Kinematic upper extremity performance in people with near or fully recovered sensorimotor function after stroke

References

• Alt Murphy M, Persson HC, Danielsson A, Broeren J, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Sunnerhagen KS 2011 SALGOT - Stroke Arm Longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg, prospective cohort study protocol. BMC Neurology 11: 56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Sunnerhagen KS, Johnels B, Willen C 2006 Three-dimensional kinematic motion analysis of a daily activity drinking from a glass: a pilot study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 3: 18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Willen C, Sunnerhagen KS 2011 Kinematic variables quantifying upper-extremity performance after stroke during reaching and drinking from a glass. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 25: 71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault P, Pigeon P, Feldman AG, Levin MF 1999 Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. Experimental Brain Research 126: 55–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya KN, Verma R, Garg RK 2011 Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 18(Suppl 1): 599–610.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barkelius K, Johansson A, Korm K, Lindmark B 1997 Reliabilitet-och validitetsprövning av Motor assessment Scale enligt Uppsala Akademiska sjukhus-95 [Reliability and validity test of modified engine assessment scale according to Uppsala Academic Hospital-95]. Nordisk Fysioterapi 1: 121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Beer RF, Dewald JP, Dawson ML, Rymer WZ 2004 Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis. Experimental Brain Research 156: 458–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer RF, Ellis MD, Holubar BG, Dewald JP 2007 Impact of gravity loading on post-stroke reaching and its relationship to weakness. Muscle and Nerve 36: 242–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ 1999 The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disability and Rehabilitation 21: 357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea MC, Levin MF 2000 Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 123: 940–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea MC, Mitnitski AB, Feldman AG, Levin MF 2003 Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke. Experimental Brain Research 151: 289–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong SL, Schaefer SY, Lang CE 2012 Need for speed: better movement quality during faster task performance after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 26: 362–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S 1975 The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 7: 13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE 2002 The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 16: 232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks HT, Van LJ, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ 2002 Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83: 1629–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper DG, McKenna-Cole AN, Kahn LE, Reinkensmeyer DJ 2002 Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83: 702–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katrak P, Bowring G, Conroy P, Chilvers M, Poulos R, McNeil D 1998 Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: the place of early shoulder and hand movement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 79: 758–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G 2011 Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 377: 1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, Wolfe CD 2001 Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke 32: 1279–1284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL 2009 What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 23: 313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Patten C, Kothari D, Yap R 2004 Effects of velocity on maximal torque production in poststroke hemiparesis. Muscle and Nerve 30: 732–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandon L, Boudarham J, Robertson J, Bensmail D, Roche N, Roby-Brami A 2016 Faster reaching in chronic spastic stroke patients comes at the expense of arm-trunk coordination. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 30: 209–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massie CL, Malcolm MP 2012 Instructions emphasizing speed improves hemiparetic arm kinematics during reaching in stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 30: 341–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirbagheri MM, Rymer WZ 2008 Time-course of changes in arm impairment after stroke: variables predicting motor recovery over 12 months. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89: 1507–1513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS 1994 Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 75: 394–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P 2012 Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Physical Therapy 92: 791–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker VM, Wade DT, Langton Hewer R 1986 Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. International Rehabilitation Medicine 8: 69–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pereira S, Silva CC, Ferreira S, Silva C, Oliveira N, Santos R, Vilas-Boas JP, Correia MV 2014 Anticipatory postural adjustments during sitting reach movement in post-stroke subjects. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 24: 165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson HC, Parziali M, Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen KS 2012 Outcome and upper extremity function within 72 hours after first occasion of stroke in an unselected population at a stroke unit. A Part of the SALGOT Study. BMC Neurology 12: 162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, Biryukova EV, Bussel B, Levin MF 2003 Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurologica Scandinavia 107: 369–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roby-Brami A, Fuchs S, Mokhtari M, Bussel B 1997 Reaching and grasping strategies in hemiparetic patients. Motor Control 1: 91.
   Google Scholar
• Roh J, Rymer WZ, Perreault EJ, Yoo SB, Beer RF 2013 Alterations in upper limb muscle synergy structure in chronic stroke survivors. Journal of Neurophysiology 109: 768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaechter JD 2004 Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke. Progress in Neurobiology 73: 61–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH 2016 Part IV Reach, Grasp, and Manipulation Motor Control. In: translating Research into Clinical Practice, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart JC, Gordon J, Winstein CJ 2014 Control of reach extent with the paretic and nonparetic arms after unilateral sensorimotor stroke: kinematic differences based on side of brain damage. Experimental Brain Research 232: 2407–2419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear C 2010 Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurology 9: 1228–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JP 2007 Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications. Experimental Brain Research 183: 215–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi CD, Reinkensmeyer DJ 2003 Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement. Experimental Brain Research 149: 131–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM 2006 The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Europa Medicophysica 42: 241–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thrane G, Askim T, Stock R, Indredavik B, Gjone R, Erichsen A, Anke A 2015 Efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy in early stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled multisite trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 29: 517–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombly CA 1992 Deficits of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 46: 887–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM 2001 The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 33: 110–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet PM, Sheridan MR 2007 Coordination between reaching and grasping in patients with hemiparesis and healthy subjects. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 88: 1325–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De WL, Thijs V, Dobbelaere J, Devos H, Severijns D, Vanbeveren S, De WW 2008 Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 22: 173–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Wong MK, Lin KC, Chen HC 2001 Effects of task goal and personal preference on seated reaching kinematics after stroke. Stroke 32: 70–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar