Absolute and relative intrarater reliability of the modified motor assessment scale according to Uppsala academic hospital -99

References

• Aamodt G, Kjendahl A, Jahnsen R, Kjendahl A, Jahnsen R 2006 Dimensionality and scalability of the motor assessment scale (MAS). Disability and Rehabilitation 28: 1007–1013. 10.1080/09638280500476188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghadir AH, Al-Eisa ES, Anwer S, Sarkar B 2018 Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of three scales for measuring balance in patients with chronic stroke. BMC Neurology 18: 141. 10.1186/s12883-018-1146-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson C 1999 Reliabilitetsprövning av Modifierad Motor Assessment Scale enligt Uppsala Akademiska sjukhus-99. Uppsala Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Arnell M, Westlin C, Lindmark B 1996 Vidareutveckling och reliabilitetsprovning av modifierad motor assessment scale enligt uppsala akademiska sjukhus [further development and reliability testing of the modified motor assessment scale according to uppsala academic hospital]. Sjukgymnasten 12: 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson G, Nevill AM 1998 Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine 26: 217–238. 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkelius K, Johansson A, Korm K, Lindmark B 1997 Reliabilitet-och validitetsprövning av motor assessment scale enligt uppsala akademiska sjukhus-95 [reliability and validity testing of the motor assessment scale according to uppsala academic hospital-95]. Nordisk Fysioterapi 1: 121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG 1999 Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods In Medical Research 8: 135–160. 10.1177/096228029900800204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogårdh C, Lexell J 2010 A 1-year follow-up after shortened constraint-induced movement therapy with and without mitt poststroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91: 460–464. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogårdh C, Vestling M, Sjolund BH 2009 Shortened constraint-induced movement therapy in subacute stroke - no effect of using a restraint: A randomized controlled study with independent observers. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 41: 231–236. 10.2340/16501977-0312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepherd RB 1989 Modified motor assessment scale. Physical Therapy 69: 780. 10.1093/ptj/69.9.780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D 1985 Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical Therapy 65: 175–180. 10.1093/ptj/65.2.175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Eton DT, Lai JS, Peterman AH, Merkel DE 2002 Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales. Journal of Pain Symptom Management 24: 547–561. 10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00529-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoghue D, Stokes EK 2009 How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the berg balance scale in elderly people. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 41: 343–346. 10.2340/16501977-0337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English CK, Hillier SL, Stiller K, Warden-Flood A 2006 The sensitivity of three commonly used outcome measures to detect change amongst patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation following stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 20: 52–55. 10.1191/0269215506cr877oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eton DT, Cella D, Yost KJ, Yount SE, Peterman AH, Neuberg DS, Sledge G, Wood WC 2004 A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale. Journal of Clinical Epidemiologics 57: 898–910. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher RA 1992 Statistical methods for research workers. breakthroughs in statistics. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flansbjer UB, Blom J, Brogårdh C 2012 The reproducibility of berg balance scale and the single-leg stance in chronic stroke and the relationship between the two tests. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 4: 165–170.
   Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, Kostanjsek N, Ring H, Stucki G 2004 ICF core sets for stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 36 (44 Suppl): 135–141. 10.1080/16501960410016776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godi M, Franchignoni F, Caligari M, Giordano A, Turcato AM, Nardone A 2013 Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the mini-BESTest and berg balance scale in patients with balance disorders. Physical Therapy 93: 158–167. 10.2522/ptj.20120171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA 2006 Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Physical Therapy 86: 735–743. 10.1093/ptj/86.5.735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Hsieh C-L 2002 Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 16: 617–624. 10.1191/0269215502cr530oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson S 2004 Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education 38: 1217–1218. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Tao W, Norweg A, Haley S 2007 Interpreting rehabilitation outcome measurements. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 39: 585–590. 10.2340/16501977-0119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson JE 1992 Reliabilitets och validitetsprövning av modifierad motor assessment scale enligt uppsala akademiska sjukhus [reliability and validity testing of the modified motor assessment scale according to uppsala academic hospital]. Vårdhögskolan i Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY 2016 A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15: 155–163. 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G 2011 Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 377: 1693–1702. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannin N 2004 Reliability, validity and factor structure of the upper limb subscale of the motor assessment scale (UL-MAS) in adults following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 26: 109–116. 10.1080/0963828032000157970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY, Hsieh CJ 2011 Assessing the stroke-specific quality of life for outcome measurement in stroke rehabilitation: Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 9: 5. 10.1186/1477-7525-9-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder A, Winkvist L, Nilsson L, Sernert N 2006 Evaluation of the Swedish version of the modified elderly mobility scale (Swe M-EMS) in patients with acute stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 20: 584–597. 10.1191/0269215506cr972oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen SC, Anderson BA 1988 Reliability of the modified motor assessment scale and the Barthel Index. Physical Therapy 68: 1077–1081. 10.1093/ptj/68.7.1077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke GH, Muthén B 2004 Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 11: 514–534. 10.1207/s15328007sem1104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström A, Hellström K 2013 Fall risk six weeks from onset of stroke and the ability of the prediction of falls in rehabilitation settings tool and motor function to predict falls. Clinical Rehabilitation 27: 473–479. 10.1177/0269215512464703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson CU, Hansson PO, Sunnerhagen KS 2011 Clinical tests performed in acute stroke identify the risk of falling during the first year: Postural stroke study in Gothenburg (POSTGOT). Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 43: 348–353. 10.2340/16501977-0677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin J 1957 Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60: II. Prognosis. Scottish Medical Journal 2: 200–215. 10.1177/003693305700200504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salas Apaza JA, Ariel Franco JV, Meza N, Madrid E, Loézar C, Garegnani L 2021 Minimal clinically important difference: The basics. Medwave 21: e8149. 10.5867/medwave.2021.03.8149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrivener K, Schurr K, Sherrington C 2014 Responsiveness of the ten-metre walk test, step test and motor assessment scale in inpatient care after stroke. BMC Neurology 14: 129. 10.1186/1471-2377-14-129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See J, Dodakian L, Chou C, Chan V, McKenzie A, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cramer SC 2013 A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 27: 732–741. 10.1177/1545968313491000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahlberg B, Cederholm T, Lindmark B, Zetterberg L, Hellström K 2013 Factors related to performance-based mobility and self-reported physical activity in individuals 1-3 years after stroke: A cross-sectional cohort study. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 22: e426–e434. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.04.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vive S, Af Geijerstam Jl, Kuhn HG, Bunketorp-Käll L 2020 Enriched, task-specific therapy in the chronic phase after stroke: An exploratory study. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 44: 145–155. 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner JM, Rhodes JA, Patten C 2008 Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Physical Therapy 88: 652–663. 10.2522/ptj.20070255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC 2007 A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 22: 78–90. 10.1177/1545968307305353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar