Gait rehabilitation for a patient with an osseointegrated prosthesis following transfemoral amputation

References

• Aschoff HH, Clausen A, Hoffmeister T 2009 The endo-exo femur prosthesis–A new concept of bone-guided, prosthetic rehabilitation following above-knee amputation. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie 147: 610–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschoff HH, Clausen A, Tsoumpris K, Hoffmeister T 2011 Implantation of the endo-exo femur prosthesis to improve the mobility of amputees. Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie 23: 462–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branemark R, Berlin O, Hagberg K, Bergh P, Gunterberg B, Rydevik B 2014 A novel osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetic system for the treatment of patients with transfemoral amputation: A prospective study of 51 patients. Bone and Joint Journal 96-B: 106–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branemark R, Branemark PI, Rydevik B, Myers RR 2001 Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: A review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 38: 175–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnekreef JJ, van Uden CJ, van Moorsel S, Kooloos JG 2005 Reliability of videotaped observational gait analysis in patients with orthopedic impairments. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 6: 17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler K, Bowen C, Hughes AM, Torah R, Ayala I, Tudor J, Metcalf CD 2014 A systematic review of the key factors affecting tissue viability and rehabilitation outcomes of the residual limb in lower extremity traumatic amputees. Journal of Tissue Viability 23: 81–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers WL, Kistenberg RS, Gregor RJ 2009 The biomechanics of cycling with a transtibial amputation: Recommendations for prosthetic design and direction for future research. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 33: 256–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark RA, Pua YH, Bryant AL, Hunt MA 2013 Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for providing lateral trunk lean feedback during gait retraining. Gait and Posture 38: 1064–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancewicz TM, Krebs DE, McGibbon CA 2003 Lower-limb extensor power and lifting characteristics in disabled elders. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 40: 337–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demet K, Martinet N, Guillemin F, Paysant J, Andre JM 2003 Health related quality of life and related factors in 539 persons with amputation of upper and lower limb. Disability and Rehabilitation 25: 480–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ, Burgess AR 2001 Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: A long-term outcome study. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 80: 563–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek NL, Marks MB, Marshall SC, Chardon JP 2005 Dermatologic conditions associated with use of a lower-extremity prosthesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86: 659–663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas R, Cheze L, Frossard L 2009 Loading applied on prosthetic knee of transfemoral amputee: comparison of inverse dynamics and direct measurements. Gait and Posture 30: 560–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehde DM, Czerniecki JM, Smith DG, Campbell KM, Edwards WT, Jensen MP, Robinson LR 2000 Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81: 1039–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth AA, Mullaney M, Tyler TF, McHugh M, Nicholas S 2006 Electromyography of selected shoulder musculature during un-weighted and weighted pendulum exercises. North American Journal of Sports Physical therapy 1: 73–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frossard L, Cheze L, Dumas R 2011 Dynamic input to determine hip joint moments, power and work on the prosthetic limb of transfemoral amputees: ground reaction vs knee reaction. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 35: 140–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frossard L, Gow DL, Hagberg K, Cairns N, Contoyannis B, Gray S, Branemark R, Pearcy M 2010a Apparatus for monitoring load bearing rehabilitation exercises of a transfemoral amputee fitted with an osseointegrated fixation: A proof-of-concept study. Gait and Posture 31: 223–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frossard L, Hagberg K, Häggström E, Gow DL, Brånemark R, Pearcy M 2010b Functional outcome of transfemoral amputees fitted with an osseointegrated fixation: Temporal gait characteristics. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 22: 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Goujon-Pillet H, Sapin E, Fode P, Lavaste F 2008 Three-dimensional motions of trunk and pelvis during transfemoral amputee gait. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89: 87–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Branemark R 2001 Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: A survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 25: 186–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Branemark R 2009 One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses–rehabilitation perspective. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 46: 331–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Branemark R, Gunterberg B, Rydevik B 2008 Osseointegrated trans-femoral amputation prostheses: Prospective results of general and condition-specific quality of life in 18 patients at 2-year follow-up. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 32: 29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Branemark R, Hagg O 2004 Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA): Initial validity and reliability of a new outcome measure. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 41: 695–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Haggstrom E, Branemark R 2007 Physiological cost index (PCI) and walking performance in individuals with transfemoral prostheses compared to healthy controls. Disability and Rehabilitation 29: 643–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Haggstrom E, Uden M, Branemark R 2005 Socket versus bone-anchored trans-femoral prostheses: hip range of motion and sitting comfort. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 29: 153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Hansson E, Branemark R 2014 Outcome of percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses for patients with unilateral transfemoral amputation at two-year follow-up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 95: 2120–2127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggstrom E, Hagberg K, Rydevik B, Branemark R 2013 Vibrotactile evaluation: Osseointegrated versus socket-suspended transfemoral prostheses. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 50: 1423–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanspal RS, Fisher K, Nieveen R 2003 Prosthetic socket fit comfort score. Disability and Rehabilitation 25: 1278–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert LJ, Maltais DB, Lepage C, Saulnier J, Crete M, Perron M 2011 Isometric muscle strength in youth assessed by hand-held dynamometry: A feasibility, reliability, and validity study. Pediatric Physical Therapy 23: 289–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization 1993 ISO 8548-2. Prosthetics and Orthotics - Limb Deficiencies - Part 2: Method of Describing Lower Limb Amputation Stumps. Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Jaegers SM, Arendzen JH, de Jongh HJ 1995 Changes in hip muscles after above-knee amputation. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research: 276–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh JJ, Menz HB 2008 Accelerometry: A technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. Gait and Posture 28: 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause DA, Neuger MD, Lambert KA, Johnson AE, DeVinny HA, Hollman JH 2014 Effects of examiner strength on reliability of hip-strength testing using a handheld dynamometer. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 23: 56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WC, Frossard LA, Hagberg K, Haggstrom E, Branemark R, Evans JH, Pearcy MJ 2007 Kinetics of transfemoral amputees with osseointegrated fixation performing common activities of daily living. Clinical Biomechanics 22: 665–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SJ, Winston KD, Mitchell J, Girlinghouse J, Crochet K 2014 Physical activity, functional capacity, and step variability during walking in people with lower-limb amputation. Gait and Posture 40: 140–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon CC, Kulkarni J, Zimerson E, Van Ross E, Beck MH 2000 Skin disorders in amputees. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 42: 501–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martuscello JM, Nuzzo JL, Ashley CD, Campbell BI, Orriola JJ, Mayer JM 2013 Systematic review of core muscle activity during physical fitness exercises. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 27: 1684–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbelt HE, Geertzen JH, Jonkman MF, Dijkstra PU 2009 Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 90: 74–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud SB, Gard SA, Childress DS 2000 A preliminary investigation of pelvic obliquity patterns during gait in persons with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 37: 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moirenfeld I, Ayalon M, Ben-Sira D, Isakov E 2000 Isokinetic strength and endurance of the knee extensors and flexors in trans-tibial amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 24: 221–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Rueda F, Alguacil-Diego IM, Cuesta-Gomez A, Iglesias-Gimenez J, Martin-Vivaldi A, Miangolarra-Page JC 2014 Thorax, pelvis and hip pattern in the frontal plane during walking in unilateral transtibial amputees: Biomechanical analysis. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 18: 252–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan L 2012 A training programme to improve hip strength in persons with lower limb amputation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 44: 241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J 2010 Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function (2nd ed). Thorofare, New Jersey, SLACK Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin M 2013 Design features of implants for direct skeletal attachment of limb prostheses. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A 101: 3339–3348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers GM, Ryall NH, Kap A, De Laat F, Van der Linde H 2008 The mobility scale for lower limb amputees: the SIGAM/WAP mobility scale. Disability and Rehabilitation 30: 1106–1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers GM, Vos LD, Groothoff JW, Eisma WH 1996 Clinical rehabilitation of the amputee: A retrospective study. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 20: 72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers GM, Vos LD, Groothoff JW, Schuiling CH, Eisma WH 1997 Epidemiology of lower limb amputees in the north of The Netherlands: Aetiology, discharge destination and prosthetic use. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 21: 92–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjodahl C, Jarnlo GB, Soderberg B, Persson BM 2003 Pelvic motion in trans-femoral amputees in the frontal and transverse plane before and after special gait re-education. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 27: 227–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark B, Emanuelsson P, Gunnarsson U, Strigard K 2012 Validation of Biodex system 4 for measuring the strength of muscles in patients with rectus diastasis. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery 46: 102–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan J, Uden M, Robinson KP, Sooriakumaran S 2003 Rehabilitation of the trans-femoral amputee with an osseointegrated prosthesis: The United Kingdom experience. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 27: 114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tazawa E 1997 Analysis of torso movement of trans-femoral amputees during level walking. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 21: 129–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranberg R, Zugner R, Karrholm J 2011 Improvements in hip- and pelvic motion for patients with osseointegrated trans-femoral prostheses. Gait and Posture 33: 165–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Meent H, Hopman MT, Frolke JP 2013 Walking ability and quality of life in subjects with transfemoral amputation: A comparison of osseointegration with socket prostheses. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 94: 2174–2178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertriest S, Coorevits P, Hagberg K, Branemark R, Haggstrom E, Vanderstraeten G, Frossard L 2015 Static load bearing exercises of individuals with transfemoral amputation fitted with an osseointegrated implant: Reliability of kinetic data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 23: 423–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R 2008 Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89: 422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar