Non-pharmacological conservative therapy for phantom limb pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

References

• Ahmed MA, Mohamed SA, Sayed D. 2011 Long-term antalgic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex and serum beta-endorphin in patients with phantom pain. Neurological Research 33: 953–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alviar MJ, Hale T, Dungca M 2011 Pharmacologic interventions for treating phantom limb pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 12: CD006380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettany-Saltikov J 2010 Learning how to undertake a systematic review: Part 2. Nursing Standard 24: 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bokkon I, Till A, Grass F, Szabo AE 2011 Phantom pain reduction by low frequency and low intensity electromagnetic fields. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 30: 115–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley E, Nolan P 2008 Evidence-based practice: Implications and concerns. Journal of Nursing Management 16: 388–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie EE, Whyte A, Niven C 2007 Analgesia through the looking glass? A randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of viewing a virtual limb upon phantom limb pain, sensation and movement. European Journal of Pain 11: 428–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brutus S, Aguinis H, Wassmer U 2013 Self-reported limitations and future directions in scholarly reports: Analysis and recommendations. Journal of Management 39: 48–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan BL, Witt B, Charrow AP, Magee A, Howard R, Pasquina PF 2007 Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. New England Journal of Medicine 357: 2206–2207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conine TA, Herschler C, Alexander SA, Crisp R 1993 The efficacy of Farabloc in the treatment of phantom limb pain. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 6: 155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG 2008 Analysing data and undertaking meta-analysis. In: Higgins JP, Green S (Eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, pp 243–296. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C 1994 Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 309: 1286–1291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finsen V, Persen L, Lovlien M, Veslegaard EK, Simensen M, Gasvann AK, Benum PA 1988 Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after major amputation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) 70: 109–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flor H 2002 Phantom limb pain: Characteristics, causes, and treatment. Lancet Neurology 1: 182–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flor H, Denke C, Schaefer M, Grusser S 2001 Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain. Lancet 357: 1763–1764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M 2009 Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 18: 1929–1941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giummarra MJ, Moseley LG 2011 Phantom limb pain and bodily awareness: Current concepts and future directions. Current Opinions in Anesthesiology 24: 524–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbert J, Crotty M, Cameron ID 2002 Evidence for the optimal management of acute and chronic phantom pain: A systematic review. Clinical Journal of Pain 18: 84–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins J, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savocic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne J 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. British Medical Journal 343: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA 2008 Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S (Eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, pp187–241. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Deeks JJ 2008 Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JP Green S (Eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, pp 151–183. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Green S 2008 Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao AF, York R, Hsiao I, Hansen E, Hays RD, Ives J, Coulter ID 2012 A randomised controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive limb cover for chronic phantom limb pain among veteran amputees. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation 93: 617–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huse E, Larbig W, Flor H, Birbaumer N 2001 The effect of opioids on phantom limb pain and cortical reorganization. Pain 90: 47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J, Melzack R 1991 Auricular transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces phantom limb pain. Journal of Pain Symptom Management 6: 73–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern U, Altkemper B, Kohl M 2006 Management of phantom pain with a textile, electromagnetically-acting stump liner: A randomised, double-blind, crossover study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 32: 352–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J 2008 Searching for studies. In: Higgins, JP, Green S (Eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, pp 96–147. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Loke YK, Price D, Herxheimer A 2008 Adverse effects. In: Higgins JP, Green S (Eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, pp 433–448. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lundeberg T 1985 Relief of pain from a phantom limb by peripheral stimulation. Journal of Neurology 232: 79–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG 2009 Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6: e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Osorio MA, Majia-Majia JM 2012 Treatment with graded motor imagery in phantom limb pain syndrome: A systematic review. Rehabilitation 46: 310–316.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley LG 2006 Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain. Neurology 67: 2129–2134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura VL, Faurot KR, Gaylord SA, Mann JD, Sill M, Lee MY 2012 Mind-body interventions for treatment of phantom limb pain in persons with amputation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91: 701–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolajsen L 2012 Post-amputation pain: Studies on mechanisms. Danish Medical Journal 59: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor D, Green S, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ 2008 Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S (Eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, pp 83–94. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rickard JA 2004 Effects of Hypnosis in the Treatment of Residual Stump and Phantom Limb Pain (PhD Dissertation). Pullman, WA: Washington State University.
   Google Scholar
• Rothgangel AS, Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Seitz RJ, Wade DT 2011 The clinical aspects of mirror therapy in rehabilitation: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 34: 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roullet S, Nouette-Gaulain K, Brochet B, Sztark F 2009 Phantom limb pain: From physiopathology to prevention. Annales Francaises D’anesthesie et de Reanimation 28: 460–472.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ulger O, Topuz S, Bayramlar K, Sener G, Erbahceci F 2009 Effectiveness of phantom exercises for phantom limb pain. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41: 582–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, and the Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group 2003 Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 28: 1290–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viera AJ, Garrett JM 2005 Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine 37: 360–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DDR, Garner J 2002 The case against ‘the evidence’: A different perspective on evidence-based medicine. British Journal of Psychiatry 180: 8–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Tella P, Staats P, Vaslav R, Kazim D, Wesselmann 2002 Analgesic effects of intravenous lidocaine and morphine on post-amputation pain. Anesthesiology 96: 841–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar