“Just that four letter word, hope”: stroke survivors’ perspectives of participation in an intensive upper limb exercise program; a qualitative exploration

References

• Adams K. 2017. Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Patient-Therapist Relationship on Motivation and Physical Rehabilitation Change. University of Idaho
   Google Scholar
• Arkkukangas S, Soderlund A, Eriksson S, Johansson A. 2018. One-year adherence to the Otago Exercise Program with or without motivational interviewing in community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 26(3):390–395.10.1123/japa.2017-0009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O’Connor D, Patey A, Ivers N, Foy R, Duncan E, Colquhoun H, Grimshaw J. 2017. A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Journal of Implementation Science. 12(1):77.10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blanton S, Scheibe D, Rutledge A, Regan B, O’Sullivan C, Clark P. 2019. Family-centered care during constraint-induced therapy after chronic stroke: A feasibility study. Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing. 44(6):349–357.10.1097/rnj.0000000000000197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright F, Kayes N, Cummins C, Worrall L, McPherson K. 2017. Co-constructing engagement in stroke rehabilitation: A qualitative study exploring how practitioner engagement can influence patient engagement. Clinical Rehabilitation. 31(10):1396–1405.10.1177/0269215517694678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark P, Aycock D, Reiss A, Tanner D, Shenvi N, Easley K, Wolf S. 2015. Potential benefits for caregivers of stroke survivors receiving BTX‐A and exercise for upper extremity spasticity. Rehabilitation Nursing. 40(3):188–196.10.1002/rnj.147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJonckheere M, Vaughn L. 2019. Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health. 7:e000057.10.1136/fmch-2018-000057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond A, Hawkins L, Sprigg N, Ward N, Mistri A, Tyrell P, Mead G, Worthington E, Lincoln N. 2017. The Nottingham Fatigue after Stroke (NotFAST) study: Factors associated with severity of fatigue in stroke patients without depression. Clinical Rehabilitation. 31(10):1406–1415.10.1177/0269215517695857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerson K, Harding K, Taylor N. 2017. Home exercise programmes supported by video and automated reminders compared with standard paper-based home exercise programmes in patients with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 31(8):1068–1077.10.1177/0269215516680856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essery R, Geraghty A, Kirby S, Yardley L. 2017. Predictors of adherence to home-based physical therapies: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation. 39(6):519–534.10.3109/09638288.2016.1153160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin R, Cusack T, O’Grady, Murphy T, Stokes E. 2011. Family mediated exercise intervention [FAME]: Evaluation of a novel form of exercise delivery after stroke. Physiotherapy. 97:387–388
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins L, Lincoln N, Sprigg N, Ward N, Mistri A, Tyrell P, Worthington E, Drummond A. 2017. The Nottingham Fatigue After Stroke (NotFAST) study: Results from follow-up six months after stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 24(8):592–596.10.1080/10749357.2017.1368912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen J, Klassen T, Connell L, Eng J. 2020. Factors influencing the delivery of intensive rehabilitation in stroke: Patient perceptions versus rehabilitation therapist perceptions. Physical Therapy. 100(2):307–316.10.1093/ptj/pzz159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juckett L, Wengerd L, Faieta J, Griffin C. 2020. Evidence-based practice implementation in stroke rehabilitation: A scoping review of barriers and facilitators. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 74(1):7401205050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulnik S, Mohapatra S, Gawned S, Jones F. 2020. Managing the severely impaired arm after stroke: A mixed-methods study with qualitative emphasis. Disability and Rehabilitation. 42(13):1826–1834.10.1080/09638288.2018.1539777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G. 2006. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: Issues for consideration. Disability and Rehabilitation. 28(13–14):823–830.10.1080/09638280500534861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar R, Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, Miller K, Lincoln N, Partridge C Wellwood I. 2004. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke a meta-analysis. Stroke. 35(11):2529–2539.10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannin N, Ada L, English C, Ratcliffe J, Faux S, Palit M, Gonzalez S, Olver J, Cameron I, Crotty M. on behalf of the InTENSE Trial Group. 2020. Effect of additional rehabilitation after botulin toxin-A on upper limb activity in chronic stroke: The InTENSE Trial. Stroke. 51(2):556–562. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027602
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohse K, Lang C, Boyd L. 2014. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose–response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 45(7):2053–2058.10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou S, Carstensen K, Jorgensen C, Nielsen C. 2017. Stroke patients’ and informal carers’ experiences with life after stroke: An overview of qualitative systematic reviews. Disability and Rehabilitation. 39(3):301–313.10.3109/09638288.2016.1140836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. 2002. The concept of patient motivation: A qualitative analysis of stroke professionals’ attitudes. Stroke. 33(2):444–448.10.1161/hs0202.102367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Van Stralen M, West R. 2011. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Journal of Implementation Science. 6,42.10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris D, Taub E, Mark V. 2006. Constraint-induced movement therapy: Characterizing the intervention protocol. Europa Medicophysica. 42:257–268.
   Google Scholar
• Nayar S, Stanley M. 2015. Qualitative Research Methodologies for Occupational Science and Therapy. Routledge:New York, NY
   Google Scholar
• Peloquin S. 1990. The patient–therapist relationship in occupational therapy: Understanding visions and images. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 44(1):13–21.10.5014/ajot.44.1.13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romain A, Horwarth C, Bernard P. 2018. Prediction of physical activity level using processes of change from the Transtheoretical Model: Experiential, behavioral, or an interaction effect? American Journal of Health Promotion. 32(1):16–23.10.1177/0890117116686900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider E, Lannin N, Ada L, Schmidt J. 2016. Increasing the amount of usual rehabilitation improves activity after stroke: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy. 62(4):182–187.10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz R, Coats H, Engelberg R, Curtis J, Creutzfeldt C. 2017. Is there hope? Is she there? How families and clinicians experience severe acute brain injury. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 20(2):170–176.10.1089/jpm.2016.0286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signal N, McPherson K, Lewis G, Kayes N, Saywell N, Mudge S, Taylor D. 2016. What influences acceptability and engagement with a high intensity exercise programme for people with stroke? A qualitative descriptive study. Journal of Neurorehabilitation. 39(4):507–517.10.3233/NRE-161382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation. 2017. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management. Melbourne, Australia. https://strokefoundation.org.au/What-we-do/For%20health%20professionals%20and%20researchers/Clinical-guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Takebayashi T, Koyama T, Amano S, Hanada K, Tabusadani M, Hosomi M, Marumotot K, Takahashi K, Domen K. 2013. A 6-month follow-up after constraint-induced movement therapy with and without transfer package for patients with hemiparesis after stroke: A pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 27(5):418–426.10.1177/0269215512460779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek J, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees P, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G. 2014. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 9(2):e87987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visvanathan A, Mead G, Dennis M, Whiteley W, Doubal F, Lawton J. 2019. Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients’ experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions. PLoS One. 14(9):e0222500. 10.1371/journal.pone.0222500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins C, Auton M, Deans C, Dickinson H, Jack C, Lightbody C, Sutton C, van den Broek M, Leathley M. 2007. Motivational interviewing early after acute stroke: A randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 38(3):1004–1009.10.1161/01.STR.0000258114.28006.d7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2016. Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action, Geneva. https://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_report/en/.
   Google Scholar