Action observation training and brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation enhance upper extremity performance and cortical activation in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial

References

• An J, Jin SH, Lee SH, Jang G, Abibullaev B, Lee H, Moon JI 2013 Cortical activation pattern for grasping during observation, imagery, execution, FES, and observation-FES integrated BCI: An fNIRS pilot study. Conference Proceedings IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Osaka, Japan. 2013: 6345–6348.
   Google Scholar
• Athanasiou A, Klados MA, Styliadis C, Foroglou N, Polyzoidis K, Bamidis PD 2018 Investigating the role of alpha and beta rhythms in functional motor networks. Neuroscience 378: 54–70. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.05.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker-Collo SL, Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Parag V, Senior H, Rodgers A 2009 Reducing attention deficits after stroke using attention process training: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 40(10): 3293–3298. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birbaumer N, Cohen LG 2007 Brain-computer interfaces: Communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. Journal of Physiology 579(3): 621–636. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccino G 2014 Action observation treatment: A novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1644): 20130185. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cengiz B, Vuralli D, Zinnuroğlu M, Bayer G, Golmohammadzadeh H, Günendi Z, Turgut AE, Lrfanoglu B, Arıkan KB 2018 Analysis of mirror neuron system activation during action observation alone and action observation with motor imagery tasks. Experimental Brain Research 236(2): 497–503. doi:10.1007/s00221-017-5147-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury A, Meena YK, Raza H, Bhushan B, Uttam AK, Pandey N, Hashmi AA, Bajpai A, Dutta A, Prasad G 2018 Active physical practice followed by mental practice using BCI-driven hand exoskeleton: A pilot trial for clinical effectiveness and usability. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 22(6): 1786–1795. doi:10.1109/JBHI.2018.2863212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung E, Kim JH, Park DS, Lee BH 2015 Effects of brain-computer interface-based functional electrical stimulation on brain activation in stroke patients: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 27(3): 559–562. doi:10.1589/jpts.27.559.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cicerone KD 1996 Attention deficits and dual task demands after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 10(2): 79–89. doi:10.1080/026990596124566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinger JL, Vinjamuri R, Degenhart AD, Weber DJ, Sudre GP, Boninger ML, Tyler-Kabara EC, Wang W 2014 Motor-related brain activity during action observation: A neural substrate for electrocorticographic brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 8: 17. doi:10.3389/fnint.2014.00017.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Zambotti M, Bianchin M, Magazzini L, Gnesato G, Angrilli A 2012 The efficacy of EEG neurofeedback aimed at enhancing sensory-motor rhythm theta ratio in healthy subjects. Experimental Brain Research 221(1): 69–74. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3148-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertelt D, Binkofski F 2012 Action observation as a tool for neurorehabilitation to moderate motor deficits and aphasia following stroke. Neural Regeneration Research 7: 2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frolov AA, Mokienko O, Lyukmanov R, Biryukova E, Kotov S, Turbina L, Nadareyshvily G, Bushkova Y 2017 Post-stroke rehabilitation training with a motor-imagery-based brain-computer interface (BCI)-controlled hand exoskeleton: A randomized controlled multicenter trial. Frontiers in Neuroscience 11: 400. doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison KA, Winstein CJ, Aziz-Zadeh L 2010 The mirror neuron system: A neural substrate for methods in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 24(5): 404–412. doi:10.1177/1545968309354536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE 2002 The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 16(3): 232–240. doi:10.1177/154596802401105171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graimann B, Allison B, Pfurtscheller G 2009 Brain–computer interfaces: A gentle introduction. In: Graimann B, Pfurtscheller G, Allison B (Eds) Brain-Computer Interfaces, pp. 1–27. The Frontiers Collection. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah R, Rocch L, Rothwell JC 2018 Observing without acting: A balance of excitation and suppression in the human corticospinal pathway? Frontiers in Neuroscience 12: 347. doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hioka A, Tada Y, Kitazato K, Kanematsu Y, Mizobuchi Y, Mure H, Shimada K, Okazaki T, Korai M, Akazawa N, et al. 2019 Activation of mirror neuron system during gait observation in sub-acute stroke patients and healthy persons. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 60: 79–83. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2018.09.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauhanen L, Jylanki P, Lehtonen J, Rantanen P, Alaranta H, Sams M 2007 EEG-based brain-computer interface for tetraplegics. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2007: 23864. doi:10.1155/2007/23864.
   Google Scholar
• Kilner JM, Frith CD 2007 A possible role for primary motor cortex during action observation. Proceedings of National Academy Sciences of the United States of America 104(21): 8683–8684. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702937104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, Kim L, Kim YH, Yoo SK 2017 Cross-association analysis of EEG and EMG signals according to movement intention state. Cognitive Systems Research 44: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Kim S, Lee B 2016 Effects of action observational training plus brain-computer interface-based functional electrical stimulation on paretic arm motor recovery in patient with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Occupational Therapy International 23(1): 39–47. doi:10.1002/oti.1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YK, Park E, Lee A, Im CH, Kim YH 2018 Changes in network connectivity during motor imagery and execution. PLoS One 13(1): e0190715. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiper P, Szczudlik A, Agostini M, Opara J, Nowobilski R, Ventura L, Tonin P, Turolla A 2018 Virtual reality for upper limb rehabilitation in subacute and chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 99(5): 834–842. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch G, Versace V, Bonni S, Lupo F, Lo Gerfo E, Oliveri M, Caltagirone C 2010 Resonance of cortico-cortical connections of the motor system with the observation of goal directed grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 48(12): 3513–3520. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk EJ, Kim JM, Oh DW, Hwang HJ 2016 Effects of action observation therapy on hand dexterity and EEG-based cortical activation patterns in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 23(5): 318–325. doi:10.1080/10749357.2016.1157972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwah LK, Herbert RD 2016 Prediction of walking and arm recovery after stroke: A critical review. Brain Sciences 6(4): 53. doi:10.3390/brainsci6040053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang TJ, Blackwell SE, Harmer CJ, Davison P, Holmes EA 2012 Cognitive bias modification using mental imagery for depression: Developing a novel computerized intervention to change negative thinking styles. European Journal of Personality 26(2): 145–157. doi:10.1002/per.855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrimmon CM, King CE, Wang PT, Cramer SC, Nenadic Z, Do AH 2014 Brain-controlled functional electrical stimulation for lower-limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. Conference Proceedings IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2014: 1247–1250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFarland DJ, Wolpaw JR 2011 Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Communications of the ACM 54(5): 60–66. doi:10.1145/1941487.1941506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirovitch Y, Harris H, Dayan E, Arieli A, Flash T 2015 Alpha and beta band event-related desynchronization reflects kinematic regularities. Journal of Neuroscience 35(4): 1627–1637. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5371-13.2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi MR, Khaleghi A, Nasrabadi AM, Rafieivand S, Begol M, Zarafshan H 2016 EEG classification of ADHD and normal children using non-linear features and neural network. Biomedical Engineering Letters 6(2): 66–73. doi:10.1007/s13534-016-0218-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi MR, Malmir N, Khaleghi A, Aminiorani M 2015 Comparison of sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) and beta training on selective attention and symptoms in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A trend report. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry 10: 165–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neuper C, Scherer R, Wriessnegger S, Pfurtscheller G 2009 Motor imagery and action observation: Modulation of sensorimotor brain rhythms during mental control of a brain-computer interface. Clinical Neurophysiology 120(2): 239–247. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S 2005 Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 36(7): 1480–1484. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000170706.13595.4f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineda JA 2005 The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing”. Brain Research Reviews 50(1): 57–68. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad G, Herman P, Coyle D, McDonough S, Crosbie J 2010 Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: A feasibility study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 7(1): 60. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-7-60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramadan RA, Refat S, Elshahed MA, Ali RA 2015 Basics of brain computer interface. In: Graimann B, Pfurtscheller G, Allison B (Eds) Brain-Computer Interfaces, pp. pp. 31–50. Berlin, Heidelberg: The Frontiers Collection. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rathee D, Chowdhury A, Meena YK, Dutta A, McDonough S, Prasad G 2019 Brain–machine interface-driven post-stroke upper-limb functional recovery correlates with beta-band mediated cortical networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 27(5): 1020–1031. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2908125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G, Craighero L 2004 The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27(1): 169–192. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz RJ, Donnan GA 2015 Recovery potential after acute stroke. Frontiers of Neurology 6: 238. doi:10.3389/fneur.2015.00238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp SA, Brouwer BJ 1997 Isokinetic strength training of the hemiparetic knee: Effects on function and spasticity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78(11): 1231–1236. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90337-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng B, Lin M 2009 A longitudinal study of functional magnetic resonance imaging in upper-limb hemiplegia after stroke treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Brain Injury 23(1): 65–70. doi:10.1080/02699050802635299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tani M, Ono Y, Matsubara M, Ohmatsu S, Yukawa Y, Kohno M, Tominaga T 2018 Action observation facilitates motor cortical activity in patients with stroke and hemiplegia. Neuroscience Research 133: 7–14. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2017.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA 2006 The Motor Activity Log-28: Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 67(7): 1189–1194. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A 2001 Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32(7): 1635–1639. doi:10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpaw JR, McFarland DJ 2004 Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences of the United States of America 101(51): 17849–17854. doi:10.1073/pnas.0403504101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, He B 2014 Brain–computer interfaces using sensorimotor rhythms: Current state and future perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 61(5): 1425–1435. doi:10.1109/TBME.2014.2312397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JJ, Fong KN, Welage N, Liu KP 2018 The activation of the mirror neuron system during action observation and action execution with mirror visual feedback in stroke: A systematic review. Neural Plasticity 2018: 2321045. doi:10.1155/2018/2321045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar