Personality characteristics ascribed to young women who drink alcohol

References

• Unwin E, Codde J. Trends and patterns of drug-caused mortality in Australia and Western Australia. Aust NZ J Public Health 1999;23:252–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Health 2000: the seventh biennial health report of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Canberra: AIHW, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas HA, Dobson AJ. Patterns of alcohol consumption in young Australian women: socio-demographic factors, health related behaviours and physical health. Aust NZ J Public Health 2000;24:185–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones SC, Donovan RJ. Self-regulation of alcohol advertis- ing: is it working for Australia. In: Working paper, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon T. Dutch tighten their rules on advertising of alcohol. Br Med J 2000;320:1094.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michalczyk I. Alcohol ads may suffer the same fate as tobacco. Marketing 1999;November:4.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings G, MacKintosh A, Aitken P. Is alcohol advertising reaching the people it shouldn’t reach? Health Educ J 1992;51:38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken P. Television alcohol commercials and under-age drinking. Int J Advertising 1989;8:133–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman L, Orlandi M. Alcohol advertising and adoles- cent drinking. Alcohol Health Res World 1987;12:30–3.
   Google Scholar
• Jones SC, Donovan RJ. Messages in alcohol advertising targeted to youth. Aust NZ J Public Health 2001, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf KA. Alcohol advertising: regulation can help. In: Engs RC, ed. Controversies in the addictions field. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Grube J, Wallack L. Television beer advertising and drinking knowledge, beliefs, and intentions among school- children. Am J Public Health 1994;84:254–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken P, Eadie D, Leathar D, McNeill R, Scott A. Television advertisements for alcoholic drinks do reinforce under-age drinking. Br J Addict 1988;83:1399–419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casswell S, Zhang J. Impact of liking for advertising and brand allegiance on drinking and alcohol-related aggression. Addiction 1998;93:1209–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman L, Wallack L. The news on alcohol—media advocacy strategies to promote prevention policy. In: Alcohol policy X, 1996. Toronto, Canada, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Wyllie A, Zhang J, Casswell S. Responses to televised alcohol advertisements associated with drinking behaviour of 10-17-year-olds. Addiction 1998;93:361–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G, Goldman M, Greenbaum P, Christiansen B. Expectancy for social facilitation from drinking: the divergent paths of high-expectancy and low-expectancy adolescents. J Abnorm Psychol 1995;104:32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A, Clark D. Alcohol consumption in university students: the role of reasons for drinking, coping strategies, expectancies and personality traits. Addict Behav 1998;23:371–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen B, Smith G, Roehling P, Goldman M. Using alcohol expectancies to predict adolescent drinking behavior after one year. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989;57:93–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natvig Aas H, Leigh B, Anderssen N, Jakobsen R. Two- year longitudinal study of alcohol expectancies and drinking among Norwegian adolescents. Addiction 1998;93:373–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pettigrew S. Culture and consumption: a study of beer consumption in Australia. Perth, WA: University of Western Australia, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Parker BJ. Snakebites, hammers and hand grenades: myth and meaning in alcohol advertisements. Peoria, IL: Bradley University, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Heider F. Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychol Rev 1944;51:358–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley HH. The process of causal attribution. Am Psychol 1973;28:107–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie R, Kumar PA. Person memory: personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. J Pers Soc Psychol 1979;37:25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider DJ, Hastorf AH, Ellsworth PC. Person percep- tion. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Berscheid, E. Interpersonal attraction. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E. The handbook of social psychology, vol. 2, 3rd edn. New York: Random House, 1985:413–84.
   Google Scholar
• Haire M. Projective techniques in marketing research. J Marketing 1950;14:649–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster FE, Von Pechmann F. A replication of the ‘‘shopping list’’ study. J Marketing 1970;34:61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth JN. Projective attitudes toward instant coffee in the late sixties. Markedskommunikasjon 1971;8:73–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lane GS, Watson GL. A Canadian replication of Mason Haire’s ‘‘shopping list’’ study. J Acad Marketing Sci 1975;3:48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt J. Haire’s shopping list revisited. J Advertising Res 1973;13:57–61.
   Google Scholar
• Fram EH, Cibotti E. The shopping list studies and projective techniques: a 40-year review. Marketing Res 1991;3:14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Woodside AG. A shopping list experiment of beer brand images. J Appl Psychol 1972;56:512–13.
   Google Scholar