Centralization of symptoms and lumbar range of motion in patients with low back pain

References

• American Medical Association. AMA Committee on Rating of Mental and Physical Impairment. 2001 Guidelines to the evaluation of permanent impairment5th ed. American Medical Association, Chicago 2001
   Google Scholar
• Anderson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low back pain. Lancet 1999; 345: 581–585
   Google Scholar
• Chen SPC, Samo DG, Chen EH, Crampton AR, Conrad KM, Egan L, Mitton J. Reliability of three lumbar sagittal motion measurement methods: Surface inclinometers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1997; 39: 217–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare HA, Adams R, Maher CG. Construct validity of lumbar extension measures in McKenzie's derangement syndrome. Manual Therapy 2007; 12: 328–334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delitto A, Cibulka MT, Erhard RE, Bowling RW, Tenhula JA. Evidence for use of an extension-mobilization category in acute low back syndrome: A prescriptive validation pilot study. Physical Therapy 1993; 73: 216–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Fabio RP. Toward understanding centralisation. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1999; 29: 206–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donelson R, April C, Medcalf R, Grant W. A prospective study of centralization of lumbar and referred pain. Spine 1997; 22: 1115–1122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donelson R, Grant W, Kamps C, Medcalf R. Pain response to sagittal end-range spinal motion a prospective, randomized, multi-centered trial. Spine 1991; 16: S206–S212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donelson R, Silva G, Murphy K. Centralization phenomenon. Its usefulness in evaluating and treating referred pain. Spine 1990; 15: 211–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erhard RE, Delitto A, Cibulka MT. Relative effectiveness of an extension program and a combined program of manipulation and flexion and extension exercises in patients with acute low back syndrome. Physical Therapy 1994; 74: 1093–1100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz JM, Delitto A, Vignovic M, Busse RG. Interrater reliability of judgments of the centralization phenomenon and status change during movement testing in patients with low back pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81: 57–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill K, Krag MH, Johnson GB, Haugh LD, Pope MH. Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion. Spine 1988; 13: 50–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a US national survey. Spine 1995; 20: 11–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppenfeld, S. Physical examination of the spine and extremities. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Connecticut 1976
   Google Scholar
• Karas R, McIntosh G, Hall H, Wilson L, Melles T. The relationship between nonorganic signs and centralization of symptoms in the prediction of return to work for subjects with low back pain. Physical Therapy 1997; 77: 354–360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley J, Mayer TG, Cox R, Gatchel RJ, Smith J, Mooney V. Quantification of lumbar range of motion Part 5: Reliability of range-of-motion measures in the sagittal plane and an in vivo torso rotation measurement technique. Spine 1986; 11: 31–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilby J, Stigant M, Robert A. The reliability of back pain assessment by physio- therapists, using a “McKenzie algorithm”. Physiotherapy 1990; 76: 579–583
   Google Scholar
• Kopp JR, Alexander AH, Turocy RH, Levrini MG, Lichtman DM. The use of lumbar extension in the evaluation and treatment of subjects with acute herniated nucleus pulposus. Clinical Orthopaedics 1986; 202: 211–218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long A. The centralization phenomenon: Its usefulness as a predictor of outcome in conservative treatment of chronic low back pain (A Pilot Study). Spine 1995; 20: 2513–2521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May S. Classification by McKenzie mechanical syndromes: A survey of McKenzie-trained faculty. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2006; 29: 637–642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer TG, Tencer AF, Kristoferson S, Mooney V. Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction subjects. Spine 1984; 9: 588–595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, RA. The lumbar spine: Mechanical diagnosis and therapy. Spinal Publications, WellingtonNew Zealand 1981
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie RA. Understanding centralisation. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1999; 29: 487–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie RA, May S. The lumbar spine: Mechanical diagnosis and therapy vol. 1 2nd ed. Spinal Publications, Waikanae New Zealand 2003
   Google Scholar
• Nwuga G, Nwuga V. Relative therapeutic efficacy of the Williams and McKenzie protocols in back pain management. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1985; 1: 99–105
   Google Scholar
• Ponte D, Jensen G, Kent B. A preliminary report on the use of the McKenzie protocol versus Williams protocol in the treatment of low back pain. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1984; 6: 130–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portek I, Pearcy MJ, Reader GP, Mowat AG. Correlation between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement. British Journal of Rheumatology 1983; 22: 197–205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reynolds PMG. Measurement of spinal mobility: A comparison of three methods. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation 1975; 14: 180–185
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salisbury PJ, Porter RW. Measurement of lumbar sagittal mobility a comparison of methods. Spine 1987; 12: 190–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saur PMM, Ensink FBM, Frese K, Seeger D, Hildebrandt J. Lumbar range of motion: Reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine 1996; 21: 1332–1338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sufka A, Hauger B, Trenary M, Bishop B, Hagen A, Lozon R, Martens B. Centralization of low back pain, and perceived functional outcome. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1998; 27: 205–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, G. The back pain revolution. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Werneke M, Hart DL. Role of the centralization phenomenon as a prognostic factor for chronic pain or disability. Spine 2001; 26: 758–765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werneke M, Hart DL. Discriminant validity and relative precision for classifying patients with nonspecific neck and back pain by anatomic pain patterns. Spine 2003; 28: 161–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werneke M, Hart DL, Cook D. A descriptive study of the centralization phenomenon. Spine 1999; 24: 676–683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams MM, Hawley JA, McKenzie RA, van Wijmen PM. A comparison of the effects of two sitting postures on back and referred pain. Spine 1991; 16: 1185–1191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R, Binkley J, Bloch C, Goldsmith CH, Minuk T. Reliability of the modified-modified Schober and double inclinometer methods for measuring flexion and extension. Physical Therapy 1993; 73: 33–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar