Application of motor learning in neurorehabilitation: a framework for health-care professionals

References

• Beek PJ, Roerdink R 2014 Evolving insights into motor learning and their implications for neurorehabilitation. In: Selzer M, Clarke S, Cohen L, Kwakkel G, Miller R Eds Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation (2nd) pp. 95–104. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjaminse A, Welling W, Otten B, Gokeler A 2015 A Novel methods of instruction in ACL injury prevention programs, a systematic review. Physical Therapy in Sport 16: 176–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry DC, Broadbent DE 1998 Interactive tasks and the implicitexplicit distinction. British Journal of Psychology 79: 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobath B 1990 Adult Hemiplegia: evaluation and Treatment, 3rd edn. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bongaardt R, Meijer OG 2000 Bernstein’s theory of movement behavior: Historical development and contemporary relevance. Journal of Motor Behavior 32: 57–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun S, Kleynen M, Schols J, Schack T, Beurskens A, Wade D 2008 Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: A framework. Clinical Rehabilitation 22: 579–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun S, Kleynen M, Van Heel T, Kruithof N, Wade D, Beurskens A 2013 The effects of mental practice in neurological rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnström S 1992 Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia: A Neurophysiological Approach, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Buccino G, Vogt S, Ritzl A, Fink GR, Zilles K, Freund HJ, Rizzolatti G 2004 Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron 42: 323–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capio CM, Poolton JM, Sit CH, Eguia KF, Masters RS 2013 Reduction of errors during practice facilitates fundamental movement skill learning in children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 57: 295–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casamassima F, Ferrari A, Milosevic B, Ginis P, Farella E, Rocchi L 2014 A wearable system for gait training in subjects with Parkinson’s disease. Sensors 14: 6229–6246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF 2006 Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke 37: 1237–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies PM 1985 Steps to Follow: A Guide to the Treatment of Adult Hemiplegia, Berlin, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Weerdt W, Feys H 2002 Assessment of physiotherapy for patients with stroke. Lancet 359: 182–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Werd MM, Boelen D, Rikkert MG, Kessels RP 2013 Errorless learning of everyday tasks in people with dementia. Clinical Interventions in Aging 8: 1177–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechamps A, Fasotti L, Jungheim J, Leone E, Dood E, Allioux A, Robert PH, Gervais X, Maubourguet N, Olde Rikkert MG, Kessels RP 2011 Effects of different learning methods for instrumental activities of daily living in patients with Alzheimer’s dementia: A pilot study. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias 26: 273–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaul VG, Wishart LR, Richardson J, Thabane L, Ma J, Lee TD 2015 Varied overground walking training versus body-weight-supported treadmill training in adults within 1 year of stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 29: 329–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickstein R, Deutsch JE 2007 Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Physical Therapy 87: 942–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham K, Van Vliet PM, Badger F, Sackley C 2009 Use of information feedback and attentional focus of feedback in treating the person with a hemiplegic arm. Physiotherapy Research International 14: 77–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ertelt D, Hemmelmann C, Dettmers C, Ziegler A, Binkofski F 2012 Observation and execution of upper-limb movements as a tool for rehabilitation of motor deficits in paretic stroke patients: Protocol of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Neurology 12: 42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli SE, Trombly CA, Tickle-Degnen L, Verfaellie MH 2002 Effect of instructions on functional reach in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 56: 380–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher BE, Morton SM, Lang CE 2014 From motor learning to physical therapy and back again: the state of the art and science of motor learning rehabilitation research. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 38: 149–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts PM, Posner MI 1967 Human Performance, Belmont, CA, Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz NE, Cheek FM, Nichols-Larsen DS 2015 Motor-cognitive dual-task training in persons with neurologic disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 39: 142–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jie LJ, Goodwin V, Kleynen M, Braun SM, Nunns M, Wilson M 2016 Analogy learning in Parkinson’s; As easy as a walk on the beach: A proof-of-concept study. Internationa Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 23: 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kal EC, Van Der Kamp J, Houdijk H 2013 External attentional focus enhances movement automatization: A comprehensive test of the constrained action hypothesis. Human Movement Science 32: 527–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kal EC, van Der Kamp J, Houdijk H, Groet E, van Bennekom CA, Scherder EJ 2015 Stay focused! The effects of internal and external focus of attention on movement automaticity in patients with stroke. PLoS One 10: e0136917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kal EC, Winters M, Van Der Kamp J, Houdijk H, Groet E, Van Bennekom C, Scherder E 2016 Is implicit motor learning preserved after stroke? A systematic review with meta-analysis. PloS One 11: e0166376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim GJ, Hinojosa J, Rao AK, Batavia M, O’Dell MW 2017 Randomized trial on the effects of attentional focus on motor training of the upper extremity using robotics with individuals after chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 98: 1924–1931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitago T, Krakauer JW 2013 Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. Handbook of Clinical Neurology 110: 93–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleim JA, Jones TA 2008 Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51: S225–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleynen M, Bleijlevens MH, Beurskens AJ, Rasquin SM, Halfens J, Wilson MR, Masters RS, Lexis MA, Braun SM 2013a Terminology, taxonomy, and facilitation of motor learning in clinical practice: Protocol of a delphi study. JMIR Research Protocols 2: e18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleynen M, Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Verbunt JA, De Bie RA, Masters RS 2013b Investigating the dutch movement-specific reinvestment scale in people with stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 27: 160–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleynen M, Braun SM, Bleijlevens MH, Lexis MA, Rasquin SM, Halfens J, Wilson MR, Beurskens AJ, Masters RS 2014a Using a Delphi technique to seek consensus regarding definitions, descriptions and classification of terms related to implicit and explicit forms of motor learning. PloS One 9: e100227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleynen M, Braun SM, Rasquin SM, Bleijlevens MH, Lexis MA, Halfens J, Wilson MR, Masters RS, Beurskens AJ 2015 Multidisciplinary views on applying explicit and implicit motor learning in practice: An international survey. PloS One 10: e0135522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleynen M, Moser A, Haarsma FA, Beurskens AJ, Braun SM 2017 Physiotherapists use a great variety of motor learning options in neurological rehabilitation, from which they choose through an iterative process: A retrospective think-aloud study. Disability and Rehabilitation 39: 1729–1737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleynen M, Wilson MR, Jie LJ, Te Lintel Hekkert F, Goodwin VA, Braun SM 2014b Exploring the utility of analogies in motor learning after stroke: A feasibility study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 37: 277–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knott M, Voss DE 1986 Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, New York, Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kollen BJ, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E 2006 Functional recovery after stroke: A review of current developments in stroke rehabilitation research. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials 1: 75–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kollen BJ, Lennon S, Lyons B, Wheatley-Smith L, Scheper M, Buurke JH, Halfens J, Geurts AC, Kwakkel G 2009 The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: What is the evidence? Stroke 40: e89–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollen BJ, Van De Port I, Lindeman E, Twisk J, Kwakkel G 2005 Predicting improvement in gait after stroke: A longitudinal prospective study. Stroke 36: 2676–2680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakauer JW 2015 The applicability of motor learning to neurorehabilitation. In: Dietz V, Ward N Eds Oxford Textbook of Neurorehabilitation, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E 2004 Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 22: 281–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam WK, Maxwell JP, Masters RS 2009 Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes. Journal of Sports Science 27: 179–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers MR, Hatlevig RM, Davis AD, Richards AR, Rosenlof LE 2016 Does attentional focus during balance training in people with Parkinson’s disease affect outcome? A randomised controlled clinical trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 30: 53–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G 2011 Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 377: 1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg L, Langhorne P Outpatient Service Team 2004 Rehabilitation therapy services for stroke patients living at home: Systematic review of randomised trials. Lancet 363: 352–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao CM, Masters RS 2001 Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning. Journal of Sports Science 19: 307–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magill RA 2011 Motor Learning and Control: concepts and Application, 9th edn. New York, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Magill RA, Hall KG 1990 A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science 9: 241–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Durand A, Doyon J 2007 The kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: A reliability and construct validity study. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 31: 20–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masters RS 1992 Knowlegde, knerves and know-how: The role of implicit versus explicit knowlegde in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology 83: 343–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters RS, Lo CY, Maxwell JP, Patil NG 2008 Implicit motor learning in surgery: Implications for multi-tasking. Surgery 143: 140–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters RS, Maxwell JP 2004 Implicit motor learning, reinvestment andmovement disruption: what you don’t know won’t hurt you? In: Williams AM, Hodges NJ Eds Skill Acquisition in Sport: research, Theory and Practice, London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Masters RS, Pall HS, Macmahon KM, Eves FF 2007 Duration of Parkinson disease is associated with an increased propensity for “reinvestment”. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 21: 123–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters RS, Polman RCJ, Hammond NV 1993 ‘Reinvestement’: A diminsion of personalty implicated in skill breakdowm under pressure. Personality and Individual Differences 14: 665–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters RS, Poolton J 2012 Advances in implicit motor learning. In: Hodges NJ, Williams AM Eds Skill Acquisition in Sport: research, Theory and Practice (2nd edn). London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell JP, Masters RS, Eves FF 2003 The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Consciousness and Cognition 12: 376–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch K 2007 Attention and dual-task conditions: Physical therapy implications for individuals with acquired brain injury. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 31: 104–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McIsaac TL, Lamberg EM, Muratori LM 2015 Building a framework for a dual task taxonomy. BioMed Research International 2015: 591475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount J, Pierce SR, Parker J, Diegidio R, Woessner R, Spiegel L 2007 Trial and error versus errorless learning of functional skills in patients with acute stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 22: 123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratori LM, Lamberg EM, Quinn L, Duff SV 2013 Applying principles of motor learning and control to upper extremity rehabilitation. Journal of Hand Therapy 26: 94–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland RH, Van Wegen EE, Harmeling-Van Der Wel BC, Kwakkel G, Investigators E 2010 Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: Early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke 41: 745–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orrell AJ, Eves FF, Masters RS 2006 Motor learning of a dynamic balancing task after stroke: Implicit implications for stroke rehabilitation. Physical Therapy 86: 369–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, Choo PL, Forster A, Morris J, Pomeroy VM, Langhorne P 2014 Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4: CD001920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Baer G, Langhorne P, Pomeroy V 2007 Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation 21: 395–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasquin SM, Verhey FR, Lousberg R, Lodder J 2005 Cognitive performance after first ever stroke related to progression of vascular brain damage: A 2 year follow up CT scan study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 76: 1075–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasquin SM, Verhey FR, Lousberg R, Winkens I, Lodder J 2002 Vascular cognitive disorders: Memory, mental speed and cognitive flexibility after stroke. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 203: 115–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasquin SM, Welter J, Van Heugten CM 2013 Course of cognitive functioning during stroke rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 23: 811–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber A 1967 Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6: 855–863.
   Google Scholar
• Reber AS 1993 Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: an Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious, New York, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy 2014 Clinical Practice Guideline for Physical Therapy in Patients with Stroke, KNGF. Amersfoort, The Netherlands. https://www.fysionet-evidencebased.nl/index.php/kngf-guidelines-in-english
   Google Scholar
• Sale P, Franceschini M 2012 Action observation and mirror neuron network: A tool for motor stroke rehabilitation. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 48: 313–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA 1975 A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 82: 225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA, Lee TD 2011 Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 5th edn. p. p 327. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schollhorn WI 2016 Invited commentary: Differential learning is different from contextual interference learning. Human Movement Science 47: 240–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea CH, Kohl RM 1991 Composition of practice: Influence on the retention of motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 62: 187–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shull PB, Jirattigalachote W, Hunt MA, Cutkosky MR, Delp SL 2014 Quantified self and human movement: A review on the clinical impact of wearable sensing and feedback for gait analysis and intervention. Gait and Posture 40: 11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH 2006 Motor Control: translating Research into Clinical Practice, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons L, Sharma N, Baron JC, Pomeroy VM 2008 Motor imagery to enhance recovery after subcortical stroke: Who might benefit, daily dose, and potential effects. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 22: 458–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen B, Van Der Kamp J, Verneau M, Jongbloed-Pereboom M, Masters RS 2010 Implicit and explicit learning: Applications from basic research to sports for individuals with impaired movement dynamics. Disability and Rehabilitation 32: 1509–1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens A, Moser M, Köke A, Van Der Weijden T 2016 The use and perceived usefulness of a patient-specific measurement instrument in physiotherapy goal setting. A Qualitative Study. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 27: 23–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian SK, Massie CL, Malcolm MP, Levin MF 2010 Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 24: 113–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ 2010 President’s Perspective. Evidence for physical therapist practice: How can we reconcile clinical guidelines and patient-centered care? Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 34: 52–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tilborg IA, Kessels RP, Hulstijn W 2011 How should we teach everyday skills in dementia? A controlled study comparing implicit and explicit training methods. Clinical Rehabilitation 25: 638–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet PM, Wulf G 2006 Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? Disability and Rehabilitation 28: 831–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, Van Wegen EE, Ket JC, Heymans MW 2011a Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: A systematic review. Stroke 42: 1482–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, Van Wegen EE, Harmeling-Van Der Wel BC, Kwakkel G, Investigators E 2011b Is accurate prediction of gait in nonambulatory stroke patients possible within 72 hours poststroke? The EPOS study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 25: 268–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White L, Ford MP, Brown CJ, Peel C, Triebel KL 2014 Facilitating the use of implicit memory and learning in the physical therapy management of individuals with Alzheimer disease: A case series. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy 37: 35–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AM, Ward P, Knowles JM, Smeeton NJ 2002 Anticipation skill in a real-world task: measurement, training, and transfer in tennis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8: 259–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Lewthwaite R 1994 Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 65: 316–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf G, Landers M, Lewthwaite R, Tollner T 2009 External focus instructions reduce postural instability in individuals with Parkinson disease. Physical Therapy 89: 162–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar