Flipped classroom versus traditional teaching methods within musculoskeletal physical therapy: a case report

References

• Adams CL 2013 A comparison of student outcomes in a therapeutic modalities course based on mode of delivery: Hybrid versus traditional classroom instruction. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 27: 20–34. doi:10.1097/00001416-201310000-00005.
   Google Scholar
• Bayliss AJ, Warden SJ 2011 A hybrid model of student-centered instruction improves physical therapist student performance in cardiopulmonary practice patterns by enhancing performance in higher cognitive domains. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 25: 14–20. doi:10.1097/00001416-201107000-00005.
   Google Scholar
• Betihavas V, Bridgman H, Kornhaber R, Cross M 2016 The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today 38: 15–21. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonk CJ, Graham CR 2012 The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Boucher B, Robertson E, Wainner R, Sanders B 2013 “Flipping” Texas State University’s physical therapist musculoskeletal curriculum: Implementation of a hybrid learning model. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 27: 72–77. doi:10.1097/00001416-201307000-00010.
   Google Scholar
• Chung EJ, Lee BH 2018 The effects of flipped learning on learning motivation and attitudes in a class of college physical therapy students. Journal of Problem-Based Learning 5: 29–36. doi:10.24313/jpbl.2018.5.1.29.
   Google Scholar
• Deprey SM 2018 Outcomes of flipped classroom instruction in an entry-level physical therapy course. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 32: 289–294. doi:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000035.
   Google Scholar
• Ding C, Li S, Chen B 2019 Effectiveness of flipped classroom combined with team-, case-, lecture-and evidence-based learning on ophthalmology teaching for eight-year program students. BMC Medical Education 19: 419. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1861-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon K, Young B, Bachman T, Longbottom T, Severin R, Walker MJ 2020 Doctor of physical therapy education in a hybrid learning environment: Reimagining the possibilities and navigating a “new normal.” Physical Therapy 100: 1268–1277. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaa096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew KF, Lo CK 2018 Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education 18: 38. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itokazu M 2019 Relationship between students’ preferences for flipped or traditional classrooms and perceived course workload. Journal of Asian Rehabilitation Science 2: 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Khanova J, Roth MT, Rodgers JE, McLaughlin JE 2015 Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum. Medical Education 49: 1038–1048. doi:10.1111/medu.12807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lage MJ, Platt GJ, Treglia M 2000 Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education 31: 30–43. doi:10.1080/00220480009596759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Lim C, Kim H 2017 Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development 65: 427–453. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo CK, Hew KF 2017 A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 12: 4. doi:10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE 2006 Too much teaching, not enough learning: What is the solution? Advances in Physiology Education 30: 17–22. doi:10.1152/advan.00061.2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason GS, Shuman TR, Cook KE 2013 Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education 56: 430–435. doi:10.1109/TE.2013.2249066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer R, Mayer RE 2005 The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAlister RB 2014 Use of instructor-produced YouTube® videos to supplement manual skills training in occupational therapy education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 68: S67–S72. doi:10.5014/ajot.2014.685S04.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merrill MD 2002 First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 50: 43–59. doi:10.1007/BF02505024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore AW, Smith RA 2012 Effects of video podcasting on psychomotor and cognitive performance, attitudes and study behaviour of student physical therapists. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49: 401–414. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.728876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray L, McCallum C, Petrosino C 2014 Flipping the classroom experience: A comparison of online learning to traditional lecture. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 28: 35–41. doi:10.1097/00001416-201407000-00006.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty J, Phillips C 2015 The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education 25: 85–95. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtake PJ, Lyons A, Glogowski M, Stellrecht E, Aronoff N, Grabowski J, Zafron ML 2018 Using an interprofessional flipped classroom educational strategy for developing evidence-based practice knowledge and skills. Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice 11: 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.xjep.2017.12.010.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson C 2003 Bringing ADDIE to life: Instructional design at its best. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 12: 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Ramnanan CJ, Pound LD 2017 Advances in medical education and practice: Student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Advances in Medical Education and Practice 8: 63. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S109037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickes PC 2016 Generations in flux: How Gen Z will continue to transform higher education space. Planning for Higher Education 44: 21.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts D 2019 Higher education lectures: From passive to active learning via imagery? Active Learning in Higher Education 20: 63–77. doi:10.1177/1469787417731198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sole G, Schneiders A, Hébert-Losier K, Perry M 2013 Perceptions by physiotherapy students and faculty staff of a multimedia learning resource for musculoskeletal practical skills teaching. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy 41: 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer ET 2013 Action research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker B 2012 The flipped classroom. Education Next 12: 82–83.
   Google Scholar
• Veneri DA, Gannotti M 2014 A comparison of student outcomes in a physical therapy neurologic rehabilitation course based on delivery mode: Hybrid vs traditional. Journal of Allied Health 43: 75E–81E.
   Google Scholar
• Zipp GP, Maher C, Olson V 2017 Pediatric education special series solo-framed flipped learning environment: “Speaking the language of today’s learner”. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 31: 141–150. doi:10.1097/00001416-201731030-00022.
   Google Scholar