Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a physiotherapy-led remotely delivered physical activity intervention in cancer survivors using wearable technology. The IMPETUS trial

References

• Aadland E, Ylvisåker E 2015 Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer in adults under free-living conditions. PLoS One 10: e0134606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfano CM, Bluethmann SM, Tesauro G, Perna F, Agurs-Collins T, Elena JW, Ross SA, O’ Connell M, Bowles HR, Greenberg D, et al. 2016 NCI funding trends and priorities in physical activity and energy balance research among cancer survivors. Journal of the Natural Cancer Institute 108: djv285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Thoracic Society 2002 Committee on proficiency standards for clinical pulmonary function laboratories, ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 166: 111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick JM, Guinan G, Kennedy MJ, Hollywood D, Courneya KS, Culos-Reed N, Bennett K, O’Donnell DM, Hussey J 2013 Feasibility and efficacy of a supervised exercise intervention in de-conditioned cancer survivors during the early survivorship phase: The PEACH trial. Journal of Supportive Care in Cancer 7: 551–562.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick JM, Hussey J, Kennedy MJ, O’Donnell DM 2014 Testing the ‘teachable moment’ premise: Does physical activity increase in the early survivorship phase? Journal of Supportive Care in Cancer 22: 989–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, May AM, Schwartz AL, Courneya KS, Zucker DS, Matthews CE, Ligibel JA, Gerber LH, et al. 2019 Guidelines for cancer survivors: Consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 51: 2375–2390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova C, Celli BR, Barria P, Casas A, Cote C, de Torres JP, Jardim J, Lopez MV, Marin JM, de Oca M M, et al. 2011 The 6-min walk distance in healthy subjects: Reference standards from seven countries. European Respiratory Journal 37: 150–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Hahn EA, Dineen K 2002 Quality of life scores differences between improvement and worsening. Quality of Life Research 11: 207–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, et al. 1993 The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology 11: 570–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry UA, Wahlich C, Fortescue R, Cool DG, Knightly R, Harris T 2020 The effects of step-count monitoring interventions on physical activity: Systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based randomised controlled trials in adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 17: 129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J 1988 Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health - Ireland 2016 A healthy weight for Ireland: Obesity Policy and Action Plan 2016-2025 https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/c778a9-a-healthy-weight-for-ireland-obesity-policy-and-action-plan-2016-202/
   Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G 2011 CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. Journal of Medical and Internet Research 13: e126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feehan LM, Geldman J, Sayre EC, Park C, Ezzat AM, Yoo J, Hamilton CB, Li LC 2018 Accuracy of Fitbit devices: Systematic review and narrative syntheses of quantitative data. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth 9: e10527.
   Google Scholar
• Fong DY, Ho JW, Hui BP, Lee AM, Macfarlane DJ, Leung SS, Cerin E, Chan WY, Leung IP, Lam SH, et al. 2012 Physical activity for cancer survivors: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal 344: e70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes CC, Swan F, Greenley SL, Lind M, Johnson MJ 2020 Physical activity and nutrition interventions for older adults with cancer: A systematic review. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 14: 689–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gell NM, Grover KW, Humble M, Sexton M, Dittus K 2017 Efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel technology-based intervention to support physical activity in cancer survivors. Journal of Supportive Care in Cancer 25: 1291–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin G, Shephard RJ 1985 A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sports Science 10: 141–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Granger CL, Holland AE, Gordon IR, Denehy L 2015 Minimal important difference of the 6-minute walk distance in lung cancer. Chronic Respiratory Disease 12: 146–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberlin C, Broderick J, Guinan EM, Darker C, Hussey J, O’Donnell DM 2019 eHealth-based intervention to increase physical activity levels in people with cancer: Protocol of a feasibility trial in an Irish acute hospital setting. BMJ Open 9: e024999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberlin C, O’Donnell DM, Moran J, Broderick JM 2020 Perceptions of eHealth enabled physical activity interventions among cancer survivors. Journal of Medical and Internet Research Cancer 6: e16469.
   Google Scholar
• Harris J, Cheevers K, Armes J 2018 The emerging role of digital health in monitoring and supporting people living with cancer and the consequences of its treatments. Current Opinions in Supportive and Palliative Care 12: 268–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husebø AM, Dyrstad SM, Søreide JA, Bru E 2013 Predicting exercise adherence in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of motivational and behavioural factors. Journal of Clinical Nursing 22: 4–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP 1998 Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. JAMA 279: 281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin ML, Crumley M, Bernstein A, Baumgartner L, Gilliland R, Kriska FD, A B-BR 2003 Physical activity levels before and after a diagnosis of breast cancer: The Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) Study. Cancer 97: 1746–1757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr J, Anderson C, Lippman SM 2017 Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, diet, and cancer: An update and emerging new evidence. Lancet Oncology 18: e457–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch BM, Nguyen NH, Moore MM, Reeves MM, Rosenberg DE, Boyle T, Vallance JK, Milton S, Friedenreich CM, English DR 2019 A randomized controlled trial of a wearable technology-based intervention for increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors: The ACTIVATE trial. Cancer 125: 2846–2855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin Payo R, Harris J, Armes J 2019 Prescribing fitness apps for people with cancer: A preliminary assessment of content and quality of commercially available apps. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 13: 397–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTiernan A, Friedenreich CM, Katzmarzyk P, Powell KE, Macko R, Buchner D, Pescatello LS, Bloodgood B, Tennant B, Vaux-Bjerke A, et al. 2019 Physical activity in cancer prevention and survival: A systematic review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 51: 1252–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, Wood CE 2013 The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioural Medicine 46: 81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WR, Rollnick S 2012 Meeting in the middle: Motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. International Journal Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 9: 25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moholdt T, Lavie CJ, Nauman J 2018 Sustained physical activity, not weight loss, associated with improved survival in coronary heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 71: 1094–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute 2019 https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Ogura K, Yakoub MA, Christ AB, Fujiwara T, Nikolic Z, Boland PJ, Healey JH 2020 What are the minimum clinically important differences in SF-36 Scores in patients with orthopaedic oncologic conditions? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 478: 2148–2158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormel HL, van der Schoot GG, Westerink NL, Sluiter WJ, Gietema JA, Walenkamp A 2018 Self-monitoring physical activity with a smartphone application in cancer patients: A randomized feasibility study (SMART-trial). Journal of Supportive Care in Cancer 26: 3915–3923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham Q, Wiljer D, Cafazzo JA 2016 Beyond the randomized controlled trial: A review of alternatives in mhealth clinical trial methods. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth 4: e107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SM, Cadmus-Bertram L, Rosenberg D, Buman MP, Lynch BM 2018 Wearable technology and physical activity in chronic disease: Opportunities and challenges. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 54: 144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SM, Conroy DE, Keadle SK, Pellegrini CA, Lloyd GR, Penedo FJ, Spring B 2017 Breast cancer survivors’ preferences for technology-supported exercise interventions. Journal of Supportive Care in Cancer 25: 3243–3252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope ZC, Zeng N, Zhang R, Lee HY, Gao Z 2018 Effectiveness of combined smartwatch and social media intervention on breast cancer survivor health outcomes: A 10-week pilot randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine 7: E140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M 2008 A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity 5: 56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S, Brownson RC Lancet Physical Activity Series 2 Executive Committee 2016 Executive committee scaling up physical activity interventions across the globe: Stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet 388(10051): 1337–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe-Roberts D, Cercos R, Mueller F 2014 Preliminary results from a study of the impact of digital activity trackers on health risk status. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 204: 143–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santos-Lozano A, Marín PJ, Torres-Luque G, Ruiz JR, Lucía A, Garatachea N 2012 Technical variability of the GT3X accelerometer. Medical Engineering and Physics 34: 787–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt K, Vogt L, Thiel C, Jäger E, Banzer W 2013 Validity of the six-minute walk test in cancer patients. International Journal of Sports Medicine 34: 631–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shingleton RM, Palfai TP 2016 Technology-delivered adaptations of motivational interviewing for health-related behaviors: A systematic review of the current research. Patient Education and Counselling 99: 17–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short CE, Finlay A, Sanders I, Maher C 2018 Development and pilot evaluation of a clinic-based mHealth app referral service to support adult cancer survivors increase their participation in physical activity using publicly available mobile apps. BMC Health Services Research 18: 27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J, Lewis M 2012 The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 65: 301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SK WJE, Kosinski M, Gandek B 1993 SF-36 health survey. Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
   Google Scholar
• Speck RM, Courneya KS, Masse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH 2010 An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 4: 87–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F 2021 Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer Journal for Clinicians 71: 209–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson CA, Crane TE, Miller A, Garcia DO, Basen-Engquist K, Alberts DS 2016 A randomized trial of diet and physical activity in women treated for stage II-IV ovarian cancer: Rationale and design of the Lifestyle Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Enhanced Survival (LIVES): An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG-225) Study. Contemporary Clinical Trials 49: 181–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner RR, Steed L, Quirk H, Greasley RU, Saxton JM, Taylor SJ, Rosario DJ, Thaha MA, Bourke L 2018 Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 9: CD010192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valle CG, Deal AM, Tate DF 2017 Preventing weight gain in African American breast cancer survivors using smart scales and activity trackers: A randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 11: 133–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Blarigan EL, Chan H, Van Loon K, Kenfield SA, Chan JM, Mitchell E, Zhang L, Paciorek A, Joseph G, Laffan A, et al. 2019 Self-monitoring and reminder text messages to increase physical activity in colorectal cancer survivors (Smart Pace): A pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 19: 218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar