasola A, et al. A review on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions during biological nutrient removal from municipal wastewater and sludge reject water. Sci Total Environ. 2017;596:106–123.
  • Ni BJ, Yuan Z. Recent advances in mathematical modeling of nitrous oxides emissions from wastewater treatment processes. Water Res. 2015;87:336–346.
  • Domingo-Félez C, Smets BF. A consilience model to describe N2O production during biological N removal. Environ Sci (Camb). 2016;2:923–930.
  • Chen H, Zeng L, Wang D, et al. Recent advances in nitrous oxide production and mitigation in wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2020;184:116168.
  • Mannina G, Ekama G, Caniani D, et al. Greenhouse gases from wastewater treatment — a review of modelling tools. Sci Total Environ. 2016;551–552:254–270.
  • Baeten JE, van Loosdrecht MCM, Volcke EIP. When and why do gradients of the gas phase composition and pressure affect liquid–gas transfer? Water Res. 2020;178:115844.
  • Law Y, Ye L, Pan Y, et al. Nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment processes. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2012:1265–1277.
  • Chen X, Mielczarek AT, Habicht K, et al. Assessment of full-scale N2O emission characteristics and testing of control concepts in an activated sludge wastewater treatment plant with alternating aerobic and anoxic phases. Environ Sci Technol [Internet]. 2019;53:12485–12494. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b04889.
  • Hsu C-J. Diffusional mass transfer, A. H. P. Skelland, Wiley, New York (1974). AIChE J. [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1975. p. 621. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690210337.
  • Schulthess Rv, Gujer W. Release of nitrous oxide (N2O) from denitrifying activated sludge: verification and application of a mathematical model. Water Res. 1996;30(3):521–530.
  • Foley J, de Haas D, Yuan Z, et al. Nitrous oxide generation in full-scale biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2010;44:831–844.
  • Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, et al. Activated sludge model No.2d, ASM2D. Water Sci Technol. 1999;39:273–1223.
  • Domingo-Félez C, Smets BF. Modelling N2O dynamics of activated sludge biomass under nitrifying and denitrifying conditions: pathway contributions and uncertainty analysis. Chem Eng J. 2020;379:122311.
  • Matter-Müller C, Gujer W, Giger W. Transfer of volatile substances from water to the atmosphere. Water Res. 1981;15:1271–1279.
  • Higbie R. The rate of absorption of a pure gas into still liquid during short periods of exposure. Inst Chem Eng. 1935;35:36–60.
  • Chew J. Water bodies. Overland. 2019;Spring:51–58.
  • De heyder B, Vanrolleghem P, Van Langenhove H, et al. Kinetic characterization of mass transfer limited biodegradation of a low water soluble gas in batch experiments—necessity for multiresponse fitting. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997;55:511–519.
  • Wan X, Baeten JE, Volcke EIP. Effect of operating conditions on N2O emissions from one-stage partial nitritation-anammox reactors. Biochem Eng J. 2019;143:24–33.
  • Myers S.. Nitrous oxide and gas transfer in full-scale activated sludge basins. [Espoo]: Aalto University School of Engineering; 2019.
  • Sander R. Compilation of Henry’s law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent. Atmos Chem Phys. 2015;15:4399–4981.
  • Stenstrom MK, Brown LC, Hwang HJ. Oxygen transfer parameter estimation. J Environ Eng Div. 1981;107:379–397.
  • Gillot S, Capela-Marsal S, Roustan M, et al. Predicting oxygen transfer of fine bubble diffused aeration systems – model issued from dimensional analysis. Water Res. 2005;39:1379–1387.
  • Stenstrom MK, Gilbert RG. Effects of alpha, beta and theta factor upon the design, specification and operation of aeration systems. Water Res. 1981;15:643–654.
  • van der Lans R. Gas–liquid interphase transport. In: Advanced course on environmental biotechnology. Delft (Leiden, The Netherlands): TU Delft and University of Leiden; 2000. p. 16–17.
  • Rosso D, Stenstrom MK. Alpha factors in full-scale wastewater aeration systems. Proc Water Environ Fed. 2014;2006:4853–4863.
  • von Sperling M. Basic principles of wastewater treatment. Biol Wastewater Treat Ser. 2007;2:1–210.
  • Lewis WK, Whitman WG. Principles of gas absorption. Ind Eng Chem. 1924;16:1215–1220.
  • Higbie R. The rate of absorption of a pure gas into a still liquid during short periods of exposure. Trans Am Inst Chem Eng. 1935;31:365–389.
  • Baresel C, Andersson S, Yang J, et al. Comparison of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions calculations at a Swedish wastewater treatment plant based on water concentrations versus off-gas concentrations. Adv Clim Change Res. 2016;7:185–191.
  • Flores-Alsina X, Gernaey K V, Jeppsson U. Benchmarking biological nutrient removal in wastewater treatment plants: influence of mathematical model assumptions. Water Sci Technol. 2012;65:1496–1505.
  • Takács I, Patry GG, Nolasco D. A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process. Water Res. 1991;25:1263–1271.
  • Faragò M, Damgaard A, Rebsdorf M, et al. Challenges in carbon footprint evaluations of state-of-the-art municipal wastewater resource recovery facilities. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 2022;320:115715. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722012889.
  • Morris MD. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics. 1991;33:161.
  • Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Saltelli A. An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environ Modell Software. 2007;22:1509–1518.
  • Sin G, Gernaey K V, Lantz AE. Good modeling practice for PAT applications: propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25:1043–1053.
  • Valverde-Pérez B, Ramin E, Smets BF, et al. EBP2R - An innovative enhanced biological nutrient recovery activated sludge system to produce growth medium for green microalgae cultivation. Water Res. 2015;68:821–830.
  • Domingo-Félez C, Calderó-Pascual M, Sin G, et al. Calibration of the comprehensive NDHA-N2O dynamics model for nitrifier-enriched biomass using targeted respirometric assays. Water Res. 2017;126:29–39.
  • Brun R, Kühni M, Siegrist H, et al. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters—systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Res [Internet]. 2002;36:4113–4127. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135402001045.
  • de Haas D, Andrews J. Nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment – revisiting the IPCC 2019 refinement guidelines. Environ Challenges. 2022;8:100557.
  • Giraldo E. Nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment plants. A balancing act. Proc Water Environ Fed. 2012;2009:357–376.
  • Tallec G, Garnier J, Billen G, et al. Nitrous oxide emissions from secondary activated sludge in nitrifying conditions of urban wastewater treatment plants: effect of oxygenation level. Water Res. 2006;40:2972–2980.
  • Vangsgaard AK. Agertved Madsen J. Danish Environ Prot Agency. 2019;2020:1–53.
  • Al-Ahmady KK. Analysis of oxygen transfer performance on sub-surface aeration systems. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2006;3:301–308.
  • Alhassan HS. Effect of pressure, water depth and water flow rate on oxygen saturation level in activated sludge process. Am J Eng Appl Sci. 2011;4:435–439.
  • Lee J. Development of a model to determine the baseline mass transfer coefficient in bioreactors (aeration tanks). Water Environ Res. 2018;90:2126–2140.
  • Kampschreur MJ, Temmink H, Kleerebezem R, et al. Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2009;43:4093–4103.
  • Peng L.Understanding nitrous oxide production by ammonia oxidizing bacteria in an enriched nitrifying sludge. . PhD Thesis, School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland; 2015. DOI:10.14264/uql.2015.882.
  • Osada T, Shiraishi M, Hasegawa T, et al. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia generation in full-scale swine wastewater purification facilities. Front Environ Sci Eng. 2017;11(3). Article number 10.
  • Stentoft PA, Munk-Nielsen T, Møller JK, et al. Prioritize effluent quality, operational costs or global warming? – Using predictive control of wastewater aeration for flexible management of objectives in WRRFs. Water Res [Internet]. 2021;196:116960. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135421001585.
  • Amaral A, Schraa O, Rieger L, et al. Towards advanced aeration modelling: from blower to bubbles to bulk. Water Sci Technol. 2017;75:507–517.
  • Gruber W, Villez K, Kipf M, et al. N2o emission in full-scale wastewater treatment: proposing a refined monitoring strategy. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2020;699:134157. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719341348.
  • Delre A, ten Hoeve M, Scheutz C. Site-specific carbon footprints of scandinavian wastewater treatment plants, using the life cycle assessment approach. J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2019;211:1001–1014. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618336035.
  • Kosonen H, Heinonen M, Mikola A, et al. Nitrous oxide production at a fully covered wastewater treatment plant: results of a long-term online monitoring campaign. Environ Sci Technol [Internet]. 2016;50:5547–5554. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04466.
  • Sin G, de Pauw DJW, Weijers S, et al. An efficient approach to automate the manual trial and error calibration of activated sludge models. Biotechnol Bioeng [Internet]. 2008;100:516–528. doi:10.1002/bit.21769.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.